Ginzberg Ginsburg Herma 1951
莪
Super 19701
2 3 莪
Vaus McAllister 1991Ros, Schwartz, &Surkiss, 1999
莪
‧
1991 2000 2001
2002 2008 2008
莪
莪 莪
2-2-2
莪 莪
2-2- 2Super 1970
Wollack et al.
1971
Rokeach 1973 Miller 1974 Kalleberg 1977
Pryor 1979
Gomez-Mejia 1981
‧
Elizur 1984
Vans & McAllister 1991
Schwartz 1999
Ros et al. 1999 Robbins 2003 Simon & Manson
2003
1.
2.
Lyons et al.
2006
1. 2. altruistic
3.
1983 Wollack Goodale Wijting & Simth
1984
1990
‧
1993 Lincoln Kalleberg
1995
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
34
莪 莪
Rokeach 1973 Elizur 1984 Robbins 2003
莪 莪
1984 1987 1993
1995
2010
莪 莪
1996莪 莪
1996
莪莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
35
莪莪
莪莪
莪莪
莪莪
莪莪
莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
36
莪 莪
1996
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
37
莪
莪莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
Gagne , 1985
莪 莪
Kimble,1967 2001
Marzano 1992
莪 莪
1997
莪 莪
Scott, 1962 1994
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
38
莪 莪
1997Kimble 1967
Rokeach 1968
Utsumi Mendes 2000
2002
莪 莪
莪 莪
2002
莪 莪
2003莪 莪
2-3-1
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
39
2-3- 1
1981
1982
1990
1992
1992
1994
1994
1997
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
40
2001
2001 ( )
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2003
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
41
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪 莪 莪 莪 莪
2004
2006
2007
2007
2009
2011
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
42
2003
莪 莪 莪 莪 莪 莪
1996 2008
莪 莪
莪 莪 莪 莪 莪
20032008
2000
莪
莪 莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
43
莪
莪 莪 莪 莪 莪
20001997
莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
2-3-2 2-3- 2
1986
1986
1992 1995 1997
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
45
莪 莪
莪
莪 莪
‧
Gordon 2001
2007 Domer, 1983
莪 莪
20022002
莪 莪
20042002
2007
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
47
莪 莪
2-4-1
莪 莪 莪
2-4- 1
2001
2001
2003
2002
2004
2004
2004
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
48
2004
2005
2005
2005
2007
2007
2007
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
49
2008
莪 莪
莪 莪
2008
2008
2009
2011 ,
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
50
莪 莪
19982007
莪 莪
2-4-2 2-4- 2
2001
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
52
莪 莪
莪 莪
2007
2008
莪
2009
2012
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
54
莪 莪
A A1 A2 A3
t-test ANOVA
B B1 B2 B3
C
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
55
莪 莪莪 莪
莪 莪
‧
2,305 53.84%
2
莪 莪
700 67396.14 48 625
89.28
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
57
莪 莪莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
2001 20082009
莪 莪
2
莪 莪
Miller 19742008
2002
‧
2009 2002
莪 莪
20082001
莪 莪
3-4-1
‧
莪 莪
Hollingshead 19571996 3-4-2
‧
Cronbach α .88 Cronbach α .89
Cronbach α .90 Cronbach α .91
Cronbach α .91
Cronbach α .747 Cronbach α .890
Cronbach α .889 Cronbach α .859
Cronbach α .794 Cronbach α .900 2009
莪 莪
36 2009 20042008
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
61
莪 莪
Cronbach α .927Cronbach α .837 Cronbach α .755
Cronbach α .829 Cronbach α .756
Cronbach α .826 Cronbachα .852 2009
莪 莪
Likert type5 4 3 2
1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
62
莪
莪莪 莪
3-5-1
100 2
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
64
莪 莪莪 莪
莪 莪
S P S S 18.0
descriptive statistics
t t-test
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
65
t
One-Way ANOVA
F p 0.5 Dunnett’s
T3
Pearson Product-Moment Correlation
Stepwise multiple regression analysis
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
66
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
67
莪 莪 莪 莪
莪 莪 莪 莪
4-1-1
4.26
4.10 4.13 4.19
4.12 4.07 3.97
4.12
4.12
‧
GreenhouseGeisser 4-1-2
F 3.743,2335.653 =25.333 p<.001 Dunnett's T3
4-1- 2
SS df MS F
A 1530.048 3.743 408.772 25.333***
S 68593.864 624 109.926
A*S 37688.523 2335.653 16.136
Total 107812.4 2963.396
***p<.001
‧
3.61 3.54 3.75
3.47 3.78 3.61
3.61
GreenhouseGeisser 4-1-4
F 4.241,2646.240 =46.845 p<.001 Dunnett's T3
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
70
4-1- 4
SS df MS F
A 1825.515 4.241 430.468 46.845***
S 52171.812 624 83.609
A*S 24316.985 2646.240 9.189
Total 78314.31 3274.481
***p<.001
4-1-5
3.60 3.69 3.91
3.77 3.74 3.81
3.75
3.75
‧
Mauchly's W .553
X
2 =386.148 p<.001GreenhouseGeisser 4-1-6
F 4.075,2542.942 =32.002 p<.001 Dunnett's T3
4-1- 6
SS df MS F
A 1276.376 4.075 313.204 32.002***
S 58149.460 624 93.188
A*S 24888.124 2542.942 9.787
Total 84313.96 3171.017
***p<.001
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
72
莪 莪
4.123.97 4.26
莪 莪
莪 莪
3.613.47 3.78
莪 莪
莪 莪
3.753.81 3.91
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
73
莪 莪
‧
‧
‧
t=-2.732 t=-2.46
.05
‧
F=2.793 p<.05
莪 莪
F=6.622 p<.01
F=3.80 p<.05
莪 莪
‧
‧
F=2.682 p<.05
F=3.660 p<.05
F=3.245 p<.05
‧
F=2.947 p<.05
‧
‧
‧
6.696** 4>2,3
2. 174 4.0965 .65105
‧
3.141* 4>3
2. 174 4.1446 .56245
F=3.141 p<.05
F=3.242 p<.05 F=6.696 p<.01
‧
‧
‧
3.892* 2>4
2. 12 4.2083 .77181
3. 33 3.6570 .72876
4. 122 3.7678 .70022
5. 31 3.3716 .92753
‧
F=3.892 p<.05
F=3.140 p<.05
‧
‧
‧
‧
F=2.785 p<.05
‧
F=3.026 p<.05
‧
‧
5.469** 1,2>3
2. 293 3.9087 .66250
3. 36 3.4175 .71591
4. 47 3.9672 .73940
1. 248 3.8021 .76408
4.438** 1,2>3
2. 293 3.8035 .73767
3. 36 3.3422 .64490
4. 47 3.6985 .77341
1. 248 3.7481 .73075
5.922** 1,2,4>3
2. 293 3.7822 .71828
3. 36 3.2494 .65676
4. 47 3.7630 .72213
1. 248 3.8523 .82604
5.083** 1,2>3
2. 293 3.8516 .78278
3. 36 3.3194 .62531
4. 47 3.7557 .87122
1. 248 3.7842 .68040
4.697** 1,2>3
2. 293 3.7750 .62507
3. 36 3.3592 .59192
4. 47 3.7630 .69212
**p<.01
‧
F=4.697 p<.01莪 莪
F=5.469 p<.01
F=4.438 p<.01
F=5.922 p<.01
F=5.083 p<.01
‧
‧
‧
4.576*** 4>2,3
2. 190 3.6265 .73427
‧
4.638*** 4>3
2. 190 3.7368 .75419
F=2.635 p<.05
莪 莪
F=4.576 p<.001
F=4.638 p<.001
4-2-21
‧
4.087** 4>1,2,3
2. 174 3.6676 .74906
3. 275 3.6341 .72466
4. 69 4.0052 .71771
5. 12 3.9175 .67169
1. 92 4.0009 .69495
6.356*** 5>2,3
2. 174 3.9612 .84636
‧
4.426** 4>3
2. 174 3.7803 .65532
F=4.426 p<.01
莪 莪
F=3.181 p<.05
F=4.087 p<.01
F=6.356 p<.001
F=3.244 p<.05
F=3.083 p<.05
莪
4-2-22
莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
103
莪
1.莪 莪 莪 2.
莪 莪 莪 3.
莪 莪 莪 4.
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
105
莪 莪 莪
4-2-23
莪 莪 莪 莪 1.
莪 莪 莪 2.
莪 莪 莪 3.
莪
莪
莪
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
107
莪 莪 莪
4-2-24
莪 莪 莪 莪 1.
莪 莪 莪 2.
莪 莪 莪 3.
莪 莪 莪 4.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
108
莪 莪 莪 5.
莪 莪 莪 6.
莪
莪
莪
莪
莪
莪
莪
莪
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
110
莪 莪
Pearson
2010 1.00
.70-.99 .40-.69 .10-.39 .10
Pearson
4-3-1
‧
.495 .500 .485
.596 .368 .583 .368 .596
.01
‧
.366 .536 .582 .512
.549 .522 .351
.351 .582 .01
*p<.05莪 **p<.01
莪 4-3-2
.01 .05
‧
.242 .324 .316
.450 .334 .254 .242 .450
.01
.450
.334 .435 .449 .292
.256 .246 .162
.01
‧
.692 .699 .406 .650
.686 .585 .406 .699
.01
.699
.650 .634 .573 .649
.601 .571 .571 .650
.01
.650
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
115
莪 莪
莪 莪
‧
***p<.001
莪 莪
4-4-1.243 24.3%
16.4% 3.4%
‧
***p<.001
莪 莪
4-4-2.24 24%
17.4% 2.2%
‧
***p<.001
莪 莪
4-4-3‧
***p<.001
4-4-4
.323 32.3%
24.7%
2.2% 1.9%
‧
***p<.001
4-4-5
‧
***p<.001
4-4-6
‧
***p<.001
4-4-7
‧
‧
***p<.001
莪 莪
4-4-9‧
***p<.001
4-4-10
‧
***p<.001
4-4-11
‧
***p<.001
4-4-12
‧
***p<.001
4-4-13
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
129
4-4-14
R R2莪莪 R2莪莪 β F
1 .541 .292 .292 .304 257.393***
2 .600 .360 .068 .258 175.135***
3 .610 .372 .012 .146 122.721***
***p<.001
4-4-14
.372 37.2%
29.2% 6.8%
1.2%
β
莪 莪
4-4-15‧
***p<.001
莪 莪
4-4-15.562 56.2%
42.3% 11.1%
1.6%
‧
50.1% 50.1% 29.9% 48.1% 49.8% 37.2% 56.2%
***p<.001 1 2
4-4-16
莪 莪
‧
***p<.001
莪 莪
4-4-17‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
133
莪 莪
56.2%
25.9%
莪 莪
55.2%
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
134
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
135
莪 莪莪 莪
莪 莪 莪
莪 莪
莪
莪 莪莪
莪 莪
莪
莪 莪
4.12
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
136
莪 莪
3.61
莪 莪
3.75
莪 莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
137
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
r =.606, p < .01p
< .01
莪 莪
r =.378, p< .01
p < .01
莪
莪 莪
r =.738, p < .01p
< .01
‧
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
140
莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
141
莪 莪
莪 莪
1
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
142
莪 莪 莪 莪 莪 莪 莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
143
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
144
莪 莪
莪 莪
莪
莪 莪
莪 莪
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
145
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
146
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
147
2008
1972
1989 1981
2001
2005 S
2005
1993 119
2435-2437 1988
2011
1986
‧
412 56-60 2001‧
17 62-68 2002
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
150
2005
2002
2008
2008
2003
2007
2010 SPSS(PASW) ( )
2004
1997
2001
2003
2008
1997
‧
15 129-172 2002
1984
60 1030-1036 1999
7 95-117
‧
‧
14 79-111 1986
‧
‧
‧
35 313-337
2005
5 213-229 1993
2 94-142 2003
2009 2003
2009 3C
2006
2003
2005
1982 15
51-67 1994
‧
18 43-65 2001
2006
1995
2000
2001
1993 19
161-171
‧
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
159
2009
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
160
‧
comparison fallacy. Journal of International Business Studies, 10, 515-537.Brown, D. (2002). The role of work and cultural values in occupational choice, satisfaction and success: A theoretical tatement. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80(1), 48-56.
Dose, J. J. (1997). Work value: An integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 214-240.
Elizur, D. (1984). Facets of work values: A structural analysis of work outcomes.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 379-389.
Evans, R. N. (1978). Foundations of vocational education (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH:
Merrill.
Gagne, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. American Psychologist, 39(4), 337-385.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). NY: Holt,Rineh art,&
Winston.
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Experiencing work: values, attitude, andmoods.
Human Relations, 50(4), 393-416.
Gomez-Mejia, L.R.(1981). Development and empirical testing of a need deprivation and social processing of information model of work values. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota.
Gordon, D. G. (2001). Classroom management:Problems and solutions. Music Educators Journal, 88(2), 1-7.
Hales, L. W., & Fenner, B. (1972). Work values of 5th, 8th, and 11th grade students.
Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 20, 199-203.
Hazer, J. T., & Alvares, K. M. (1981). Police work values during organizational entry and assimilation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(1), 12-18.
‧
Herr, E. L., & Enderlein, T. E. (1974). Vocational maturity, theeffects school, grade, curriculumand sex. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 8, 227-238.
Jaw, B.S., Ling, Y.H., Wang, C.Y. & Chang, P. (2007). The impact of culture on Chinese employees’ work values. Personnel Review, 36(1), 128-144.
Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction.
American Sociological Review, 42, 124-143.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24.
Kilmann, R. H., Saxton, M. J., and S Eepra, R. (1985). Gaining control of the culture.
San Francisco: Jossey-bass publishers.
Kimble, G. A. (1967). Foundations of conditioning and learning. New York:
Appleton.
Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology, 47.
Lincoln, J. R., & Kalleberg, A. L. (1990). Culture, control, and commitment.
Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, S.T., Duxbury, L.E., & Higgins, C.A. (2006). A Comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review. 66(4), 605-618.
Macnab, D., & Fitzsimmous, G. W. (1987). A multitrait-multimethod study of work-related needs, value, and preferences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 1-15.
Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). NY: Van No strand.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown.
Miller, M. F. (1974). Relationship and vocation maturity to work values. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 367-371.
‧
Parker, T. C. (1976). Statistical Methods for Measuring Training Results, L.Craig ed., Training and Development, Handbook Guide to Human Resource Development. N.Y: McGraw-Hill.
Pine, G. L., & Innis, G. (1987). Cultural and Individual work value. The Career Development Quarterly, 14(2), 279-287.
Pryor, R. (1979). Insearch of a concept: Work values. The Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 27, 250-258.
Ravlin, a. M. (1989). A work values approach to culture: A field test of the value congruence process & Its Relationship to Individual Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 424-432.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (1993). Essential of Organizational Behavior. NY:
Prentice-Hall international.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. NY: Free press.
Ros, M., Schwartz, S.H., and Surkiss, S. (1999). Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48 (1), 9–71.
Rounds, J. B. (1991). The comparative and combined utility of work value and interest data in career counseling with adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 32-45.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. M. Zanna, San Diego: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work.
Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23-47.
Scott, W. A. (1962). Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibiligy. Sociometry, 25, 405-414.
Simon Wong, C.K., & Manson Chung, K.H. (2003). Work Values of Chinese Food Service Managers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Bradford, 15(1), 66.
‧
Super, D. E. (1970). Work values in inventory. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Tough, A. (1982). The adult learning projects (2nd ed.). Ontario: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Utsumi, M. C., & Mendes, C. R. (2000). Researching the attitudes towards vmthematics in basic education. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 237-224.
Vaus, D., & McAllister, I. (1991). Gender and work orientation: Values and satisfaction in Western Europe. Work and Occupations, 18(1), 72-93.
Vroom, R. (1964). Work and motivation. NY: John.
Weiner, B. (1974). Cognitive views of human motivation. NY: Academic.
Weiner, B. (1982). The emotional consequences of causala scriptions. In M. S. Clark,
& Fiske, S. T. (Ed.), Af fect and congnition. Hillsidale,NJ Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wollack. (1971). Development of the survey of work values. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 331-338.
Woloszyk, C. A. (1996). Vocational education’s linkages with business community of Michigan. Michigan: Michigan councilor vocational education.
Woolfolk, A. E. (1990). Educational psychology (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Zytowski, D. (1970). The concept of work values. Vocational Guidance Quart, 18(3), 176-177.