• 沒有找到結果。

Channel equalization architecture

5.3 A RCHITECTURE OF C HANNEL E QUALIZER

5.3.2 Channel equalization architecture

The hardware architecture of the proposed channel equalization is shown in Fig. 5.9. In the proposed algorithm, the hardware consists of one (2m1) bits subtractor, and (2m1+ m2) bits

registers. One register gister is for keeping

utput stable. The minuend is selected from the dividend after shifting (m2-n2-1) bits right, updates the minuend every cycle. The other re

o

Consider 2K mode here, (4K and 8K the memory storage are 2X and 4X)

Used to implement the Time domain non-causal

property

*(1-ß) H for Scatter pilot

(A<<1), and (sub<<1) (t 2. The subtrahend is the divisor. The control signals of MUX1 and MUX2 are depends on each state and sign bit of sub. The q[k] is se of th gn bit o rther e q[k] is one bit output per cycle, so it will through an S/P aft m2cycles to become ts outp ratio of working

lock rate and symbol rate is {1:m2}.

he result of subtraction) by MUX1 and MUX

inver e si f sub. Fu more, th

er an m2 bi ut. The

c

Fig. 5.9 Hardware architecture for proposed channel equalization

According to implementation loss is less than 0.15dB in equalization, we define the input and output formats are (12, 10) [28]. So we need 12 cycles for one division operation.

Furthermore, in DVB-T/H system, because of 64-Qam, it will provide a 6 times clock rate (about 54.8 Mhz) for Viterbi decoder in general design. In our design, because of other function needed, it already provides a 12 times clock rat (about 109MHe z). Here we provide two structures for comparisons. One is 12 cycle architecture, and it is the proposed design in paper. The other is 6 cycle architecture, but it still needs 12 cycles for one symbol division.

The clock rate is not fas e enough through put.

ere we can double the hardware and add some muxs to achieve the throughput.

e .10, and the 6 cycle architecture is shown in

Fig.5

t enough, so we can execute parallel to achiev H

Th 12 cycle architecture is shown in Fig. 5 .11.

Fig. 5.10 Proposed architecture for 12 cycle

Fig. 5.11 Proposed architecture for 6 cycle

The timing diagram of these two structures is shown in Fig. 5.12. We can find the output latency is one symbol in 12 cycle architecture, but the latency is two symbols in 6 cycle

We can find each operation is twice times in 6 cycle architecture. But it can be chosen by HD_A

Fig. 5.12 Timing diagram

The synthesis results and gate-level simulation results by Prime-power with UMC 0.18um cell library of divider model are shown in Table 5-3. In this table we can find in our proposed design the hardware cast can be saved 90.5%, even in 6 cycle architecture, it still can be saved 81% of the original design. Furthermore, the power consumption can be reduced 59.9%, and it still can be reduced 59% in 6 cycle architecture. And the functions are consistent in three cases.

In Table 5-4, it shows the improvements ratio in the equalizer. We can find the hardware ratio of dividers in equalizer. In original design, division gate count is 62.8% of equalizer. In proposed design, we can find the division gate count is 13.9% of equalizer. So the equalizer gate count can be reduced to 43%

power is reduced by 17% in equalizer

of original design. The hardware cost is saved by 57% and .

Table 5-3 Synthesis and gate-level simulation results Divider architecture Single cycle division

model

6 cycles 12 cycles (proposed in paper) Clock rate 9.1 (64/7) Mhz [1] 54.8 Mhz 109 Mhz

Clock period 109 ns 18.16 ns 9.08 ns

Gate count (*1) 5901 1122

(561 x 2)

564

Gate count ratio of original design

100% 19% 9.5%

Power per symbol (*2) 2.184 mW 0.686 mW (0.343 mW x 2)

0.658 mW

Power ratio of original 100% 31.4% 30.1%

design

Table 5-4 Comparisons for cost and power Equalizer Gate count

(excluding SRAM)

Power consumption

Proposed design 8103 14.92 mW

Original design[28] 18777 17.98 mW

Improvements ratio 57% (10674) 17% (3.06 mW)

Chapter 6 .

Conclusion and Future Work

After the algorithm and perform nalysis, the proposed low complexity adaptive weight channel estimator for pilot signal can improve th nce 0.3dB under dynamic channel with Doppler 60Hz. Furthermore, it will not degrade the performance, but the fixed

we in high cts.

In choosing interpolation methods, we analyze the noise term ect between polynomial interpolatio ds. In noise floor region, high order interpolation methods will get better performance. However, we should focus on the QEF region. We can find the linear interpolation will better than cubic interpolation in QEF region under channel which specified by standards.

As we kn ders cost alizer wer can be

further saved by exploiting add-shift divider structure. The modified division structure will save 90.5% hardware cost and 59.9% power consumption in divider itself. The hardware saved by 57% and power reduced by 17% in equalizer. Furthermore, this method can be used not only DVB-T/H system, but also the system which working clock rate is not the critical design issue.

ance a

e performa

ight estimator will failed Doppler effe

eff n metho

ow the divi are dominant the equ cost. The area and po

Bibliography

[1] Rechard Van Nee, and Ramjee Prasad, “OFDM for Wireless Multimedia

ing Structure,

ov. 1999.

[6]

. 2004.

P.Hoeher, S. Kaiser , and P. Robertson, “Two dimensional pilot-symbol-aided channel estimation by Wiener filtering”, IEEE ICSASSP’97, Munich, Germany, Apr. 1997

M. Speth, S. Fechtel, G. Fock, and H. Meyr, “Optimum Receiver Design for OFDM-Based Broadband Transmission-Part II: A Case Study”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Apr. 2001.

1] Y. Zhao and A. Huang, “A novel channel estimation method for OFDM mobile Communications”, pp.20-51, 2000.

[2] Salzberg, B.R, “Performance of an Efficient Parallel Data Transmission System,” IEEE Trans. Comm., Vol. COM-15, pp.805-813, Dec. 1967.

[3] ESTI EN 300 744 V1.5.1, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Fram Channel Coding and Modulation for Digital Terrestrial Television,” Nov. 2004.

[4] ESTI EN 300 401 V1.3.3, “Radio Broadcasting Systems; Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) to Mobile, Portable and Fixed Receivers,” May 2001.

[5] IEEE 802.11a IEEE Standards for Wireless LAN Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications, N

IEEE P802.15 Working Group, “Multi-band OFDM Physical Layer Proposal for IEEE 802.15 Task Group 3a,” July 2003.

[7] ESTI EN 302 304 V1.1.1, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Transmission System for Handheld Terminals (DVB-H),” Nov. 2004.

[8] ETSI EN 301 192 V1.4.1, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); DVB specification for Data Broadcasting,” Nov

[9]

[10]

[1

communication systems based on pilot signals and transform-domain processing”, 1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference, May 1997.

2] M. Nakamura and et al.,“A study on an MMSE ICI canceller for OFDM under

ommunication Proceedings, Sept 2003.

any, Sept 2003.

IEEE Transaction on Wireless

[17] System”, IEEE

[18] L. Erup, F l Modems-Part II: Implementation and

[19] F erical Analysis”, New York:McGraw-Hill,1956,

[20] ltipath

[21] Miloš D. Ercegovac, Arithmetic”, MK publishers, 2004, ch.5.

[1

Doppler-spread channel”, in proc. of IEEE 2003 14th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobil Radio C

[13] V. Fischer, A. Kurpiers and D. Karsunkc, “ICI reduction method for OFDM systems”, 8th International OFDM-Workshop 2003, Hamburg, Germ

[14] J. Rinne, M. Renfors ,“Equalization of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing signals”, IEEE GLOBECOM’94, Nov 1994.

[15] T. Kella, “Decision-directed channel estimation for supporting higher terminal velocities in OFDM based WLANs”, IEEE GLOBECOM’03, Dec 2003.

[16] S. Tomasin, A. Gorokhov, H-B. Yang, J-P Linnartz, “Iterative interference cancellation and channel estimation for mobile OFDM”,

Communications, Jan 2005.

T-A. Lin, C-Y. Lee, “Predictive Equalizer Design for DVB-T ISCAS2005, May 2005.

.M. Gardner, “Interpolation in Digita

performance”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, June 1993.

.B. Hildebrand, “Introduction to Num Section 2.5.

R.S. Sherratt, S.L. Linfoot, “Deterministic equalization and results of a DVB-T mu

equalizer for both 16-QAM and 64-QAM operation”, Consumer Electronics, IEEE Trans.

Vol.49, Issue 1, Feb. 2003.

Tomás Lang, “Digital

[22] Cheng-Wei Kuang, “Timing Synchronization for DVB-T System,” MS Thesis, NCTU,

Sep. 2004.

MOTIVATE report to the 36th DVB-TM meeting, 26,27 J

[23] anuary 2000.

[25] 1974.

Receiver for DVB-T/H

[29]

l 2006.

[24] P. Robertson and S. Kaiser, “The Effects of Doppler Spreads in OFDM(A) Mobile Radio Systems,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf., Vol. 1, pp. 329-333, Sep. 1999.

W. C. Jakes, “Microwave Mobile Communications,” John Wiley & Sons Inc.,

[26] M. Patzold and F. Laue, “Statistical properties of Jakes’ fading channel simulator”, 1998 IEEE 48th Vehicular Technology Conference, May 1998.

[27] P. Dent, G.E. Bottomley, and T.Croft, “Jakes fading model revisited”, IEE Electronic Letters, June 1993.

[28] L-F. Chen, Y. Chen, L-C. Chien, Y-H. Ma, C-H. Lee, Y-W. Lin, C-C. Lin, H-Y. Liu, T-Yi.

Hsu, C-Y. Lee, ”A 1.8V 250mW COFDM Basedband Applications”, ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 2006.

Yu-Wei Lin, “The Matrix Prefetch Buffer Based FFT Processor,” MS Thesis, NCTU, Jun.

2003.

[30] Y-H. Ma, L-F. Chen, C-Y. Lee, “A Channel Equalizer Design for COFDM System“, IEEE VLSI-DAT'06, Apri

作 者 簡 歷

姓名 :馬英豪

學歷: 1988. 9 ~ 1994. 6 新竹縣立長安國民小學 1997. 6 新竹縣立湖口國民中學

2000. 9 ~ 2004. 6 國立交通大學 電子工程學系 學士 出生地 :台灣省桃園縣

出生日期:1981. 12. 02

1994. 9 ~

1997. 9 ~ 2000. 6 國立新竹高中

2004. 9 ~ 2006. 7 國立交通大學 電子研究所 系統組 碩士

得 獎 事 績

2005/05 2005 全國 IC 設計競賽優等獎 2006/05 2006 全國 IC 設計競賽佳作獎

發 表 論 文

-Chung Chien, Ying-Hao Ma, Chia-Hao Lee, Yu-Wei Lin, Chien-Ching Lin, Hsuan-Yu Liu, Terng-Yin Hsu, Chen-Yi Lee, “A 1.8V 250mW COFDM Basedband Receiver for DVB-T/H Applications”, ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 262-263, San Francisco, USA, Feb. 2006.

ing Ha Equalizer Design for

COFDM System”, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on VLSI Design, T'06), pp. 75-78, HsinChu, Taiwan, April 2006.

Yi th

2D Channel Estimation Method for DVB-T/H Application”, accepted by 17th VLSI Design/CAD Symposium, Aug. 2006.

z Lei-Fone Chen, Yuan Chen, Lu

z Y - o Ma, Lei-Fone Chen, Chen-Yi Lee, “A Channel

Automation ,and Test (VLSI-DA

z Chia-Hao Lee, Lei-Fone Chen, ng-Hao Ma, Chen-Yi Lee, “Phase Alignment wi