• 沒有找到結果。

Limitations and Suggestions for Future Study

Chapter 5 Conclusion

5.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Study

Although the present study has shown findings with a positive effect on students’

listening comprehension with the assistance of NESTs, especially for those with more

than three years of instruction of NESTs, there are limitations that should be considered.

First of all, we cannot ignore other potential factors that might also affect students’

listening comprehension achievement, such as test-taker variables (Farhady, 1982)

including their experience with test types, their weak and strong areas in language skills,

different resources and exposure of English in urban and rural areas (Chang, 2007).

However, since the goal of the present study is to gain a general understanding of the

students’ listening ability under the guidance of NESTs in a co-teaching module, the

large sample size of this study and the statistical analysis of the data might be sufficient

61

to provide a general pattern of students’ listening performance regardless of other

possible influential factors. Second, the main focus of the present study is analyzed

quantitatively. Although statistical data could provide a general picture of how NESTs

help improve students’ listening ability in English, qualitative data, such as interviews,

classroom observations, questionnaires, might give us a more holistic view of the

impact of the NESTs.

Considering the limitations of the present study, suggestions for future research

are addressed as follows. First of all, the listening test could be shortened in order to

rule out the potential attention span issue. For example, the instruction of the tests could

be either in just Chinese or English. Even though the actual testing parts took up around

20 minutes, the participants were still under the pressure of “taking a test” when

listening to the instruction. In order to exclude the potential attention span issue, it is

suggested that we should take as many test-taker variables as possible into

consideration when administering a test. Secondly, qualitative data should be collected

in each of the areas through interviews and classroom observations to explore how

specifically NESTs influence students in terms of improving their English listening

ability. Last but not least, observations on NESTs themselves could be explored

including their gender, characteristics, and their beliefs of education so that more can

62

be understood in terms of the type of NESTs that contribute most to English learning

in Taiwan. In other words, ETAs could be the subject of future study.

63

Reference

Anderson, J. R. (1985). A series of books in psychology. Cognitive psychology and its

implications (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry

Holt & Co.

Arnold, J. (2000). Seeing through Listening Comprehension Exam Anxiety. TESOL

Quarterly, 34(4), 777-786

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of

Communication Disorders, 36(3), pp.189-208.

Barratt, L., & Kontra, E. H. (2000). Native‐English‐speaking teachers in cultures

other than their own. TESOL Journal, 9(3), 19-23.

Benke, E., & Medgyes, P. (2005). Differences in teaching behaviour between native

and non-native speaker teachers: As seen by the learners. In Llurda E. (Ed.),

Non-native language teachers (pp. 195-215). New York: Springer, Boston, MA.

Bensimon, E. M. (2005). Closing the achievement gap in higher education: An

organizational learning perspective. New Directions for Higher Education,

2005(131), 99-111.

Brindley, G. (1998). Assessing listening abilities. Annual Review of Applied

Linguistics, 18, 171-191.

64

Brindley, G., & Slatyer, H. (2002). Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening

assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 369-394.

Buck, G. (1991). The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study1.

Language Testing, 8(1), 67-91.

Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listening teacher. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J.

Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp.

113-131). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.

Buck, G. (1990). The testing of second language listening comprehension.

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lancaster, England.

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. England: Cambridge University Press.

Buckley, F. J. (2000). Team teaching: What, why, and how? Thousand Oaks, CA:

SAGE Publications, Inc.

Burstall, C. (1975). French in the primary school: The British experiment. Canadian

Modern Language Review, 31(5), 388-402.

Candlin, C., Abbs, B., & Edelhoff, C. (1982). Challenges: A multi-media project for

learners of English. Langenscheidt.

Carless, D., & Walker, E. (2006). Effective team teaching between local and

native-speaking English teachers. Language and Education, 20(6), 463-477.

65

Carroll, J. B. (1961). Fundamental considerations in testing for English language

proficiency of foreign students. Testing the English Proficiency Of Foreign

Students, 36.

Carroll, B. J. (1980). Testing communicative performance: An interim study. Oxford:

Pergamon Press.

Chang, A., & Read, J. (2006). The effects of listening support on the listening

performance of EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 375-397.

Chang, A. (2008). Listening strategies of L2 learners with varied test tasks. TESL

Canada Journal, 26(1), 1-26.

Chang, A. (2009). EFL listeners' task-based strategies and their relationship with

listening performance. TESL-EJ, 13(2), n2.

Chapelle, C. A. (1999). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research.

Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research

(pp. 32-70). England: Cambridge University Press

Chern, C. L. (2010). An overview of English language education at primary level in

Taiwan. Proceedings of Second Language Studies: Acquisition, Learning,

Education and Technology Conference, Tokyo. Retrieved from

http://www.gavo.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/L2WS2010/papers/L2WS2010_S-03.pdf

66

Chien, C. N., & Wei, L. (1998). The strategy use in listening comprehension for EFL

learners in Taiwan. RELC Journal, 29(1), 66-91.

Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective

practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-16.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in

second language acquisition. London: Routledge.

Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Toward an

integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 431-457.

Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language

classroom. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 206-220.

Farhady, H. (1979). The disjunctive fallacy between discrete-point and integrative

tests. TESOL Quarterly 13(3), 347-357.

Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner's perspective.

TESOL Quarterly, 16(1), 43-59.

Ferris, D. (1998). Students' views of academic aural/oral skills: A comparative needs

analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 289-316.

Field, J. (2008). Bricks or mortar: Which parts of the input does a second language

listener rely on?. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 411-432.

67

Field, J. (2010). Listening in the language classroom. ELT Journal, 64(3), 331-333.

Florence Ma, L. P. (2012). Advantages and disadvantages of native‐and nonnative‐

English‐speaking teachers: Student perceptions in Hong Kong. TESOL

Quarterly, 46(2), 280-305.

Flores, A. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap

or opportunity gap?. The High School Journal, 91(1), 29-42.

Gardner, R. C. (2008). Individual differences in second and foreign language learning.

In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language

and education (pp. 1135-1146). New York: Springer, Boston, MA.

Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners'

English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal of

Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977.

Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). The significance of listening comprehension

in English language teaching. Theory and Practice In Language Studies, 6(8),

1670-1677.

Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening

comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75.

Goh, C. C. M. (2002). Teaching listening in the language classroom. Singapore:

SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

68

Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners.

ELT Journal, 60(3), 222-232.

Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2

proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.

Griffiths, R. (1991). Pausological Research in an L2 Context: A Rationale, and

Review of Selected Studies. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 345-64.

Hamouda, A. (2013). An investigation of listening comprehension problems

encountered by Saudi students in the EL listening classroom. International

Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2),

113-155.

Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems.

Language Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 137-153.

Haycock, K. (2001). Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58(6),

6-11.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. New York: Oxford

university.

Herbert, P., & Wu, C. H. F. (2009). Cultural diversity in the classroom: Shortcomings

and successes of English co-teaching programs in East Asia. Zeitschrift für

Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 14(1).

69

Huang, F. C. (2011). English co-teaching in elementary school: A case study of the

English co-teaching program in Kaohsiung city. Unpublished doctoral

dissertation. National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.

Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In: J.B. Pride & J. Holmes

(Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin

Kemp, J. (2009). The listening log: Motivating autonomous learning. ELT Journal,

64(4), 385-395.

Kitao, S. K., & Kitao, K. (1996). Testing communicative competence. Internet TESL

Journal, 2(5), 1-7

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.

Kurita, T. (2012). Issues in second language listening comprehension and the

pedagogical implications. Accents Asia, 5(1), 30-44.

Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language

tests: A teacher's book. Bristol, Inglaterra: Longmans, Green and Company.

Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom

second language acquisition. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language

process (pp. 27-44). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

70

Lin, X. W. (2017). Effects of co-teaching of nests and lets on efl young learners’

listening comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan

University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.

Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Glass & C.

Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley,

MA: Newbury House.

Markham, P. L. (1988). Gender and the perceived expertness of the speaker as factors

in ESL listening recall. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 397-406.

Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: who's worth more?. ELT Journal, 46(4),

340-349.

Morrow, K. (1979). Communicative language testing: Revolution or evolution. In C.J.

Brumfit & K. Johnson. (Eds.), The communicative approach to language

teaching (pp. 143-157). England: Oxford University Press.

Murphy, J. M. (1991). Oral communication in TESOL: Integrating speaking,

listening, and pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1), 51-75.

Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?.

Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.

71

NORO, T. (2006). Developing a construct model of "listening Stress": A qualitative

study of the affective domain of the listening process. ARELE: Annual Review of

English Language Education in Japan, 17, 61-70.

O'malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language

acquisition. England: Cambridge University Press.

O'MALLEY, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension

strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.

Pavlenko, A., Dans, A., Pavlenko, A., Blackledge, I., & Piller, M. (2001). How am I to

become a woman in an American vein?”: Transformations of gender

performance in second language learning. Multilingualism, Second Language

Learning, and Gender, 6, 133-174.

Poon, A., & Higginbottom, T. (2000). Net-working: Examples of good professional

practice within the NET scheme. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Education

Department.

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. England: Cambridge

university press.

Riley, P., & Zoppis, C. (1985). The sound and video library. In P. Riley (Ed.),

Discourse and learning (pp. 114-131). London: Longman.

72

Rogers, C. V., & Medley Jr, F. W. (1988). Language with a purpose: Using authentic

materials in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 21(5),

467-478.

Rost, M. (1990). Listening in Language Learning. New York: Longman.

Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and Researching Listening. London: Longman.

Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research.

Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221.

Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in

adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American

Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.

Shohamy, E., & Inbar, O. (1991). Validation of listening comprehension tests: The

effect of text and question type. Language Testing, 8(1), 23-40.

Storey, P., Luck, J., Wang-Kho, E., Lin, A. & Berry, R.S.Y. (2001). Monitoring and

evaluation of the native-English teacher scheme. Unpublished Research Report.

Honk Kong Institute of Education.

Teng, H. (2001). The influence of syntactic modification on EFL listening

comprehension. Proceedings of the eighteenth conference of English teaching

and learning in the ROC, 288-305.

73

Teng, H. C. (2013, October). Analysis of EFL Learners’ Task Strategies for a

Listening Comprehension Test. Paper presented at the 21st Annual KOTESOL

International Conference, Seoul, Korea.

Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching listening. MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French)

listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387-409.

Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension:

Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168-176.

Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to Learn or Learning to Listen?. Annual Review of

Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.

Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening

comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191-210.

Vongpumivitch, V. (2007). Research on EFL listening assessment in Taiwan: Current

issues and future directions. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 31(3), 63-100.

Vogely, A. (1995). Perceived strategy use during performance on three authentic

listening comprehension tasks. Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 41-56.

Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. England: Oxford

University Press.

74

Weir, C. J., & Weir, C. J. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. New

York: Prentice Hall.

Wesche, M. B. (1983). Communicative testing in a second language. Modern

Language Journal, 67(1), 41-55.

Wu, C. H. (2015). A study on local teacher and foreign teacher’s different co-teaching

models: the effects on taiwanese sixth graders’ english listening and speaking

abilities. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Education,

Taipei, Taiwan.

Yen, H. J. (2016). The Impact of English Teaching Assistants on English Learning in

Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University,

Taipei, Taiwan.

Zandvliet, D. B., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Physical and psychosocial environments

associated with networked classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 8(1),

1-17.

Cambridge Assessment English. (2019). [Ebook]. Retrieved from

https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/126460-cec-handbook-for-teachers.pdf

75

Cambridge Assessment English. (2019). [Ebook]. Retrieved from

https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/357180-starters-movers-and-flyers-handbook-for-teachers-2018.pdf

NAER. (2018). Directions governing for the 12-Year Basic Education Curricula

[News Release]. Retrieved June 30, 2019 from the National Academy for

Educational Research:

https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14379,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw

Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing. (2019). Comprehensive

assessment program for junior high school students [News Release]. Retrieved

June 30, 2019 from https://cap.nace.edu.tw/background.html