• 沒有找到結果。

CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION

5.4 Managerial Implication

The scope of this study was to understand the perceptions of spectator’s about the service quality and game quality in sporting events. The study examined service performance during the final round in 2014 Vietnam University Games. Thus, based on the evaluation of spectator’s viewpoint, some suggestions need to carry out for organization. First point, 34.5% spectator was evaluated the food outside is better than the ones in the arena. Second, the quality of sound in arena is important. Third, the attitudes of employees while interacting with spectators are critical. Four, the professional knowledge of font line employees is necessary. Finally, the player performance including the home team and guest team play an important role on the games itself. For the future organizations, the manager should pay attention to improve such as providing training sections for employees, offering high quality food and sound system in the arena, and preparing high quality technology scoreboards and decorations in the arena.

56

REFERENCES

Abdullah, D. N. M. A. & Rozario, F. (2009). Influence of service and product quality towards customer satisfaction: A case study at the staff cafeteria in the hotel industry. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 53(28).

Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53–

66.

Andranovish, G., Burbank, M. and Heying, C. (2001). Olympic Cities: Lessons Learned from Mega-event Politics. Journal of Urban affairs, 23(2).

Baade, R. A., & Tiehen, L. J. (1990). An analysis of major league baseball attendance.

Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14, 14–32.

Babakus, E., C. C. Bienstock, J. R. V. Scotter. (2004). Linking perceived quality and customer satisfaction to store traffic and revenue growth. Decision Sciences 35 (4), 713–737.

Bauer, H. H., Sauer, N. E., & Exler, S. (2005). The loyalty of German soccer fans: Does a team’s brand image matter? International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 7, 14 –22.

Bigne, J. E., Martynez, C., Miquel, M. J., Andreu, L. (2003). Servqual Reliability and Validity in Travel Agencies. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 258–262.

Brady, M. K., & Cronin, J. J. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality : A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(7), 34–49.

Branvold, S. E., Pan, D. W., & Gabert, T. E. (1997). Effects of winning percentage and market size on attendance in minor league baseball. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 6(4), 35–42.

Burbank, M., Andranivish, G. and Heying, C. (2002). Mega-event, Urban Development, and Public Policy. Review of Policy Research, 19(3), 179–202.

57

Brislin, R. W. (1980) Translation and Content Analysis of Oral and Written Material. In H.

C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Vol.2.

Methodology (pp.389–444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Carlson, J., & O’Cass, A. (2010). Exploring the relationships between e-service quality, satisfaction, attitudes, and behaviors in content driven e-service web sites. Journal of Services Marketing, 24, 112–127.

Ching-Fu Chen & Fu-Shian Chen. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management 31, 29–35.

Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A re-examination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 56–68.

Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218

DeSchriver, T. D. (1999). Factors affecting spectator attendance at NCAA Division II football contests. International Sports Journal, 3(2), 55–65.

Delaney, C. (2005). The Spirituality Scale, Development and Psychometric Testing of a Holistic Instrument to Assess the Human Spiritual Dimension. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 23(2), 145–167.

DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas-Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric Toolbox for testing Validity and Reliability. Journal of Nursing scholarship, 39(2), 155–164.

Fang, Fang Chen, Karen H. Sousa, and Stephen G. West. (2005). Testing Measurement In variance of Second-Order Factor Models. Equation Modeling, 12(3), 471–492

58

Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience.

Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6-21.

Funk, D., & James, J. (2006). Consumer loyalty: The meaning of attachment in the development of sport team allegiance. Journal of Sport Management, 20(2), 189–217.

Hall, C. M. (1922). Hallmark Tourist Events: Impacts, Management and Planning. London:

Belahven Press.

Hightower, R., Brady, M. K., & Baker, T. L. (2002). Investigating the role of the physical environment in hedonic service consumption: An exploratory study of sporting events. Journal of Business Research, 55 (9), 697–707.

Holder, J. (2003). What is at stake for Caribbean in Hosting the Cricket World Cup 2007 Event – An Address to the CTO Teacher Forum. [Online]. Available at:

http://www.onecaribbean.org [accessed: December 5, 2013].

Holt, D. B. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. The Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1 – 16.

IEG (International Event Group) (2008). IEG Sponsorship Report. Chicago, IL: IEG, Inc.

Ind, N. (1997). The corporate brand. London: Macmillan Press.

James, J. D., & Ross, S.D. (2004). Comparing sport consumer motivations across multiple sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13(1), 17 – 25.

John, A. (2004). Global Games: Culture, Political Economy and Sport in the Globalized World of the 21st Century. Third World Quarterly, 25(7), 1325–37.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006).

Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption:

Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132 – 140.

59

Homburg, C., & Giering, A. (2001). Personal characteristics as moderators of the relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty - An empirical analysis.

Psychology and Marketing, 18(1), 43–66.

Homburg, C., Koschate, N., Hoyer, W. D., (2006). The role of cognition and affect in the formation of customer satisfaction: A dynamic perspective. Journal of Marketing 70(7), 21-31.

Kahle, L., Aiken, D., Dalakas, V., & Duncan, M. (2003). Men’s versus women’s collegiate basketball customers: Attitudinal favorableness and the environment.

International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 5(2), 145–159.

Kandampully, J. (1998). Service quality to service loyalty: a relationship which goes beyond customer services. Total Quality Management, 9(6), 431–443.

Ko, Y. J., & Pastore, D. L. (2004). Current issues and conceptualizations of service quality in the recreational sport industry. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13, 159–167.

Ko, Y. J., Zhang, J., Catani, K., & Pastore, D. (2011). Assessment of event quality in major spectator sports. Managing Service Quality, 21, 304–332.

Koo, Y. G., Andrew, D. P. S., & Kim, S. (2008). Mediated relationships between the constituents of service quality and behavioral intentions: A study of women’s college basketball fans. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 4, 390–411.

Kwon, H. H., Trail, G. T., & Anderson, D. F. (2005). Are points of attachment necessary in predicting cognitive, affective, conative, or behavioral loyalty? A case analysis.

Sport Management Review, 8(3), 225–270.

Laroche, M., Ueltschy, L. C., Shuzo, A., & Cleveland, Y., P. P. (2004). Service quality perceptions and customer satisfaction: Evaluating the role of culture. Journal of International Marketing, 12(3), 58–85.

60

Leedy, P. D & Ormardo, J. E (2001). Practical research: planning and design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lee, Lee, Seo, and Green. (2012). A New Approach to Stadium Experience: The Dynamics of the Sensoryscape, Social Interaction, and Sense of Home. Journal of Sport Management, 26, 490–505.

Lehtinen, U., & Lehtinen, J. R. (1983). Service Quality: A Study of Quality Dimensions.

Unpublished manuscript, Helsinki, Finland OY.

Lehtinen, U., & Lehtinen, J. R. (1991). Two approaches to service quality dimensions.

The Services Industries Journal, 11(3), 287–303.

MacKay & Crompton. (1988). A conceptual model of consumer evaluation of recreation service quality. Leisure Studies, 7(1), 40–49.

Madrigal, R. (1995). Cognitive and affective determinants of fan satisfaction with sporting event attendance. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, 205–227.

Mahoney, D. F., & Howard, D. R. (2001). Sport business in the next decade: A general overview of expected trends. Journal of Sport Management, 15 (4), 275–296.

Malhotra, N. K., Hall, J., Shaw, M., & Crisp, M. (1996). Marketing research: An applied orientation. Sydney: Prentice-Hall.

Marcum, J. P., & Greenstein, T. N. (1985). Factors affecting attendance of Major League Baseball: II. A within-season analysis. Sociology of Sport Journal, 2, 314–322.

Mason, D. S. (1999). What is the sports product and who buys it? The marketing of professional sports leagues. European Journal of Marketing, 33(3), 402–419.

McPherson, B. D., Curtis, J. E., & Loy, J. W. (1989). The social significance of sport: An introduction to the sociology of sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books.

Melnick, M. J. (1993). Searching for sociability in the stands: A theory of sports spectating. Journal of Sport Management, 7(1), 44–60.

61

Milne, G. R., & McDonald, M. A. (1999). Sport marketing: Managing the exchange process. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Mullin, B. J., Hardy, S., & Sutton, W. A. (2007). Sport marketing (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Munro, B. H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia:

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

Morgan, M. & Summers, J. (2005). Sports Marketing. Thomson: Australia.

Nunnally, J. C. (1976). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York:

McGraw-Hill.

Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(Special issue), 33–44.

Oliver, R. L., Rust, R. T., & Varki, S. (1997). Customer delight: Foundations, findings, and managerial insight. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 311–336.

Pan, D. W., Gabert, T. E., McGaugh, E. C., & Branvold, S. E. (1997). Factors and differential demographic effects on purchases of season tickets for intercollegiate basketball games. Journal of Sport Behavior, 20, 447–463.

Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 136–153.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berr y, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing (41–55).

Patrick Y. K. C. (1997). Re-examination a Model for Evaluating Information Centre Success Using a Structural Equation Modeling approach, Decision science, 28(2).

62

Plunkett Research. (2011). Sports industry overview. [Online]. Available at:

http://www.plunkettresearch.com/Sports%20recreation%20leisure%20market%20r esearch/industry%20statistics. [accessed: December 10, 2013].

Pfaff, S. (2002). Erlebnismarketing für die Besucher von Sportveranstaltungen – Erlebnisstrategien und -instrumente am Beispiel der Fußballbundesliga [Experiential marketing for the visitors of sports events – Experience strategies and -instruments for the German Bundesliga]. Unpublished dissertation, University of Göttingen, Germany.

Reisinger, Y., Turnes, L. (1999). Structural equation model with LISREL: application in tourism. Tourism Management, 20, 71–88.

Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-Sectional Versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines.

Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 261–179.

Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (1994). Service Quality: Insights and managerial implications from the frontier’. In R. T. Rust & R. L. Oliver (Eds.), Service Quality: New directions in theory and practice (pp. 1-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does ‘‘product quality’’ really mean? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25–43.

Greenwell, C. (2001). The influence of spectator sports facilities on customer satisfaction and profitability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

Greenwell, T. C., Fink, J. S., & Pastore, D. L. (2002). Assessing the influence of the physical sports facility on customer satisfaction within the context of the service experience. Sport Management Review, 5(2), 129–148.

Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44.

63

Gobé, M. (2001). Emotional branding: The new paradigm for connecting brands to people. New York: Allworth Press.

Salkind, N. J. (2000). Exploring research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Schaaf, P. (1995). Sport marketing: It’s not just a game anymore. Amherst, NY:

Prometheus Books.

Shapiro & Ridinger, Trail. (2013). An Analysis of Multiple Spectator Consumption Behaviors, Identification, and Future Behavioral Intentions Within the Context of a New College Football Program. Journal of Sport Management, 27, 130–145.

Schofield, J. A. (1983). Performance and attendance at professional team sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 6, 196–206.

Sutton, R., A. Rafaeli. (1988). Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores. Academy of Management Journal 31(3), 461– 487.

Spreng. R. A., MacKenzie, S. C., and Olshavsky, R. W. (1996). A re-examination of the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60, 15–52.

Theodorakis, N. D., Alexandris, K. (2008). Can service quality predict spectators’

behavioral intentions in professional football? Managing Leisure, 13, 162–178.

Theodorakis, N. D., Koustelios, A., Robinson, L., & Barlas, A. (2009). Moderating role of team identification on the relationship between service quality and repurchase intentions among spectators of professional sports. Managing Service Quality, 19, 456–473.

Theodorakis, N. D., Koustelios, A., Robinson, L., & Barlas, A. (2009). Moderating role of team identification on the relationship between service quality and repurchase intentions among spectators of professional sports. Managing Service Quality, 19, 456–473.

64

Theodorakis, Kostas Alexandris, Nikolaos Tsigilis, Serafim Karvounis. (2013). Predicting spectators’ behavioral intentions in professional football: The role of satisfaction and service quality. Sport Management Review, 16, 85–96.

Yoshida, M., & James, J. (2010). Customer satisfaction with game and service experience: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Sport Management, 24, 338–361.

Yoshida, M., & James, J. (2011). Service quality at sporting events: Is aesthetic quality a missing dimension? Sport Management Review, 14, 13–24.

Wall, G., & Myers, K. (1989). Factors influencing attendance: Toronto Blue Jays game.

Sport Place International, 3(1), 29–33.

Williams, P., & Soutar, G. N. (2009). Value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in an adventure tourism context. Annual of Tourism Research, 36(3), 413–438.

Wochnowski, H. (1996). Veranstaltungsmarketing – Grundlagen und Gestaltungsempfehlungen zur Vermarktung von Veranstaltungen. Frankfurt, DE:

Peter Lang Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften. [Event marketing – Foundations and design recommendations for the marketing of events].

Zeithaml, Valerie A., Parasuraman, A. & Berry, Leonard, L. (1990). Delivering Quality Service. The Free Press, New York, N.Y

Zhang, J. J., Pease, D. G., Smith, D. W., Lee, J. T., Lam, E. T. C., & Jambor, E. A. (1997).

Factors affecting the decision making of spectators to attend minor league hockey games. International Sports Journal, 1(1), 39 – 53.

65

APPENDIX

66 APPENDIX 1

Scales Used for Constructs and References

Scales and Item References

Service Quality Dimension Stadium employees

1. You can rely on the employees at

this arena being friendly 1-6 Yoshida & James, 2010 2. The attitude of the employees is

willingness to help spectator’s 3. The attitude of the employees at

this arena shows you that the understand your needs

4. You can rely on the arena employees taking actions to address your needs

5. The employees at this arena respond quickly to your needs 6. The arena’s employees understand

that you rely on their professional knowledge

Sensorycape

1. The arena’s scoreboards are

entertaining to watch 1-9 Lee, Lee, Seo & Green (2012) arrangement of the aisles and seats 7. The arena’s provides good tasting

food than outside

8. The arena’s provides good sightlines to watch the game

9. The smell of the crowd is exciting Game Quality Dimension

Opponent characteristics

1. Opposing teams are high quality

teams 1-4 Yoshida & James, 2010

2. Opposing teams have star players

67

Scales and Item References

3. Opposing teams have good win/loss records

4. Opposing teams have a good history

Player performance

1. Your team’s players perform

well-executed plays 1-6 Yoshida & James, (2010)

2. Players on your team have superior skills

there being a good atmosphere. 1-5 (Yoshida & James, 2010) 2. This stadium’s ambiance is what

you want at a game.

3. The (team name) understand that atmosphere is important to you.

4. You enjoy the excitement surrounding the performance of the players

68

Scales and Item References

sporting event to other people

69 APPENDIX 2

Questionnaire Form English version

The customer satisfaction and behavior intension on 2014 Vietnam University Games questionnaire Dear,

The purpose of this questionnaire is to understanding your experiences in 2014 Vietnam University Games which will be useful to investigate the customer satisfaction and behavior intension.

The questionnaire contains (1) service quality, (2) game quality, (3) customer satisfaction and behavior intensions. Please respond to all the items, by completing the questionnaire in about 15 minutes, you are giving us permission to use the information you provide, which will be totally confidential.

Nation Taiwan University of Physical Education and Sport Phan, Danh Na

Master student I. Demographic information

1. Gender:

Male Female

2. Age:

Under 18 years olds 18 to 24 years olds

25 to 30 years olds Over 30 years olds 3. Marital status:

Single Married

 Divorced

4. Education background:

 Below high school  High school

 University/College  Graduated 5. Occupation:

Student Teacher/Lecture

70

Employee Engineer

Doctor/Nurse Housekeeper

Other

6. Did you attendance the 2014 Vietnam University Games?

Yes No

II. Survey questionnaires PART 1

The purpose of the part is to understand your evaluation on service quality and service satisfaction; and your service employees and sensorycape experience on Vietnam University games.

Please take a close look on these questions and choose the level of agreement on each of items below based on your owned experiences about the Vietnam University Games.

1. Strongly Disagree 5. Somewhat Agree

2. Disagree 6. Agree

3. Somewhat Disagree 7. Strongly Agree 4. Neither agree or disagree

Service Quality Dimension

2. The attitude of the employees demonstrates their willingness to help

      

3. The attitude of the employees at this arena shows that they understand your needs

      

4. You can rely on the arena

employees take actions to address       

71 your needs

5. The employees at this arena

respond quickly to your needs       

6. The employees arena’s understand that you rely on their professional knowledge

      

Sensorycape

1. The arena’s scoreboards are

entertaining to watch       

2. The arena’s decorations are

enjoyable       

3. The arena has a quality sound

system       

4. The music at the area is exciting       

5. The arena provides comfortable

seating       

6. The arena’s has appropriate spatial

arrangement of the aisles and seats       

7. The arena provides better food than

outside       

8. The arena’s provides good

sightlines to watch the game       

9. The atmosphere of the crowd is

exciting       

PART 2

The purpose of this part is to understand your evaluation on game quality and game satisfaction; and your perceived opponent characteristics, player performance and game atmosphere in Vietnam University games.

Please take a close look on these questions and choose the level of agreement on each of items below based on your own experiences about the Vietnam University Games.

1. Strongly Disagree 5. Somewhat Agree

2. Disagree 6. Agree

3. Somewhat Disagree 7. Strongly Agree 4. Neither agree or disagree

72 1. Opposing teams are high quality

teams       

2. Opposing teams have star players       

3. Opposing teams have good win/loss

records       

4. Opposing teams have a good

history       

Player performance

1. Your team’s players perform

well-executed plays       

2. Players on your team have superior

skills       

3. Your team gives 100% effort every

game       

2. This stadium’s ambiance is what

you want at a game.       

3. The (team name) understand that

atmosphere is important to you.       

4. You enjoy the excitement surrounding the performance of the players

      

5. You like the excitement associated

with player performance       

PART 3

The purpose of this part is to understand your satisfaction with the overall of the event and will you intensions in the next season.

Please take a close look on these questions and choose the level of agreement on each of items below based on your owned experiences about the Vietnam University Games.

73

1. Very Low 5. Somewhat High

2. Low 6. High

3. Somewhat Low 7. Very High 4. Average

Customer Satisfaction and Behavior Intensions Dimensions

Customer satisfaction Very low Somewhat Low to

Somewhat High Very High 1. Based on all my experience in this

arena, I am very satisfied       

2. I am satisfied with my decision to

attend this games       

3. I am satisfied with the outcome of

this game       

4. I truly enjoy going to this sporting

event       

Behavioral intentions

1. I would like to visit this sporting

event in the future       

2. I would say positive things about

going to this sporting event to others        3. I would like to attend this sporting

events in future       

4. I would recommend this sporting

event to others       

74 APPENDIX 3

Questionnaire Form Vietnamese version Xin chào bạn,

Nhằm đánh giá mức độ hài lòng của khán giả khi đến tham dự giải thể thao sinh viên (VUG) mùa giải 2014. Thông qua nghiên cứu này chúng tôi có thể hiểu thêm sự hài lòng của khán giả thông qua chất lượng phục vụ và chất lượng trận đấu của giải (VUG). Chân thành cảm ơn sự hợp tác của các bạn.

Trân trọng!

Khoa quản lý thể thao trường đại học thể thao quốc gia Đài Loan

Người hướng dẫn: Giáo sư Tiến sĩ Mark-Lin Người thực hiện: Phan Danh Na

Phần 1: Thông tin cá nhân

Bạn vui lòng đánh dấu (X) vào các ô vuông thích hợp với chọn lựa sau:

1. Giới tính:

□ Nữ □ Nam

2. Tuổi:

□ Dưới 18 tuổi □ từ 18 đến 24 tuổi

□ từ 25 đến 30 tuổi □ trên 30 tuổi 3. Trình độ học vấn:

□ Tốt nghiệp THPT hoặc dưới THPT □ Chưa tốt nghiệp ĐH, CĐ

□ Đã tốt nghiệp Đại học, Cao đẳng □ Sau Đại học 4. Công việc chuyên môn:

□ Học sinh/sinh viên □ Nhân viên

□ Kinh doanh □ Bác sỹ/y tá

□ Giáo viên/giảng viên □ Kỹ sư

75

76

77

78

79

vào mùa sau độ

rất thấp

độ thấp

độ gần thấp

độ trung

bình độ gần cao

độ cao

độ rất cao 1. Bạn muốn đến xem giải VUG

trong tương lai       

2. Bạn muốn nói những điều tốt đẹp về giải VUG đến với nhứng bạn khác

      

3. Bạn muốn thường xuyên đến

xem giải VUG trong tương lai       

4. Bạn muốn giới thiệu giải VUG

đến với những người bạn khác       

80 APPENDIX 4

Results of items analysis in pilot-study

Items Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

81

82

Equal variances not

assumed -8.184 52.324 .000

CS2

Equal variances assumed .103 .749 -7.379 53 .000

Equal variances not

assumed -7.426 48.408 .000

CS3

Equal variances assumed .407 .526 -8.689 53 .000

Equal variances not

assumed -8.735 49.897 .000

CS4

Equal variances assumed .756 .389 -8.932 53 .000

Equal variances not

assumed -8.992 47.967 .000

BI1

Equal variances assumed 6.621 .013 -7.353 53 .000

Equal variances not

assumed -7.440 38.969 .000

BI2

Equal variances assumed 1.957 .168 -7.042 53 .000

Equal variances not

assumed -7.086 48.735 .000

BI3

Equal variances assumed .015 .902 -5.468 53 .000

Equal variances not

assumed -5.458 52.041 .000

BI4

Equal variances assumed .054 .816 -6.886 53 .000

Equal variances not

assumed -6.920 50.290 .000

83 APPENDIX 5

Mean Standard Deviation and Percentage of Frequencies

Percentage of Frequencies (%)

employees at this arena being friendly

employees at this arena shows that they understand your

5. The employees at this arena

respond quickly to your needs 4.67 1.127 0.0 3.4 9.5 33.8 27.1 23.1 3.2

6. The employees arena’s

understand that you rely on 4.89 1.174 1.1 1.9 5.2 29.1 32.1 22.8 7.8

84

1. The arena scoreboards are

entertaining to watch 5.34 1.131 0.0 0.9 4.3 19.8 24.4 36.2 14.4

2. The arena’s decorations are

enjoyable 4.95 1.168 0.6 3.0 5.0 25.2 32.2 26.9 7.1

6. The arena’s has appropriate spatial arrangement of the aisles and seats

4.93 1.174 0.2 2.8 7.1 25.9 28.5 28.7 6.7

7. The arena provides better

food than outside 4.28 1.332 2.4 7.6 13.8 34.5 23.1 13.8 4.5

8. The arena’s provides good

sightlines to watch the game 4.96 1.209 0.9 2.1 7.6 23.1 29.7 29.1 7.5

9. The atmosphere of the

crowd is exciting 5.19 1.174 0.2 1.9 4.1 22.4 28.5 29.7 13.2

Game quality dimension

85

1. Opposing teams are high

quality teams 4.90 1.050 0.6 0.7 6.3 28.0 31.9 29.3 3.2

2. Opposing teams have star

2. Opposing teams have star