• 沒有找到結果。

4-7 The characteristics of Rubrene doped CBP layer of triple hole blocking layer for white OLEDs

The schematic energy band diagrams of devices are shown in Figure 4.24. The device with

52

doped Rubrene into hole blocking layer for CBP is designed as following:

Device P: ITO/MoO3 (5 nm)/NPB (35 nm)/CBP: Rubrene (6 nm)/DPVBi (20 nm)/CBP (2 nm)/DPVBi

(20 nm)/CBP (2 nm)/BPhen (10 nm)/LiF (0.5nm)/Al (100 nm)

Device Q: ITO/MoO3 (5 nm)/NPB (35 nm)/CBP (6 nm)/DPVBi (20 nm)/CBP: Rubrene (2 nm)/DPVBi

(20 nm)/CBP (2 nm)/BPhen (10 nm)/LiF (0.5nm)/Al (100 nm)

Device R: ITO/MoO3 (5 nm)/NPB (35 nm)/CBP (6 nm)/DPVBi (20 nm)/CBP (2 nm)/DPVBi (20

nm)/CBP: Rubrene (2 nm)/BPhen (10 nm)/LiF (0.5nm)/Al (100 nm)

Device S: ITO/MoO3 (5 nm)/NPB (35 nm)/CBP (6 nm)/DPVBi (10 nm)/CBP: Rubrene (2 nm)/DPVBi

(30 nm)/CBP (2 nm)/BPhen (10 nm)/LiF (0.5nm)/Al (100 nm)

In the device, the NPB is used as hole-injecting layer and hole-transport layer. The CBP layers

are used as the EML and the HBLs. In Fig. 4.24, HBL1, HBL2 and HBL3 represented the HBL

that was close to the anode side, in the middle, and close to cathode, respectively, which forms

so-called the THBL that can control the carrier recombination in the EML to adjust the emission

color of devices. The Rubrene is used as a guest doping material to emit the yellow light for

achieving the white light emission, and the DPVBi is used as blue-emitting layer. The Rubrene is

doped into the CBP layer rather than the DPVBi layer. This is due to the fact that CBP has higher

carrier trapping ability than that of DPVBi. Nevertheless, if the Rubrene is doped into the DPVBi

layer, it will cause the attenuation in luminous efficiency of DVPBi. Figure 4.25 (a) shows the

EL spectra of devices at current density of 100mA/cm2. The peak wavelengths of non-doped

53

device are at 416 nm and 468 nm originating from CBP and DPVBi, respectively. It shows the

main peak emission from CBP (HBL1), and minor peak emission from DPVBi (I), which implies

that the recombination zone of excitons is at the range of CBP (HBL1) and DPVBi (I). To

confirm the excitons recombination zone and to achieve white light emission, the Rubrene is

doped into the CBP (HBL1) in device A. The emission peaks of device P are at 460 nm and 564

nm wavelength from DPVBi (I) and Rubrene, respectively. It indicates that most excitons

recombination happens within the DPVBi (I) layer and the CBP (HBL1) layer, resulting in the

yellow light emission of Rubrene. In addition, the emission peak from CBP (HBL1) in device P

is disappeared due to the energy transfer from host to guest, i.e., CBP (HBL1) to Rubrene.

Furthermore, a part of blue light emitted from DPVBi (I) is absorbed by Rubrene molecular,

leading to the reduction in emission peak of DPVBi (I). However, the intensity of yellow light is

higher than that of blue light. Hence, in order to reach the balance between intensity of yellow

light and blue light, the doping position of Rubrene changed to the CBP (HBL2) of device Q,

which can prevent the blue light emitted from the DPVBi (I) layer from absorbing by the

Rubrene. As a result, the relative intensity of yellow to blue emission decreases in device Q. It is

also found that the intensity of blue emission is higher than that of yellow emission, indicating

that most of excitons recombination is at the range of CBP (HBL1)/DPVBi (I) while few

exctions trapping and formation is at CBP (HBL2) layer. In device R, the Rubrene is doped into

the CBP (HBL3), and the intensity of yellow light is almost negligible. It is attributed to the fact

54

that the Rubrene doping layer is far away from the exction recombination zone, which is

consistent with previous discussion. The main exctions recombination zone of device is at the

interface of CBP (HBL1)/DPVBi (I), and the intensity of blue emission in device Q is higher

than that of yellow emission, so the thickness of the DPVBi (I) layer nearing the CBP (HBL1)

should be decreased to balance the yellow and blue emission. This is the reason why the device S

based on the structure of device Q is fabricated. In device S, the thickness of DPVBi (I) layer

decreased to 10nm and the thickness of DPVBi (II) layer increased to 30 nm. Compared with

device Q, the yellow intensity in device S is enhanced while the blue intensity is a little decrease.

This is due to the fact that the amount of exciton in CBP (HBL2) increases and the amount of

exciton in DPVBi (I) layer reduces, resulting from a decrease in the thickness of DPVBi (I) layer.

The intensity of yellow emission from Rubrene is almost the same with the intensity of blue

emission from DPVBi in device S by adjusting the thickness of DPVBi layer based on the

structure of device Q. Figure 4.25(b) shows the CIE coordinates of various devices at current

density of 100 mA/cm2. The CIE coordinates of device P-R are (0.431, 0.419), (0.258, 0.331)

and (0.218, 0.292), respectively. It can be seen that the CIE coordinates of device P-R are far

away the standard CIE coordinate of white emission. The CIE coordinate of device S is (0.322,

0.368) and is close to the standard CIE coordinate of white emission.

Figure 4.26 (a) shows the EL spectra of device S at applied voltage of 8-12V. It can be seen

that the EL spectra show 416, 468 and 560 nm wavelengths for CBP, DPVBi and Rubrene,

55

respectively. The ratio of blue and yellow emission intensity in EL spectra is almost the same at

different applied voltages, indicating that the excitons recombination zone of device S is steady.

In other words, the ratio is not change as the applied voltage switches. Figure 4.26 (b) shows CIE

coordinates of device S at different applied voltages. The CIE coordinates of device S at 8-12 V

are (0.321, 0.379), (0.324, 0.393), (0.319, 0.389), (0.315, 0.379) and (0.322, 0.368), respectively.

The difference in CIE coordinates of device S is ±△x, y = (0.001, 0.011). The result shows that the

excitons can be confined in the recombination zone by using THBL structure, i.e., the holes are

confined and accumulated in the HOMO level of CBP (HBL1)/ DPVBi (I)/ CBP (HBL2)

potential well in device S due to the existence of potential barrier at the CBP (HBL1)/ DPVBi (I)

and DPVBi (I)/ CBP (HBL2) heterointerfaces. As a result, the balance of electron and hole can

be improved by using the THBL structure, and thus the CIE coordinates stability of device S is

achieved.

The current density-voltage, luminance-voltage and luminous efficiency-current density

characteristics of devices were shown in Fig. 4.27. At a current density of 10mA/cm2, the turn-on

voltages are 6.9V, 9V, 11.2V, and 8.2V for devices P-S, respectively. The turn-on voltage of

device P is lower than that of other devices. It is attributed to the fact that the barrier of energy

level between NPB and CBP is 0.8 eV and is higher than that of between NPB and Rubrene,

resulting that the hole in device P can easily inject into Rubrene of bipolar molecules in CBP

(HBL1) due to a substantially higher carrier affinity [28]. Besides, it can be seen that the turn-on

56

voltage of device S is lower than that of device Q. The phenomenon is attributed to the fact that

the DPVBi (I) layer thickness of device S becomes thinner than that of device Q, which enables

Rubrene in CBP (HBL2) to be more close to the recombination zone of exciton. Furthermore, it

is found that the efficiency of device P has a roll-off phenomenon (see Fig. 4.27 (c)). This is due

to the fact that there is a peak wavelength of 460 nm in normalized EL spectra and it enhances as

the increase at applied voltage of 7-10V, as shown in inset of Fig. 4.27 (c). The minority hole

blocked by barrier of NPB/ CBP (HBL1) will cross the barrier of CBP (HBL1) and inject into

DPVBi (I) as the increasing voltage, leading to the decrease of excitons at CBP (HBL1) and the

reduction of energy transfer from CBP host to Rubrene guest, and thereby decrease efficiency of

Rubrene. However, the whole efficiency of device P is reduced with increasing current density.

In contrast, the roll-off phenomenon is barely for device S. The maximum luminance and

maximum luminous efficiency of the device S is 2410 cd/m2, 2.05 cd/A at 12V, respectively. The

result indicates that stable luminous efficiency can be achieved by the improved carrier balance

(as confining of holes).

57

相關文件