Conclusion

Previous research has acknowledged that one’s EV may greatly affect the behavior of individuals. The past few years, PEB has increasingly received research attention as climate change continues to rocket. This urged the demand for theoretical advancement in defining the indicators that make people perform environmentally responsible behaviors. This study thus contributes to this research stem by exploring the association of employee’s EV and PEN with their behavior—PEB—with the given setting at work.

Our data suggests that employees who have high EV, perform PEBs, and work places with high PENs also tends to influence employees to act Pro-environmentally. All in all, though this study does not yet give a complete picture of PEB in work environments, it is hoped that the model and the theoretical implications of this study can give some light for future research achievements to advance people’s understanding of the mysterious indicators of PEB, and PEB in organizations; moreover, to help our planet to become beautiful once again.

REFERENCE

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior: Springer.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1988). Theory of reasoned action-Theory of planned behavior.

University of South Florida.

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.

Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement.

Journal of Business research, 55(3), 177-191.

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.

Brislin, R. (1986). The Wording and Translation of Research Instruments. 1986. Field Methods in Cross Cultural Research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 159-163.

Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and planning A, 30(8), 1445-1460.

Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21.

Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance.

Ciocirlan, C. E. (2016). Environmental Workplace Behaviors: Definition Matters.

Organization & Environment, 1(20).

Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 425-442.

Eng Ann, G., Zailani, S., & Abd Wahid, N. (2006). A study on the impact of environmental management system (EMS) certification towards firms' performance in Malaysia. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(1), 73-93.

Fietkau, H.-J., & Kessel, H. (1981a). Umweltlernen: Handlungsleitende Konsequenzen.

umweltbewusstseins. Modell-Erfahrungen (Koenigstein, Hain).

Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Kayser, D. N., & Koranyi, N. (2010). Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 67-79.

Govindarajulu, N., & Daily, B. F. (2004). Motivating employees for environmental improvement. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(4), 364-372.

Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (2007). Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior:

Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 323-334.

Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.

Hirsh, J. B. (2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 245-248.

Ickes, W., Patterson, M. L., Rajecki, D., & Tanford, S. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to preinteraction expectancies. Social Cognition, 1(2), 160.

Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28(1), 111-133.

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260.

Maclagan, P. (1999). Corporate social responsibility as a participative process. Business ethics: A european review, 8(1), 43-49.

Mandip, G. (2012). Green HRM: People management commitment to environmental sustainability. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, ISSN, 2277, 2502.

Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: the emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. The Journal of Marketing, 51-67.

Naffziger, D. W., Ahmed, N. U., & Montagno, R. V. (2003). Perceptions of environmental consciousness in US small businesses: An empirical study. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 68(2), 23.

Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740-756.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.

Schwarz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in experimental psychology, 10, 222-280.

Shen, S. D., & Chiu, H. Y. (2014). 影響綠色大學教職員採取環保行為意願之因素以 台灣北部某大學為例. 設計學研究, 17(1), 71-90.

Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability.

Academy of management review, 20(4), 936-960.

Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T. D., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human ecology review, 6(2), 81.

Takala, T., & Pallab, P. (2000). Individual, collective and social responsibility of the firm. Business ethics: A european review, 9(2), 109-118.

Turaga, R. M. R., Howarth, R. B., & Borsuk, M. E. (2010). Pro‐environmental behavior.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185(1), 211-224.

Videras, J., Owen, A. L., Conover, E., & Wu, S. (2012). The influence of social relationships on pro-environment behaviors. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63(1), 35-50.

Yang, Z. B. (2014). 2014 年 04 月 薪貧世代省錢大作戰調查. Retrieved from https://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/index_detail.asp?id=201404171 13725#

Appendix A

ORIGINAL Questionnaires

New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) (Dunlap et al., 2000)

1. We are approaching the limit of the number of people the earth can support.

2. Humans have the right to modify the natural environment to suit their needs.

(reversed)

3. When humans interfere with nature it often produces disasters consequence 4. Human ingenuity will insure that we do NOT make the earth unlivable. (reversed) 5. Humans are severely abusing the environment

6. The earth has plenty of natural resources if we just learn how to develop them.

(reversed)

7. Plants and animals have as much right as humans to exist.

8. The balance of nature is strong enough to cope with the impacts of modern industrial nations. (reversed)

9. Despite our special abilities humans are still subject to the laws of nature

10. The so-called “ecological crisis” facing human kind has been greatly exaggerated.

(reversed)

11. The earth is like a spaceship with very limited room and resources.

12. Humans were meant to rule over the rest of the nature. (reversed) 13. The balance of nature is very delicate and easily upset.

14. Humans will eventually learn enough about how nature works to be able to control it. (reversed)

15. If things continue on their present course, we will soon experience a major ecological catastrophe.

Workplace Pro-Environment Norm Questionnaire (Videras et al., 2012)

1. Please tell us how many of the following people [people at work] you think do things to help the environment?

a) A lot

b) Some or only a little or not at all

2. How often do you discuss with people at work?

2-1. Ways to conserve gas, energy, and water:

a) All topics several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

b) Two of the topics several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

c) one of the topic several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

d) None of the topics several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

2-2. Environmental problems such as water pollution and air pollution:

a) All topics several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

b) Two of the topics several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

c) one of the topic several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

2-3. Ways to slow down global warming:

a) All topics several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

b) Two of the topics several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

c) one of the topic several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

d) None of the topics several times a week, once or twice a week, or a few times per month

Appendix B

Questionnaires in Chinese 個人問卷

您好，

我是國立臺灣大學商學研究所的研究生，現在正在進行碩士畢業論文的研 究工作。在此研究中，主要是探討職場上環保行為與他人的環保行為之影響。

希望各位能協助學生進行此項研究，幫助我填答此份問卷。您所填寫的答 案並無對錯之分，其結果也僅供整體統計分析，絕對不會單獨對外公開發表，

敬請安心填答。

再次懇請各位惠撥一些時間填寫問卷，並謝謝您的熱心參與。

敬祝

健康快樂

國立臺灣大學商學研究所研究生

陳詩晴

中華

第一部分：請勾選出最符合「自己」平時行為的選項。

第二部分：請回想您「主管」平時的行為，盡可能回答下列問題：

第四部分：請依據自己真實感受、想法或立場，右邊適當的選項中做選擇。

第五部分：基本資料

1. 年齡:

2. 生理性別: □女性 □男性

3. 婚應狀況： □未婚 □已婚

4. 學歷： □國中以下 □高中職 □專科 □大學

□研究所以上

5. 目前任職的產業類別：

□軍公教 □餐旅服務 □服務業 □營造業 □金融/保險業

□製造業 □通信業 □運輸業 □商業 □資訊/科技業

□顧問業 □文藝 □醫療人員 □農林漁牧 □傳播/廣告/設計業

□自由業 □管家 □學生 □待業中 □退休

□其他

6. 目前任職的職位：

□一般員工 □專業人員 □基層主管 □中階主管 □高階主管

7. 從事本工作月資為 個月

8. 從事本工作年資為 年

9. 在您工作上的產品或服務中，是否有提供與環保相關的產品或服務？

□有 □沒有

10. 填答問卷日期： （Google Survey 自動記錄）

本問卷到此全部結束，請您檢察一下，非常感謝您的填答，謝謝!