• 沒有找到結果。

Aebi, H., 1984. Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology. 105, 121-126.

Chang, H.Y., Sheu, M.J., Yang, C.H., Leu, Z.C., Chang, Y.S., Peng, W.H., Huang, S.S., Huang, G.J., 2009. Analgesic effects and the mechanisms of anti-inflammation of hispolon in mice. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine doi:10.1093/ecam/nep027.

Cui, X.Y., Kim, J.H., Zhao, X., Chen, B.Q., Lee, B.C., Pyo, H.B., Yun, Y.P., Zhang, Y.H., 2006. Antioxidative and acute anti-inflammatory effects of Campsis grandiflora flower. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 103, 223-228.

Dawson, J., Sedgwick, A.D., Edwards, J.C., Lees, P., 1991. A comparative study of the cellular, exudative and histological responses to carrageenan, dextran and zymosan in the mouse. International Journal of Tissue Reactions 13, 171–185.

Dirsch, V.M., Stuppner, H., Vollmar, A.M., 1998. The Griess assay: suitable for a bio-guided fractionation of anti-inflammatory plant extracts? Planta Med. 64, 423–426.

Flohe, L., Otting, F., 1984. Superoxide dismutase assays. Methods in Enzymology 105, 93 –104.

Franzotti, E.M., Santos, C.V., Rodrigues, H.M., Mourao, R.H., Andrade, M.R., Antoniolli, A.R., 2000. Anti-inflammatory, analgesic activity and acute toxicity of Sida cordifolia L. (Malva-branca). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 72, 273–727.

Geethangili, M., Tzeng, Y.M., 2009. Review of Pharmacological Effects of Antrodia camphorata and its Bioactive Compounds. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine doi:10.1093/ecam/nep108.

Hattori, M., Sheu, C.C., 2006. Compounds from Antrodia camphorata having anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor activity. US 7109232-2006-9-19.

Hseu, Y.C., Wu, F.Y., Wu, J.J., Chen, J.Y., Chang, W.H., Lu, F.J., 2005.

Antiinflammatory potential of Antrodia camphorata through inhibition of iNOS, COX-2 and cytokines via the NF-kB pathway. International Immunopharmacology 5, 1914–1925.

Hsieh, Y.H., Chu, F.H., Wang, Y.S., Chien, S.C., Chang, S.T,, Shaw, J.F., Chen, C.Y., Hsiao, W.W., Kuo, Y.H., Wang, S.Y., 2010. Antrocamphin A, an anti-inflammatory principal from the fruiting body of Taiwanofungus camphoratus, and its mechanisms.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 58, 3153-3158.

Kang, H.S., Lee, J.Y., Kim, C.J., 2008. Anti-inflammatory activity of arctigenin from Forsythiae Fructus. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 116, 305-312.

Liu, D.Z., Liang, H.J., Chen, C.H., Su, C.H., Lee, T.H., Huang, C.T., Hou, W.C., Lin, S.Y., Zhong, W.B., Lin, P.J., Hung, L.F., Liang, Y.C., 2007. Comparative anti-inflammatory characterization of wild fruiting body, liquid-state fermentation, and solid-state culture of Taiwanofungus camphoratus in microglia and the mechanism of its action. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113, 45–53.

Nakamura, N., Hirakawa, A., Gao, J.J., Kakuda, H., Shiro, M., Komatsu, Y., Sheu, C.C.

and Hattori, M., 2004. Five new maleic and succinic acid derivatives from the mycelium of Antrodia camphorata and their cytotoxic effects on LLC tumor cell line.

Journal of Natural Products 67, 46−48.

Paglia, E.D., Valentine, W.N., 1967. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocytes glutathione peroxidase. Journal of Laboratory Clinical Medicine 70, 158–169.

Peng, C.C., Chen, K.C., Peng, R.Y., Chyau, C.C., Su, C.H., Hsieh-Li, H.M., 2007.

Antrodia camphorata extract induces replicative senescence in superficial TCC, and

inhibits the absolute migration capability in invasive bladder carcinoma cells. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 109, 93-103.

Rao, Y.K., Fang, S.H., Tzeng, Y.M., 2007. Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferation tumoral cells activities of Antrodia camphorata, Cordyceps sinensis, and Cinnamomum osmophloeum bark extracts. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 114, 78–85.

Sheeba, M.S., Asha, V.V., 2009. Cardiospermum halicacabum ethanol extract inhibits LPS induced COX-2, TNF-alpha and iNOS expression, which is mediated by NF-kappa B regulation, in RAW264.7 cells. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 124, 39-44.

Shen, Y.C., Wang, Y.H., Chou, Y.C., Chen, C.F., Lin, L.C., Chang, T.T., Tien, J.H., Chou, C.J., 2004. Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory activity of zhankuic acids isolated

from the fruiting bodies of Antrodia camphorata. Planta Med. 70, 310-314.

Wang, G.J., Tseng, H.W., Chou, C.J., Tsai, T.H., Chen, C.T., Lu, M.K. 2003. The vasorelaxation of Antrodia camphorata mycelia: involvement of endothelial Ca(2+)-NO-cGMP pathway. Life Science 73, 2769-2783.

Yun, K.J., Koh, D.J., Kim, S.H., Park, S.J., Ryu, J.H., Kim, D.G., Lee, J.Y., Lee, K.T., 2008. Anti-Inflammatory effects of sinapic acid through the suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygase-2, and proinflammatory cytokines expressions via nuclear factor-κB inactivation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56, 10265–10272.

Zimmermann, M., 1983. Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain 16, 109-110.

Figure Legends

Figue 1. HPLC analysis of MEMAC and compounds identification. (A) HPLC fingerprint of MEMAC. (B) Camphorataanhydride A (retention time = 27.13 min, peak 11) and camphorataimide B (retention time = 25.21 min, peak 8) were isolated and identified described as Materials and Methods section.

Figure. 2. Effect of MEMAC on cell viability of RAW264.7 and Human PBMCs.

RAW264.7 (2×105 cells/mL) cells and Human PBMCs (1×106 cells/mL) were treated with 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 μg/mL of MEMAC for 24 h. Cell viability was checked after treatment with MEMAC using trypan blue exclusion method and examined using phase contrast microscopy. The results were displayed in percentage of control samples. In RAW264.7 cell experiment, data are presented as the mean ± S.D. for three independent experiments. Each data point represents the meant ± S.D. from one representative donor (n=3) in human PBMCs experiment; **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 as compared with the MEMAC treatment.

Figure 3. MEMAC inhibited immunogen induced pro-inflammatory cytokine and mediator production. RAW264.7 (2×105 cells/mL) cells were pretreated with MEMAC (0, 25, 50, and 75 μg/mL) for 30 min, and then stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL), or other stimuli polyIC (20 μg/mL), Pam3 (Pam3CSK4, 200 ng/mL). Culture media were collected, the levels of (A) TNF-α and (B) IL-6 were measured at 18 h, the levels of (C) NO and (D) PGE2 were determined at 24 h. Data are presented as the mean ± S.D. for three independent experiments;

the same color column compare, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 as compared with the LPS treatment.

Figure 4. MEMAC inhibited LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine and mediator

production by human PBMCs. PBMCs (1×106 cells/mL) cells were pretreated with MEMAC (0, 25, 50, and 75 μg/mL) for 30 min, and then stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL). Culture media were collected, the levels of (A) TNF-α and (B) IL-6 were measured at 18 h, the levels of (C) NO and (D) PGE2 were determined at 24 h. Each data point represents the meant ± S.D. from one representative donor (n=3); *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 as compared with the MEMAC treatment.

Figure 5. MEMAC suppressed LPS-induced COX-2 and iNOS expression. (A) Time-course effect. RAW264.7 cells were pretreated with MEMAC (75 μg/mL) for 30 min, and then stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 8 and 14 h. (B) Dose-dependent effect. RAW264.7 cells were treated with MEMAC (0, 10, 25, 50, and 75 μg/mL) for 30 min, and then stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for another 24 h. Protein extract was analyzed by Western blotting using specific antibodies against COX-2 and iNOS. β-actin was used as an internal loading control.

Figure 6. Effects of MEMAC and indomethacin on hind paw edema induced by carrageenan in mice. Mice were i.p. treated with MEMAC (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg), indomethacin or normal saline, 30 min prior to subcutaneous injection of 1% -carrageenan (50 L) in the plantar side of right hind paws of the mice.

The paw volume was measured at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h intervals after challenge using a plethysmometer. Each value was represented as mean ± S.D. *p < 0.05,

**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 as compared with the carrageenan group (one-way

ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s multiple range test). Carr, carrageenan; Indo, indomethacin.

Figure 7. Effects of MEMAC and indomethacin on the levels of MDA, NO, and TNF-

production. Mice were i.p. treated with MEMAC (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg), indomethacin or normal saline, 30 min prior to injection of 1%

-carrageenan (50 L) in the plantar side of right hind paws of the mice.

After 5 h carrageenan challenge, the levels of (A) tissue MDA of hind paw in mice and the levels of (B) NO and (C) TNF-of serum in mice were measured. Each value represents as mean ± S.D. ###p < 0.001 as compared with the control group. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001 as compared with the carrageenan group (one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s multiple range test). Carr, carrageenan; Indo, indomethacin.

Figure 8. MEMAC alleviated carrageenan-induced hemorrhage, edema and leucocyte infiltration in mouse paw. (A) Mice were i.p. treated with MEMAC (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg), indomethacin or normal saline, 30 min prior to injection of 1% -carrageenan (50 L) in the plantar side of right hind paws of the mice.

After 5 h carrageenan challenge, the animals were sacrificed and the mouse right hind paw tissues were removed, the tissue slices were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain. All samples were observed and photographed with light microscopy. Carrageenan-treated mice showed

hemorrhage with moderately extravascular red blood cell and large amount of inflammatory leukocyte mainly neutrophils infiltration in the subdermis interstitial tissue. However, indomethacin (10 mg/kg) and MEMAC (50 mg/kg) significantly ameliorated carrageenan-induced pathological events (magnification, 100x). (B) Numbers of neutrophil infiltration in paw tissue was estimated (magnification, 400x). Each value was represented as mean ± S.D. ###p < 0.001 as compared with the control group. ***p < 0.001 as compared with carrageenan group. Scale bar, 100 μm. Carr, carrageenan; Indo, indomethacin.

Table 1: Effects of MEMAC, indomethacin, and carrageenan on the liver catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase activities in mice.

Groups Catalase

(U/mg protein)

Superoxide dismutase (U/mg protein)

Glutathione peroxidase (U/mg protein)

Control 4.87 ± 0.06 26.21 ± 0.26 2.56 ± 0.32

Carr 3.13 ± 0.42### 16.45 ± 0.22### 1.42 ± 0.08###

Carr + Indo 3.95 ± 0.37** 20.25 ± 0.34** 2.15 ± 0.19*

Carr + MEMAC (5 mg/Kg) 3.51 ± 0.23* 19.56 ± 0.17* 1.54 ± 0.07 Carr + MEMAC (25 mg/Kg) 3.98 ± 0.21** 23.46 ± 0.27** 1.83 ± 0.16* Carr + MEMAC (50 mg/Kg) 4.28 ± 0.32*** 24.89 ± 0.12*** 2.34 ± 0.12**

Each value was represented as mean ± S.D. ###p < 0.001 as compared with the control group. *p <

0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 as compared with the carrageenan group (one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s multiple range test). Carr, carrageenan; Indo, indomethacin.

Figure. 1.

Figure. 2.

Figure.3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Time (h)

0 1 2 3 4 5

Changes of edema volume (mL)

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08

Carr

Carr and Indo

Carr and MEMAC 5 mg/kg Carr and MEMAC 25 mg/kg Carr and MEMAC 50 mg/kg

*** ***

** **

**

* *

Figure 7

Figure 8

B.

***

Control - Indo 50 MEMAC (mg/kg)

** **

Neutrophil / scope (cell)

0 20 40 60 80 100

***

***

Carr

###

相關文件