• 沒有找到結果。

In this paper, we use quantile regression and learn that both spillover effects and

overreaction effect exist from US stock market to Taiwan stock market, and we separate time

period from 1995/11/7 to 1997/6/30, 1997/6/30 to 2000/6/30, 2000/7/3 to 2007/2/27, and

from 2007/3/1 to 2009/3/26 to know the spillover effects and overreaction effect respectively.

We not only demonstrate the past research that there are spillover effects in close-to-open and

close-to-close returns (Chou, Lin, Wu, 1999 and Chang, 2008), but also find that there is a

overreaction effect in open-to-close returns. Furthermore, both of spillover effects and

overreaction effect become stronger over time.

We find that if we use OLS, we can only know there is positive or negative correlation

between U.S. and Taiwan on average. And OLS overestimates or underestimates the slope

estimate at different quantiles. Quantile regression makes us know the whole behavior of the

distribution, no matter the stock price goes up or down.

Because the spillover and overreaction effects exist from US stock market to Taiwan

stock market, there are some suggestions for investors. Firstly, because of the spillover effects,

we can judge whether tomorrow’s opening price or closing price of Taiwan stock market will

goes up by today’s closing price of US. Secondly, because of the overreaction effect, if the

closing stock price of US goes down and the opening stock price of Taiwan goes down greatly,

we can earn profit by buying at the opening price and selling at the closing price except

during Financial Tsunami. So investors should be more cautious as TAIEX stock prices go

down during Financial Tsunami.

In this paper, we didn’t take the limit regulation of stock price into consideration. The

price limit regulation delays stock price discovery process if the limits are hit (Wang, L. H.,

2000), so it could be a factor that influences overreaction from US to Taiwan. After 1989, the

price limit regulation changes from 5% to 7%, and there are seven times that the down limits

adjust to 3.5% in our time period. The seven times are as follows:

1. 1999/9/27~1999/10/9: 921 earth quake.

2. 2000/3/20~2000/3/24: the turnover of the regime.

3. 2000/10/4~2000/10/11: the resignation of Premier.

4. 2000/10/20~2000/11/7: the discontinuity of the fourth nuclear power plant.

5. 2000/11/21~2000/12/31: the falling of Taiwan stock market by 320 points.

6. 2001/9/19~2001/9/21: September 11 attacks.

7. 2008/10/13~2008/10/17: financial tsunami. Because each time period of these is short, we

didn’t take into account in this paper, the following researchers can expand in this

direction.

Reference

Ashcraft, A. B. and Schuermann, T., 2008. Understanding the securitization of subprime mortgage credit. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkStaff Reports.

Arshanapalli, B., Doukas, J. and Lang, L. H. P., 1995. Pre and post-October 1987 stock market linkages between US and Asian markets. Pacific-Basin finance journal 3, 57-73.

Ghosh, A., Saidi, R. and Johnson, K. H., 1999. Who moves the Asia-Pacific stock markets-US or Japan? Empirical evidence based on the theory of cointegration. The Financial Review 34, 159-170.

Lin, B. H. and Yeh, S. K., 2000. On the distribution and conditional heteroscedasticity in Taiwan stock prices. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 10, 367-395.

Lee, B. S., Rui, O. M., Wang, S. S. and Shatin, 2001. Information transmission between NASDAQ and Asian second board markets. Journal of banking and finance, Vol. 28, N. 7, 2004, 1637-1670.

Chang, M. C., 2008. The dynamic linkage of Taiwan and US stock markets. Wang, Working Paper (National Chiao Tung University).

Cheung, Y. L., Cheung, Y. W., Ng C. C., 2007. East Asian equity markets, financial crises, and the Japanese currency. Journal of the Japanese and International Economics 21, 138-152.

Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M., Summers, L. H., 1989. What moves stock prices? Journal of Portfolio Management 15, 4–12.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., 1982. Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. London: Cambridge University Press.

Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French, 1987. Commodity futures prices: Some evidence on forecast power, premiums, and the theory of storage. Journal of Business, vol. 60, no. 1, 55-73.

Eun, C. and Shim, S.,1989, International transmission of stock market movements. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24, 241-256.

Fama, E. F., 1970. Efficient capital markets–A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, vol. 25, Issue 2, 383-417.

French, K.R., Roll, R.W., 1986. Stock return variance: the arrival of information and the reaction of traders. Journal of Financial Economics 19, 3–30.

G. De. Santis and Imrohoroglu, S., 1997. Stock returns and volatility in emerging financial markets.

Journal of International Money and Finance, Vo. 16, No. 4, 561-579.

J. M. Keynes,1964. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

K. C. John Wei, Y. J. Liu, C. C. Yang and Chaung, G. S., 1995. Volatility and price change spillover effects across the developed and emerging markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 3, 113-136.

Kleidon Allan, 1982. Stock prices as rational forecasters of future cash flows. Dept. of Accounting and Finance, Monash University.

Koenker, R. and Bassett G.W., 1982, Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles.

Journal of Derivatives, 3, 73-84.

Wang, Kuan-Min and Thanh-Binh Nguyen Thi, 2007. Testing for contagion under asymmetric dynamics: Evidence from the stock markets between US and Taiwan. Physica A 376, 422–432.

Lee, B. S., Rui, O. M. and Wang, S. S., 2004. Information transmission between the NASDAQ and Asian second board markets. Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 1637-1670.

Wang, L. H., 2000. A systematic risk and liquidity analysis of price limits mechanism on textiles and electronics in Taiwan. Working Paper (National Chiao Tung University).

Veronesi, P., 1999. Stock market overreaction to bad news in good times: A rational expectations equilibrium model. The Review of Financial Studies Vol. 12, No.5, 975–1007.

Chou, R.Y., Lin, Jin-Lung and Wu, Chung-Shu, 1999. Modeling the Taiwan stock market and international linkages. Pacific Economic Review, 4: 3, 305-320.

Koenker, R. and G. Bassett Jr., 1978. Regression quantiles. Econometrica, Vol. 46, No. 1., pp. 33-50.

Roll, R.W., 1983. On computing mean returns and the small firm premium. Journal of Financial

Economics 12, 371–386.

Roll, R.W., 1988. On computing mean returns and the small firm premium. Journal of Finance 43, 541–566.

Shiller, R.J., 1981. Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends?

American Economic Review 71, 421–498.

Miyakoshi, T., 2003. Spillovers of stock return volatility to Asian equity markets from Japan and the US. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money 13, 383-399.

Wang, Y. M., Liao, S. L. and Shyu, S., 2000. The relationships among Asian stock markets- The test of dynamic process. Asia Pacific Management Review 5, 15-27. (In Chinese)

Chan, W. S., 2003. Stock price reaction to news and no-news: drift and reversal after headlines.

Journal of Financial Economics 70, 223–260.

Thaler, R. H., 1985. Does the stock market overreaction? Journal of Finance, 793-805

Werner F. M. De Bondt and Richard H. Thaler, 1987. Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality. The Journal of Finance * Vol. Xlii, No.3.

Y. Hamao, R. W. Masulis and V. Ng, 1990. Correlations in price changes and volatility across international stock markets. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, 281-307.

TABLE 1 Descriptive Statistics

Panel A : Descriptive Statistics for Taiwan and US Stock Markets’ Returns and ADF

Unit Root Test,

1995/11/7 to

2009/3/26

Panel B : Descriptive Statistics for Taiwan and US Stock Markets’ Returns and ADF Unit Root Test, 1995/11/7 to 2009/3/26

Panel C : Descriptive Statistics for Taiwan and US Stock Markets’ Returns and ADF Unit Root Test, 1995/11/7 to 2009/3/26

Close-to-open Close-to-close

TSE OTC S&P 500

Mean 0.001839 0.000692 0.000101

Median 0.002634 0.001556 0.000615

Maximum 0.081902 0.079184 0.102457

Minimum -0.155686 -0.162348 -0.094695

Std. Dev. 0.011864 0.013015 0.013371

Skewness -1.193241 -0.892372 -0.133385

Kurtosis 18.76169 15.14800 10.23191

Observations 3178 3178 3178

Open-to-close Close-to-close

TSE OTC S&P 500

Mean -0.001806 -0.000757 0.000101

Median -0.001873 -0.001043 0.000615

Maximum 0.067319 0.079807 0.102457

Minimum -0.074804 -0.079415 -0.094695

Std. Dev. 0.013219 0.015338 0.013371

Minimum -0.126043 -0.140420 -0.094695

Std. Dev. 0.016723 0.019004 0.013371

Skewness -0.247889 -0.080337 -0.133385

Kurtosis 6.323649 5.694679 10.23191

Observations 3178 3178 3178

TABLE 2

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-1997/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 2: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under 95%

confidence interval.

0.010(interception) -0.0170 0.0000 0.500 0.0048 0.0000

( slope ) -0.1359 0.3265 0.0954 0.0808

TABLE 3

Quantile Regression, 1997/07/02-2000/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 3: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0267 0.0000 0.500 0.0033 0.0000

( slope ) 0.5180 0.0000 0.4322 0.0000

TABLE 4

Quantile Regression, 2000/07/03-2007/02/27

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 4: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0270 0.0000 0.500 0.0016 0.0000

( slope ) 0.4987 0.0000 0.5728 0.0000

TABLE 5

Quantile Regression, 2007/03/01-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 5: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0338 0.0000 0.500 0.0017 0.0000

( slope ) 0.4514 0.0000 0.5213 0.0000

TABLE 6

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 6: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0275 0.0000 0.500 0.0021 0.0000

( slope ) 0.5049 0.0000 0.4972 0.0000

TABLE 7

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-1997/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of OTC

Figure 7: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

0.010(interception) -0.0267 0.1702 0.500 0.0004 0.2025

( slope ) 0.1296 0.9891 0.0428 0.2876

TABLE 8

Quantile Regression, 1997/07/02-2000/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of OTC

Figure 8: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 1997-2000 Close-to-open

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0335 0.0000 0.500 0.0000 0.9375

( slope ) 0.4777 0.0000 0.4777 0.0000

TABLE 9

Quantile Regression, 2000/07/03-2007/02/27

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of OTC

Figure 9: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 2000-2007 Close-to-open

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0350 0.0000 0.500 0.0013 0.0000

( slope ) 0.5999 0.0006 0.5723 0.0000

TABLE 10

Quantile Regression, 2007/03/01-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of OTC

Figure 10: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 2007-2009 Close-to-open

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0313 0.0000 0.500 0.0030 0.0000

( slope ) 0.6102 0.0000 0.4765 0.0000

TABLE 11

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-open Stock Price of OTC

Figure 11: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 1995-2009 Close-to-open

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0324 0.0000 0.500 0.0014 0.0000

( slope ) 0.5698 0.0000 0.4973 0.0000

TABLE 12

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-1997/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 12: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0334 0.0000 0.500 -0.0027 0.0000

( slope ) -0.4097 0.3987 -0.0713 0.3788

TABLE 13

Quantile Regression, 1997/07/02-2000/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 13: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0384 0.0000 0.500 -0.0038 0.0000

( slope ) -0.3009 0.0079 -0.0552 0.2499

TABLE 14

Quantile Regression, 2000/07/03-2007/02/27

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 14: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0341 0.0000 0.500 -0.0013 0.0000

( slope ) -0.4318 0.0038 -0.2106 0.0000

TABLE 15

Quantile Regression, 2007/03/01-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 15: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0358 0.0000 0.500 -0.0007 0.1958

( slope ) -0.1179 0.0018 -0.1460 0.0002

TABLE 16

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 16: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0352 0.0000 0.500 -0.0018 0.0000

( slope ) -0.2010 0.0329 -0.1610 0.0000

TABLE 17

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-1997/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 17: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 1995-1997 Open-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0371 0.0000 0.500 -0.0012 0.0677

( slope ) -0.8424 0.0000 -0.1173 0.1342

TABLE 18

Quantile Regression, 1997/07/02-2000/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 18: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 1997-2000 Open-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0406 0.0000 0.500 -0.0017 0.0135

( slope ) -0.4578 0.0000 -0.1371 0.0250

TABLE 19

Quantile Regression, 2000/07/03-2007/02/27

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 19: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 2000-2007 Open-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0346 0.0000 0.500 -0.0010 0.0023

( slope ) -0.4563 0.0001 -0.2610 0.0000

TABLE 20

Quantile Regression, 2007/03/01-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 20: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 2007-2009 Open-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0423 0.0000 0.500 -0.0015 0.0485

( slope ) -0.2383 0.0150 -0.2129 0.0006

TABLE 21

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Open-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 21: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 1995-2009 Open-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0383 0.0000 0.500 -0.0011 0.0000

( slope ) -0.3213 0.0004 -0.2131 0.0000

TABLE 22

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-1997/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 22: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0342 0.0000 0.500 0.0012 0.0845

( slope ) -0.4623 0.0058 0.1414 0.0901

TABLE 23

Quantile Regression, 1997/07/02-2000/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 23: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0442 0.0000 0.500 -0.0007 0.3359

( slope ) 0.2351 0.0300 0.2835 0.0000

TABLE 24

Quantile Regression, 2000/07/03-2007/02/27

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 24: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0432 0.0000 0.500 0.0001 0.7226

( slope ) 0.2951 0.0874 0.3478 0.0000

TABLE 25

Quantile Regression, 2007/03/01-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 25: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0419 0.0000 0.500 0.0001 0.9039

( slope ) 0.4236 0.0000 0.3655 0.0000

TABLE 26

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of TAIEX

Figure 26: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and TAIEX under

0.010(interception) -0.0419 0.0000 0.500 0.0001 0.6389

( slope ) 0.3901 0.0000 0.3323 0.0000

TABLE 27

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-1997/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 27: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 1995-1997 Close-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0555 0.0000 0.500 -0.0000 0.9593

( slope ) -1.3262 0.0009 0.0001 0.9992

TABLE 28

Quantile Regression, 1997/07/02-2000/06/30

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 28: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 1997-2000 Close-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0499 0.0000 0.500 -0.0012 0.1471

( slope ) 0.5029 0.0011 0.3618 0.0000

TABLE 29

Quantile Regression, 2000/07/03-2007/02/27

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 29: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 2000-2007 Close-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0479 0.0000 0.500 -0.0001 0.8755

( slope ) 0.4370 0.0018 0.2806 0.0000

TABLE 30

Quantile Regression, 2007/03/01-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 30: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 2007-2009 Close-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0487 0.0000 0.500 0.0001 0.9224

( slope ) 0.2956 0.0000 0.3187 0.0000

TABLE 31

Quantile Regression, 1995/11/07-2009/03/26

Independent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of S&P 500 Dependent Variable: The Returns of Close-to-close Stock Price of OTC

Figure 31: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and OTC under 95%

confidence interval.

OTC 1995-2009 Close-to-close

Quantile Coefficient P-value Quantile Coefficient P-value

0.010(interception) -0.0496 0.0000 0.500 -0.0004 0.2411

( slope ) 0.3215 0.0000 0.2985 0.0000

TABLEEEE 32: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and close-to-open returns of TAAAAIEX uuuunder 95% confiiiidence interval from 1995 to 1997, 1997 to 2000, 2000000 to 2007 and 2007 to 2009.

Figure 2: 1995-1997 Figure 3: 1997-2000

Figure 4: 2000-2007 Figure 5: 2007-2009

In figure 2, there are

TABLE 33: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and close-to-open returns of OTC under 95% confidence interval from 1995 to 1997, 1997 to 2000, 2000 to 2007 and 2007 to 2009.

Figure 7: 1995-1997 Figure 8: 1997-2000

Figure 9: 2000-2007 Figure 10: 2007-2009

In figure 7, there are

TABLE 34: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and close-to-open returns of TAIEX and OTC under 95%

confidence interval from 1995 to 2009.

This table reports the slope estimate of both the quantile regression and ordinary least squares method from 1995 to 2009. We can know that both of the slope estimates are positive. In other words, there are positive correlations not only between S&P 500 and close-to-open returns of TAIEX, but also between S&P 500 and close-to-open returns of OTC. Moreover, we can find that the slope estimates are different in most of the quantiles.

Figure 6: 1995-2009 Figure 11: 1995-2009

TABLE 35: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and open-to-close returns of TAIEX under 95% confidence interval from 1995 to 1997, 1997 to 2000, 2000 to 2007 and 2007 to 2009.

Figure 12: 1995-1997 Figure 13: 1997-2000

Figure 14: 2000-2007 Figure 15: 2007-2009

In figure 12, there are significant negative effects from US to TAIEX at following quantiles : 5%:θ=0.05

10%:θ= 0.15, 0.85, 0.9, 0.95

In figure 13, there are significant negative effects from US to

TABLE 36: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and open-to-close returns of OTC under 95% confidence interval from 1995 to 1997, 1997 to 2000, 2000 to 2007 and 2007 to 2009.

Figure 17: 1995-1997 Figure 18: 1997-2000

Figure 19: 2000-2007 Figure 20: 2007-2009

In figure 17, there are significant negative effects from US to OTC at following quantiles :

TABLE 37: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and open-to-close returns of TAIEX and OTC under 95% confidence interval from 1995 to 2009.

This table reports the slope estimate of both the quantile regression and ordinary least squares method from 1995 to 2009. We can know that both of the slope estimates are negative. In other words, there are negative correlations not only between S&P 500 and open-to-close returns of TAIEX, but also between S&P 500 and open-to-close returns of OTC. Moreover, we can find that the slope estimates are different in most of the quantiles.

Figure 16: 1995-2009 Figure 21: 1995-2009

TABLE 38: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and close-to-close returns of TAIEX under 95%

confidence interval from 1995 to 1997, 1997 to 2000, 2000 to 2007 and 2007 to 2009.

Figure 22: 1995-1997 Figure 23: 1997-2000

Figure 24: 2000-2007 Figure 25: 2007-2009

In figure 22, there are significant positive effects from US to

TABLE 39: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and close-to-close returns of OTC under 95% confidence interval from 1995 to 1997, 1997 to 2000, 2000 to 2007 and 2007 to 2009.

Figure 27: 1995-1997

Figure 28: 1997-2000

Figure 29: 2000-2007 Figure 30: 2007-2009

When θ=0.01, there is

TABLE 40: The slope estimate of the quantile regression between S&P 500 and close-to-close returns of TAIEX and OTC under 95% confidence interval from 1995 to 2009.

This table reports the slope estimate of both the quantile regression and ordinary least squares method from 1995 to 2009. We can know that both of the slope estimates are positive. In other words, there are positive correlations not only between S&P 500 and close-to-close returns of TAIEX, but also between S&P 500 and close-to-close returns of OTC. Moreover, we can find that most of the slope estimates are different in most of the quantiles.

Figure 26: 1995-2009 Figure 31: 1995-2009

相關文件