王甫昌（1996）。〈台灣反對運動的共識動員，一九七九至一九八九年 兩次挑戰高峰的比較〉，《台灣政治學刊》，1: 129-209。
王振寰（1996）。《誰統治台灣？轉型中的國家機器與權力結構》。台 北：巨流。
李天任、藍莘譯（1995）。《大眾媒體研究》。台北：亞太。（原書 Wimmer, R., & Dominick, J. [1987]. Mass media research: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth）
林照真（1999）。〈當前台灣近似媒體觀察組織的幾個盲點〉，《新聞 學研究》，60: 171-176。
林麗雲（2003）。〈坐而言，起而行：「無盟」的實踐〉，《台灣社會 研究季刊》，50: 145-169。
何榮幸（1996）。〈一個自主性新聞專業團體的誕生：記「台灣新聞記 者協會」組織過程與實踐經驗〉，《新聞學研究》，52: 95-108。
邱皓政（2005）。《量化研究與統計分析》。台北：五南。
胡幼偉（1998）。《傳播訊息的第三人效果》。台北：五南。
洪永泰（2001）。〈抽樣〉，國立政治大學選舉研究中心（編），《民 意調查》，頁 75-125。台北：五南。
洪裕程（2000）。《運動，安身立命於無以為家》。東華大學族群關係 與文化研究所碩士論文。
管中祥、張時健 (2005)。〈新自由主義下的台灣媒體改革運動〉，
《台灣史料研究》，24: 196-236。
張茂桂（1994）。〈民間社會、資源動員與新社會運動：台灣社會運動 研究的理論志向〉，《香港社會科學學報》，4: 33-66。
楊汝椿（1996）。〈另類記者的媒體改造經驗：兼論內部新聞自由和新 聞倫理重建〉，《新聞學研究》，52: 83-94。
楊國樞（1989）。〈台灣新興社會運動研討會總結報告〉，徐正光、宋 文里（編），《台灣新興社會運動》，頁 311-327。台北：巨 流。
羅文輝（2000）。〈媒介負面內容與社會距離對第三人效果認知的影 響〉，《新聞學研究》，65: 95-129。
羅文輝、牛隆光（2003）。〈自尊、第三人效果與對限制媒介支持度的 關聯性研究〉，《新聞學研究》，75: 141-167。
羅文輝、林文琪、牛隆光、蔡卓芬（2003）。〈媒介依賴與媒介使用對 選舉新聞可信度的影響：五種媒介的比較〉，《新聞學研究》，
74: 19-44。
Castells, F. (1978). The social democratic image of society. London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Carroll, W. K., & Hackett, R. A. (2006). Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory. Media, Culture & Society, 28(1), 83-104.
Chia, S. C., Lu, K. H., & Mcleod, D. M. (2004). Sex, lies, and video compact disc: A case study on third-person perception and motivations for media censorship. Communication Research, 31(1), 109-130.
David, P., Liu, K., & Myser, M. (2004). Methodological artifact or persistent bias? Communication Research, 31(2), 206-233.
Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-13.
Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1991). Social movements: A cognitive approach. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D.
Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53-76). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-38.
Grass, G., & Grunow, B. (2003). Media reform movement comes of age.
People’s Weekly World (US), 18(24). Retrieved February 18, 2006, from http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/4380/1/189/
Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the x-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45, 27-38.
Gunther, A. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
Gunther, A. C., & Hwa, A. P. (1996). Public perceptions of television influence and opinions about censorship in Singapore. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(3), 248-265.
Gunther, A. C., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58-67.
Gunther, A. C., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communication action, Vol. 2.
Cambridge: Polity.
Hackett, R. (2000). Taking back the media: Notes on the potential for a communicative democracy movement. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 61-86.
Henriksen, L., & Flora, J. A. (1999). Third-person perception and children:
Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads. Communication Research, 26, 643-665.
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent. New York:
Pantheon.
Hourigan, N. (2001). New social movement theory and minority language television campaigns. European Journal of Communication, 16(1), 77-100.
Jensen, J. D., & Hurley, R. J. (2005). Third-person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability, and presumed behavior. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 242-256.
Johnson, N. (2003). The history of media reform: Scanning the horizon.
Retrieved February 18, 2006, from http://www.nicholasjohnson.org/
writing/masmedia/ ncmr1107.html/
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 49, 583-600.
Lee, C., & Yang, S. (1996). Third-person perception and support for censorship of sexually explicit visual content: A Korean case. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA.
Lo, V. H., & Paddon, A. R. (1998). The third-person perception and support for restrictions of pornography: Some methodological problems.
Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Journalism and Mass Communication, Baltimore, MD.
McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212-1241.
McChesney, R. W. (2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the 21st century. NY: Monthly Review Press.
McChesney, R. W., & Nichols, J. (2002, January 7-14). The making of a movement. Nation, 274(1), 11-17. Retrieved February 21, 2006, from http://web.ebscohost.com.
McLeod, D. M., Detenber, B. H., & Eveland, W. P. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other.
Journal of Communication, 51, 678-695.
Meirick, P. C. (2004). Topic-relevant reference groups and dimensions of distance: Political advertising and first- and third-person effects.
Communication Research, 31(2), 234-255.
Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Nichols, J. & McChesney, R. W. (2002, July/August). On the verge in Vermont: Media reform movement rears critical mass. FAIR.
Retrieved February 21, 2006, from http:// web.ebscohost.com.
Paek, H. J., Pan, Z. D., Sun, Y., Abisaid, J., & Houden, D. (2005). The third-person perception as social judgment: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads.
Communication Research, 32(2), 143-170.
Rojas, H., Shah, D. V., & Faber, R. J. (1996). For the good of others:
Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-186.
Salwen, M. B., & Driscoll, P. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial.
Journal of Communication, 47(2), 60-78.
Scott, B., & McChesney, R. W. (2006). A century of radical media criticism in the USA. In D. Berry & J. Theobald (Eds.), Radical mass media criticism: A cultural genealogy (pp. 177-191). Montreal: Black Rose Books.
Shah, D. V., Faber, R. J., & Youn, S. (1999). Susceptibility and severity:
Perceptual dimensions underlying the third-person effect.
Communication Research, 26, 240-267.
Snow, D. A., Rochford, Jr. E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986).
Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
Starr, J. M. (2000). Air wars: The fight to reclaim public broadcasting.
Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Tewksbury, D., Moy, P., & Weis, D. S. (2004). Preparations for Y2K:
Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect.
Journal of Communication, 54, 138-155.
Touraine, A. (1988). The return of the actor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005). The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy: The case of Gaza settlers. Communication Research, 32(6), 794-821.
Turner, R., & Killian, L. (1957). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.