• 沒有找到結果。

行政院文化建設委員會(編)(1999)。台灣社區總體營造的軌跡。台北:行政院 文化建設委員會。

行政院文化建設委員會(2010)。91-93 年台灣健康社區六星計畫修正總說明,

2010 年 5 月 20 日,取自:http://sixstar.cca.gov.tw/frontsite/sixstar/dispatch.

do?def=frontsite.sixstar.newcountry_detail_1&menuId=MjAx。

王本壯(2005)。公共參與社區總體營造相關計畫執行之行動研究:以苗栗縣推動 社區規劃師運作模式為例。公共行政學報,17,1-35。

王俐容(2006)。文化公民權的建構:文化政策的發展與公民權的落實。公共行政 學報,20,129-159。

史美強(2005)。制度、網絡與府際治理。臺北:元照出版公司。

史美強、王光旭(2008)。臺灣府際財政治理的競合關係:一個網絡分析的實證研 究。公共行政學報,28,39-83。

朱景鵬(2006)。府際關係管理與行政效能之強化。研考雙月刊,30(6),64-76。

朱鎮明(2004)。地方治理與地方政府現代化—21 世紀英國地方層次的變革。行 政暨政策學報,38,31-60。

江大樹(2001)。府際關係導論。載於趙永茂、孫同文、江大樹(編),府際關係

(1-46 頁)。臺北:元照出版社。

江大樹、張力亞(2008a)。社區營造中組織信任的機制建構:以桃米生態村為 例。東吳政治學報,26(1),87-141。

江大樹、張力亞(2008b)。社區營造、政策類型與治理網絡之建構:六星計畫的 比較分析。府際關係研究通訊,4,4-9。

吳 東 野 (1994),歐洲聯盟條約輔助原則條款之理論分析。問題與研究,33

(11),11-20。

呂育誠(2005)。地方治理意涵及其制度建立策略之研究。公共行政學報,14,1-38。

李永展(2009)。全球時代下的臺灣社區營造。國家與社會,7,1-27。

李長晏(2002)。中央與地方關係的重構與運作。中國地方自治,55(12),30-41。

林水波、施能傑、葉匡時、何鴻榮、劉旭清(1993)。強化政策執行能力之理論建 構。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。

施能傑(1999)。政策執行的要素分析。研考雙月刊,23(4),6-15。

孫同文(2002)。全球化對府際關係的影響。研考雙月刊,26(4),89-99。

孫同文、林玉雯(2007)。析論府際關係的多元面向。研習論壇,75,10-15。

張四明(2001)。從府際關係運作的觀點探討我國山坡地開發管制政策之執行。行 政暨政策學報,33,77-100。

張四明(2006)。我國府際關係問題之探討。研習論壇,61,1-7。

曹俊漢(1990)。公共政策。臺北:三民。

郭昱瑩(2009)。政府績效管理與執行力建構。研考雙月刊,33(2),30-47。

陳立剛(2002 年 5 月)。跨區域合作體制研究:跨區域政府組織的建立與治理挑 戰。前瞻新世紀:兩岸三地的府際關係學術研討會,南投。

陳其南(2005)。小空間大視野:公民美學從社區小空間做起。傳統藝術,59,4-6。

陳其南、劉正輝(2005)。文化公民權之理念與實踐。國家政策季刊,4(3),

77-88。

陳金貴(1990)。美國府際關係與府際管理的探討。行政學報,22,13-26。

陳敦源(1998)。跨域管理:部際與府際關係。載於黃榮護(編),公共管理

(226-270 頁)。臺北:商鼎文化。

曾怡仁、黃競娟(2000)。府際關係研究分析—兼論水資源管理個案。公共行政學 報,4,241-257。

黃偉峰(1998 年 3 月)。歐盟共同區域政策與其對歐洲區域動員之影響。歐洲聯 盟經貿政策學術研討會,臺北。

黃偉峰(2003)。剖析歐洲聯盟正在成型的治理體系。歐美研究,33(2),291-344。

趙永茂、孫同文、江大樹(2001)。府際關係。臺北:元照出版公司。

歐信宏、史美強、孫同文、鍾起岱(2004)。府際關係:政府互動學。臺北:空中 大學。

孫本初、謝宗學、劉坤億、陳衍宏(譯)(2002)。治理、政治與國家(Jon Piere

& B. Guy Peters 原著)。臺北:智勝。

6, Perri (1997). Holistic government. London: Demos.

6, Perri, D. Leat, K. Seltzer, & G. Stoker (2002).Towards holistic governance: The new reform agenda. New York: Palgrave.

Agranoff, R., & M. McGuire (2001). Big questions in public network management.

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295-326.

Agranoff, R., & M. McGuire (2003). Collaborative public management. Washington DC.: Georgetown University Press.

Agranoff, R. (2005). Managing collaborative performance. Public Performance & Man-agement Review, 29(1), 18-45.

Bache I., & M. Flinders (Eds.). (2004). Multi-Level governance. Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press.

Caruson, K., & S. A. MacManus (2006). Mandates and management challenges in the trenches: An intergovernmental perspectives on homeland security. Public Ad-ministration Review, 66(4), 522-536.

De Bruijn, J. A., & E. F. Ten Heuvelhof (1997). Instruments for network management. In W. J. M. Kickert, E.-H. Klijn, & J. F. M. Koppenjan (Eds.), Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: SAGE Publications.

Eisinger, P. (2006). Imperfect federalism: The intergovernmental partnership for home-land security. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 537-545.

Elmore, R. (1985). Fordward and backward mapping. In K. Hanf, & T. Toonen(Eds.), Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems. Dordrecht, Holland:

Martinus Nijhoff.

Entwistle, T., & M. Laffin (2005). The periphery of the best value regime. Local Gov-ernment Studies, 35(1), 21-37.

Fawcett, P., & R. A. W. Rhodes (2007). Central government. In A. Seldon (Ed.), Blair’s Britain 1994–2007 (pp. 79-103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.

Geddes, M., J. Davis, & C. Fuller (2007). Evaluating local strategic partnerships: Theory and practice of change. Local Government Review, 33(1), 97-116.

Goggin, M. L., A. Bowman, J. Lester, & L. O’Toole (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman /Little, Brown Higher Education.

Gunningham, N., & D. Sinclair (2002). Leaders and laggards: Next generation envi-ronmental regulation. UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

Hodson, D., & I. Maher (2001). The open method as a new mode of governance: The case of soft economic policy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 719-746.

Horgan, G. W. (2003). Devolution and intergovernmental relations: The emergence of in-tergovernmental affairs agencies. Public Policy and Administration, 18(3), 12-24.

Howlett, M., & M. Ramesh (Eds.). (2006). Deregulation and its discontents: Rewriting the rules in Asia cheltenham. Uk: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

Jacob, B., B. Lipton, V. Hagens, & B. Reimer (2008). Re-thinking local autonomy: Per-ception from four rural municipalities. Canadian Public Administration, 51(3), 407-427.

Laffin, M. (2007). Comparative central-local relations: Regional centralism, governance and intergovernmental relations. Public Policy and Administration, 22(1),

74-91.

Laffin, M. (2008). Local government modernization in England: A critical review of the LGMA evaluation studies. Local Government Review, 34(1), 109-125.

Laffin, M. (2009). Central-Local relations in an era of governance: Towards a new re-search agenda. Local Government Studies, 35(1), 21-37.

Lazar, H. (2006). The intergovernmental dimensions of the social union: A sectoral analysis. Canadian Public Administration, 49(1), 23-45.

Leach, S., & D. Wilson (2002). Rethinking local political leadership. Public Administra-tion, 80(4), 665-689.

Long, E., & A. L. Franklin (2004). The paradox of implementing the government per-formance and results act: Top-Down direction for bottom-up implementation.

Public Administration Review, 64(3), 203-319.

Mandell, M. P. (1990). Network management: Strategic behavior in the public sector. In R. W. Gage, & M. P. Mandell (Eds.), Strategies for managing intergovern-mental policies and networks (pp. 29-53). New York: Praeger Publishers.

Martin, S. (2002). The modernization of UK local government: Markets, managers, moni-tors and mixed fortunes. Public Management Review, 4(3), 291-307.

McGuigan, J. (2001). Three discourses of cultural policy. In N. Stevenson (Ed.), Culture

& Citizenship (pp. 124-137). London: Sage publications.

Metcalfe, L. (1994), International policy co-ordination and public management reform.

International Review of Administrative Science, 60, 271-290.

Moynihan, D. P., & P. W. Ingraham (2003). Look for the silver lining: When perform-ance-based accountability systems work. Journal of Public Administration Re-search and Theory, 13(4), 469-490.

Nakamura, R. T., & F. Smallwood (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: Martin’s Press, Inc.

Peters, B. G., R. A. W. Rhodes, & V. Wright (Eds.). (2000). Administering the summit:

Administration of core executive in developed countries. New York: St. Mar-tin’s Press.

Pierce, J. C., N. P. Lovrich, & D. Moon (2002). Social capital and government perform-ance. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 381-397.

Raab, J., & B. Milward (2003). Dark networks as problems. Journal of Public Admini-stration Research and Theory, 13(4), 413-440.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy network, governance, re-flexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University.

Richards, D., & M. J. Smith (2002). Governance and public policy in the United King-dom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosell, S. (1999). Renewing governance: Governing by learning in the information age. Ontario: Oxford University Press.

Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129-168.

Selden, S. C., P. W. Ingraham, & W. Jacobson (2001). Human resource practices in state government: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 598-607.

Stever, J. A. (2005). Adapting intergovernmental management to the new age of terror-ism. Administration & Society, 37(4), 379-403.

Tannam, E. (2006). The European Union model and administrative co-operation: The case of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Public Administration, 84(2), 407-422.

相關文件