Limitations and Future Studies - 採用線上教學/學習系統之決定因素－越南胡志明市大學教師與學生之比較分析

Chapter 5 : Conclusion

5.3 Limitations and Future Studies

There are several limitations of this research that should be considered, as well as directions for future studies correlated to similar topics or industries that need further investigation.

1. Demographical data is not well balanced in terms of teaching experience and ET/LS experience for lecturers; current school status and ET/LS experience for students.

Additionally, there is a lack of information about age and gender of subjects. It is also expected that much more meaningful results would be derived if larger number of subjects could be accessed.

2. Since several items from the scale were deleted to increase the model fit, better measures of system and user attributes should be developed to improve the consistency of the total model.

3. According the survey statistics, as all subjects are quite familiar with Internet and technology, the sample characteristics observed here may not be interesting to some readers, who pay attention to users with very little computer experience.

4. For future studies, it may be useful to examine the effectiveness of ET/LS in promoting learning and whether such systems can provide as good as or better learning experience than provided by traditional classes in universities of Ho Chi Minh City.

5. If more universities in Ho Chi Minh City with larger number of participants as qualified subjects take part in the research, then it can be investigated whether ranking of university has any effect on users’ adoption of ET/LS.

REFERENCES

Alsalem, A. (2004). "Educational Technology and E-learning." Riyadh: Alroshd publication.

Álvarez, A., et al. (2013). "Blending traditional teaching methods with learning environments:

Experience, cyclical evaluation process and impact with MAgAdI." Computers & education 68:

129-140.

Bonk, C. J. and C. R. Graham (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, John Wiley & Sons.

Brown, I. T. (2002). "Individual and technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web‐

based learning technologies in a developing country." The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 9(1): 1-15.

Carswell, A. D. and V. Venkatesh (2002). "Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance education environment." International Journal of human-computer studies 56(5): 475-494.

Chiu, C.-M. and E. T. Wang (2008). "Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention:

The role of subjective task value." Information & management 45(3): 194-201.

Dang, T. T. and M. Robertson (2010). Responses to learning management system: A case study in higher education in Vietnam, ACEC2010 Conference, Melbourne, Australia.

Davis, F. (2007). User acceptance of information technology: Research progress, current controversies, and emerging paradigms. Proceedings of the Keynote speech at the seventh international conference of electronic commerce, Taiwan, ROC.

Davis, F. D. (1989). "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology." MIS quarterly: 319-340.

Davis, F. D., et al. (1989). "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models." Management science 35(8): 982-1003.

Deng, L. and N. J. Tavares (2013). "From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities." Computers & education 68: 167-176.

Fathema, N., et al. (2015). "Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions." Journal of Online Learning & Teaching 11(2).

Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1977). "Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research."

Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

Gharib, M., et al. (2016). "Promotion of critical thinking in e-learning: a qualitative study on the experiences of instructors and students." Advances in medical education and practice 7: 271.

Hartshorne, R. and H. Ajjan (2009). "Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies:

theory and empirical tests." Journal of computing in higher education 21(3): 183.

HEFCE (2005). "HEFCE strategy for e‐learning."

Holmes, B. and J. Gardner (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice, Sage.

Hufnagel, E. M. and C. Conca (1994). "User response data: The potential for errors and biases."

Information systems research 5(1): 48-73.

Hutcheson, G. D. and N. Sofroniou (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models, Sage.

Islam, A. (2011). "The determinants of the post-adoption satisfaction of educators with an e-learning system." Journal of Information Systems Education 22(4): 319-332.

Islam, A. (2012). "The role of perceived system quality as educators’ motivation to continue e-learning system use." AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 4(1): 25-43.

Johnson, S. C., et al. (2010). "At the intersection of social and cognitive development: Internal working models of attachment in infancy." Cognitive Science 34(5): 807-825.

Jones, A. (2004). "A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers."

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). "An index of factorial simplicity." Psychometrika 39(1): 31-36.

Kelman, H. C. (1958). "Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change." Journal of conflict resolution 2(1): 51-60.

King, W. R. and J. He (2006). "A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model." Information

& management 43(6): 740-755.

Laurillard, D. (2005). E-learning in higher education. Changing higher education, Routledge: 87-100.

Le, L., et al. (2013). Developing Active Collaborative e‐Learning Framework for Vietnam’s Higher Education Context. ECEL2013-Proceedings for the 12th European Conference on eLearning: ECEL 2013, Academic Conferences Limited.

Lee, B.-C., et al. (2009). "Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results."

Computers & education 53(4): 1320-1329.

Lee, J.-S., et al. (2003). "Technology acceptance and social networking in distance learning."

Journal of Educational Technology & Society 6(2): 50-61.

Lee, M. K., et al. (2005). "Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation." Information & management 42(8): 1095-1104.

Lee, Y.-C. (2008). "The role of perceived resources in online learning adoption." Computers &

education 50(4): 1423-1438.

Legris, P., et al. (2003). "Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model." Information & management 40(3): 191-204.

Liaw, S.-S., et al. (2007). "Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning."

Computers & education 49(4): 1066-1080.

Lunney, M., et al. (2008). "Facilitating Critical Thinking through Online Courses." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 12: 85-97.

Ma, Q. and L. Liu (2004). "The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings." Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC) 16(1): 59-72.

Malhotra, Y. and D. F. Galletta (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, IEEE.

Martocchio, J. J. and J. Webster (1992). "Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training." Personnel Psychology 45(3): 553-578.

Melone, N. P. (1990). "A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research." Management science 36(1): 76-91.

Minedu (2009). "What is e‐Learning?" New Zealand Education Website, Ministry of Education.

Mo, S.-Y. A. (2003). Cinematographs contextualising historical, political and philosophical influences on the development of education in Vietnam, Curtin University.

Moon, J.-W. and Y.-G. Kim (2001). "Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context."

Information & management 38(4): 217-230.

O'Reilly, C. A. and J. Chatman (1986). "Organizational commitment and psychological attachment:

The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior." Journal of applied psychology 71(3): 492.

OECD (2005). "OECD Annual Report 2005."

Piccoli, G., et al. (2001). "Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training." MIS quarterly: 401-426.

Pituch, K. A. and Y.-k. Lee (2006). "The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use."

Computers & education 47(2): 222-244.

Radović-Marković, M. (2010). "Advantages and disadvantages of e-learning in comparison to traditional forms of learning." OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PETROŞANI~ ECONOMICS~ 10(2):

289-298.

Robey, D. (1996). "Research commentary: diversity in information systems research: threat, promise, and responsibility." Information systems research 7(4): 400-408.

Roca, J. C., et al. (2006). "Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model." International Journal of human-computer studies 64(8): 683-696.

Ruiz, J. G., et al. (2006). "The impact of e-learning in medical education." Academic medicine 81(3): 207-212.

Saadé, R. and B. Bahli (2005). "The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model."

Information & management 42(2): 317-327.

Saadé, R. G., et al. (2012). "Critical thinking in E-learning environments." Computers in Human Behavior 28(5): 1608-1617.

Sánchez-Franco, M. J., et al. (2009). "Exploring the impact of individualism and uncertainty avoidance in Web-based electronic learning: An empirical analysis in European higher education."

Computers & education 52(3): 588-598.

Siegenthaler, E., et al. (2010). "Improving the usability of e-book readers." Journal of usability studies 6(1): 25-38.

ŠUmak, B., et al. (2011). "A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types." Computers in Human Behavior 27(6): 2067-2077.

Sun, P.-C., et al. (2008). "What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction." Computers & education 50(4): 1183-1202.

Tao, Y.-H., et al. (2006). "Improving training needs assessment processes via the Internet: system design and qualitative study." Internet Research 16(4): 427-449.

Teo, T., et al. (2009). "Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)." Computers & education 53(3): 1000-1009.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). "Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model." Information systems research 11(4): 342-365.

Venkatesh, V. and F. D. Davis (2000). "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model:

Four longitudinal field studies." Management science 46(2): 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., et al. (2002). "User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model." Decision sciences 33(2): 297-316.

Vilaseca, J. and D. Castillo (2008). "Economic efficiency of e-learning in higher education: An industrial approach." Intangible Capital 4(3): 191-211.

Wagner, N., et al. (2008). "Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders' analysis." Journal of Educational Technology & Society 11(3): 26-36.

Wang, W.-T. and C.-C. Wang (2009). "An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems." Computers & education 53(3): 761-774.

Welsh, E. T., et al. (2003). "E‐learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions."

international Journal of Training and Development 7(4): 245-258.

Zhang, D. and J. F. Nunamaker (2003). "Powering e-learning in the new millennium: an overview of e-learning and enabling technology." Information systems frontiers 5(2): 207-218.

Zhang, D., et al. (2006). "Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness." Information & management 43(1): 15-27.

APPENDIX Appendix A: Formal Research Questionnaire for Lecturers English Version

Dear Sir or Madam,

This questionnaire is used for an academic research about the determinants of e-teaching/learning system adoption in colleges of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The general goal of this study is to investigate the acceptance of both lecturers and students to adopt E-Teaching/Learning system, as well as to compare the differences in those two types of users. The idea is whether the technological and psychological aspects influence the users’ attitude, and eventually has any effect on the users’ adoption intentions. In addition, the types of users are also addressed and examined since they may have different impact on different types of lecturers and learners who adopt Teaching/Learning system. Your knowledge and experiences for E-Teaching/Learning system will undoubtedly contribute enormously to the data collection of this research. This questionnaire will be collected anonymously. Please feel safe to fill it as this is for academic purposes only. We appreciate your kindly assistance. Thank you so much!

Best Regards,

IMBA, National University of Kaohsiung Advisor: Prof. ChieHsing Wu

Student: Pham Ngoc Que Tram E-Mail:

Part One:

1. University: ………

2. Department: ………

3. Years of experience

󠇕 1-5 years 󠇕 11-15 years

󠇕 6-10 years 󠇕 over 15 years

4. How long have you been using E-Teaching/Learning system?

󠇕 less than 1 years 󠇕 3-4 years

󠇕 1-2 year(s) 󠇕 over 5 years

5. Which subjects in your coursework involve E- Teaching/ Learning system? ………

Part Two:

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Perceived usefulness” of the Technological aspect in E-Teaching/Learning system. The degree of agreement is divided into 5 stages. Stage 1 refers to totally disagree; stage 2 refers to disagree; stage 3 refers to moderate; stage 4 refers to agree and stage 5 refers to totally agree. Please choose the proper answer according to your own knowledge or experience.

1 2 3 4 5

1 I think ET/LS can improve the teaching

efficiency.     

2 I think ET/LS can improve the quality of my

teaching.     

3 I think ET/LS can reduce teaching work load.     

4 Overall, I think ET/LS is useful.     

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Perceived ease of use” of the Technological aspect in E-Teaching/Learning system. The degree of agreement is divided into 5 stages. Stage 1 refers to totally disagree; stage 2 refers to disagree; stage 3 refers to moderate; stage 4 refers to agree and stage 5 refers to totally agree. Please choose the proper answer according to your own knowledge or experience.

1 2 3 4 5

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Perceived functionality”

of the Technological aspect in E-Teaching/Learning system. The degree of agreement is divided into 5 stages. Stage 1 refers to totally disagree; stage 2 refers to disagree; stage 3 refers to moderate; stage 4 refers to agree and stage 5 refers to totally agree. Please choose the proper answer according to your own knowledge or experience.

1 2 3 4 5

1 I think ET/LS contains functions that I can

use in teaching.     

2 I think functions of ET/LS are sufficient.      3 Overall, I am satisfied with the functions of

ET/LS for teaching.     

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Perceived playfulness” of the Psychological aspect in E-Teaching/Learning system. The degree of agreement is divided into 5 stages. Stage 1 refers to totally disagree; stage 2 refers to disagree; stage 3 refers to moderate; stage 4 refers to agree and stage 5 refers to totally agree. Please choose the proper answer according to your own knowledge or experience.

1 2 3 4 5

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Social influence” of the Psychological aspect in E-Teaching/Learning system. The degree of agreement is divided

into 5 stages. Stage 1 refers to totally disagree; stage 2 refers to disagree; stage 3 refers to moderate; stage 4 refers to agree and stage 5 refers to totally agree. Please choose the proper answer according to your own knowledge or experience.

1 2 3 4 5

4 Overall, I think using ET/LS in teaching has

social value in school.     

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Adoption attitude” in E-Teaching/Learning system. The degree of agreement is divided into 5 stages. Stage 1 refers to totally disagree; stage 2 refers to disagree; stage 3 refers to moderate; stage 4 refers to agree and stage 5 refers to totally agree. Please choose the proper answer according to your own knowledge or experience.

1 2 3 4 5

1 I think using ET/LS is a good idea in

teaching.     

2 I think using ET/LS seems helpful in

teaching.     

3 I think I have a positive attitude toward the

use of ET/LS.     

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Adoption intention” in E-Teaching/Learning system. The degree of agreement is divided into 5 stages. Stage 1 refers to totally disagree; stage 2 refers to disagree; stage 3 refers to moderate; stage 4 refers to agree and stage 5 refers to totally agree. Please choose the proper answer according to your own knowledge or experience.

Please leave your comments or suggestions regarding this questionnaire.

……….

This is the end of the questionnaire. Thank you for your help!

Vietnamese Version

Kính gửi Quý Thầy /Cô,

Bảng câu hỏi này được thiết kế nhằm phục vụ đề tài nghiên cứu khoa học về các yếu tố quyết định việc áp dụng hệ thống dạy và học trực tuyến tại các trường đại học trên địa bàn thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam. Mục tiêu chung của nghiên cứu này là để tìm hiểu mức độ tiếp nhận của cả giảng viên và sinh viên trong việc áp dụng hệ thống dạy và học trực tuyến, cũng như để so sánh sự khác biệt giữa hai đối tượng người dùng. Nghiên cứu sẽ chỉ ra cụ thể rằng có hay không các yếu tố trong khía cạnh kĩ thuật và tâm lí ảnh hưởng tới thái độ tiếp nhận, sau đó là ý định tiếp nhận của người dùng. Bài khảo sát áp dụng cho cả 2 trường hợp sử dụng e-learning cho toàn bộ khóa học hoặc sử dụng e-learning như một công cụ hỗ trợ việc học trên lớp. Sự tham gia của Quý Thầy/Cô sẽ góp phần rất lớn vào kết quả nghiên cứu. Tất cả thông tin Quý Thầy/Cô cung cấp sẽ được bảo mật tuyệt đối. Trân trọng cảm ơn Quý Thầy/Cô đã tham gia nghiên cứu này.

IMBA, Đại học Quốc lập Cao Hùng GVHD: GS. ChieHsing Wu

Người nghiên cứu: Phạm Ngọc Quế Trâm E-Mail:

Phần Một:

1. Trường đại học: ………

2. Khoa/ Ngành: ………...

3. Kinh nghiệm giảng dạy

󠇕 1-5 năm 󠇕 11-15 năm

󠇕 6-10 năm 󠇕 hơn 15 năm

4. Quý Thầy/Cô đã sử dụng hệ thống dạy và học trực tuyến được bao lâu?

󠇕 ít hơn 1 năm 󠇕 3-4 năm

󠇕 1-2 năm 󠇕 hơn 5 năm

5. Các môn học Quý Thầy/Cô sử dụng hệ thống dạy và học trực tuyến:

………

55 kinh nghiệm của riêng Quý Thầy/Cô.

1 2 3 4 5 kiến thức hoặc kinh nghiệm của riêng Quý Thầy/Cô.

1 2 3 4 5

Những câu hỏi này được thiết kế nhằm tìm hiểu suy nghĩ của Quý Thầy/Cô về “Mức độ mang đến hứng thú giảng dạy” của hệ thống dạy và học trực tuyến riêng về khía cạnh tâm lí. Câu trả lời sẽ có 5 mức độ. Mức độ 1 là hoàn toàn không đồng ý,; mức độ 2 là không đồng ý; mức độ 3 là bình thường; mức độ 4 là đồng ý và mức độ 5 là hoàn toàn đồng ý. Vui lòng chọn câu trả lời đúng theo kiến thức hoặc kinh nghiệm của riêng Quý Thầy/Cô.

1 2 3 4 5 hoặc kinh nghiệm của riêng Quý Thầy/Cô.

1 2 3 4 5

1 Tôi sẽ sẵn sàng sử dụng hệ thống dạy và học trực

tuyến.     

2 Tôi rất vui khi sử dụng hệ thống dạy và học trực

tuyến ngay bây giờ và trong tương lai     

3 Nhìn chung, tôi chắc chắn sử dụng hệ thống dạy

và học trực tuyến trong giảng dạy.     

Xin Quý Thầy/Cô cho ý kiến ở bên dưới nếu có góp ý cho bảng câu hỏi này.

……….

Bảng câu hỏi kết thúc tại đây. Xin chân thành cảm ơn Quý Thầy/Cô.

Appendix B: Formal Research Questionnaire for Students

English Version

Dear Sir or Madam,

Best Regards,

IMBA, National University of Kaohsiung Advisor: Prof. ChieHsing Wu

Student: Pham Ngoc Que Tram E-Mail:

4. How long have you been using E-Teaching/Learning system?

󠇕 less than 1 year 󠇕 over 2 years

󠇕 1-2 year(s)

5. Which subjects in your coursework involve E- Teaching/ Learning system?

………..

Part Two:

1 2 3 4 5

1 I think ET/LS can improve the learning

efficiency.     

2 I think ET/LS can improve the quality of my

learning.     

3 I think ET/LS can reduce learning work load.     

4 Overall, I think ET/LS is useful.     

1 2 3 4 5

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Perceived functionality”

1 2 3 4 5

1 I think ET/LS contains functions that I can

use in learning.     

2 I think functions of ET/LS are sufficient.      3 Overall, I am satisfied with the functions of

ET/LS for learning.     

These questions are designed to explore your insights about the “Perceived playfulness” of

在文檔中採用線上教學/學習系統之決定因素－越南胡志明市大學教師與學生之比較分析 (頁 50-70)