• 沒有找到結果。

Chapter 6 Conclusions and Future Work

6.2 Future Work

The normalization factor β and the offset factor α influence the decoder BER performance quite large. Through our research, we found that our proposed dynamic normalized-offset technique and dynamic normalization technique [23] have

similar BER decoding performance. The other idea is to dynamically adjust the two factors α and β in the same time. The threshold values of α and β may be obtained through simulations. Moreover, as mentioned in Appendix A, there are a lot of different codeword lengths and code rates in 802.16e standard. Our future work is to integrate the multi-mode 802.16e LDPC decoder design.

Appendix A

LDPC Codes Specification in IEEE 802.16e

OFDMA

The LDPC code in IEEE802.16e is a systematic linear block code, where k systematic information bits are encoded to n coded bits by adding m= −n k parity-check bits. The code-rate is k n/ .

The LDPC code in IEEE802.16e is defined based on a parity-check matrix H of size m n× that is expanded from a binary base matrix H with size b mb× , where nb m= ⋅z mb and n= ⋅ . In this standard, there are six different base matrices. One z nb for the rate 1/2 code is depicted in Figure A.1. Two different ones for two rate 2/3 codes, type A is in Figure A.2 and type B is in Figure A.3. Two different ones for two rate 3/4 codes, type A is in Figure A.4 and type B is in Figure A.5. One for the rate 5/6 code is depicted in Figure A.6. In these base matrices, size n is an integer equal to b 24 and the expansion factor z is an integer between 24 and 96. Therefore, we can compute the minimal code length as nmin =24 24 576× = bits and the maximum code length as nmax =24 96 2304× = bits.

For codes 1/2, 2/3B, 3/4A, 3/4B, and 5/6, the shift sizes ( , , )p f i j for a code size corresponding to the expansion factor z are derived from f p i j , which is the ( , ) element at the i-th row, j-th column in the base matrices, by scaling ( , )p i j proportionally as

0 permutation matrix. The permutation matrix represents a circular right shift by

( , , )

Figure A.1 Base matrix of the rate 1/2 code

Rate 2/3 A code:

Figure A.2 Base matrix of the rate 2/3, type A code

Rate 2/3 B code:

Figure A.3 Base matrix of the rate 2/3, type B code

Rate 3/4 A code:

Figure A.4 Base matrix of the rate 3/4, type A code

Rate 3/4 B code:

Figure A.5 Base matrix of the rate 3/4, type A code

Rate 5/6 code:

Figure A.6 Base matrix of the rate 5/6 code

References

[1] R. G. Gallager, Low-density parity-check codes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1963.

[2] D. J. C. Mackay and R. M. Neal, “Near Shannon limit performance of low density parity check codes,” Electron. Lett., Vol. 32, pp. 1645-1646, Aug. 1996.

[3] T. J. Richardson and R. L. Urbabke, “Efficient encoding of low-density parity-check codes,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 47, pp. 638-656, Feb.

2001.

[4] D. J. C. Mackay, S. T. Wilson, and M. C. Davey, “Comparison of constructions of irregular gallager codes,’’ IEEE Trans. Comm., Vol. 47, pp. 1449-1454, Oct.

1999.

[5] S. J. Johnson and S. R. Weller, “A family of irregular LDPC codes with low encoding complexity,” IEEE Comm. Lett., Vol. 7, pp. 79-81, Feb. 2003.

[6] J. Chen, A. Dholakia, E. Eleftheriou, and M.P.C. Fosoorier, and X.Y. Hu,

“Reduced-complexity decoding of LDPC codes,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 53, pp. 1288-1299, July 2005.

[7] R. Tanner, “A recursive approach to low complexity codes,” IEEE Trans. Inform.

Theory, Vol. 27, pp. 533-547, Sep. 1981.

[8] M. Luby, M. Mitzenmacher, A. Shokrollahi, D. Spielman, and V. Stemann,

“Practical loss-resilient codes,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 47, pp. 569-584, Feb. 2001.

[9] T. J. Richardson, M. A. Shokrollashi, and R. L. Urbanke, “Design of

capacity-approaching irregular low-density parity-check codes,” IEEE Trans.

Inform. Theory, Vol. 47, pp. 619-637, Feb. 2001.

[10] D. J. C. Mackay, “Good error-correcting codes based on very sparse matrices,”

IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 45, pp. 399-431, Mar. 1999.

[11] F. R. Kschischang, B. J. Frey, and H. A. Loeliger, “Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 47, pp. 498-519, Feb.

2001.

[12] H. Futaki and T. Ohtuski, “Low-density parity-check (LDPC) coded OFDM systems,” IEEE VTS, Vol. 1, pp. 82-86, Fall. 2001.

[13] X. Y. Hu, E. Eleftheriou, D. M. Arnold, and A. Dholakia, “Efficient implementation of the sum-product algorithm for decoding LDPC codes,” IEEE GLOBECOM’01, Vol. 02, pp. 1036-1036E, Nov. 2001.

[14] Jinghu Chen and Marc P.C. Fossorier, “Near Optimum Universal Belief Propagation Based Decoding of Low-Density Parity Check Codes,” IEEE Trans.

on Commun., Vol. 50, pp. 583-587, NO.3 Mar. 2002.

[15] Marjan Karkooti and Joseph R. Cavallaro, “Semi-parallel reconfigurable architectures for real-time LDPC decoding,” IEEE ITCC’04 Vol. 65, pp.

683-689.

[16] Z. Wang, Y. Chen, and K. K. Parhi, “Area efficient decoding of quasi-cyclic low density parity check codes,” IEEE ICASSP’04, Vol. 5, pp. 49-52, May. 2004.

[17] A. J. Blanksby and C. J. Howland, “A 690-mW 1-Gb/s 1024-b, rate-1/2 low-density parity-check code decoder,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 37, pp.

404-412, Mar. 2002.

[18] Y. Chen and D. Hocevar, “A FPGA and ASIC implementation of rate 1/2, 8088-b irregular low density parity check decoder,” IEEE GLOBECOM’03, Vol.

3, pp. 113-117, Dec. 2003.

[19] Chien-Ching Lin, Kai-Li Lin, Hsie-Chia Chang and Chen-Yi Lee, “A 3.33Gb/s (1200,720) low-density parity check code decoder,” IEEE Proceedings of ESSCIRC, Grenoble, France, 2005.

[20] T.M.N. Ngatched, M. Bossert, and A. Fahrner, “Two decoding algorithms for low-density parity check codes,” IEEE ITCC’04, Vol. 32, pp. 253-257.

[21] Yuan-Jih Chu and Sau-Gee Chen, “An efficient LDPC code structure combined with the concept of difference family,” IWCMC’06, Vol. 18, pp.

355-360.

[22] I. V. Kozintsev. Software for low-density parity-check codes. [Online] Available at: http://www.kozintsev.net/soft.html.

[23] Yen-Chin Liao, Chien-Ching Lin, Chih-Wei Liu, and Hsie-Chia Chang, “A dynamic normalization technique for decoding LDPC codes,” IEEE Signal Processing Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 768-772, Nov. 2005.

自 傳

邱敏杰,1982 年 6 月 15 日出生,高雄縣人。2004 年自國立暨南 國際大學電機工程學系畢業,隨即進入國立交通大學電子研究所攻讀 碩士學位。研究興趣為通訊系統與數位信號處理,碩士論文題目為低 密度對偶檢查碼解碼演算法之改進以及其高速解碼器架構之設計。