• 沒有找到結果。

3-2-6 The Mean Size, Zeta Potential and Swelling Ratio

The mean size of the hybrid nanoparticles was measured by dynamic light scatter (DLS).

As aforementioned, with the increase of silica substitutions, the more bulky groups exist in

the hybrids, which may hinder the self-assemble behavior, resulting in higher CAC values and

larger nanoparticle size, shown in Table 3.3. The zeta potential of CHC and the hybrids

nanoparticles was also shown in Table3.3.

The swelling ratio was primarily estimated by comparing the size under SEM image with

the size measured by dynamic light scatter (DLS). The self-assembly silica-CHC

nanoparticles show a spherical appearance with an average size around 65 nm in diameter in

SEM images. Besides, from the dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurement (Table 3.3), the

mean size of the hybrid nanoparticles was around 133 nm in diameter, which is greater by

about 2 times in volume than that of SEM measurement. This is mainly due to swelling effect

in water medium. In comparison with neat CHC, where a swelling of nearly 8 times was

observed in an earlier study [8], indicating a considerable reduction in the swelling behavior, to

nearly 4 times, when an equivalent amount of the -NH2 groups from the APTES was

chemically modified with the –COOH groups of the CHC macromolecule. Such a silica

substitution should enhance the rigidity of the resulting hybrid entity, thus, reduce

considerably its swelling.

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Intensity

2 theda

Figure 3.13 X-ray diffraction pattern of silica-CHC.

Table 3.3 The mean size and zeta potential of the different ratio of (COOH of

CHC): (NH

2

of APTES) hybrids.

         

sample mean size Zeta potential(mV)

CHC 122 -33.47

CA 133 17.59

C2A 302 34.78

C5A 500 45.26

C10A 600 --

 

Figure 3.14 (a) TEM image of the silica-CHC nanoparticle (b) The

interior TEM image of silica-CHC nanoparticle, showing a layer-like

nanoarchitecture where a highly- ordered silica phase of ~6 nm in width

surrounding the nanoparticle.

Conclusions

A novel hybrid macromolecule based on a chemical modification along the –COOH groups

of amphiphilic chitosan (CHC) with (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane molecules was

successfully designed and synthesized. This hybrid macromolecule showed a

concentration-dependent self-assembly behavior making a final hybrid nanoparticle tunable in

size, drug encapsulation efficiency and release profile. Formation of a highly-ordered

crystalline silica layer of ~6 nm in thickness, upon self-assembly of the hybrid molecule

rendered a prolonged, sustained release of a model drug, CPT, compared with the neat CHC

molecules. Such an continuous highly-ordered silica nanoarchitecture evolved surrounding

the hybrid nanopartciles provided not only a well-stabilized nanostructure without using

crosslinker to prevent undesirable diluting disassembly, but proved to be a result of highly

self-organization rather than random arrangement of the hybrid macromolecule upon the

natural assembly operation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

[1] Gamys CG, Beyou E, Bourgeat-Lami E. Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry 2010; 48: 784–93.

[2] Mu¨llner M, Schallon A, Walther A, Freitag R, Mu¨llner AHE. Biomacromolecules 2010;

11: 390–6.

[3] Qi XY, Xue C, Huang X, Huang Y, Zhou XZ, Li H, et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010; 20:

43–9.

[4] Murakami K, Aoki H, Nakamura S, Nakamura SI, Takikawa M, Hanzawa M, et al.Biomaterials 2010; 31: 83-90.

[5] Wang GH, Zhang LM. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006; 110: 24864-8.

[6] Tripathi BP, Shahi VK. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008; 112 (49): 15678–90.

[7] Guo XH, Zheng D, Hu N. J.Phys. Chem. B 2008; 112 (48): 15513–20.

[8] Liu KH, Chen SY, Liu DM, Liu TY. Macromolecules 2008; 41: 6511-6.

[9] Fu L, Sa´ Ferreira RA, Silva NJO, Carlos LD. Chem. Mater. 2004; 16: 1507-16.

[10] Bermudez VZ, Carlos LD, Alca´cer L. Chem. Mater. 1999; 11: 569-80.

[11] Mahapatro A, Johnson DM, Patel DN, Feldman MD, Ayon AA, Agrawal CM. Langmuir 2006; 22: 901-5.

[12] Yan E, Ding Y, Chen CJ, Li R, Hu Y, Jiang X. Chem. Commun. 2009; 12:

2718–20.

[13] Franville AC, Mahiou R, Zambon D, Cousseins JC. Solid State Sciences 2001; 3:

211–22.

[14] Goncüalves MC, Bermudez VZ, Sa´ Ferreira RA, Carlos LD, Ostrovskii D, Rocha J.

Chem. Mater. 2004; 16: 2530-43.

[15] Silva SS, Ferreira RAS, Fu L, Carlos LD, Mano JF, Reisab RL, et al. J. Mater.

Chem. 2005; 15: 3952–61.

[16] Carlos LD, Sa´ Ferreira RA, Orion I, Bermudez VZ, Rocha J. J. Lumin. 2000; 87: 702-5.

[17] Lin CL, Shih CL, Chau LK. Anal. Chem. 2007; 79 : 3757-63.

[18] Yavuz MS, Cheng YY, Chen JY, Cobley CM, Zhang Q, Rycenga M, et al.

Nature 2009; 8: 935-9.

[19] Liu Li, Xu Xian, Guo S, Han W. Carbohydrate Polymers 2009; 75: 401–7.

[20] Zhu A, Chan-Park MB, Dai S, Li L. Colloids Surf. B 2005; 43: 143–9.

[21] Wang Y, Liu L, Weng J, Zhang Q. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007; 69: 597–606.

[22] Li G, Zhuang Y, Mu Q, Wang M, Fang Y. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008; 72: 60–6.

[23] Wilhelm M, Zhao C, Wang Y, Xu R, Winnik MA, Mura J. Macromolecules 1991; 24: 1033–40.

[24] Amiji MM. Carbohydr. Polym. 1995; 26: 211–3.

[25] Lee KY, Jo WH. Langmuir 1998; 14: 2329–32.

[26] Hu FQ, Liu LN, Du YZ, Yuan H. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 6955-63.

[27] Sun ZC, Bai F, Wu HM, Schmitt SK, Boye DM, Fan HY. J. Amer. Chem. Soc.

2009; 131: 13594–5.

[28] Wen J, Wilkes GL. Chem. Mater. 1996; 8: 1667-81.

[29] Ritger PL, Peppas NA. J. Controlled Release 1987; 5: 37-42.

[30] Fini A, Orienti I. Am. J. Drug Delivery 2003; 1: 43–59.

[31] Lee M, Nah JW, Kwon Y, Koh JJ, Lo KS, Kim SW. Pharm. Res. 2001; 18: 427–31.

[32] Muzzarelli RAA, Muzzarelli C. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2005; 186: 151–209.

[33] Zhao AJ, Yuan XB, Chang J. Polym. Bull. 2004; 4: 59–63.

[34] Chae SY, Son S, Lee M, Jang MK, Nah JW. J. Controlled Release 2005; 109:330–44.

[35] Suia W, Songa G, Chenb G, Xuc G. Colloids Surf., A 2005; 256: 29–33.

[36] Letchford K, Burt H. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2007; 65: 259–69.

[38] Sezgin Z, Yu ksel N, Baykara T, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2006; 64: 261–8.

[39] Zuccari G, Carosio R, Fini A, Montaldo PG, Orienti I. J. Control. Release 2005;103:

369–80.

[40] Liu P, Wang BC, Li J, Qiao WL. Med. Hypotheses 2008; 71: 379–81.

[41] Young C, Ozols RF, Myers CE. New Engl. J. Med. 1981;30: 139–153.

[42] Takahashi T, Yamada Y, Kataoka K, Nagasaki Y. Journal of Controlled Release 2005;

107: 408-16.

[43] Paul G, Heimink J, Koller H. Chem. Mater. 2008; 20: 5083-9.

[44] Azzam T, Domb AJ. Current Drug Delivery 2004; 1: 165-193.

[45] Garnett MC. Critical Review in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems 2004; 16: 147-207.

[46] Rolland A. Harwood, Amsterdam 1999.

[47] Kneuer C, Sameti M, Bakowsky U, Schiestel T, Schirra H, Schmidt H, Lehr CS.

Bioconjugate chemistry 2000; 11: 926-32.

[48] Kneuer C, Sameti M, Haltner EG, Schiestel T, Schirra H, Schmidt H, Lehr CS.International Journal of Pharmaceutical 2000; 196: 257-261.

[49] Sanhu KK, McIntosh CM, Simard JM, Smith SW, Rotello VM. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2002; 13: 3-6.

[50] Kubo T, Sugita T, Shimose S, Nitta Y, Ikuta Y, Murakami T. International Journal of Oncology 2001; 18: 121-5.

[51] Berry CC, Curtis ASG. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2003; 36: R198-206.

[52] Zhu SG, Xiang JJ, Li XL, Shen SR, Lu HB, Zhou J, et al. Biotechnology of Applied Biochemistry 2004; 39: 179-187.

[53] Gupta AK, Curtis ASG. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 3029-40.

計畫名稱:以無機分子改質雙性機丁聚糖之自組裝混成複合材料及其生醫特性之研究

(

無法以量化表達之成

請就研究內容與原計畫相符程度、達成預期目標情況、研究成果之學術或應用價

相關文件