• 沒有找到結果。

Panel B firm performance and asymmetric distribution

ATOBINQ, ATOBINQt+} AROA, database. Heteroscedasticity consistent t statistics are reported in parentheses.

b ASYMt is the asymmetric dis

ibutionof stock/cash dis

ibutionas measured by the ratio of stock/cash proportion in employee bonus relative to stock/cash proportion in dividends;

凹的

Mt

equals to one if the fmn is a family-controlled fmn, and zero otherwise; BDSZt is board size in seat number; BDSHt is the shareholding by board of directors; BLKSHt is outside blockholder shareholding; INDSTt is the percentage of

indep 巴 ndent

board member;

Chiao Da Management Review Vol. 33 No.2, 2013 25

INSTt indicates the percentage of stocks by domestic financial institutions; FINSTt is the percentage of stocks by foreign fmancial institutions; DUALt equals to one when the CEO serves as chair of the board and zero otherwise; MGR _ SHARE is the shareholdings by managers. LEVt is total liabilities to total assets; SIZEt is the natural logarithm of total assets at year t; Growtht is the market to book ratio of shareholders' equity; RDt is R&D intensity at year t, defined as R&D expenditures divided by net sales.

C t statistics in parentheses • p < 0.05, •• p < 0.01, ••• p < 0.001

commonly employed in prior research (e.g., Young and Wu, 2009; Coles et al., 2005; Anderson et al., 2004; Beasley, 1996; Chung et al., 2002). The inverse Mills ratio (lMR) generated from the frrst stage is then added to Model (3) and (4) as the second-stage regression. Table 6 shows the results. The results for the second stage regression remain unchanged, indicating that the results in the main tests are not driven by the self-selection bias of

asymme的'.

7. Conclusion

This paper documents the relationships between profit sharing bonus and firm performance for public1y traded corporations in the high-tech

indus甘y

of Taiwan. As employee stock bonus in Taiwan is part of the profit sharing scheme,

the decision for the amount and the method of profit sharing bonus is usually made along with the decision for shareholder dividends. The main contribution of this paper is disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of the profit sharing stock bonus practice that rarely exists in US data. Firm valuation generally increases with the profit sharing bonus. This result is consistent with a large literature on the positive incentive effects associated with increased employee stock bonus (Conte and Svejnar, 1990; Kruse, 1992, 1993; Lin and Chen, 2009; Jeng et al., 2009). The results also fmd that the positive relationship between employee bonus and future performance can increase with

asymme仕lC

distribution. The results are supportive of the prior literature that stock compensation can help align the interests between shareholders and the firm and can mitigate the agency problems between shareholders and managers.

This study is subject to a few limitations. First, 1 use Taiwan firms as our sample. Future studies could extend the research to other countries to improve the

26 The Asymmetric distribution between Stock Bonus and Stock Dividends: Net lncentives or Entrenchments?

generalizability of the results. Second, the results are subject to the robustness of the measure for asymmetric distribution-the stockJcash proportion of employee bonus relative to the stockJcash proportion of dividends, and two performance measures - TOBINQ and ROA. In addition, the effect of asymmetric

dis仕ibution

might be reflected in other outcomes. Future research can employ other research designs to validate whether benefits stil1 outweigh the costs of asymmetric distribution.

Reference

Aboody, D. (1996),“Market Valuation of Employee Stock Options," Journal 01 Accounting and Economics, 22,357-391.

Anderson, R. c., Mansi, S. A. and Reeb, D. M. (2004),“Board Characteristics, Accounting Report

Integri旬,

and the Cost of Debt," Journal 01 Accounting

αnd Economics, 37(3), 315-342.

Azfar, O. and Danninger, S. (2001),“Profit-sharing, Employment Stability, and Wage Growth," lndustrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(3), 619-630.

Baber, W., Janakiraman, S., Kang, S. (1996),“Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Executive Compensation," Journal 01 Accounting and Economics, 21(3), 297-318.

Baker, G. P., Jensen, M. G. and Murphy, K. J. (1987),

Incentives: Practice vs. Theory," The Journal

0/ Finance, 的 (3), 593-616.

Beasley, M. S. (1996),“An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud," The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465.

Bebchuk, L.A., Fried, J.M., Walker, D.I. (2002),“Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation," University

0/

Chicago Law Review, 69(3), 751-846.

Berg位, P. E., Ofek, E. and Yermack, D. (1997),“Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions," Journal 01 Finance, 52(4), 1411-1438.

Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S. (2001),“Are CEOs Rewarded F or Luck? The Ones Without Principals

鈍 "

Quarterly Journal

0/

Economics 116(3),

Chiao Da Management Review Vol. 33 No.2, 2013 27

901-932.

Bhargava, S. (1994),

Evidence 企om

U.K. Panel Data," The Economic Journal, 104(426), 1044-1056.

Blasi, 1., Conte, M. and Kruse, D. (1996),“Employee Stock Bonus and Corporate Performance among Public Companies," lndustrial and Labor Relations Review, 50(1), 60-79.

Brown, S., Fakhfakh, F. and Sessions, 1. G. (1999),“Absenteeism and Employee Sharing: An Empirical Analysis Based on French Panel Data, 1981-1991,"

lndustrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(2), 234-251.

Cable,1. and Wilson, N. (1989),“Profit-sharing and Productivity: An Analysis of UK Engineering Firms," The Economic Journal, 99(396), 366-375.

Cheadle, A. (1989),“Explaining Pattems of Profit-sharing

Activi句,"

lndustrial Relations, 28(3),387-400.

Cho, M. H. (1998),“Ownership Structure, Investment, and the Corporate Value:

An EmpiricalAnalysis," Journal ofFinancial Economics, 47(1), 103-121.

Chung, C. W. (2004).

Employee Bonus in Share Form, Dividends in Cash Form and Dilution Effects," Money Watching & Credit Rating, 133-142.

Chung, R., Firth, M. and Kim, J. (2002), “Institutional Monitoring and Opportunistic Eamings Management," Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 29-48.

Coles, J., Daniel, N. and Naveen, L. (2005),“Boards: Does One Size Fit All?"

Working Paper, Arizona State University and Purdue University.

Conte, M. and Svejnar, 1. (1990), “The Performance Effects of Employee Ownership Plans." in Blinder, A. (ed.),

P句lÏng

for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence, (143-181), Washington, D.

c.:

The Brookings Institution.

Coyle-Shapiro, J.,

Moηow,

P., Richardson, R. and Dunn, S. (2002),“Using Profit Sharing to Enhance Employee Attitudes: A Longitudinal Examination of the

E宜的ts

on Trust and Commitment," Human Resource

Manα~geme肘,

41(2), 423-439.

Dean, J. and Uimonen, T. 2002,“Taiwan Bonus Triggers Concems-Huge Stock Awards Prompt Closer Scrutiny Of Company Accounting", The Asian Wall

28

Street Journal (July 18).

The Asymmetric distribution between Stock Bonus and Stock Dividends .Net Incentives or Entrenchments?

Fenn, G. W. and Liang, N.

(200 1),“c。中orate

Payout Policy and Managerial Stock Incentives," Journal 01 Financial Economics, 60(1),45-72.

Fitzroy, F. and Kraft, K. (1987),

相關文件