System Requirement:
Any OS (Window/Mac/Linux…, etc.) with JavaScript supported explorer, such like Internet Explorer. Please note that you should open the security rule to make sure the explorer can read the local files in your hard disk.
1. Build a data sheet.
Each column means the input/output of different projects.
Each row mean different fields/industries/business units, …, etc.
2. Save the input/output data as text file.
Use ―Save As…‖ function to save the data:
a. Choose type to ―Text file (Separate by Tab)(*.txt)/文字檔(Tab 字元分隔)(*.txt)‖
b. Save the file as ―data.txt‖
3. Run “RunBLP.htm”
The program should integrate the input/output data if the data is valid. Shown below:
If the program does not integrate the data, please check if the input/output file is in right format.
4. Set Total Budget, required efficiency and Max Satisfaction Gap.
5. Start calculation.
Press ―Run‖ and the program will list the decision flow and final budget left/total output.
Caculation start...
Field 1 Project 4 is disqualified Field 1 Project 8 is disqualified Field 3 Project 1 is disqualified Field 3 Project 5 is disqualified Field 3 Project 7 is disqualified Field 4 Project 2 is disqualified Field 4 Project 4 is disqualified
Field 1, choose 5 as reference sequence.
▽51=(0,0.44,26.58,2.2) ▽52=(0,0.65,37.28,0.15)
▽53=(0,1.32,64.18,33.26) ▽54=(0,0.66,66.53,2.56)
▽55=(0,0,0,0) ▽56=(0,0.3,52.61,9.41)
▽57=(0,0.02,67.14,12.96) ▽58=(0,0.74,42.9,1.82) MAX▽58=67.14; min▽58=0
Field 2, choose 4 as reference sequence.
▽41=(0,0.02,20.68,31.96) ▽42=(0,0.92,18.97,18.76)
▽43=(0,1,11.57,65.91) ▽44=(0,0,0,0)
▽45=(0,0.05,11.39,32.28) ▽46=(0,0.09,15.63,60.88)
▽47=(0,0.19,1.68,6.88) ▽48=(0,18.16,5.45,51.94) MAX▽48=65.91; min▽48=0
Field 3, choose 3 as reference sequence.
▽31=(0,0.81,11.49,0.19) ▽32=(0,0.95,12,1.25)
▽33=(0,0,0,0) ▽34=(0,0.63,6.95,1.32)
▽35=(0,2.26,19.25,0.37) ▽36=(0,1.98,17.46,0.18)
▽37=(0,1.11,10.77,1.47) ▽38=(0,0.1,10.28,0.02)
▽39=(0,0.04,18.39,19.14) MAX▽39=19.25; min▽39=0
Field 4, choose 3 as reference sequence.
▽31=(0,0.24,1.17,75.31) ▽32=(0,0.31,1.29,108.01)
▽33=(0,0,0,0) ▽34=(0,1.63,0.33,73.75)
▽35=(0,0.73,13.77,81.51) ▽36=(0,1.87,0.04,36.27)
▽37=(0,7.58,0.99,53.61) ▽38=(0,3.22,0.11,18.92) MAX▽38=108.01; min▽38=0
Let distinguishing coefficient ζ=0.5
Come out Grey Relational Degree of each Proposal. See the table above.
Come out Internal Efficiencies for each Project of Dvisions. See the table above.
Come out External Efficiencies for each Project of Dvisions. See the table above.
The qualified funding requirement for field #1 is: $1559 The qualified funding requirement for field #2 is: $4166 The qualified funding requirement for field #3 is: $1157 The qualified funding requirement for field #4 is: $1041 Total funding requirement for all qualified projects is: $7923 The best satisfied percentage of each field is 75.73%:
***** 1st run -- Choose the project based on optimal satisfaction. Each Field cannot exceed 75.73%. *****
Field 1 cannot exceed $1181 Field 2 cannot exceed $3155 Field 3 cannot exceed $876 Field 4 cannot exceed $788
===Choose the project from Field 1. ===
Step 1:
Option 1: project 5 - Output = 4761 + 213 = 4974 Option 2: project 3 - Output = 1486 + 2145.5 = 3631.5
Choose Project 5, which cost $142. Field 1 Budget Left: $1039. Satisfcation: 9.11%.
Step 2:
Option 1: project 1 - Output = 8160 + 752.9675000000001 = 8912.9675 Option 2: project 3 - Output = 1486 + 2145.5 = 3631.5
Choose Project 1, which cost $424. Field 1 Budget Left: $615. Satisfcation: 36.31%.
Step 3:
Option 1: project 2 - Output = 941 + 63.825 = 1004.825 Option 2: project 3 - Output = 1486 + 2145.5 = 3631.5
Choose Project 3, which cost $313. Field 1 Budget Left: $302. Satisfcation: 56.38%.
Step 4:
Option 1: project 2 - Output = 941 + 63.825 = 1004.825 Option 2: project 7 - Output = 1809 + 1534.9125 = 3343.9125
Choose Project 7, which cost $294. Field 1 Budget Left: $8. Satisfcation: 75.24%.
Step 5:
Option 1: project 2 - Output = 941 + 63.825 = 1004.825 Option 2: project 6 - Output = 3449 + 1209.49 = 4658.49 Budget quota is not sufficient to choose project 6!
===Choose the project from Field 2. ===
Step 1:
Option 1: project 4 - Output = 5186 + 9898 = 15084 Option 2: project 4 - Output = 5186 + 9898 = 15084
Choose Project 4, which cost $569. Field 2 Budget Left: $2586. Satisfcation: 13.66%.
Step 2:
Option 1: project 7 - Output = 4150 + 7050.8425 = 11200.8425 Option 2: project 7 - Output = 4150 + 7050.8425 = 11200.8425
Choose Project 7, which cost $455. Field 2 Budget Left: $2131. Satisfcation: 24.58%.
Step 3:
Option 1: project 3 - Output = 1210 + 123.12 = 1333.12 Option 2: project 2 - Output = 2853 + 6743.25 = 9596.25
Choose Project 2, which cost $808. Field 2 Budget Left: $1323. Satisfcation: 43.98%.
Step 4:
Option 1: project 3 - Output = 1210 + 123.12 = 1333.12 Option 2: project 1 - Output = 2992 + 5580.12 = 8572.12
Choose Project 1, which cost $767. Field 2 Budget Left: $556. Satisfcation: 62.39%.
Step 5:
Option 1: project 3 - Output = 1210 + 123.12 = 1333.12 Option 2: project 5 - Output = 4900 + 5911.75 = 10811.75 Budget quota is not sufficient to choose project 5!
===Choose the project from Field 3. ===
Step 1:
Option 1: project 3 - Output = 1989 + 62 = 2051
Option 2: project 9 - Output = 26 + 263.66249999999996 = 289.6625
Choose Project 3, which cost $262. Field 3 Budget Left: $614. Satisfcation: 22.64%.
Step 2:
Option 1: project 4 - Output = 395 + 51 = 446
Option 2: project 9 - Output = 26 + 263.66249999999996 = 289.6625
Choose Project 4, which cost $100. Field 3 Budget Left: $514. Satisfcation: 31.29%.
Step 3:
Option 1: project 2 - Output = 2255 + 444.4375 = 2699.4375
Option 2: project 9 - Output = 26 + 263.66249999999996 = 289.6625
Choose Project 2, which cost $481. Field 3 Budget Left: $33. Satisfcation: 72.86%.
Step 4:
Option 1: project 8 - Output = 866 + 47.712500000000006 = 913.7125 Option 2: project 9 - Output = 26 + 263.66249999999996 = 289.6625 Budget quota is not sufficient to choose project 8!
===Choose the project from Field 4. ===
Step 1:
Option 1: project 5 - Output = 760 + 1433.1075 = 2193.1075 Option 2: project 3 - Output = 66 + 4491 = 4557
Choose Project 3, which cost $114. Field 4 Budget Left: $674. Satisfcation: 10.95%.
Step 2:
Option 1: project 5 - Output = 760 + 1433.1075 = 2193.1075
Option 2: project 7 - Output = 18 + 3463.3199999999997 = 3481.32
Choose Project 7, which cost $254. Field 4 Budget Left: $420. Satisfcation: 35.35%.
Step 3:
Option 1: project 5 - Output = 760 + 1433.1075 = 2193.1075 Option 2: project 6 - Output = 39 + 1681.47 = 1720.47
Choose Project 5, which cost $111. Field 4 Budget Left: $309. Satisfcation: 46.01%.
Step 4:
Option 1: project 1 - Output = 296 + 3717.0499999999997 = 4013.05 Option 2: project 6 - Output = 39 + 1681.47 = 1720.47
Choose Project 1, which cost $282. Field 4 Budget Left: $27. Satisfcation: 73.1%.
Step 5:
Option 1: project 6 - Output = 39 + 1681.47 = 1720.47 Option 2: project 6 - Output = 39 + 1681.47 = 1720.47 Budget quota is not sufficient to choose project 6!
===1st run Caculation complete.===
Each field received (satisfaction):
Field 1: $1173/$1559 (75%) Field 2: $2599/$4166 (62%) Field 3: $843/$1157 (73%) Field 4: $761/$1041 (73%) Satisfaction level:13%
Budget left: $624
***** 2nd run Pick-Up -- Choose the candidate project from all field. The satisfaction of each field shall not exceed 75.73% + 10% = 85.73%. *****
Field 1 cannot exceed $1337.
Field 2 cannot exceed $3572.
Field 3 cannot exceed $992.
Field 4 cannot exceed $892.
Check is there any feasible project in Field 2...
Choose Field 2 Project 3, which cost $146. Then each field received (satisfaction):
Field 1: $1173/$1559 (75%) Field 2: $2745/$4166 (66%) Field 3: $843/$1157 (73%) Field 4: $761/$1041 (73%) Satisfaction level:9%
Check is there any feasible project in Field 2...
Choose Field 2 Project 6, which cost $140. Then each field received (satisfaction):
Field 1: $1173/$1559 (75%) Field 2: $2885/$4166 (69%) Field 3: $843/$1157 (73%) Field 4: $761/$1041 (73%) Satisfaction level:6%
Check is there any feasible project in Field 2...
Cannot find any more feasible projects in Field 2.
Check is there any feasible project in Field 4...
Choose Field 4 Project 6, which cost $112. Then each field received (satisfaction):
Field 1: $1173/$1559 (75%) Field 2: $2885/$4166 (69%) Field 3: $843/$1157 (73%) Field 4: $873/$1041 (84%) Satisfaction level:15%
Check is there any feasible project in Field 3...
Choose Field 3 Project 9, which cost $51. Then each field received (satisfaction):
Field 1: $1173/$1559 (75%) Field 2: $2885/$4166 (69%) Field 3: $894/$1157 (77%) Field 4: $873/$1041 (84%) Satisfaction level:15%
Check is there any feasible project in Field 1...
Choose Field 1 Project 2, which cost $65. Then each field received (satisfaction):
Field 1: $1238/$1559 (79%) Field 2: $2885/$4166 (69%) Field 3: $894/$1157 (77%) Field 4: $873/$1041 (84%) Satisfaction level:15%
Check is there any feasible project in Field 3...
Choose Field 3 Project 6, which cost $34. Then each field received (satisfaction):
Field 1: $1238/$1559 (79%) Field 2: $2885/$4166 (69%) Field 3: $928/$1157 (80%) Field 4: $873/$1041 (84%) Satisfaction level:15%
Check is there any feasible project in Field 1...
Cannot find any more feasible projects in Field 1.
Check is there any feasible project in Field 3...
Cannot find any more feasible projects in Field 3.
Check is there any feasible project in Field 4...
Cannot find any more feasible projects in Field 4.
*****Caculation complete.*****
Each field received (satisfaction):
Field 1: $1238/$1559 (79%) Field 2: $2885/$4166 (69%) Field 3: $928/$1157 (80%) Field 4: $873/$1041 (84%) Satisfaction level:15%
Budget left: $76
Total investment: $5924 Total Output: $90216.86
Total efficiency obtained: 1522.9%
****************************