• 沒有找到結果。

Housing Studies 14(6), 733-753

Miao, H., S. Ramchander, M.W. Simpson, 2011. Return and volatility in U.S. housing markets. Real Estate Economics 39, 701-741.

Mikhed, V., P. Zemcik, 2009. Do housing prices reflect fundamentals? Aggregate and panel data evidence. Journal of Housing Economics 18, 140-149.

Muellbauer, J., A. Murphy, 1991. Regional economic disparities: the role of housing.

In: Bowen A, Mayhew K (eds) Reducing regional inequalities. Kogan Page, London.

Patton, A. J., 2006a. Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. International

Economic Review 47(2), 527-556.

Patton, A. J., 2006b. Estimation of multivariate models for time series of possibly different lengths. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21, 147-173.

Patton, A. J., 2012. A review of copula models for economic time series. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 110, 4-18.

Pollakowski, H.O., T.S. Ray, 1997. Housing price diffusion patterns at different aggregation levels: An examination of housing market efficiency. Journal of

Housing Research 8, 107-124.

Potepan, M. J., 1996. Explaining intermetropolitan variation in housing prices, rents and land prices. Real Estate Economics 24, 219-245.

Saks R.E., 2008. Job creation and housing construction: Constraints on metropolitan area employment growth. Journal of Urban Economics 64, 178-195.

Sasser, A. C., 2010. Voting with their feet: Relative economic conditions and state migration patterns. Regional Science and Urban Economics 40, 122-135.

Sklar, A., 1959. Fonctions de repartition a n Dimentional et Leurs Marges.

Publications de L’Institut de Statistique de L’Universite de Paris 8, 229-231.

Swan, C., 1995. Demography and the demand for housing: A reinterpretation of the Mankiw-Weil demand variable. Regional Science and Urban Economics 25, 41-58.

Thomas, A., 1993. The influence of wages and house prices on British interregional migration decisions. Applied Economics 25, 1261-1268.

Vogiatzoglou, M., 2010. Dynamic copula toolbox. Retrieved from http://www.downloadplex.com/Publishers/Manthos-Vogiatzoglou/Page-1-0-0-0-0.html.

Yunus, N., P.E. Swanson, 2013. A closer look at the U.S. housing market: Modeling relationships among regions. Real Estate Economics 41(3), 542-568.

Zhu, B., R. Füss, N.B. Rottke, 2013. Spatial linkages in returns and volatilities among U.S. regional housing markets. Real Estate Economics 41(1), 29-64.

Zimmer, D. M., 2012. The Role of Copulas in the Housing Crisis. The Review of Economics and Statistics 94(2), 607-620.

Zimmer, D. M., 2015. Time-Varying Correlation in Housing Prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 51, 86-100.

Table 1: Summary statistics of regional housing price indices

Region

London EAST SE SW EM WM Wales YH NW NE Scotland

Panel A: Raw housing price index

Mean 206.9025 169.6503 182.6677 170.9908 159.8756 148.0992 143.2533 144.7312 137.3908 133.5899 131.3476 Median 133.4903 123.8585 129.7893 120.0965 119.7708 112.0871 103.5885 108.0350 104.4526 102.4292 100.9474 Maximum 610.5968 384.6785 432.9201 390.7877 349.7366 316.6305 320.0378 318.6236 307.8240 294.4709 290.6071 Minimum 21.93434 21.91666 22.08399 21.24192 21.70923 19.13100 22.73384 23.90014 17.99438 20.84695 23.5669 Std. Dev. 161.8412 115.5185 129.7107 122.5907 110.3671 100.3726 98.08965 95.36703 95.47181 89.90084 85.1072 Observations 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 Panel B: Log-differenced housing price index

Mean 0.0213 0.0183 0.0191 0.0186 0.0178 0.0179 0.0163 0.0160 0.0176 0.0165 0.0156 Median 0.0215 0.0177 0.0199 0.0201 0.0180 0.0163 0.0114 0.0171 0.0162 0.0150 0.0137 Maximum 0.1115 0.1392 0.1085 0.1503 0.1554 0.1656 0.1432 0.1306 0.1077 0.1259 0.0922 Minimum -0.0640 -0.1023 -0.0626 -0.0747 -0.0617 -0.0566 -0.0937 -0.0804 -0.0601 -0.0713 -0.0706

Std. Dev. 0.0337 0.0368 0.0332 0.0329 0.0319 0.0317 0.0349 0.0353 0.0297 0.0350 0.0280

Observations 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156

Panel A and Panel B report the summary statistics of raw housing price indices and log-differenced housing price indices from 1976Q1 TO 2015Q1, respectively. EAST is East of England; SE is South-East; SW is South-West; EM is East Midlands; WM is West Midlands; YH is Yorkshire and The Humberside; NW is North-West; and NE is North-East.

Table 2: ADF unit root tests of regional house prices indices

Ln(HPI) ∆Ln(HPI)

(1) (2)

London -6.788874*** -7.228913***

East of England -7.270413*** -7.158123***

South East -5.804777*** -6.124066***

South West -4.129548*** -6.723399***

East Midlands -6.502157*** -5.890577***

West Midlands -7.091988*** -4.737102***

Wales -4.884115*** -5.475566***

Yorkshire and The Humberside -7.284084*** -7.338543***

North West -3.426865*** -6.308013***

North East -4.194346*** -3.982829***

Scotland -9.829876*** -3.968998***

This table reports the results of augmented Dickey-Fullers (ADF) unit root tests of all regional housing price indices (HPI). Logarithmic transformation applies to all housing price indices; First order of difference is further taken on logged housing price indices in column (2). *** stand for significance at the 1% level.

Table 3: Pearson correlation coefficients of housing price index between each region

London EAST SE SW EM WM Wales YH NW NE Scotland

London 1.0000

East of England 0.7440 1.0000

South East 0.8613 0.8537 1.0000

South West 0.7483 0.7964 0.8748 1.0000

East Midlands 0.6702 0.7459 0.7575 0.7410 1.0000

West Midlands 0.6267 0.7132 0.7745 0.8144 0.7948 1.0000

Wales 0.6234 0.5959 0.6561 0.6212 0.7280 0.6825 1.0000

YH 0.5722 0.5766 0.6615 0.6319 0.7723 0.7349 0.7633 1.0000

North West 0.5219 0.5479 0.6165 0.6094 0.6892 0.7135 0.7384 0.7530 1.0000

North East 0.3594 0.4378 0.4483 0.4290 0.5838 0.5444 0.5449 0.6003 0.6470 1.0000

Scotland 0.3929 0.4763 0.4563 0.5215 0.5064 0.5368 0.5077 0.6181 0.6506 0.6661 1.0000

This table reports the Pearson correlation coefficients of housing prices among eleven regions in U.K. EAST is East of England; SE is South-East; SW is South-West; EM is East Midlands; WM is West Midlands; YH is Yorkshire and The Humberside; NW is North-West; and NE is North-East.

Table 4: Descriptives of copula values between each region and London

Region

East and South Midlands and Wales Yorkshire and The Humber, North, and Scotland

EAST SE SW EM WM WALES YH NW NE SCOTLAND

Panel A: Basic information

Mean 0.7476 0.8562 0.7629 0.6861 0.6491 0.6369 0.5901 0.5420 0.3862 0.3860 Median 0.7514 0.8580 0.7656 0.6786 0.6610 0.6646 0.6014 0.5490 0.3465 0.3958 Maximum 0.8823 0.9190 0.8885 0.8104 0.8478 0.8997 0.8371 0.8335 0.7737 0.8651 Minimum 0.5456 0.6698 0.4594 0.5442 0.4558 0.2977 0.2368 -0.0641 -0.0966 -0.2595 Std. Dev. 0.0605 0.0332 0.0661 0.0464 0.0940 0.1668 0.1293 0.1258 0.2331 0.2431 Sum 116.6302 133.5735 119.0110 107.0312 101.2541 99.3571 92.0576 84.5535 60.2500 60.2227 Panel B: Shape of distribution

Skewness -0.6335 -1.5114 -1.5166 0.2170 -0.1136 -0.4964 -0.1819 -1.0913 0.0064 -0.4021 Kurtosis 4.1106 9.2636 7.8997 3.2286 1.9379 2.2009 2.2706 7.1382 1.7166 2.8266 Panel C: Test of normal distribution

Jarque-Bera 18.4521 314.4042 215.8512 1.5636 7.6677 10.5575 4.3188 142.2788 10.7074 4.3993 Probability 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.4576 0.0216 0.0051 0.1154 0.0000 0.0047 0.1108

Observations 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156

This table reports the summary statistics of copula values of housing prices between each region and London. EAST is East of England; SE is South-East; SW is South-West;

EM is East Midlands; WM is West Midlands; YH is Yorkshire and The Humberside; NW is North-West; and NE is North-East.

Table 5: Structural breaks test of copula values between each region and London

Region Time points of breaks

East of England No breakpoints

South East No breakpoints

South West No breakpoints

East Midlands No breakpoints

West Midlands No breakpoints

Wales

2008 Q2

Yorkshire and The Humberside No breakpoints

North West No breakpoints

North East No breakpoints

Scotland No breakpoints

This table reports the results of structural breaks test of copula values of housing prices between ten regions and London from 1976Q1 to 2015Q1. The Bai-Perron breakpoints test using sequential L+1 breaks vs. L is used to determine breaks (Bai and Perron, 1998).

Table 6: Determinants of housing correlation coefficients between regions

Ex-post crisis * -0.3137 -0.7624 -0.7624

(0.5942) (0.2741) (0.2741)

Ex-post crisis * 0.1918 0.1171 0.1171

(0.1153) (0.4493) (0.4493)

Ex-post crisis * 0.0461 -0.0725 -0.0725

(0.7545) (0.7202) (0.7202)

Ex-post crisis * -0.5537 -0.0334 -0.0334

(0.4016) (0.9660) (0.9660)

F-statistic 26.1139 21.51945 21.5195

Adj. R2 0.4634 0.42074 0.4207

N 350 340 340

This table reports the results of OLS models regressing the copula values of housing prices between ten regions and London from 1977 to 2011. is the dynamic correlation coefficients between X variable of each region and those of London; UER is unemployment rate; POP is population; CP is construction permits; INCOME is personal income; Ex-post is an indicator variable that equals to one for period from 2009 to 2011, otherwise equals to zero; GDP is gross domestic product; CPI is consumer price index; and MR is interest rate of 5-year fixed rate mortgage. P-value is reported in parentheses; ***, **, and * stand for significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. 

Table 7: Granger causality tests among copula values of regional economic factors

Dependent variables

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

- 6.9410*** 2.2000 0.8616 2.3465

(0.0084) (0.1380) (0.3533) (0.3533) 5.0062** - 0.7320 6.7100*** 3.7266***

(0.0253) (0.3922) (0.0096) (0.0096)

12.6300*** 1.1761 - 3.2392* 0.0066*

(0.0004) (0.2781) (0.0719) (0.0719)

1.9552 3.0691* 1.7717 - 0.8041

(0.1620 ) (0.0798) (0.1832) (0.7676)

2.5229 0.1151 0.0491 0.0873 -

(0.1122) (0.7344) (0.8246) (0.7676)

N 340 340 340 340 340

This table reports the results of VAR(1) Block Exogeneity Wald Tests between copula values of regional economic factors from 1977 to 2011. HPI is housing price index; UER is unemployment rate;

POP is population; CP is construction permits; and INCOME is personal income. Chi-square value is reported, and we report p-value in parentheses. ***, **, and * stand for significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Q1 1976 Q1 1981 Q1 1986 Q1 1991 Q1 1996 Q1 2001 Q1 2006 Q1 2011

LONDON EAST SE

SW EM W M

W ALES YH NW

NE SCOTLAND

   

This figure presents time trends of housing price indices of eleven regions in U.K. from 1976Q1 to 2015Q1. EAST is East of England; SE is South-East; SW is South-West;

EM is East Midlands; WM is West Midlands; YH is Yorkshire and The Humberside; NW is North-West; and NE is North-East.

Figure 1: Time trends of housing prices

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and EAST GDP growth rate

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and SE GDP growth rate

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and SW GDP growth rate

 

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and EM GDP growth rate

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and WM GDP growth rate

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and WALES GDP growth rate

This figure presents time-series of copula values between ten regions and London from 1976Q1 to 2015Q1. GDP growth rate is marked by dashed line as a comparison.

EAST is East of England; SE is South-East; SW is South-West; EM is East Midlands; WM is West Midlands; YH is Yorkshire and The Humberside; NW is North-West; and NE is North-East.

Figure 2: Time trends of copula values of housing prices between each region and London 

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDOn and YH GDP growth rate

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and NW GDP growth rate

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and NE GDP growth rate

 

-0.25

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

LONDON and SCOTLAND

GDP growth rate

 

Figure 2: Continued

Appendix A: AIC and BIC for copula values between each region and London

Gaussian copula Student’s T copula

AIC BIC AIC BIC

LON_EAST -1.31E+02 -1.25E+02 -129.2154 -120.0658 LON_SE -207.6968 -201.5971 -209.8900 -200.7404 LON_SW -142.1756 -136.0761 -140.1635 -131.0139 LON_EM -97.1019 -91.0022 -103.6303 -94.4808 LON_WM -87.3424 -81.2427 -85.67933 -76.5298 LON_WALES -91.7208 -85.6211 -91.2232 -82.0736 LON_YH -66.3574 -60.2577 -71.5368 -62.3872 LON_NW -64.0329 -57.9332 -64.1308 -54.9813 LON_NE -28.3440 -22.2443 -26.8952 -17.7457 LON_SCOTLAND -38.4331 -32.3334 -36.4193 -27.2697 This appendix reports the results of AIC and BIC test for Gaussian and Student’s T copula values between each region and London from 1976Q1 to 2015Q1. LON_EAST is the copula values between London and East of England; LON_SE is the copula values between London and South-East;

LON_SW is the copula values between London and South-West; LON_EM is the copula values between London and East Midlands; LON_WM is the copula values between London and West Midlands; LON_YH is the copula values between London and Yorkshire and The Humberside;

LON_NW is the copula values between London and North-West; and LON_NE is the copula values between London and North-East.

Appendix B: Sensitivity of settings for testing the determinants of housing

相關文件