Spiked Cu and Zn concentration (mg/kg)

Cu 0 + Zn 0 Cu 75 + Zn 0Cu 150 + Zn 0Cu 0 + Zn 200 Cu 75 + Zn 200 Cu 150 + Zn 200Cu 0 + Zn 400 Cu 75 + Zn 400 Cu 150 + Zn 400

Cu concentration in shoot (mg/kg)

0

Fig. 5. Cu concentration (mg/kg) of rice shoot in different treatments. Values represent mean ² standard deviation (n = 4). Different letters within same each spiked Cu and Zn treatment are significantly different after ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD at p

= 0.05. (NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition ; 0, 75, 150 = spiked Cu concentration (mg/kg

) )

) ; 0, 200, 400 = spiked Zn concentration (mg/kg ) )

35

Spiked Cu and Zn concentration (mg/kg)

Cu 0 + Zn 0 Cu 75 + Zn 0Cu 150 + Zn 0Cu 0 + Zn 200 Cu 75 + Zn 200 Cu 150 + Zn 200Cu 0 + Zn 400 Cu 75 + Zn 400 Cu 150 + Zn 400

Cu concentration in root (mg/kg)

0

Fig. 6. Cu concentration (mg/kg) of rice root in different treatments. Values represent mean ² standard deviation (n = 4). Different letters within same each spiked Cu and Zn treatment are significantly different after ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD at p

= 0.05. (NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition ; 0, 75, 150 = spiked Cu concentration (mg/kg) ; 0, 200, 400 = spiked Zn concentration (mg/kg))

) )

ҁࣴز่݀ᆶځ࣬౦Ǵёૈࣁҁ၂ᡍβᝆޑ pH ॶߚமለ܄Ϸҁ၂ᡍβᝆ٠ߚࣁ ᝄख़ልԡࢉβᝆǴ܌аࡼҔׯؼᏊࡕዿਥύልޑᐚࡋफ़ե൯ࡋόεǶόӕ೽Տύ ልޑᐚࡋࣁǺዿਥ > Ӧ΢೽ ɭ ዼಈȐკ 4 - 6ȑǶ߻ΓࣴزΨࡰрНዿӚ೽Տύ ልᐚࡋޑ໩ׇࣁǺዿਥ > ယ > ಳ > ዼಈ (Gu et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2009)Ƕ

ಃ

ಃϤ࿯ǵልᎋ࣬ϕբҔჹНዿύልᐚࡋϐቹៜ

΋ǵᕫᕫԯ

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊǵࡼҔҡԪᆶࡼҔ୴ޥޑೀ౛Ǵልǵᎋǵልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔࣣ

཮ཱུᡉ๱ቹៜᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋȐ߄ 6ȑǶҁࣴزޑ่݀ᆶ߻Γࣴزόᅰ࣬ӕǴ Sarkunan et al. (1989) ࡰрልǵᎋǵልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔࣣ཮ቹៜዼಈύልޑᐚࡋǹ Kim ک McBride (2009) ޑࣴزᡉҢନΑልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔѦǴልǵᎋࣣ཮ᡉ๱ቹ ៜεلύልޑᐚࡋǶ

(΋) బуልᐚࡋ 0 mg/kg

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊΠǴ҂బуልޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 mg/kg ܈ 400 mg/kg Ǵᕫ ԯύልޑѳ֡ᐚࡋϟܭ 4.40 - 4.84 mg/kgǴ಍ी΢҂ၲډ 5 % ᡉ๱НྗȐკ 7aȑǴ

่݀ᡉҢ྽βᝆ҂ᚐѦబуልᐚࡋǴջচҁβᝆύӄໆልᐚࡋࣁ 16.8 mg/kg

ࡼҔҡԪࡕǴᒿ๱ᎋᐚࡋޑቚуǴᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋև౜Πफ़ᖿ༈Ǵᕫԯύል ޑᐚࡋҗ 4.86 ± 0.68 mg/kgȐCu 0 + Zn 0ȑϩձफ़եԿ 3.46 ± 0.76 mg/kgȐCu 0 + Zn 200ȑᆶ 2.71 ± 0.81 mg/kgȐCu 0 + Zn 400ȑǴՠѝԖబуᎋᐚࡋ 400 mg/kg ޑೀ

౛Ԗၲډᡉ๱ৡ౦ǶҗԜёޕࡼҔҡԪΠǴβᝆ҂ᚐѦబуልᐚࡋਔǴӆబуᎋ 400 mg/kg཮׭ڋᕫԯ֎ԏልǶ

ਔǴ ӆᚐѦబуᎋ٠ό཮ቹៜᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋǶ

ࡼҔ୴ޥޑ่݀ᆶࡼҔҡԪޑ่݀࣬՟Ǵᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋᒿ๱ᎋޑቚуԶफ़

37

߄ 6ǵόӕೀ౛ΠልکᎋΒӢηϩ݋ჹᕫԯύልᐚࡋ(mg/kg)ޑቹៜ

Table 6. A two - way ANOVA analysis for the effect of Cu and Zn on Cu concentration (mg/kg) of brown rice in different treatments

Effect NA¨ Lime Compost

Cu *** *** ***

Zn *** *** ***

Cu × Zn ** *** ***

NS : not significant.

* significance at the 0.05 probability levels.

** significance at the 0.01 probability levels.

*** significance at the 0.001 probability levels.

§ NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition.

კ 7ǵόӕೀ౛Πᒿ๱ᎋᐚࡋޑቚуᕫԯύልᐚࡋ (mg/kg) ޑᡂϯ (a) ልᐚࡋ 0

NA Lime Compost

Cu concentration in brown rice (mg/kg)

0

NA Lime Compost

Cu concentration in brown rice (mg/kg)

0

NA Lime Compost

Cu concentration in brown rice (mg/kg)

0

39

׭ڋᕫԯ֎ԏልǶ

(Β)బబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊΠǴబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 mg/kg ཮ᡉ๱

फ़եᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋǴᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋҗ 6.38 ± 0.72 mg/kg फ़Կ 4.96 ± 0.75 mg/kgȐკ 7bȑǹฅԶǴబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబу 400 mg/kgǴᎋࠅ

཮ߦ຾ᕫԯ֎ԏልǶబуᎋᐚࡋ 200 mg/kgਔǴልᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔࣁ࡮לբҔǴฅԶ బуᎋᐚࡋࣁ 400 mg/kg ਔǴልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔ߾ᙯࣁڐӕբҔǶќ΋ࣴز߾ࡰ

рషӝబуᎋȐ200ǵ400 ᆶ 800 mg/kg ȑǵልȐ50ǵ100 ᆶ 200 mg/kg ȑǵᙻȐ25ǵ

50 ᆶ 100 mg/kg Sarkunan et al.,

1989

ȑޑβᝆǴዼಈύልޑᐚࡋᒿ๱ᎋޑቚуԶቚу(

)ǶόӕޑచҹΠǴዼಈύልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔόӕǴёૈࣁڐӕ܈࡮לբҔǶ

ࡼҔҡԪϷ୴ޥࡕǴᕫԯύልᐚࡋޑᖿ༈ᆶ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑೀ౛࣬ӕǶబу ልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 mg/kg ཮׭ڋᕫԯύ֎ԏልǶబуልᐚ ࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 400 mg/kg ߾཮ߦ຾ᕫԯ֎ԏᎋǶ

(Ο)బуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑ௃ݩΠǴబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 mg/kgǴ ᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋҗ 6.23 ± 1.31 mg/kg ΢ϲԿ 8.11 ± 0.46 mg/kgȐკ 7cȑǴՠӧ಍

ी΢ࠅคᡉ๱ৡ౦Ȑp > 0.05ȑǶऩӆబуᎋ 400 mg/kgǴᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋ΢ϲԿ 9.41

± 2.14 mg/kgǴЪӧ಍ी΢ၲډ 5 % ᡉ๱НྗǶҗԜ่݀ளޕǴబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 400 mg/kg ཮ߦ຾ᕫԯ֎ԏልǴҁࣴز่݀ᆶ Sarkunan et al. (1989) ࣬՟Ƕ

ࡼҔҡԪᆶ୴ޥޑ่݀Ψᆶ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑೀ౛΋ኬǴబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 mg/kg ٠ό཮ቹៜᕫԯჹልޑ֎ԏȐp > 0.05ȑǴՠࢂబу ᎋᐚࡋ 400 mg/kg ཮ߦ຾ᕫԯ֎ԏልǶᆕӝ΢ॊ่݀ᡉҢǴόᆅԖคࡼҔׯؼᏊǴ బуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆ Ǵӆబуᎋᐚࡋ 400 mg/kgǴᎋ཮ߦ຾ᕫԯ֎ԏልǶ

(Ѥ)ᕴᕴ่

ᗨฅβᝆబуልᐚࡋ 0ǵ200 ܈ 400 mg/kg ਔǴӆబуᎋ 200 mg/kg ܈ᎋ 400 mg/kgǴᎋ཮ߦ຾܈׭ڋᕫԯ֎ԏልǶՠεठ΢ёᘜયрǴబуል 75 mg/kg ܈ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 400 mg/kgǴᎋ཮ߦ຾ᕫԯ֎ԏልǶ

ΒǵННዿӦ΢೽

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑ௃ݩΠǴѝԖል཮ᡉ๱ቹៜНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋǴᎋǵል کᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔ߾ჹНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋคቹៜȐ߄ 7ȑǴLuo ک Rimmer (1995) ޑࣴز߾ᡉҢǴልǵᎋό཮ቹៜεഝӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋǴልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔ཮ᡉ

๱ቹៜεഝύልޑᐚࡋǶќ΋ࣴز߾ᡉҢǴልǵᎋǵልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔჹዿาύ ልޑᐚࡋԖᡉ๱ቹៜ(Sarkunan et al., 1989)ǶࡼҔҡԪ܈ࡼҔ୴ޥΠǴልکᎋޑ࣬

ϕբҔჹНዿӦ΢೽ύልԖᡉ๱ቹៜǶ (΋) బуልᐚࡋ 0 mg/kg

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑ௃ݩΠǴ҂బуልޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 ܈ 400 mg/kgǴ཮

ߦ຾НዿӦ΢೽֎ԏልȐკ 8aȑǶќ΋ࣴزࠅᡉҢ҂బуልޑβᝆǴऩబуᎋ 10 mg/kg

Ǵεഝύልޑᐚࡋ཮΢ϲǴՠऩᎋගଯԿ 100 mg/kg Luo and Rimmer, 1995

ǴεഝӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚ

ࡋ߾཮Πफ़( )ǶFageria (2002) ޑࣴز่݀߾ᡉҢబуᎋ཮׭

ڋНዿӦ΢೽֎ԏልǵ້ᆶේǹబуᎋ߾཮ߦ຾๼ل֎ԏልǶ

ࡼҔҡԪᆶ୴ޥΠǴ҂బуልޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 ܈ 400 mg/kgǴεठ΢

٠ό཮ߦ຾܈׭ڋНዿӦ΢೽֎ԏልǶόӕೀ౛ΠНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑѳ֡ᐚࡋࣁ 2.45 - 3.08 mg/kgȐࡼҔҡԪȑᆶ 1.49 - 2.22 mg/kgȐࡼҔ୴ޥȑǶ

(Β)బуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg

კ 8b ่݀ᡉҢ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑ௃ݩΠǴబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబ

41

߄ 7ǵόӕೀ౛ΠልکᎋΒӢηϩ݋ჹНዿӦ΢೽ύልᐚࡋ(mg/kg

Table 7. A two-way ANOVA analysis for the effect of Cu and Zn on Cu concentration (mg/kg) of shoot in different treatments

)ޑቹៜ

Effect NA¨ Lime Compost

Cu *** *** ***

Zn NS NS ***

Cu × Zn NS * ***

NS : not significant.

* significance at the 0.05 probability levels.

** significance at the 0.01 probability levels.

*** significance at the 0.001 probability levels.

§ NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition.

კ 8ǵόӕೀ౛Πᒿ๱ᎋᐚࡋޑቚуНዿӦ΢೽ύልᐚࡋ (mg/kg) ޑᡂϯ (a) ል

NA Lime Compost

Cu concentration in shoot (mg/kg)

0

NA Lime compost

Cu concentration in shoot (mg/kg)

0

NA Lime Compost

Cu concentration in shoot (mg/kg)

0

43

ᎋᐚࡋ 10 ܈ 100 mg/kg

ࡼҔҡԪޑೀ౛Ǵబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋӕኬޑΨό཮ߦ຾

܈׭ڋНዿӦ΢೽֎ԏልǶฅԶࡼҔ୴ޥࡕǴబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబ уᎋ 400 mg/kg཮ߦ຾Ӧ΢೽֎ԏልǴԜࣁڐӕբҔǶబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg

ǴεഝӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋࣣόڙቹៜǶฅԶ Sarkunan et al.

(1989) ޑ่݀ࠅว౜Ǵబуᎋ཮फ़եዿาύልޑᐚࡋǶ

ޑβ ᝆǴНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋࣁ 3.71 ± 0.07 mg/kgǶӆబуᎋᐚࡋ 200 mg/kg Ϸ 400 mg/kgǴНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋϩձ΢ϲԿ 5.06 ± 0.75 mg/kg Ϸ 6.55 ± 1.83 mg/kg Ǵ ՠѝԖబуᎋᐚࡋ 400 mg/kg

(Ο)బబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg

ޑೀ౛Ԗၲ಍ी΢ 5 % ᡉ๱ৡ౦Ƕ

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊΠǴబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑѳ֡ᐚ ࡋϟܭ 10.2 - 14.2 mg/kgȐკ 8cȑǴЪӚೀ౛໔ӧ಍ी΢٠คᡉ๱ৡ౦ǶࡼҔҡԪ ࡕǴᗨฅᒿ๱ᎋᐚࡋޑቚуǴНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋև౜Πफ़ᖿ༈Ǵՠࢂ಍ी΢

҂ၲډ 5 % ᡉ๱ৡ౦Ƕҗ΢ॊளޕǴόᆅࢂ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊ܈ࡼҔҡԪǴНዿӦ΢

೽ύልޑᐚࡋࣣόڙబуᎋᐚࡋޑቹៜǶ

ࡼҔ୴ޥΠНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋԖᡉ๱ᡂϯǶబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβ ᝆǴНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋࣁ 3.63 ± 0.58 mg/kg

(Ѥ)ᕴ่

Ƕᒿ๱ᎋᐚࡋబуԿ 200 ܈ 400 mg/kgǴНዿӦ΢೽ύልޑᐚࡋϩձቚуԿ 6.09 ± 1.26 mg/kg Ϸ 9.26 ± 0.96 mg/kgǴ ЪΟᅿᐚࡋೀ౛໔֡ၲډ 5% ᡉ๱ৡ౦ǶҗԜ่݀ёޕࡼҔ୴ޥΠǴబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 ܈ 400 mg/kgǴᎋ཮ߦ຾НዿӦ΢೽֎ԏልǶ

εठ΢Ǵ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊᆶࡼҔҡԪޑ௃ݩΠǴόᆅβᝆబуልᐚࡋࣁՖǴӆ బуᎋ 200 ܈ 400 mg/kg ٠ό཮ߦ຾܈׭ڋНዿӦ΢೽֎ԏልǶฅԶǴࡼҔ୴ޥ ࡕǴబуልᐚࡋଯܭ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 ܈ 400 mg/kg ཮ߦ຾Нዿ Ӧ΢೽֎ԏልǶ

Οǵዿዿਥ

ᆕӝልᎋΒӢηϩ݋ޑ่݀Ȑ߄ 8ȑǴόᆅԖคࡼҔҡԪ܈୴ޥǴልࣣ཮ቹៜ ዿਥύልޑᐚࡋȐp < 0.001ȑǴልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔ߾ό཮ჹዿਥύልޑᐚࡋԖቹៜǶ

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊᆶࡼҔҡԪΠǴᎋ཮ᡉ๱ቹៜዿਥύልޑᐚࡋǶ (΋) బуልᐚࡋ 0 mg/kg

όᆅԖคࡼҔׯؼᏊǴ܌Ԗೀ౛Πዿਥύልޑᐚࡋεऊࣁ 8 mg/kgȐკ 9aȑǶ

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊǵࡼҔҡԪ܈ࡼҔ୴ޥΠǴልᎋᐚࡋೀ౛໔ࣣ҂ၲ 5 % ᡉ๱ৡ౦Ƕ Ԝ่݀ᡉҢǴዿਥύልޑᐚࡋ٠҂ڙబуᎋޑቹៜǶ

(Β) బуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊΠǴబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴዿਥύልޑᐚࡋനեǴᐚࡋ ࣁ 32.4 ± 5.96 mg/kgȐკ 9bȑǶӆᚐѦబуᎋᐚࡋ 200 mg/kg ܈ 400 mg/kg ਔǴ ዿਥύልޑᐚࡋϩձ΢ϲԿ 47.0 ± 8.18 mg/kg ᆶ 59.5 ± 12.2 mg/kg

ࡼҔҡԪᆶࡼҔ୴ޥޑ่݀࣬ৡόεǶࡼҔҡԪΠǴዿਥύልޑᐚࡋࣁ 41.5 ± 2.44 mg/kgȐCu 75 + Zn 0ȑǵ33.5 ± 6.42 mg/kgȐCu 75 + Zn 200ȑϷ 43.8 ± 10.3 mg/kg ȐCu 75 + Zn 400ȑǴЪೀ౛໔҂ၲᡉ๱ৡ౦Ȑp > 0.05ȑǶࡼҔ୴ޥΠǴዿਥύᎋޑ ᐚࡋΨ҂ၲ಍ी΢ 5 % ᡉ๱ৡ౦Ƕ่݀ᡉҢǴࡼҔҡԪᆶࡼҔ୴ޥࡕǴబуልᐚ ࡋ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆᚐѦబуᎋᐚࡋ 200 mg/kg ܈ 400 mg/kgǴᎋό཮ߦ຾܈

׭ڋዿਥ֎ԏልǶ

ǴՠѝԖబу ᎋᐚࡋ 400 mg/kg ޑೀ౛Ԗᡉ๱ৡ౦Ȑp < 0.05ȑǶᆕӝ΢ॊ่݀ளޕǴబуልᐚ 75 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋᐚࡋ 400 mg/kgǴᎋω཮ߦ຾ዿਥ֎ԏልǶ

(Ο) బуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊǵࡼҔҡԪᆶࡼҔ୴ޥΠǴᗨฅబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴ

45

߄ 8ǵόӕೀ౛ΠልکᎋΒӢηϩ݋ჹНዿਥ೽ύልᐚࡋޑቹៜ

Table 8. A two-way ANOVA analysis for the effect of Cu and Zn on Cu concentration (mg/kg) of rice root in different treatments

Effect NA¨ Lime Compost

Cu *** *** ***

Zn * ** NS

Cu × Zn NS NS NS

NS : not significant.

* significance at the 0.05 probability levels.

** significance at the 0.01 probability levels.

*** significance at the 0.001 probability levels.

§ NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition.

კ 9ǵόӕೀ౛Πᒿ๱ᎋᐚࡋޑቚуዿਥύልᐚࡋ (mg/kg) ޑᡂϯ (a) ልᐚࡋ 0 mg/kg, (b) ልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg, (c) ልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg

Treatments

NA Lime Compost

Cu concentration in root (mg/kg)

0

NA Lime Compost

Cu concentration in root (mg/kg)

0

NA Lime Compost

Cu concentration in root (mg/kg)

0

47

ೀ౛໔Ǵዿਥύልޑᐚࡋࣣ҂ၲ಍ी΢ 5 % ᡉ๱НྗǶҗԜ่݀ёޕǴόᆅԖค

ࡼҔׯؼᏊǴబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆబуᎋ 200 mg/kg ܈ 400 mg/kg ό཮ߦ຾܈׭ڋዿਥ֎ԏᎋǶ

Ѥǵᕴᕴ่

ᆕӝልکᎋ࣬ϕբҔჹᕫԯǵНዿӦ΢೽ϷዿਥύልޑቹៜǴёว౜Ԗคࡼ

ҔࡼҔׯؼᏊޑ௃ݩΠǴబуᎋၨ཮ߦ຾܈׭ڋᕫԯ֎ԏልǴځԛࣁНዿӦ΢೽Ǵ ӆٰࣁዿਥǴӢԜёޕልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔჹНዿӚ೽Տύልޑቹៜำࡋεठࣁᕫ ԯ > НዿӦ΢೽ > ዿਥǶ௢ෳёૈޑচӢࣁዿਥӃௗ᝻ډልᎋǴ٠ಕᑈεໆል ᎋܭਥ೽܈Нዿਥ߄य़֎ߕልᎋǴߔᏲε೽ϩޑߎឦ໺ᒡԿዼಈύǴӢԶβᝆӕ ਔӸԖᎋਔǴ٠ό཮ߦ຾܈׭ڋዿਥ֎ԏልǶНዿӦ΢೽ȐዿาᆶယȑӧНዿғ

౛תᄽޑфૈࣁ໺ᒡᎦϩǴόܰಕᑈልᐚࡋǴ܌аబуᎋΨό཮ჹНዿӦ΢೽ύ ልޑᐚࡋԖϼεቹៜǶε೽ϩޑᎦϩ཮ၮଌԿᕫԯǴልӢԶᒿᎋޑቚуԶԖڐӕ

܈࡮לբҔǶԿܭࣁՖόӕልబуໆΠǴНዿύልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔࣁڐӕ܈࡮ל բҔǴ߾ሡ຾΋؁ࣴزǶ

ಃΎ࿯ǵόӕೀ౛ჹНዿύᎋᐚࡋޑቹៜ

΋ǵᕫᕫԯ

ҁࣴز܌Ԗೀ౛Πᕫԯύᎋޑѳ֡ᐚࡋϟܭ 31.2 - 47.3 mg/kgȐკ 10ȑǶਥᏵ ᆵ᡼Ӧ୔ၭբނύख़ߎឦ֖ໆፓ่ࢗ݀(݅੏዇, 1991)Ǵᆵ᡼Ӧ୔ᕫԯύᎋ֖ໆࣁ 1.99 - 80 mg/kgȐଳख़ࣁ୷ྗȑǴᎋޑѳ֡ᐚࡋࣁ 39.2 ² 12.1 mg/kg Ƕᆶ΢ॊЎ᝘

ޑ่݀ჹྣǴҁࣴزᕫԯύᎋޑᐚࡋࣣϟܭ҅தᐚࡋጄൎϣǶҗԜёޕǴНዿғ ߏܭልᐚࡋեܭ 150 mg/kg

ᆶᕫԯύልޑᐚࡋ࣬КǴᕫԯύᎋޑ֖ໆၨଯǴӢࣁ࣬ၨܭልǴᎋၨܰ۳Ӧ

΢೽໺ᒡǶεठԶقǴࡼҔҡԪϷ୴ޥ٠ό཮फ़եᕫԯύᎋޑᐚࡋǴᕫԯύᎋޑ Ϸᎋᐚࡋեܭ 400 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴᕫԯᔈค१ࠔӼӄ ϐᅪቾǶ

Spiked Cu and Zn concentration (mg/kg)

Cu 0 + Zn 0 Cu 0 + Zn 200 Cu 0 + Zn 400Cu 75 + Zn 0 Cu 75 + Zn 200 Cu 75 + Zn 400 Cu 150 + Zn 0 Cu 150 + Zn 200 Cu 150 + Zn 400

Zn concentration in brown rice (mg/kg)

0

Fig. 10. Zn concentration (mg/kg) of brown rice in different treatments. Values represent mean ² standard deviation (n = 4). Different letters within same each spiked Cu and Zn treatment are significantly different after ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD at p = 0.05. (NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition ; 0, 75, 150 = spiked Cu concentration (mg/kg) ; 0, 200, 400 = spiked Zn concentration (mg/kg) )

) )

49

ᐚࡋᆶ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑೀ౛εӭ҂ၲ಍ी΢ᡉ๱ৡ౦ǶฅԶǴࠅԖࣴزᡉҢࡼҔ ҡԪǵᆘޥᆶԡݝёफ़եพनύᎋޑᐚࡋ(Khan and Jones, 2008)Ƕ၀ࣴزޑβᝆࣁ ᝄख़ልᎋԡࢉޑࣳ፦ᝆβЪ pH ॶࣁ 3.35ǴᎋޑԖਏ܄ଯǴբނό፾ӝܭԜᕉნ ΠғߏǶऩࡼҔׯؼᏊࡕǴβᝆύԖਏ܄ᎋफ़եǴӢԶբނᡏύᎋޑᐚࡋΨफ़եǶ ϸᢀҁࣴزޑβᝆࣁᦍ፦ᗹᝆβЪࣁեࡋልᎋԡࢉβᝆǴ܌аࡼҔҡԪ܈୴ޥჹ ܭफ़եᕫԯύᎋޑᐚࡋၨคਏ݀Ƕ

ΒǵННዿӦ΢೽

҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑ௃ݩΠǴబуᎋᐚࡋ 0 mg/kg

Gu et al., 2011 ޑೀ౛ǴНዿӦ΢೽ύᎋޑѳ

֡ᐚࡋεऊࣁ 22.6 - 43.7 mg/kgǴЪᒿ๱ᎋᐚࡋޑቚуǴНዿӦ΢೽ύᎋᐚࡋΨᒿ ϐቚуȐკ 11ȑǶΞҗკύёܴᡉளޕǴࡼҔҡԪϷ୴ޥܭబуᎋޑβᝆǴεठ

΢೿ёᡉ๱फ़եНዿӦ΢೽ύᎋޑᐚࡋǴԜ่݀ᆶ߻Γࣴز࣬՟( )Ƕ

၀ࣴزࡰрࡼҔ०Ԫᆶ᝗෦ёफ़եዿาᆶယύᎋޑ֖ໆǶ Οǵዿዿਥ

҂బуᎋޑೀ౛Ǵዿਥύᎋޑѳ֡ᐚࡋϟܭ 37.3 - 56.8 mg/kgȐკ 12ȑǶ྽బ уᎋᐚࡋਔǴዿਥύᎋޑѳ֡ᐚࡋ΢ϲԿ 140 - 380 mg/kgǶࡼҔҡԪϷ୴ޥ൳Я

೿ёаᡉ๱फ़եዿਥύᎋޑᐚࡋȐ҂బуᎋޑೀ౛ନѦȑǴԜ่݀ᆶНዿӦ΢೽ύ

ᎋޑ่݀࣬՟ǴচӢࣁȐ1ȑࡼҔҡԪȐCaCO

3

ȑࡕǴCa

²⁺

ஒβᝆጤᡏ΢ޑ H

⁺

Ϸ Al

³⁺

࿼ඤрٰǴβᝆ pH ॶගଯǴញрޑ CO

3

2-Alloway, 1995 کᎋ׎ԋ؈ᐘǴ٬ளᎋྋှࡋफ़ եǶȐ2ȑ୴ޥԖᡵ୷ϯբҔǴ܌аβᝆ pH ॶ཮ගଯǴᎋޑྋှࡋΠफ़ǶԜѦ୴

ޥ߄य़܌൤֖ޑӚᅿ۔ૈ୷ӵ⇌୷ǵ♐୷ᆶ♏୷Ǵёᆶᎋ׎ԋᗖ่( ;

Lee et al., 2004)

ᆶНዿӦ΢೽Ϸᕫԯύᎋᐚࡋ࣬КǴዿਥύᎋޑᐚࡋനଯǴځԛࣁӦ΢೽Ǵ നࡕࣁᕫԯȐკ 10 - 12ȑǶ߻ΓࣴزΨࡰрᎋӧНዿᡏϣᐚࡋ٩ׇࣁǺዿਥ > ಳ ယ > ዿዼ > ᕫԯ > қԯ(೚҉ྼ, 1990)Ƕ

Spiked Cu and Zn concentration (mg/kg)

Cu 0 + Zn 0Cu 0 + Zn 200Cu 0 + Zn 400 Cu 75 + Zn 0 Cu 75 + Zn 200 Cu 75 + Zn 400Cu 150 + Zn 0 Cu 150 + Zn 200 Cu 150 + Zn 400

Zn concentration in shoot (mg/kg)

0

Fig. 11. Zn concentration (mg/kg) of rice shoot in different treatments. Values represent mean ² standard deviation (n = 4). Different letters within same each spiked Cu and Zn treatment are significantly different after ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD at p = 0.05. (NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition ; 0, 75, 150 = spiked Cu concentration (mg/kg ) ; 0, 200, 400 = spiked Zn concentration (mg/kg ) )

) )

51

Spiked Cu and Zn concentration (mg/kg)

Cu 0 + Zn 0 Cu 75 + Zn 0Cu 150 + Zn 0Cu 0 + Zn 200 Cu 75 + Zn 200 Cu 150 + Zn 200Cu 0 + Zn 400 Cu 75 + Zn 400 Cu 150 + Zn 400

Zn concentration in root (mg/kg)

0

Fig. 12. Zn concentration (mg/kg) of rice root in different treatments.. Values represent mean ² standard deviation (n = 4). Different letters within same each spiked Cu and Zn treatment are significantly different after ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD at p = 0.05. (NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition ; 0, 75, 150 = spiked Cu concentration (mg/kg

) )

) ; 0, 200, 400 = spiked Zn concentration (mg/kg) )

ಃ

ಃΖ࿯ǵልᎋ࣬ϕբҔჹНዿύᎋᐚࡋϐቹៜ

΋ǵᕫᕫԯ

ልکᎋΒӢηϩ݋ჹᕫԯύᎋᐚࡋޑ่݀ᡉҢȐ߄ 9ȑǴ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑ௃ݩ

ΠǴልǵᎋǵልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔჹᕫԯύᎋޑᐚࡋࣣԖཱུᡉ๱ቹៜȐp < 0.01ȑǴԜ

่݀ܭ߻Γࣴز࣬಄(Sarkunan et al., 1989)ǶҡԪϷ୴ޥೀ౛ΠǴబуᎋ཮ቹៜᕫ ԯύᎋޑᐚࡋǴՠѝԖӧҡԪೀ౛Ǵልکᎋޑ࣬ϕբҔჹᕫԯύᎋޑᐚࡋԖᡉ๱

ቹៜǶ

(΋) బуᎋᐚࡋ 0 mg/kg

όᆅԖคࡼҔׯؼᏊǴ҂బуᎋޑβᝆǴӆᚐѦబуልᐚࡋ 75 ܈ 150 mg/kgǴ εठ΢ό཮ߦ຾܈׭ڋᕫԯ֎ԏᎋȐკ 13aȑǶόӕೀ౛Πᕫԯύᎋޑѳ֡ᐚࡋࣁ 31.2 - 33.9 mg/kgȐ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊȑǵ33.8 - 38.7 mg/kgȐࡼҔҡԪȑᆶ 33.4 - 38.9 mg/kg ȐࡼҔ୴ޥȑǶ

(Β) బуᎋᐚࡋ 200 mg/kg

җკ 14b ่݀ளޕǴ҂ࡼҔׯؼᏊޑ௃ݩΠǴబуᎋᐚࡋ 200 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴ ᕫԯύᎋᐚࡋࣁ 37.8 ± 0.92 mg/kg Ǵऩӆబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ཮ᡉ๱फ़եᕫԯύ ᎋޑᐚࡋǴᎋᐚࡋࣁ 33.3 ± 1.68 mg/kgǶฅԶǴගଯబуልᐚࡋԿ 150 mg/kg ਔǴ ᕫԯύᎋᐚࡋࠅҗ 37.8 ± 0.92 mg/kg ΢ϲԿ 41.7 ± 2.63 mg/kgǴЪၲᡉ๱ৡ౦Ȑp

< 0.05ȑǶ่݀ᡉҢǴబуልᐚࡋ 75 mg/kg ཮׭ڋᕫԯ֎ԏᎋǹՠࢂబуልᐚࡋ 150 mg/kgࠅ཮ߦ຾ᕫԯ֎ԏᎋǶSarkunan et al. (1989) ࣴزషӝబуόӕᐚࡋልȐ50ǵ 100 ᆶ 200 mg/kg ȑǵᎋȐ200ǵ400 ᆶ 800 mg/kg ȑᆶᙻȐ25ǵ50 ᆶ 100 mg/kg ȑ ჹНዿዼಈύልᐚࡋቹៜǴว౜బуᎋᐚࡋ 200 mg/kg ޑβᝆǴӆᚐѦబуል 50ǵ 100 ܈ 200 mg/kg ཮ߦ຾ዼಈ֎ԏᎋǶࡼҔҡԪ܈୴ޥࡕǴӆబуል 75 ܈ 150

53

߄ 9ǵόӕೀ౛ΠልکᎋΒӢηϩ݋ჹᕫԯύᎋᐚࡋ(mg/kg

Table 9. A two-way ANOVA analysis for the effect of Cu and Zn on Zn concentration (mg/kg) of brown rice in different treatments

)ޑቹៜ

Effect NA¨ Lime Compost

Cu *** NS *

Zn *** ** ***

Cu × Zn * * NS

NS : not significant.

* significance at the 0.05 probability levels.

** significance at the 0.01 probability levels.

*** significance at the 0.001 probability levels.

§ NA = no amendment ; Lime = lime addition ; Compost = compost addition.

კ 13ǵόӕೀ౛Πᒿ๱ልᐚࡋޑቚуᕫԯύᎋᐚࡋ (mg/kg) ޑᡂϯ (a) ᎋᐚࡋ 0

NA Lime Compost

Zn concentration in brown rice (mg/kg)

0

NA Lime Compost

Zn concentration in brown rice (mg/kg)

0

NA Lime Compost

Zn concentration in brown rice (mg/kg) ¹⁰

在文檔中 施用石灰與堆肥對水稻及青梗白菜中銅和鋅相互作用之影響 (頁 45-65)