國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
9 R2P respons protect第 20
10 ICISS respons protect第 20
11 World Summit respons protect第 20
0.00%!
0.50%!
1.00%!
1.50%!
2.00%!
0.00%!
0.50%!
1.00%!
1.50%!
2.00%!
2.50%!
0.00%!
0.50%!
1.00%!
1.50%!
2.00%!
2.50%!
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
12 Libya respons protect第 20
於 於 ICISS 第 1
於 0.30意 於 - 2
intervene 2.05意⽔水本committee 0.99意⽔水本military 0.62意⽔水本react 0.58 意⽔水本rebuild 0.41意⽔水 sovereign 0.53意⽔水 ICISS
2001 4 intervene
來-1.82意 於military - 1.27意 react第 rebuild第
第 於 於 prevent第
第 第 15
於 2005 summit本outcome本
document genocide 16⽔水 world summit summit
0.58意 2005 2010⽔水本0.42意
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
15"- ICISS 第於 3 "
16" world第 於 第 "
0!
100!
200!
300!
400!
500!
600!
‧
ICISS
2000-2004
sovereign 0.53
summit 0.58 0.42 0.69
genocide 0.41 0.36 1.11 0.72
outcome 0.38 0.53
paragraph 0.46
pillar 0.86
‧
意⽔水本assist 0.58意⽔水本society 0.46意⽔水inform 0.41意⽔水 paragraph 0.46
意⽔水 0.3意 於 - 1 inform
於 pillar本paragraph assist
於 138
140 paragraph⽔水 ⽼老 於
於 成第 three pillars⽔水 - 本
- 於 -
-於 R2P R2P第 4 於
paragraph R2P 138 140 paragraph⽔水
於 ⾥里
18"2009 第Implementing the Responsibility to Protect本2010 本 第 Early Warning, Assessment and the Responsibility to Protect⽔水本2011
第 The Role of Regional and Subregional Arrangements in Implementing the Responsibility to Protect⽔水本2012 第 Responsibility to
Protect: Timely and Decisive Response⽔水本2013 第
Responsibility to protect: State responsibility and prevention⽔水本2014
起 第 Fulfilling our collective responsibility: international assistance and the responsibility to protect⽔水 "
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
region第 2009 於 第
ICISS ICISS 0.3
於 World Summit 第 2 respons protect第
World Summit 0.41%本Libya 0.39意本 第0.49%於 於 0.93意⽔水
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
於
- 1 於 15 於 第
第 於 於
1 於 於
- 1
於 第
第 於 1 第 第 於
R2P第 於 15 1 於
R- 於2005
ICISS ⾛走 增 本 為第看上
於 ICISS
於 本 於
於
於 第
1 於 - 於 1
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
⽼老 於 4 於
ICISS ⾛走 增 2005 於 4
知 於 於
於 剛第
於 中⼩小
ICISS ⾛走 增 於 第 為第 於 友
於 於 1
於 第本 為第 第
ICISS 於 1 P 0.3意
ICISS 第 本
⽔水 於 第於
2 本 於 等
於 於 來
第於 第 第
R2P 於 ICISS
R2P 於 第 children⽔水本 第
women⽔水 第 civilian⽔水 ICISS 於
R2P 於 於
第 於2005
ICISS 於 R2P 4 才於 第本 第本
第 第於 World Summit 於 第
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
ICISS 4 於 ICISS
於 第 4 於 於
4 於 於 - 於
第 R2P第 World Summit
於 第 第 R2P第
於 第
於 第 implement⽔水
於 0.93意⽔水於
9 麼
renegotiate⽔水於 19(A. Bellamy, 2012)
於 都 2005 第R2P 能
⽔水
⾃自 1 於R2P ICISS 2014
於 於 ICISS
於2005 第 World Summit⽔水 R
- R2P 1 於 4 於
1 於R2P
於 4 於 R2P 中
於 第 1 R2P
於 2011 2014 於
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
19 A/RES/63/308, 7 October 2009
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
R2P 於
本 於 本 於
於 2 於
第 第 於 第 的
於 2 都 第 於
4 4
於 剛
1 1 於 於 ICISS友
於 於 21 於
第 4 第
於 R2P 於
-於 R2P - 於 第
第
第 於 ⾥里 的
於 - 第剛 1
於 於 第
第 R2P第 於 第
- 於 第
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
第 於 會
⼿手 - 於
-第 剛 第
integration⽔水本 第 independent⽔水 第 territory⽔水
於 於 於
1 第 第 2
R2P ⽼老 - 第
於 R-
-4
於 剛 1
於 剛 於
1 剛
回 於 4
於 於 4 1 R- 於
於 於 4 4 於
於
-於 Nvivo本SAS於STATISTICA於
SPSS 於 (Miner,
2012, pp. 91-131)
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
於
-於 於 R
- 是 於 於 2
於 第 微
於 第 多
- 於
於 多
於 1
於 1 多 於
本 麼 於
多 於 z 本 本
log-likelihood⽔水 於 多
Zipf’s Law⽔水 於 是
於 的 4
於
R- 於
於 - 於
R-於
於 ⼰己
於 4 於
就1就 於 R 於
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
於 本
-R tm第 package⽔水 第 pre-processing⽔水
於 本 cluster⽔水 correlation⽔水
R-於
於 ⽔水 多 於
第 big data⽔水 於 4
於 都 於
於 - 於 第本
第於 本 20
於 第- 於
於
-於 真 的
於 - 於
於 2014
於 R2P 20 於 Robert Jackson
於 第 於
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
20"2015 - 5 第於 2196 ⽔水本
2206 ⽔水本2211 ⽔水本2217 ⽔水本2220 P
⽔水 2223" ⽔水 "
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
本 多
於 就1就 於 1
-1 於 於
- 於
-(Acharya, 2009) 於
於 4 於
於
於 於
於 於 1
4 於 4 於
2 於
第 於
於 4 於 會⼿手
- 於 2
於
-‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
3 sovereign 3
ICISS ICISS
2000-2004
World Summit
2005-2010
Libya
2011-2014 2006,2009,2010,2013,2014,2015
2009-2014
state 5.06 sovereignti 1.98 sovereignti 1.70 sovereignti 1.79 nation 2.54 respons 5.20 sovereignti 3.67 nation 1.38 state 1.42 state 1.54 sovereignti 2.25 protect 3.80 intern 2.84 secur 1.33 secur 1.40 intern 1.44 unit 2.05 state 3.47 respons 2.10 council 1.32 nation 1.26 nation 1.38 intern 1.70 sovereignti 3.07 protect 1.54 iraq 1.27 intern 1.24 territori 1.27 state 1.54 intern 2.47 intervent 1.47 state 1.16 council 1.16 secur 1.23 council 1.35 sovereign 1.07 human 1.44 intern 1.16 territori 1.07 integr 1.09 resolut 1.32 right 1.00 peopl 1.29 govern 1.13 govern 0.94 peac 1.01 territori 1.28 crime 0.93 sovereign 1.01 iraqi 1.05 unit 0.93 unit 0.97 peac 1.22 oblig 0.93 communiti 0.84 territori 0.99 countri 0.89 countri 0.93 integr 1.19 principl 0.93 right 0.81 peopl 0.99 resolut 0.88 respect 0.90 secur 1.12 human 0.87 nation 0.79 unit 0.99 peac 0.87 council 0.89 humanitarian 1.09 intervent 0.73
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
principl 0.71 resolut 0.97 integr 0.85 support 0.75 conflict 1.03 communiti 0.67 commiss 0.68 polit 0.79 independ 0.78 independ 0.73 respect 0.93 equal 0.67 secur 0.68 countri 0.78 lebanon 0.78 sovereign 0.65 govern 0.90 fundament 0.67 practic 0.61 integr 0.78 respect 0.77 resolut 0.62 principl 0.90 nation 0.67 equal 0.58 republ 0.75 sovereign 0.76 polit 0.62 countri 0.87 unit 0.67 govern 0.53 peac 0.69 support 0.70 peopl 0.59 region 0.87 popul 0.60 territori 0.53 respect 0.68 iraq 0.65 ukrain 0.59 prevent 0.77 prevent 0.60 author 0.51 sovereign 0.62 peopl 0.62 govern 0.59 sudan 0.64 respect 0.60 issu 0.48 democrat 0.60 polit 0.56 principl 0.54 adopt 0.55 commiss 0.53 concept 0.46 independ 0.57 continu 0.55 region 0.53 charter 0.55 concern 0.53 general 0.46 support 0.57 region 0.51 continu 0.49 law 0.55 core 0.53 interven 0.43 process 0.51 israel 0.46 law 0.49 action 0.51 global 0.53 notion 0.43 full 0.49 forc 0.46 commit 0.48 assist 0.51 institut 0.53 peac 0.43 communiti 0.48 kosovo 0.45 effort 0.43 libya 0.51 report 0.53 world 0.43 principl 0.45 effort 0.45 communiti 0.42 peopl 0.51 summit 0.53 charter 0.41 congo 0.45 communiti 0.43 conflict 0.40 protect 0.51 assist 0.47 law 0.41 region 0.45 call 0.42 situat 0.40 respons 0.51 build 0.47 respect 0.41 forc 0.42 lebanes 0.41 concern 0.38 right 0.51 charter 0.47 mean 0.38 situat 0.40 respons 0.40 import 0.37 support 0.51 law 0.47
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
militari 0.38 restor 0.39 principl 0.40 uniti 0.36 civilian 0.48 member 0.47 object 0.38 establish 0.39 full 0.39 call 0.35 commit 0.48 pillar 0.47 polit 0.38 import 0.38 law 0.39 includ 0.35 cooper 0.48 world 0.47 regard 0.38 agreement 0.37 commit 0.38 forc 0.34 human 0.48 assembl 0.40 decis 0.35 repres 0.36 stabil 0.38 stabil 0.34 concern 0.45 commit 0.40 make 0.35 continu 0.35 parti 0.35 parti 0.34 forc 0.45 fulfil 0.40 question 0.35 author 0.34 process 0.35 respons 0.33 import 0.45 govern 0.40 accept 0.33 member 0.31 import 0.33 full 0.33 african 0.42 outcom 0.40 case 0.33 end 0.31 repres 0.33 violat 0.33 syrian 0.42 paragraph 0.40 citizen 0.33 mr 0.31 situat 0.33 protect 0.33 establish 0.39 polit 0.40
claim 0.33 law 0.3 presid 0.32 right 0.33 relat 0.39 practic 0.40
council 0.33 secretarygener 0.3 palestinian 0.31 syrian 0.31 syria 0.39 purpos 0.40 countri 0.33 east 0.3 issu 0.31 process 0.31 today 0.39 reinforc 0.40
duti 0.33 implement 0.30 charter 0.30 ensur 0.35 affirm 0.33
extern 0.33 concern 0.30 afghanistan 0.30 independ 0.35 africa 0.33
power 0.33 member 0.30 develop 0.30 libyan 0.35 al 0.33
chang 0.30 mr 0.30 polit 0.35 articl 0.33
develop 0.30 syria 0.30 communiti 0.32 domest 0.33
effect 0.30 member 0.30 crisi 0.32 earli 0.33
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
freedom 0.30 dialogu 0.32 edward 0.33
resourc 0.30 includ 0.32 express 0.33
role 0.32 fail 0.33
rule 0.32 genocid 0.33
idea 0.33 import 0.33 luck 0.33 manag 0.33 matter 0.33 meet 0.33 organ 0.33 peopl 0.33 press 0.33 provis 0.33 rule 0.33 societi 0.33 undermin 0.33
‧
ICISS ICISS
2000-2004
World Summit
2005-2010
Libya
2011-2014 2006,2009,2010,2013,2014,2015
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
militari 0.62 law 0.59 human 0.78 primari 0.67 conflict 0.82 genocid 0.72 peopl 0.62 popul 0.59 resolut 0.75 crime 0.66 govern 0.78 summit 0.69 react 0.58 communiti 0.52 communiti 0.70 prevent 0.65 civilian 0.73 human 0.67 support 0.58 concern 0.52 summit 0.58 humanitarian 0.64 secretarygener 0.73 member 0.64 case 0.53 situat 0.52 world 0.57 resolut 0.57 special 0.69 assist 0.58 mean 0.53 children 0.49 primari 0.53 communiti 0.56 member 0.66 outcom 0.53 sovereignti 0.53 support 0.49 prevent 0.52 import 0.56 support 0.66 atroc 0.51 chapter 0.49 effort 0.45 violenc 0.51 support 0.54 atroc 0.64 principl 0.50 direct 0.49 member 0.45 import 0.49 countri 0.54 communiti 0.64 world 0.50 interven 0.49 peopl 0.45 peopl 0.49 situat 0.54 import 0.64 situat 0.49 oper 0.49 action 0.42 support 0.49 popul 0.51 advis 0.62 develop 0.48 question 0.49 parti 0.42 concept 0.47 principl 0.49 world 0.60 violat 0.48 situat 0.49 peac 0.42 situat 0.46 includ 0.48 concept 0.58 general 0.47 unabl 0.49 resolut 0.42 principl 0.45 children 0.47 report 0.58 paragraph 0.46 unwil 0.49 commit 0.38 effort 0.44 peac 0.47 action 0.51 societi 0.46 debat 0.45 develop 0.38 children 0.43 effort 0.45 general 0.51 time 0.45
seek 0.45 human 0.38 right 0.42 violenc 0.45 role 0.51 earli 0.43
make 0.41 secretarygener 0.38 war 0.42 peacekeep 0.43 implement 0.49 communiti 0.41 rebuild 0.41 time 0.38 genocid 0.41 peopl 0.43 assembl 0.47 inform 0.41
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
harm 0.37 fail 0.35 implement 0.41 commit 0.37 includ 0.47 organ 0.39 idea 0.37 right 0.35 law 0.41 implement 0.37 principl 0.44 right 0.39
peac 0.37 act 0.31 outcom 0.38 violat 0.37 act 0.42 govern 0.38
chang 0.33 call 0.31 includ 0.38 genocid 0.36 adopt 0.42 resolut 0.38 concept 0.33 ensur 0.31 work 0.37 action 0.35 primari 0.42 council 0.36 conflict 0.33 import 0.31 action 0.37 author 0.34 summit 0.42 special 0.36 exercis 0.33 oblig 0.31 commit 0.36 ensur 0.34 crimin 0.40
focus 0.33 region 0.31 peac 0.34 secretarygener 0.34 law 0.40
involv 0.33 rest 0.31 regard 0.34 mission 0.33 court 0.38
popul 0.33 work 0.31 role 0.34 mandat 0.33 mass 0.38
countri 0.34 women 0.32 call 0.35
ethnic 0.34 forc 0.31 commit 0.35
secretarygener 0.34 war 0.31 humanitarian 0.35 cleans 0.33 account 0.31 african 0.33
effect 0.33 continu 0.31 peopl 0.33
peacekeep 0.33 concept 0.31 time 0.33
general 0.32 parti 0.31 arm 0.31
member 0.32 capac 0.31
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
issu 0.32 continu 0.31
women 0.31 countri 0.31
assist 0.30 mechan 0.31
concern 0.30 organ 0.31
displac 0.30 situat 0.31
report 0.30 continu 0.30
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
. (2014). : .
. (2010). (2 ed.). :
.
Ching-chihChen . (2011).
: new approaches to historical studies. : .
. (2012). : .
: .
· . (1998). – (
, Trans.). : .
. (1996). . : .
. (2011). :
: .
. (2012). ( , Trans.). :
.
Hampsher-Monk, I. (2010). ( , Trans.). :
.
‧
Acharya, A. (2009). Whose ideas matter?: agency and power in Asian regionalism. New York: Cornell University Press.
Alston, P., & MacDonald, E. (2008). Human rights, intervention and the use of force. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Annan, K. (2000). We the peoples: the role of the United Nations in the 21st century: United Nations, Department of Public Information New York, NY.
Ball, T., Farr, J., & Hanson, R. L. (1989). Political innovation and conceptual change (Vol. 11): Cambridge University Press.
Beck, R. J., Arend, A. C., Vander Lugt, R. D., & Kelsen, H. (1996).
International rules: approaches from international law and
international relations: Oxford University Press New York and Oxford.
Bellamy, A. (2012). R2P–Dead or Alive? The Responsibility to Protect–From Evasive to Reluctant Action? (pp. 11-28). Johannesburg, South Africa:
HSF, ISS, KAS & SAIIA.
Bellamy, A. J. (2011). Global politics and the responsibilty to protect : from words to deeds. London ; New York: Routledge.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics : investigating language structure and use. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Byers, M. (1999). Custom, power, and the power of rules : international relations and customary international law. Cambridge England ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cap, P. (2002). Explorations in political discourse : methodological and critical perspectives. Frankfurt am Main ; New York: P. Lang.
‧
Checkel, J. T. (2007). International institutions and socialization in Europe.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, R. H., & Voïnov Kohler, J. (2008). The responsibility to protect : the global moral compact for the 21st century (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dai, X. (2007). The study of international institutions
International Institutions and National Policies: Cambridge University Press.
Donnelly, J. (2000). Realism and international relations. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Dougherty, J. E., & Pfaltzgraff, R. L. (2001). Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey: Longman.
Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2013). International Relations Theories:Discipline and Diversity: Oxford University Press.
Dunoff, J. L., & Pollack, M. A. (2013). Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations : the state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, C. (2008). The power of words in international relations : birth of an anti-whaling discourse. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Evans, G. (2009). The Responsibility to Protect: From an Idea to an
International Norm. In J. V. K. Richard H. Cooper (Ed.), Responsibility to Rrotect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century (pp. 15-30).
New York Palgrave Macmillan
Evans, G. J. (2008). The responsibility to protect : ending mass atrocity crimes once and for all. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Fierke, K. M., & Jorgensen, K. E. (2001). Constructing International Relations:
the next generation: ME Sharpe.
Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K. G., & McRobbie, C. J. (2012). Second international handbook of science education: Springer.
Glanville, L. (2013). Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: A New History: University of Chicago Press.
‧
Hampsher-Monk, I., Tilmans, K., & van Vree, F. (1998). History of concepts:
Comparative perspectives: Amsterdam University Press.
Hathaway, O. A., & Koh, H. H. (2005). Foundations of international law and politics. New York, N.Y.: Foundation Press : Thomson West.
Hobson, A. (2004). The Oxford Dictionary of Difficult Words: Oxford University Press.
ICISS. (2001a). The responsibility to protect : report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa:
International Development Research Centre.
ICISS. (2001b). The Responsibility to Protect: Research, Bibliography,
Background : Supplementary Volume to the Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottwa: International Development Research Centre.
Jackson, R. H. (2007). Sovereignty : evolution of an idea. Cambridge: Polity.
Kalmo, H., & Skinner, Q. (2010). Sovereignty in fragments : the past, present and future of a contested concept. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Cultural norms and national security: police and military in postwar Japan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1989). International institutions: two approaches: Springer.
Klosko, G. (2011). The Oxford handbook of the history of political philosophy.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Klotz, A. (1995). Norms in international relations : the struggle against apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Klotz, A., & Prakash, D. (2008). Qualitative methods in international relations : a pluralist guide. Basingstoke England ; New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Krasner, S. D. (1983). International regimes: Cornell University Press.
Lehto, M. (2014). Slowly but surely? The challenge of the responsibility to protect. In R. L. a. J. Petman (Ed.), International Law-making (pp. 283-297). New York: Routledge.
‧
Lowe, V. (2000). The Politics of Law-Making: Atre the Method and Character of Norm Creatuon Changing? In M. Byers (Ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics New York: Oxford University Press.
Melching, W., & Velema, W. (1994). Main Trends in Cultural History: Ten Essays: Rodopi.
Miner, G. (2012). Practical text mining and statistical analysis for non-structured text data applications (1st ed.). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
Moravcsik, A. (1992). Liberalism and international relations theory: Center for International Affairs, Harvard University Cambridge, MA.
Morgenthau, H. J., Thompson, K. W., & Clinton, W. D. (2006). Politics among nations : the struggle for power and peace. Boston: McGraw-Hill
Higher Education.
percy, S. (2007). Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. NY: oxford Unversity Press.
Sandholtz, W., & Stiles, K. W. (2008). International Norms and Cycles of Change.
Sandholtz, W., & Stiles, K. W. (2009). International norms and cycles of change. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Shawki, N., & Cox, M. (2009). Negotiating sovereignty and human rights : actors and issues in contemporary human rights politics. Farnham, England ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub.
Sinclair, A. (2010). International relations theory and international law : a critical approach. Cambridge ;: New York : Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics: Cambridge University Press.
Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (2012). International relations theory (5th ed.).
Boston: Longman.
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
. (2004). . , 1, 82. Retrieved
from
http://sfx.lib.nccu.edu.tw/sfxlcl41?sid=google&aulast=%E6%9D%8E%E5%A E%8F%E5%9B%BE&atitle=%E8%A5%BF%E6%96%B9%E6%80%9D%E6
%83%B3%E5%8F%B2%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%96%B9%E6%B3
%95%E7%9A%84%E6%BC%94%E8%BF%9B&title=%E6%B5%99%E6%
B1%9F%E5%AD%A6%E5%88%8A%2F%23%2F%E6%B5%99%E6%B1%
9F%E5%AD%B8%E5%88%8A&volume=1&date=2004&spage=82&issn=10 03-420X
. (2003). :
? (19), 113-138.
. (2013). : .
(4), 171-221.
. (1977). . , 04, 357-383.
. (2014). . , 2, i-vi.
Retrieved from
http://www.linkingbooks.com.tw/lnb/top/9789570842661p1.aspx
. (1997). , [ ] - .
, 7(4), 151-179.
. (1997). [ ] . ,
36(12), 1-22.
. (2002). . , 41(2),
43-67.
‧
Acharya, A. (2013). The R2P and Norm Diffusion: Towards A Framework of Norm Circulation. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5(4), 466-479.
Annan, K. (1999). Two concepts of sovereignty. The economist, 18(9), 1999.
Armitage, D. (2004). THE FIFTY YEARS'RIFT: INTELLECTUAL HISTORY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. Modern Intellectual History, 1(01), 97-109.
Axelrod, R. (1986). An Evolutionary Approach to Norms. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095-1111.
Bellamy, A. J. (2006). Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(2), 143-169.
Bellamy, A. J. (2011). Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(3), 263-269.
doi:10.1017/s0892679411000219
Devetak, R. (2014). Historiographical foundations of modern international thought: Histories of the European states-system from Florence to Göttingen. History of European Ideas(ahead-of-print), 1-16.
Diehl, G. G. a. P. F. (1992). Toward a Theory of International Norms: Some Conceptual and Measurement Issues. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(4), 634-664.
Epstein, C. (2013). Constructivism or the eternal return of universals in
International Relations. Why returning to language is vital to prolonging the owl’s flight. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 499-519.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual review of political science, 4(1), 391-416.
Florini, A. (1996). The evolution of international norms. International Studies Quarterly, 363-389.
Gallagher, A. M. (2012). A Clash of Responsibility: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(3), 334-357.
‧
Gries, S. T. (2015). Some Current Quantitative Problems in Corpus Linguistics and a Sketch of Some Solutions. [
]. , 16(1), 93-117.
doi:10.1177/1606822x14556606
Gurowitz, A. (2006). The Diffusion of International Norms: Why Identy Matters. International Politics, 43(3), 305-341.
Harris, G. E. (2007). Persuading Consensus: legitimating norms and norms legitimating-Some Implications for Diplomacy. Cross-sections, 3, 16.
Herrmann, R. K., & Shannon, V. P. (2001). Defending international norms:
The role of obligation, material interest, and perception in decision making. International Organization, 55(03), 621-654.
Hirsch, M. B.-J. (2014). Ideational change and the emergence of the
international norm of truth and reconciliation commissions. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 810-833.
Hofferberth, M., & Weber, C. (2015). Lost in translation: a critique of constructivist norm research. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(1), 75-103.
Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory.
International Security, 23(1), 171-200.
Howard, P. (2004). Why not invade North Korea? Threats, language games, and US foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 48(4), 805-828.
Keohane, R. O. (1998). International institutions: Can interdependence work?
Foreign Policy, 82-194.
Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory.
International Security, 20(1), 39-51.
Koslowski, R., & Kratochwil, F. V. (1994). Understanding change in
international politics: the Soviet empire's demise and the international system. International Organization, 48(02), 215-247.
Krasner, S. D. (1976). State power and the structure of international trade.
World Politics, 28(03), 317-347.
‧
Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(02), 185-205.
Kvastad, N. B. (1977). Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Ideas.
Journal of the History of Ideas, 157-174.
Mandelbaum, M. (1965). The history of ideas, intellectual history, and the history of philosophy. History and Theory, 5, 33-66.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions.
International Security, 19(3), 5-49.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1995). A realist reply. International Security, 82-93.
Miglietti, S. (2014). Meaning in a Changing Context: Towards an
Interdisciplinary Approach to Authorial Revision. History of European Ideas, 40(4), 474-494.
Moses, J. (2013). Sovereignty as irresponsibility? A Realist critique of the Responsibility to Protect. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 113-135. doi:10.1017/s0260210512000113
O'Connor, B., David Bamman and Noah A. Smith. (2011). Computational Text Analysis for Social Science: Model Assumptions and Complexity. Paper presented at the NIPS Workshop on Computional Social Science and the Widsom of Crowds.
Orchard, P. (2012). The evolution of the responsibility to protect: at a
crossroads? International Affairs, 88(2), 377-386. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01077.x
Piiparinen, T. (2012). Sovereignty-building: three images of positive
sovereignty projected through Responsibility to Protect. Global Change, Peace & Security, 24(3), 405-424.
Richter, M. (1990). Reconstructing the history of political languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. History and Theory, 38-70.
Slaughter, A.-M., Tulumello, A. S., & Wood, S. (1998). International law and international relations theory: a new generation of interdisciplinary scholarship. American Journal of International Law, 367-397.
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Smith, S. (2000). The discipline of international relations: still an American social science? The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 2(3), 374-402.
Weeds, J., & Weir, D. (2005). Co-occurrence retrieval: A flexible framework for lexical distributional similarity. Computational Linguistics, 31(4), 439-475.
Weiss, T. G. (2006). R2P after 9/11 and the World Summit. Wis. Int'l LJ, 24, 741.
Wiener, A. (2009). Enacting meaning-in-use: qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies, 35(01), 175-193.
doi:doi:10.1017/S0260210509008377
Williams, P. D., & Bellamy, A. J. (2012). Principles, Politics, and Prudence:
Libya, the Responsibility to Protect, and the Use of Military Force.
Global Governance, 18(3), 273-297. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000307484800003