中國醫藥大學機構典藏 China Medical University Repository, Taiwan:Item 310903500/25971
全文
(2) †.
(3) . NSC 87-2314-B-039-010. . 86 8 1
(4) 87 7 31
(5). !"#. .
(6) $%&'()*. . . 0123>
(7) DE 123!0 12ghiJ}~ NE, DA {|. wA NE, DA, 5-HT {|34HIiJ}~A. Black and white chambers. 5-HT {|9.
(8) Elevated plus-maze . !"#$%&'(.
(9) . )*+,-)./+,012342 buspirone 56789 :;<=3>?@ A3. Abstract. B !"#$%&'(C 0.1. 0.5 g/kg DE3)*+, )./+,FGHI. In this study, we investigated the anxiolytic effect. &JCKLMNOPQEPRS)*T. of Coptis rhizome and berberine after acute and. UKNO VOKWX*Y34Z[\C. one-week administration by black/white test and. KLMNO9>
(10) . elevated plus-maze, the sedative effect of Coptis. ?@A3)*+,] )./+,]FGHI&J. rhizome and berberine after acute and one-week. C^_`LMNO TU^_`K*Y3Z[&. administration by hexobarbital-induced hypnosis and. JCab`LMNO TUa_`K*Y9. locomotor. . B &'(C 0.5 g/kg DE3)*+,. investigated the sedative mechanism of berberine by. )./+,FGHI hexobarbital cdefNO. combining APO, n -MT, LD+BEZ, PCPA and. ghiJjdQE9&'( 0.5 g/kg Gk0. 5-HTP, and the anxiolytic and sedative mechanisms. APO3LD+BEZ PCPA cdQEHIl4H. of the berberine by detecting the changes of. mn -MT 5-HTP cdQEZ[9. monoamines in the rats’ brain.. activity. detection.. Furthermore,. we.
(11) opqrstuviJwxyz{|<. In the black/white test, the methanol extract of. =3&'( 0.1 0.5 g/kg GghiJ}~ NE, DA. Coptis rhizome and berberine after acute and. {| wA NE, DA, 5-HT {|34HIiJ}. one-week administration prolonged the first time. ~A 5-HT {|9. entry, time spent in the white compartment and the. :;<=. B !". total changes between the two compartments, shorten. $%&'()*+, )./+,>hDE. the time spent in the black compartment. In the 1.
(12) elevated plus-maze test, the methanol extract of. )*+,-(./01234567. Coptis rhizome and berberine after acute and. 89*:;<=>?-()@ABCD1. one-week administration prolonged the entries and. EFG(/1HIJKLM NOPQ. time spent in the open arms. The methanol extract of. R36S9* LMT$UVW. Coptis rhizome and berberine at higher dose after. XY-Z[\6]^_(`a$. acute and one-week administration prolonged the. bc/deef$ghi&R-j. hexobarbital-induced sleeping time in mice and. k(1)$ lmn&,opqr
(13) . decreased the locomotor activity in the rats. The. (protoberberine type alkaloids; berberine,. hypermotilities induced by APO, LD+BEZ and PCPA. palmatine) (2)$stuvwxy %&. were. z (3) {D|(4) }~(5) . decreased. by. the. berberine. and. the. hypomotilities induced by HAL and 5-HTP were augumented. by. the. berberine.. The. (6) (7)PR$. berberine.
(14) &!zR
(15) &. decreased the levels of NE and DA in the cortex, the. .R$
(16) !|RK. NE, DA and 5-HT in the brain stem, and increased. D . the levels of 5-HT in the cortex. These results suggested that the methanol extract. D| D ¡&. of Coptis rhizome and berberine after acute and. ¢$
(17) &£R¤¥¦. one-week administration possessed anxiolytic and. §¨o©§ª«$¬&¢ _/d. sedative effects. The sedative mechanism of the. -.®/¯*k°!uR±. berberine was related to the decrease in the. ²³&´µ$¶·vw¸F¹Nº»Black. catecholaminergic system activity and the increase in. & White) ¼ { ½ ¾ ¿ À Á » Elevated. the serotonergic system activity. The anxiolytic. plus-mazeÂP¡. mechanism of the berberine was related to the. ÇÈÉÊ. decrease in the levels of NE, DA in the cortex and NE,. RBsÌÍÎÏR*. DA, 5-HT in the brain stem, and the increase in the. ÐÑ®-jÒÓÔÕ-jÒÓÖ{*ÒÓ. levels of 5-HT in the cortex.. ר&ÙÚ<H*R3 diazepam?. yÃÄÅÆ´µ &,pË.
(18) *. ¶·vwÛ´µ ÇÈÉÊ Keywords: Coptis rhizome, Berberine,. pË. Antianxiety.
(19) *R5ܸ´µ. ÇÈÉÊ. &,pË.
(20) ÙÚ. <HÒÓKÒÓ*¢Ý$±FsÌ.
(21) . ÍÎÞR!. buspirone ßà. áâFãäl-j,å$. . &,. Coptis spps.!"#$%&'(. 2.
(22) \VX\V2SPY U1%ÒÓ. »ÐÂyÃæ*çè. ÇÈÉÊ. yÃÏR* *érêë3.
(23) 60 pGZì. UO[2\ U]1^_ ºX. × 1. . ` Uab®öк!cø, º. Coptis. ,!deõ XÐõªfO*ÐyÃ&. chinensis Franch.!"#$ ì FÇÈíî*® 50ï×ðñ. !ø, +º4gh9»line crossingsÂ. òÊóôZõöõ÷ó øùúòÊ. !õ(8)$yÃF buspirone(2 mg/kgi.p.). ûü|ýþ¯ ÇÈ. ßàáP 20 pGijFÃ(9)$. ÉÊ. $ <2> à ¼ { ½ ¾ ¿ À Á. (Elevated. plus-maze) kl*
(24) . »ÂyÃ. yÃmnqm Pellow n 1985 l. <1> à º ë»Light/dark testÂ*
(25). oRãä!(Elevated. . º ëR¡. . plus-maze)qqpqrst©R!¡. ° ! ë·1yÃI. ÄÅlrumnqm¡. ¡!Ê. uv{/wx,!V(10)$#+. !"(8)$·#$ 1%!y. '/wy(40z10 cm)+'{|y(40z10z. Ã&ÏâoÐ'yÃ&(oN)»27X27. 40 cm)F/w*ߨ (10z10 cm). cmÂ*Ð'(o¹)»27X18 cmÂ+y. $. . Ã&,#47cm{!-./·-01&Ð yÃpÐõPâÐQPâÐ. /2»7X7 cmÂöyÃ&013&l4 %$ 5)!!6¡7878R9. õPâ ÇÈÉÊ. :;9X9cm<W$öyÃ4=&l>?á. 1%ÒÓpR#2STPK$U 60 p. º R 100W N @ A B » A @ C. G?ÐQPâöVPÐõ WP. 4400lux ºR40WD@AB+AB. \VX\V2SPY$U1%ÒÓ. Ë7837cm{$öE¡. ÇÈÉÊ. öE¡. F5pG±.
(26) F.
(27) 60 pGì$. Uw}yÃ&~yá ]1^àl. FHì78IJKyÃ. Ð'{|yX`$Ui}/wy{. L×MNO×MZN$. |ycõ b/wy*ø,ãä (11)$yÃI W 5 pGöE$U. yÃpÐõPâÐQPâÐ õPâ ÇÈÉÊ. ëÐõöâ 20 E$yÃø,LM.
(28) F. 1%ÒÓpR#2STPK U 60 p. NO×MZN$yÃF buspirone(2. G?ÐQPâöVPÐõ WP. mg/kgi.p.)ßàáP 20 pGi 3.
(29) *. jFÃ$. Ï ¡Ó*
(30)
(31) F1%ÒÓpR#2ST. <3> à hexobarbitalklHø,*
(32) PK$U60pGZK× yÃpÐõPâÐQPâÐ õPâ ÇÈÉÊ. pRú. R¡ mq» <2>¡ ¢ ëq 5p.
(33) F. Gì$U6} ¡Ó ë¡ £5p. 1%ÒÓpR#2STPK U 60 p. G/X`¡ ± WX` 1 ø$. G?ÐQPâöVPÐõ WP. àáâP vehicle$. \VX\V2SPY U1%ÒÓ. yÃÏ©Rª4 catecholaminergic. ÇÈÉÊ. system.
(34) 60 pGZp. !ÒÓø,pRAPO»0.3. R` hexobarbital»100 mg/kgÂk. mg/kg s.c.Â10 pGqP¢¤©Rq. lHX`L hexobarbital O. ¥¦§ç(14)¨ © -MT»50 mg/kg i.p. Â2. U*ß»righting reflexÂø,. øqP(15)?L-dopa»200 mg/kg i.p. Â. »onsetÂLßO!ø,. 50 p G q P ¦ benserazide » 50. »sleeping timeduration (12) $àáâP. mg/kgi.p.Â80 pGqPI3¤. vehicle$. ©Rq¥¦§ç(16) $. <4> à$U ¡Ó*
(35) . <6> àª4 serotonergic system *. ¡Ó* ëq©RY¡. ¡Ó. Ï ¡Ó*
(36) . ëf(1-Opto-Varimex-3 Animal.
(37) F1%ÒÓpR#2ST. Activity Meter, USA)$yÃpÐõPâ. PK$U 60 pGZK× pRú. ÐQPâÐõPâ ÇÈ. R¡ mq» <2>¡ ¢ ëq 5 p. ÉÊ. Gì$U6} ¡Ó ë¡ £ 5.
(38) F1%ÒÓpR#. 2STPK$U55pG?ÐQP. pG/X`¡ ± WX` 1 . âöVPÐõ WP\VX\. ø$àáâP vehicle$. V2SPY$U1%ÒÓ ÇÈÉ Ê. yÃÏ©Rª4.
(39) 55pGw}·4. serotonergic system. !ÒÓø,. 5pGZ/X`$U*=¡. ª 5-HTP»50 mg/kg i.p.Â30 pGqP. j!ª ( ¡. (17)?PCPA»200 mg/kg i.p.Â24 ø. ?6¡cËP)$©R$U. qP(18)$. öâ6E± WX`1 ø(13)$à áâ3PYvehicle$. <7> à$U4«¬lt. ýC*
(40). ÇÈò. <5> àª4catecholaminergic system 4. *op
(41) 2.
(42) SPY$UÐ ø¡ ì$U®]¡ Ê. ¶ W ª Æ p  ª Æ Z F. ; ¡ ì·â¯°±²³´. Mann-Whitney U-test Ãël,ÇÆ*ÈÉ. µ $ ¬ ì ⯠p o cortex K brain. Ê P Ë 0.05 F×ø½Ì&h. stem 1p¡ ® 5ml 0.01N HCl K 500¶ l. ÅÍÎ$. 0.1M EDTA ×F3·v¸*¡ ¦} 4 g NaCl¡ ±F 12 ml n-butanol òÊ¡ ¹º. . Ë(¡ Ê n-butanol »¡ Z¦} 17 ml. 1 à º ë»Light/dark testÂ*
(43) . n-heptan K 400¶ l 0.025N HCl ¼û¹. #ÐÐOÐÑÒÓÈÔ ÇÈò. º*¡ ½«¬6}¼û»$ ¾ b n-heptane »WF 200¶ l 0.2M tris-Hcl. Ê. ¿À¼û»pH8.5¹ºòʱË(¡. NºXÐõ# ºÕO º!ø, a. !«¬t. (19).
(44) »0.10.5 g/kgÂà U®¹. b® º!ø,3&Ö×!RþØ®. $pËÏ4«¬. »NEDA5-HTÂF5 ë*$ º!ø,¥¦®+º,!deõ$ ©R{Áû»Â»HPLC model 510, #ÐóOÐÙÒÓÈÔ ÇÈò. Solvent Delivery system M45  » Waters Associates  à ; » Electrochemical. Ê. Detectors LC-4C  » Bioanalytical system. õ WP\Và U®¹NºXÐ. Inc.  ë * $ p Ë Ï R Column . õ# ºÕO º!ø, ab® º!. Lichrospher 100»RP-18 endcapped,4mmz. ø ,3&Ö×!RþØ® º!ø. 125mm»E.Merck 50734¡ 6¡4¦. ,¥¦®+º,!deõ$. &. PIC. B7(Waters. Associates). * 2 à¼{½¾¿ÀÁ (Elevated plus-maze). methanol/water ,lñÁ 2.0 ml/min$pË ¼;.
(45) »0.10.5 g/kgÂöVPÐ. kl*
(46) . ^ÄÝ©R Data module M746 ½. Ð\ ÐÒÓÈÔ ÇÈòÊ. X`*$.
(47) »0.10.5 g/kgÂÐõPÐ <8> hÅpÂ. ÚÛP3à U®¼{½¾¿ÀÁ/. yÃÏ*hexobarbital klH. wyi}õø,3&¥¦!R¢. l ¡ÓyÃ3F one-way ANOVA. |y!i}õø,3&üÜ!R$. pÂlªÆZF Duncan'n multiple range test ÃëhűpÂl,ÇÆ*ÈÉ Ê P Ë 0.05 F×ø½Ì&hÅÍ. 3 à hexobarbital klHø,*
(48) . Î$¹Nºyü{½¾¿ÀÁ½F. 3ÐÝ Ð¾ÒÓÈÔ ÇÈò Ê. non-parameter hÅÏF Kruskal-Wallis « 5.
(49) »0.10.5 g/kgÂÐõP.
(50) ÐÚÛP3à hexobarbital kl!Hø. AïÅ;Æ!ÄÅ(20)$Crawley & Goodwin. ,&Ö×R$. *vwls#ãU1ðñ/w. æç. è!ò¶·ó;ãU®¹NºØk l+º,deõüÜ XÐõ#NºO. 4 à$U ¡Ó*
(51) 3оÐÒÓÈÔ ÇÈòÊ. º!ø,Øab®¹º!ø,N.
(52) »0.10.5 g/kgÂÐõPÐÚ. º×*´ëj½·j!RÆô. ÛP3à$Ul ¡Ó&R$. ãäõ21$&vwõ;benzodiazepine 3chlordiazepoxidediazepamØÖ×. 5 àª4 catecholaminergic system *. U® º*bø,A%&. Ï ¡Ó*
(53) . · Ò Ó®Crawley & Goodwin Costall. 3оÒÓÈÔ
(54) »0.5 g/kg Onaivi&Martin Young&JohnsonP*vw à APO LD+BEZ kl$Ul ¡Ó¥. txy22-24$*5buspirone®Costall. ¦&R?à© -MT kl$Ul . Carli Lopez-Rubalcava MisslinSanchez. ¡Ó&ÞR$. P*vwlsãUab® º*bø , Ö × A ® º b ø , Ø þ Ø 23,. 6 àª4 serotonergic system *. 25-27 . Ï ¡Ó*
(55) . $vw*ßàáâbuspirone*yÃ. ÒÓ3KÏqCrawleyCostallP*vwÒ. 3оÑÒÓÈÔ
(56) »0.5 g/kg ÓÐG$A òÊ
(57) 0.1 à p-chlorophenylalanine kl$Ul ¡ 0.5 g/kgÒÓ×ls!Ö× UXÐõ# Ó¥¦&R?à 5-hydroxytryptophan. ºÕO º!ø, º*bø,. kl$Ul ¡Ó&ÞR$. +º,deõ. üÜ U º*. bø,$·ÒÓKvw*ßàáâ* 7 à$U4«¬lt. ýC*
(58). diazepambuspironeÐGÈÔ òÊ. .
(59) %&*R$. 3оóÒÓÈÔ
(60) »0.10.5 g/kgÂ3!ß$Uà NE, DA ýC. lõ®¼yž¿¨ÀÁkl. á NE, DA, 5-HT ýC±¥¦$Uà. ÄÅ*yÃMontgomery®lvwõ. 5-HT ýC$. ;·yÃq£RãUà\®{!7 /w!x,Øö÷¶Akl. . AïÅ;Æ!ÄÅ28$PellowP*vwl. âÏ®¹Nºkl UÄÅ*. s ¼yž¿¨ÀÁqÐ'ø«. yùNºq£RãU®äå æç. Á!RÆ ë. èøléØê´ëìçè!í¡î. R 6. ù. &úÔG. ·ÄÅà U$U3&R.
(61) 29 . $®Pellow ListerRodgersP*vw. È
(62) ÈÔ òÊ.
(63) . õ;FãäãU/wy*i}õ. 0.5 g/kgú9ÐõPÔÐQP3%&Ù. bø,*ûpüôR!õ. ÚR$. 29-31. $Ïq®PellowP*vwxy¼. LD+BEZPCPAÏkl* ¡Ó±. yž¿¨ÀÁ!RÆ ëbenzodiazepine. ¥ © -MT 5-HTP Ï k l * ¡ Ó . !?A®RodgersýCole%þ. ÈÔ
(64) 0.5 g/kg*ÙÚR·K. õ;PYdiazepambenzodiazepine. ßcatecholaminergic system¥. RÒ3chlordiazepoxidebretazenil!. serotonergic system&¢$.
(65) 0.5 g/kg!ßAPO. È¥¦i}/wyõÖ×®/wy bø,ûpü 32 33 $Abuspirone®. # Ká
(66) h4. Dunn Soderpalm Lee & Rodgers. !=. Kostowski Luscombe P * v wÐGl. lt. s!¥¦ Uab®/wybø,. &õ;ì 5-HT }áØk. i}/wyõûpüÈÔbuspirone®. lAüßá 5-HT *ýC½. ¼yž¿¨ÀÁÄÅ&R. ØR 38-40 ?lõá. 34-36. $vwÏR*ßàáâdiazepam. DA hÔ locus coeruleus * NE =t. buspirone3!¥¦ U®/wy*b. øÜØ*41$·51990. ø,i}õûpüRÒÓK . Golembiowska õ; ipsapirone *. I*vwÒÓÐG$A òÊ. Rq#üÜ 5-HT ! turnoverrate¥.
(67) 0.10.5 g/kgÒÓ×!¥¦. ¦ NE DA * tumover rate Ï42?#. U®/wy*bø,i}õûp. locus coeruleus NE !=Øå. üÈÔ òÊ. raphe =!4344A ipsapirone.
(68) %&. (3 5-HT NE DA P). !Ó&1!p!¢Ý37$. Ø# 5-HT1A autoreceptors üÜ. *R$. = 5-HT ! turnover rateiAü raphe à locus coeruleus *© NE. ¶¹Nº¼yž¿½ÀÁkl * ¡j. =ê(disinhibition)R±. * ¡ ëhexobarbitalk. ¥¦ NE * turnover rate4546 ?B substantia. UÄÅ3¡ ij¡. . nigra ! DA =Ü raphe =!.
(69) 0.5 g/kgÒÓ×ÐõÐQP%. ô·t Ipsapirone øsubsta. ß$Ul ¡ÓÖ×hexobarbitalkl. nigra ! DA =ÜØê. *Hø,A òÊ. R. lHyÃÒÓls òÊ.
(70) . DA * turnover rate Ü&¥¦*s. 0.1 g/kgÒÓ×ÐõÐQPà$Ul. $#·!á 5-HT NE DA P«. ¡Óhexobarbitalkl*Hø,½ú. ¬=g 7. Klt. ýC*ª®.
(71) !K-jÐ. n*!). medicinal herbs. Journal of. 38-4147. $ZIÏ "#$Pvw. Ethnopharmacology 1986; 15: 279-288.. õ;ôà NE DA *ýCüÜ. 4. Chen HC, Hsieh MT: Hemodynamic. NE DA % turnover rate ¥¦øá. effects of "san-huang-hsieh-hsin-tang" in. 5-HT NE DA *ýCüÜ 5-HT NE. patients with essential hypertension.. DA % turnover rate ¥¦øØÙÚ. American Journal of Chinese Medicine. R 48 $¶·vwiÐ&£R. 1986; 14: 51-58.. . ({Áû4»Â'()´µ. 5. Takase H, Imanishi K, Miura O, Yumioka.
(72) 0.10.5 g/kg àyá àá. E: A possible mechanism for the gastric. «¬lt. mucosal protection by oren-gedoku-to. *ýCª*
(73) y. (OGT), a traditional herbal medicine.. ÃÒÓÈÔ
(74) 0.10.5 g/kg 2SPY. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 1989;. 3!üÜàá4 NE DA *ýC. 51: 17-23.. á 5-HT *ýC±¥¦à 5-HT !. 6. Yamahara J: Behavioral pharmacology of. ýC$!)
(75) 0.1 g/kg ÒÓ×*. berberine-type alkaloids. (1) Central. R!¤ß$Uà NE, DA ýC. depressive action of Coptidis rhizoma and. á NE, DA, 5-HT ýC±¥¦$U. its constituents. Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi. à 5-HT ýC&¢$. 1976; 72; 899-908.. *ùFÒÓÈÔ òÊ. 7. Kumazawa N, Ohta S, Tu SH,.
(76) 3% È*ÙÚR. Kamogawa A, Shinoda M: Protective. lR·!¤Kß$Uà NE, DA. effects of various methanol extracts of. ýCá NE, DA, 5-HT ýC±¥¦. crude drugs on experimental hepatic injury. $Uà 5-HT ýC&¢$. induced by alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate in rats YakugakuZasshi 1991; 111: 199-204.. . 8. Griebel G, Moreau JL, Jenck F, Misslin R, Martin JR Acute and chronic treatment. 1. Tang W, Eisenbrand G: Chinese Drugs of Plant Origin. Pp.362-371, Springer Verlag,. with 5-HT reuptake inhibitors differentially. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1992.. modulate emotional responses in anxiety. 2. Lee MK, Kim HS: Inhibitory effects of. models in rodents. Psychopharmacology 1994; 113: 463-470.. protoberberine alkaloids from the roots of. 9. Ogawa N, Hara C, Takaki S: Anxiolytic. Coptis japonica on catecholamine biosynthesis in PC12 cells. Planta Medica. Activity of SC-48274 compared with those. 1996; 62: 31-34.. of buspirone and diazepam in experimental anxiety models. Japan J Pharmacol 1993;. 3. Franzblau SG, Cross C: Comparative in. 61: 115-21.. vitro antimicrobial activity of Chinese 8.
(77) 10. Montgomery KC The relation between. on central nervous system combination of. fear induced by novelty stimulation and. L-dopa and benserazide HCl. Tokyo IKa. exploratory behaviour. J Comp Physiol. Daigaku Zasshii 1977; 35:715-30. 17. Everett GM Effect of. Psychol 1955; 48: 254-260.. 5-hydroxytryptophan on brain levels of. 11. Pellow S, File SE: Anxiolytic and axiogenic drug effects on exploratory. dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin. activity in an elevated plus-maze: A novel. in mice. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol. test of anxiety in the rat. Pharmacol. 1974; 10: 261-262. 18. Kenneth KB, Weissman A. Biochem Behav 1986;24:525-9.. p-Chlorophenylalanine: a specific depletor. 12. Fujomori H Porentiation of barbital hypnosis as an evaluation method for. of brain serotoin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. central nervous system depressant.. 1966; 154: 499- 516. 19. Shibuya T, Sato K, Saiafsky B (1982). Psychopharmacology 1965; 7:374-377.. Simulaneous measurement of biogenic. 13. Itoh T, Murai S, Yoshida Y, Asito H and Ching HC Effects of methamphetamine. amines and related compounds by high. and morphine on the vertical and. performance liquid chromatograghy. horizontal motor activities in mice.. (HPLC). Int J Clin Pharmacol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1987; 27:. 20:297-301. 20. Crawley JN, Goodwin FK: Preliminary. 139-197.. report of a simple animal behavior model. 14. Montanaro N, Vaccheri A, Dall OR, Gandolfi O Time course of rat motility. for the anxiolytic effects of. response to apomorphine: A simple model. benzodiazepines. Pharmacol Biochem. for studying preferential blockade of brain. Behav 1980; 13:167-70. 21. Young R, Johnson DN: A fully automated. dopamine receptors mediating seddation. Psychopharmacology 1983; 81:214-9.. light/dark apparatus useful for comparing. 15. Widerlov E, Lewander T Inhibition of the. anxiolytic agents. Pharmacol Biochem & Behav 1991; 40:739-43.. in vivo biosynthesis and changes of. 22. Sanchez C: Serotonergic mechanisms. catecholamine levels in rats brain after alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine; Time-and. involved in the exploratory behaviour of. dose-response relationships.. mice in a fully automated. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol. two-compartment black and white test. 1978; 304:111-123.. box. Pharmacol Toxicol 1995; 77:71-8. 23. Costall B, Jones BJ, Kelly ME, Naylor RJ,. 16. Shibuya T, Takhashi N Pharmacological studies of L-dopa andd dopa. Tomkins DM: Exploration of mice in a. decarboxylase inhibitor especially effect. black and white test box: validation as a 9.
(78) 30. Lister RG: The use of a plus-maze to. model of anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem &. measure anxiety in the mouse.. Behav 1989; 32(3):777-85.. Psychopharmacology 1987; 92(2):180-5.. 24. Lopez-Rubalcava C, Saldivar A,. 31. Rodgers RJ, Cole JC, Cobain M, Daly P,. Fernandez-Guasti A: Interaction of GABA and serotonin in the anxiolytic. Doran PJ, Eells JR, Wallis P:. action of diazepam and serotonergic. Anxiogenic-like effects of fluprazine and. anxiolytics. Pharmacol Biochem & Behav. eltoprazine in the mouse elevated. 1992; 43(2):433-40.. plus-maze: profile comparisons with 8-OH-DPAT, CGS 12066B, TFMPP and. 25. Onaivi ES, Martin BR:. mCPP. Behav Pharmacol 1992; 3:621-34.. Neuropharmacol-ogical and physiological. 32. Cole JC, Rodgers RJ: An ethological. validation of a computer-controlled two-compartment black and white box for. analysis of the effects of chlordiazepoxide. the assessment of anxiety. Progress in. and bretazenil (Ro 16-6028) in the murine. NeuroPsycho-pharmacology & Biological. elevated plus- maze. Behav Pharmacol. Psychiatry 1989; 13(6):963-76.. 1993; 4: 573-80. 33. Rodgers RJ, Cole JC: The elevated. 26. Carli M, Prontera C, Samanin R: Evidence that central. plus-maze: Pharmacology, methodology. 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neurones are. and ethology. In: Cooper SJ, Hendrie CA,. involved in the anxiolytic activity of. eds. Ethology and psychopharmacology.. buspirone. Br J Pharmacol 1989;. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons 1994;. 96(4):829-36.. 9-44.. 27. Misslin R, Griebel G, Saffroy-Spittler M,. 34. Dunn RW, Corbett R, Fielding S: Effects. Vogel E: Anxiolytic and sedative effects. of 5-HT1A receptor agonists and NMDA. of 5-HT1A ligands, 8-OH-DPAT and. receptor antagonists in the social. MDL 73005EF, in mice. Neuroreport. interaction test and the elevated plus maze.. 1990; 1(3-4):267-70.. Eur J Pharmacol 1989; 169(1):1-10. 35. Kostowski W, Dyr W, Krzascik P, Jarbe. 28. Montgomery KC: The relation between fear induced by novelty stimulation and. T, Archer T: 5-Hydroxytryptamine1A. exploratory behaviour. J Comp Physiol. receptor agonists in animal models of. Psychol. 1955; 48:254-60.. depression and anxiety. Pharmacol & Toxicol 1992; 71(1):24-30.. 29. Pellow S, Chopin P, File SE, Briley M:. 36. Soderpalm B, Hjorth S, Engel JA: Effects. Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of. of 5-HT1A receptor agonists and. anxiety in the rat. J Neurosci Meth. 1985;. L-5-HTP in Montgomery's conflict test.. 14(3):149-67.. Pharmacol, Biochem & Behav 1989; 10.
(79) locus coeruleus from the dorsal raphe and. 32(1):259-65.. its action on responses to noxiousstimuli.. 37. Vander AJ, Sherman JH, Luciano DS:. J Physiol 1979; 286:401-15.. Consciousness and behavior. In: Human. 44. Verge D. Daval G. Patey A. Gozlan H. el. physiology: The mechanisms of body function. Vander AJ, Sherman JH,. Mestikawy S. Hamon M: Presynaptic. Luciano DS(eds) , USA, Mc Graw-Hill,. 5-HT autoreceptors on serotonergic cell. 1994; 369-82.. bodies and/or dendrites but not terminals are of the 5-HT1A subtype. Eur J. 38. Thiebot MH, Hamon M, Soubrie P: Attenuation of induced-anxiety in rats by. Pharmacol 1985; 113(3):463-4.. chlordiazepoxide: role of raphe dorsalis. 45. Beninger RJ, The role of dopamine in. benzodiazepine binding sites and. locomotor and learing. Brain Res Rev 1983;. serotoninergic neurons. Neuroscience.. 6:173-96. 46. Hsieh MTT, Peng WH, Hsieh CC: Effects. 1982; 7(9):2287-94.. of DL-tetrahydropalmatine on motor. 39. Thiebot MH, Soubrie P, Hamon M, Simon P: Evidence against the. activity and the brain monoamine. involvement of serotonergic neurons in. concentration in rats. Chin J Physiol 1994;. the anti-punishment activity of diazepam. 37:79-82.. in the rat. Psychopharmacology 1984; 82(4):355-9. 40. Higgins GA, Jones BJ, Oakley NR, Tyers . MB: Evidence that the amygdala is involved in the disinhibitory effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacology 1991; 104(4):545-51. 41. Stahl SM: Essential psychopharmacology: neuroscientific basis and practial applications. New York, Cambrige university press, 1996;167-215. 42. Golembiowska K: Ipsapirone, a new anxiolytic drug, stimulates catecholamine turnover in various regions of the rat brain. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm 1990; 42:143-50. 43. Segal M: Serotonergic innervation of the 11.
(80) . 60. First time entry (sec.). *** 40. ***. ***. ** *. 20. 0. Control. 0.1. 0.5. CRMeOH ext.. 0.1. 0.5 (g/kg) 2 (mg/kg). Berberine. BUS. Fig 1. Effects of methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.), berberine and buspirone (BUS) after acute treatment on the first time entry in black and white compartment in mice. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group (Kruskal-Wallis H following by Mann-Whitney U test).. 12.
(81) Time spent in white compartment (sec.). ***. 200. ***. *** ***. 150. ***. 100. 50. 0. Time spent in black compartment (sec.). 300. 250. ***. 200. *** 150. ***. ***. ***. 100. 50. 0. Control. 0.1. 0.5. CRMeOH ext.. . 0.1. 0.5 (g/kg) 2 (mg/kg). Berberine. BUS. Fig 2. Effects of methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.) berberine, and buspirone (BUS) after acute treatment on the time spent in white and black compartments of black and 13 < 0.001 as compared with the white test in mice. ***P control group (Kruskal-Wallis H following by Mann-Whitney U test)..
(82) Total changes between two compartments (counts). ***. 60. 50. ***. **. 0.1. 0.5. ***. **. 40. 30. 20. 10. 0. Control. BUS. CRMeOH ext. 0.1. 0.5 (g/kg). Berberine. Fig 3. Effects of buspirone (BUS), methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext) and berberine on the total changes between two compartments in the Black & white test in mice. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group (Oneway ANOVA following by Scheffe test). . 14.
(83) 50. ***. First time entry (sec.). 40. ***. 30. ** *. 20. 10. 0. Control. 0.1. 0.5. CRMeOH ext.. 0.1. 0.5 (g/kg). Berberine. Fig 4. Effects of methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.) and berberine after one-week administration on the first time entry from white to black in black & white test in mice. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group. (Kruskal-Wallis H following by Mann-Whitney U test). . 15.
(84) Time spent in white compartment (sec.). 250. 200. ***. ***. *** ***. 150. 100. 50. 0. Time spent in black compartment (sec.). 300. 250. 200. ***. 150. ***. ***. ***. 100. 50. 0. Control. 0.1. 0.5. CRMeOH ext.. . 0.1. 0.5 (g/kg). Berberine. Fig 5. Effects of methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.) and berberine after one-week administration on the time spent in the white and black compartments in black & white test in mice. ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group (Kruskal-Wallis H following by Mann16 Whitney U test)..
(85) Total changes between two compartments (counts). 60. ***. 50. **. **. **. 40. 30. 20. 10. 0. Control. 0.1. 0.5. CRMeOH ext.. 0.1. 0.5 (g/kg). Berberine. Fig 6. Effects of methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.) and berberine after one week administration on the total changes between two compartments in black & white test. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group (One-way ANOVA following by Scheffe test). . 17.
(86) . ***. 80 70. Time spent Entries. ***. 30. **. 20 10. **. ***. 40. **. ***. 50. ***. ***. 60. ***. Time spent (sec.) and entries in open arms. 90. 0. Control. BUS. CRMeOH ext.. 0.1. CRMeOH ext. BER. 0.5. 0.1. BER. 0.5 (g/kg). Fig 7. Effects of buspirone (BUS, 2 mg/kg), methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.) and berberine (BER) on the time spent and entries in open arms during 5 mins in mice. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group, respectively (One-way ANOVA following by Scheffe test).. 18.
(87) . **. 20. **. ***. 30. ***. ***. 40. ***. 50. **. 60. ***. Time spent Entries. ***. 70. ***. Time spent (sec.) and entries in open arms. 80. 10 0. Control. BUS. CRMeOH ext.. 0.1. CRMeOH ext. BER. 0.5. 0.1. BER. 0.5 (g/kg). Fig 8. Effects of buspirone (BUS, 2 mg/kg), methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.) and berberine (BER) after one-week administration on the time spent and entries in open arms during 5 mins in mice. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group, respectively (One-way ANOVA following by Scheffe test).. 19.
(88) . 70 60. ***. Onset Duration. **. Time (mins). 50 40 30 20 10 0. Control. CRMeOH ext. CRMeOH ext. BER. 0.1. 0.5. 0.1. BER. 0.5 (g/kg). Fig 9. Effect of methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.) and berberine (BER) on the hexobarbital-induced hypnosis in mice. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group. (One-way ANOVA following by Scheffe test).. 20.
(89) Onset 120. ***. ***. 140. Duration. Times (mins). 100 80 60 40 20 0. Control. CR MeOH ext CR MeOH ext. Ber. Ber. Fig 10. Effect of methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CR MeOH ext) and berberine after one-week administration on the hexobarbital-induced hypnosis in mice. ***P < 0.001, as compared with the control group. (One-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe test). . 21.
(90) Acute One week. 2000. ***. 1500. 1000. ***. *** **. Locomotor activity counts /30 min. 2500. 500. 0. Control. CRMeOH ext CRMeOH ext. BER. 0.1. 0.5. 0.1. BER. 0.5 (g/kg). Fig 11. Effect of methanol extract of Coptis rhizome (CRMeOH ext.) and berberine (BER) after acute or one-week administration on the locomotor activity in rats. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared with the control group, respectively. (One-way ANOVA following by Scheffe test). . 22.
(91) Locomotor activity counts /30 min. ***. ***. 5000. 4000. 3000. 2000. ***. 1000. 0. Control. BER. APO APO/BER. AMT. AMT/BER LD+BEZ LD+BEZ/BER. Fig 12. Effects of berberine (BER, 0.5 g/kg) on the changes of apomorphine (APO, 3 mg/kg)-, α-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMT, 100 mg/kg)-, and l-dopa plus benserazide (LD+BEZ)induced locomotor activities. ***P < 0.001 as compared with the APO and AMT group, respectively. (One-way ANOVA following by Scheffe test). . 23.
(92) *** Locomotor activity counts /30min. 3500 3000 2500. ***. 2000 1500 1000 500 0. Control. BER. 5-HTP 5-HTP/BER PCPA. PCPA/BER. Fig 13.Effects of berberine (BER, 0.5 g/kg) on the changes of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP, 50 mg/kg)- and p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA, 200 mg/kg)-induced locomotor activities in rats. ***P < 0.001 as compared with 5-HTP and PCPA group, respectively. (Oneway ANOVA following by Scheffe test).. 24.
(93) 4000. **. 2000. **. 2500. *** ***. 3000. *** ***. Control BER 0.1 g/kg BER 0.5 g/kg. *** ***. 500. ***. 1000. ***. 1500. * ***. Concentration (ng/g tissue). 3500. 0. NE. DA. 5-HT. Cerebral Cotrex. NE. DA. 5-HT. Brain stem. Fig 14. Effect of BERBERINE (0.1, 0.5 g/kg) on the monoamines' levels in the cortex and brain stem of rats. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001as compared with the control group, respectively. (unpaired Student's t-test).. 25.
(94)
相關文件
臺大機構典藏NTUR (National Taiwan University 二 Repository, http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw) 經驗與協助推 動臺灣學術機構典藏TAIR (Taiwan Academic Institutional Repository,
6 《中論·觀因緣品》,《佛藏要籍選刊》第 9 冊,上海古籍出版社 1994 年版,第 1
The first row shows the eyespot with white inner ring, black middle ring, and yellow outer ring in Bicyclus anynana.. The second row provides the eyespot with black inner ring
With regard to spending structure, visitors from Mainland China spent 60% of the per-capita spending on shopping, whereas those from Hong Kong and Taiwan, China spent 79% and 74% of
With regard to the spending structure, visitors from Mainland China spent 63% of their per- capita spending on shopping, whereas those from Hong Kong and Taiwan, China spent 79% and
After the SARS crisis in 2003, there is a huge and on-going reform in the post-graduate medical training program to improve the medical service in Taiwan. Our institute has
• The residence time in a particular modulating state is exponentially distributed with parameter μ and, after expiration of this time, the modulating process changes state. •
An elementary energy method is introduced in [18] based on a macro-micro decomposition of the equation into macroscopic and microscopic components to analyze the