• 沒有找到結果。

促發歸屬感與一歲半嬰兒的助人行為 - 政大學術集成

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "促發歸屬感與一歲半嬰兒的助人行為 - 政大學術集成"

Copied!
69
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)立立. 政 治 大. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. •‧. Helping following priming with affiliation in 18-month-old infants.. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v.

(2) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v.

(3)

(4) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v.

(5) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v.

(6) 60. 18. 18. 立立. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. 18. 0. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 18. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 20. 0. 30.

(7) Abstract Previous studies propose that helping behaviors can be an effective strategy for establishing friendly relationship and affiliation with others. However, for eighteen-month-old infants, the ability of helping is under development. Hence, it is difficult to evaluate whether they pursuit affiliation by helping others, especially in natural conditions. In this thesis, two controlled experiments were conducted to understand whether the helping behaviors can be evoked by priming. In the first. 政 治 大 implicit photos to evoke their tendency of affiliation and to measure the influence of 立立 experiment, sixty eighteen-month-old infants were recruited and primed by several. the primes. Results show that the primes do not significantly evoke the subjects to. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. perform more helping behaviors in both conditions: primed by the photos imply. •‧. together and primed by other photos (back-to-back, baseline, and alone). To exclude. y. Nat. the possible interferences of the previous helping tasks, the second experiment. er. io. sit. undertook the same procedures and settings with the first experiment, but modified the task to clarify the needs of helping. Results reveal that the difference of priming. al. n. v i n C htogether and others. effect is still insignificant between However, if the photos are engchi U grouped by the easier-perceivable meaning: representing photos having two objects as. together, and representing photos having only one object as individuality, the significance of priming can be observed. Subjects primed by together photos performed significantly more helping than those primed with individuality photos in specific periods (0-20s and 0-30s). Based on these findings, this study suggests that the perceptual stimulus can stably evoke affiliation of eighteen-month-old infants, and influence the tendency of helping others.. Keywords: helping behavior, affiliation, infants and implicit photos..

(8) " .................................................................................................................. 0 .......................................................................................................... 2 .......................................................................... 2 .............................................................................. 5 ............................................................................................ 5 ................................................................................ 7 ........................................................................................ 9 .................................................................................................. 13 .............................................................................................................. 15 ................................................................ 17 .............................................................. 17 .................................................................. 18 ........................................................................................ 22 ............................................................................................................ 25 .................................................................................................... 25 .......................................................................................................... 25 .................................................................................. 26 ...................................................................................................... 30 .................................................................................................. 32 .................................................................................................... 34 ...................................................................................................... 34 .................................................................. 34 ............................................................................................................ 36 ............................................................................................................ 39 .................................................................................................... 39 ...................................................................................................... 39 .................................................................................. 40 ...................................................................................................... 43 .................................................................................................. 45 .................................................................................................... 46 ...................................................................................................... 46 .................................................................. 46 ............................................................................................................ 48 ............................................................................................ 52. 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. ...................................................................................................................... 57. ". 0".

(9) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Dekovic & Janssens, 1992; Eisenberg et al., 1996;. Hampson, 1984; Raviv, Bar-Tal, Ayalon, & Raviv, 1980. •‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. ". Ch. engchi. 1". i n U. v.

(10) affiliation. helping behavior. helping behavior. prosocial behavior. Grusec, Davidov, & Lundell, 2002; Warneken & Tomasello, 2009a. 立立. •‧ 國. •‧. Grusec, Davidov, &. n. al. selection. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Lundell, 2002. ㈻㊫學. altruism. 政 治 大. i n Darwin 1871 Ch engchi U. Hamilton 1964. ". 2". v. natural. kin selection.

(11) Trivers 1971. reciprocal altruism. 政 治 大. Grusec, Davidov, & Lundell, 2002. 立立. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Lakin. Baumeister. Leary 1995. Caporael 2001. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. affiliation. •‧. harmonious. 2003. Ch. Axelrod. engchi. i n U. v. Hamilton 1981 Lakin. 2003 Gintis. 2003 Brewer 2007. ". 3".

(12) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. ". Ch. engchi. 4". i n U. v.

(13) 1970 Fabes, & Spinrad, 2006. Eisenberg,. 1970. aggression. criminality. 1970. 1970. Eisenberg et al., 2006. 政 治 大 Brownell et al., 2009; Dunfield et al.,. Dunfield, Kuhlmeier, O’Connell, & Kelley, 2011. 立立. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. 2011; Hay, 1979; Hay et al., 1991; Levitt et al., 1985; Liszkowski et al., 2006; Liszkowski et al., 2008; Rheingold, 1982; Vaish et al., 2009; Warneken & Tomasello,. Nat. sit. y. •‧. 2006; Warneken & Tomasello, 2007; Zahn-Waxler et al., 1992. n. al. er. io. Grusec, Davidov, & Lundell, 2002; Warneken & Tomasello, 2009a. i n U. C hDunfield et al., 2011 engchi. v. emotional helping & Tomasello, 2009a. ". 5". Warneken.

(14) Zahn-Waxler Radke-Yarrow. Wagner 1992. 30. 1. 1. Vaish Carpenter. Tomasello 2009. empathy. 立立. 32. a. ㈻㊫學. a. b. a b. y. Nat. a. a. n. al. b. Ch. b. engchi. i n U. v. b b b. b. 18. Dunfield. ". 2011. 24. 18 6". 24. b. b. b b. a. er. io. sit. b. b. b. •‧. •‧ 國. 18. 政 治 大. 2. b. 32. 24.

(15) 18. 24. 2 2 政 治 大. 立立. 18. 1. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. 24. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Hay 1979. 8. Ch. engchi. 12. 8. 18. i n U. 8. v. 24 7. 8 Levitt. ". 18 1985. 8. 24. 20. 29. 36. 7". 12.

(16) 13. 29. 36. Hay. 1991. 48. 立立. 1 48 2 政 治 大 25. y. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. io. sit. 2. n. al. 1. Brownell Svetlova. ". er. Nat. 1. 2. Ch1 engchi. Nichols 2009. 14. 8". i n U. 18. v. 14. 25.

(17) 25. 18. 25 18. 立立. 12. 政 治 大 2. 3. Nat. n. al. er. io. sit. y. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學 25. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. declarative informative gestures. Tomasello,. Carpenter, & Liszkowski, 2007. Liszkowski. 2006. 25. 18. ". 9". 12. 28.

(18) protoimperative gestures 12. 93%. 立立. 12. 18. 政 治 大. 2006. y. Nat. 15. n. al. er. io 16. Ch. engchi. 12. 16. accidental no. ". •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Liszkowski. sit. 88%. 10". i n U. v. 18. self. other.

(19) 15 10. 立立. 政 治 大 12. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學 er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. n. 12. 18. Ch. i n U. engchi. v. 12 Liszkowski Carpenter Tomasello 2008. 28. 12 a. :. a. b : b. a. ". b 11".

(20) ?. 30. 立立. 19%. 政 治 大 44%. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 15. ". 12". i 21n U. v. 12.

(21) 0.47. 0.08 0.36. 0.08. 0.14. 0.33 70%. 27% 12. 立立. 政 治 大. 12. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. instrumental helping. Rheingold 1982. ". Ch. engchi 20. 18. 13". i n U. 20. v. 24. 20. 30.

(22) 20 13. 20. 18. 30. 立立. 18 政 治 大. Tomasello 2006. 24. 18. ㈻㊫學 •‧. •‧ 國. Warneken. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 20. ". 24. 14". 18.

(23) 18. 18. 18. Warneken. Tomasello 2007 Warneken. 24. 14. Tomasello 2006. 14 14. 立立. 14. 政 治 大. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學 •‧. 14. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 14. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2. 2 14 12 12. ". 15".

(24) Warneken & Tomsello, 2009b. 12. 12. 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. ". Ch. engchi. 16". i n U. v.

(25) Baumeister & Leary, 1995 Baumeister & Leary, 1995. Axelrod & Hamilton, 1981; Brewer, 2007; Gintis, Bowles, Boyd & Fehr, 2003. 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Warden. ". n. 26. al. 1982. Burd. Ch. 293. 11. 12. engchi. i n U. 2003. v. 26. 13. Mackinnon 2003. er. io Coleman. Weisz. sit. y. Nat McGuire. 131. 17". 9. 10. 12.

(26) 9 13. Sebanc 2003. 98. support intimacy. 5. conflict. asymmetry. 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Axelrod & Hamilton, 1981;. Brewer, 2007; Gintis et al., 2003; Lakin et al., 2003. 12. priming effect. ". 3. 18".

(27) Lakin. Chartrand 2003. 61 nonconscious affiliation goal 政 治 大 conscious affilation goal no goal 立立. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. friend. •‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. implicit. ". 19". v. partner.

(28) Over. Carpenter 2009b. 5. 28. 5. third-party social exclusion. 政 治 大. ㈻㊫學. •‧ 國. 立立. 30. •‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 5 5. Over. Carpenter 2009a. Lakin. Carpenter 2009b. 5 implicit. ". Chartrand 2003. 20". 18. Over.

(29) 60. 18. 15 together aloneness baseline. back-to-back. 立立. ㈻㊫學. b b. •‧. •‧ 國. a. 政 治 大. n. 18. 18. Over. Ch. engchi. Carpenter 2009a. i n U. v. 18. 18. ". er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 21".

(30) Baumeister & Leary,1995 Axelrod & Hamilton, 1981; Brewer, 2007; Gintis, Bowles, Boyd, & Fehr, 2003. 立立. 政 治 大 12 Rheingold,. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Liszkowski et al., 2006; Liszkowski et al., 2008. 1982; Warneken & Tomasello, 2006; Warneken & Tomasello, 2007. sit. y. Nat. Dunfield et al., 2011; Vaish et al., 2009; Zahn-Waxler et al., 1992. n. al. er. io. Brownell et al., 2009; Hay, 1979; Hay et al., 1991; Levitt et al., 1985. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 12. Over. Carpenter 2009a. 18 18. 18 18. ". 22".

(31) Over Carpenter 2009a. 18 60. 18. together aloneness. baseline back-to-back. 政 治 大. a. 立立. Carpenter 2009a. a. ㈻㊫學. •‧ 國. Over. b. •‧. b. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. b. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 18. b b. ". b. 23".

(32) 18 b. 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. ". Ch. engchi. 24". i n U. v.

(33) 18 Over 2009a. 60. Carpenter. 18 together. baseline. aloneness. back-to-back a. 立立. b. b. •‧ 國. •‧ er. io. sit. y. Nat. a l17.5 19.5 30i v n Ch e n g c15h i U. n. 60 SD=0.63 7. 8. 7. 2009a. ㈻㊫學. 18. Over Carpenter 政 治 大. 30. M =18.54 8. 7. 8. 7. 8. F(3,26) =0.292 p =0.831 F(3,26) =1.826 p=0.167 F(3,56) =1.046. p=0.379. babyhome 4 ". 3 25". 1.

(34) p. 18.48. 18.76. 18.54. 18.37. 0.86. 0.58. 0.67. 0.64. 19.7-17.7. 19.6-17.9. 19.5-17.7. 19.5-17.7. 19.0-17.6. 18.5. 18.47. 18.56. 0.63. 0.64. 0.69. 19.7-17.7. 19.7-17.9. 19.5-17.6. n. Ch. engchi Over. 19.5-17.5. y. 18.55 0.64. 19.5-17.5. er. io. al. i n U. v. Carpenter 2009a 25.3 x19. ". 26". 0.167. 0.64. •‧. 19.7-17.9. Nat. 19.3-17.7. 18. 7. ㈻㊫學. •‧ 國. 0.52 立立. 政18.81治 18.17 大 0.67 0.47. sit. 18.56. 0.831. 0.379.

(35) 立立. 政 治 大 a. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. ". Ch. engchi. 27". i n U. v.

(36) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. #. Ch. engchi. 28#. i n U. v.

(37) Over 52. Carpenter 2009a. 90. 26. 60 6. 立立. 8. 政 治 大. y. sit. n. al. er. io. #. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Nat. b. Ch. engchi. 29#. i n U. v. a.

(38) 立立. 18. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. 15. 政 治 大 15 15. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. a. b. •‧. 15. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. a. 5 !. ! !. #. 30#.

(39) ! ! !. ! ! !. a. a. b 政 治 大. 立立. a. a. y. sit. n. al. b. er. io. b. b. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. b. Nat. b. b. i n 20 Ch engchi U. v. b b. b b. 10 10 b 20 b. #. 31#. b.

(40) 30 b 40 b b. 立立. 政 治 大. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. b. :. sit. n. al. er. io. a. Carpenter 2009a. y. Nat. Over. •‧. b. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. : b b. #. 32#.

(41) 0 10. 20. 20. 60. •‧. 100%. n. al. er. sit. y. 100%. Ch. engchi. 33#. 40. 20. ㈻㊫學. io. #. 30. 25%. Nat. 90%. •‧ 國. 立立 15. 30. 政 治 大 5 25%. 25% 18. 10. i n U. v. 18.

(42) 18. 18. 政 治 大 F(3,16)立立 = 0.148 p = 0.93 •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. 12.92. 11.99. 16.67. n. al. 61.2. 0.93. y. 60.0. sit. io. 56.2. 8.2. er. Nat. 59.4. p. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 18. b. 0. 10. 18 5. Over. Carpenter. 2009a. 2. #. 34#. (1, N=60) =.

(43) 0.231. p =0.631. b 2. (1, N=60) = 0.202. 0. p = 0.653 2. 立立. 40. (2, N=45) = 2.143. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. #. p = 0.343. Ch. engchi. 35#. i n U. v.

(44) Over. Carpenter 2009a. 2009a. 0. Over. Carpenter. 10. 0.6 0.2. b. 0. 10 b. 0. 政 治 大. 40. 立立. Carpenter 2009a. sit. y. Nat. er. Carpenter 2009a. io. Over. Over. n. al. Ch. Carpenter 2009a. Over 0. engchi U. 10. 0.2. b 0.4. v ni. Carpenter 2009a. Over. #. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Carpenter 2009a. Over. 0 Over. Carpenter 2009a. 10. Carpenter 2009a. 36#. 0.6. Over.

(45) b. Over. Carpenter 2009a. b b Feinman,. 政 治 大. 1982. 立立. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Kim, Walden & Knieps, 2010; Walden & Kim, 2005 6. y. n. er. io. al. sit. b. Ch. b Over. 41. 7. Nat b. 10. •‧. 0. engchi. Carpenter 2009a. i n U. v. b b. b. Woodward, 1998; Woodward & Guajardo, 2002; Gredeback et. al., 2009. #. 37#.

(46) Over. Over. Carpenter 2009a. 18. Carpenter 2009a. 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. #. Ch. engchi. 38#. i n U. v.

(47) Warneken. Warneken. Tomasello 2006. 18. Tomasello 2006. 0. 18. 10. 70%. 政 治 大. 立立. al. 7. Ch. 8. engchi. sit. 29 15. n. 7. 20.1. er. io. SD=0.98. 17.0. y. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Nat. 60. i n U. 31. M=18.47 8. v. F(3,25) =1.256 p = 0.331 F(3,27) = 0.727. p = 0.545. F(3,56) = 0.987. p = 0.406. babyhome 2. #. 3. 39#.

(48) p. 18.65. 18.65. 18.00. 19.00. 1.0. 1.0. 0.9. 0.9. 20.1-17.3. 19.8-17.3. 19.7-17. 19.9-17.2. 18.25. 18.14. 18.51. 18.58. 政0.42 治 0.85大 19.4-17.5 立立 18.8-17.5 19.6-17.2 0.72. 0.545. 0.73 19.8-17.8. 18.38. 18.27. 18.78. 0.93. 0.77. 0.88. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. 18.46. 20.1-17.3. 19.9-17.3. 19.7-17.0. 19.9-17.2. y. 0.82. sit. io. n. al. 0.406. er. Nat Warneken. 0.331. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Tomasello 2006 47 6. 32. #. 40#. 290 60.

(49) ㈻㊫學. b. •‧ 國. 立立. 政 治 大 b. 150. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. #. •‧. b. Ch. engchi. 41#. i n U. v.

(50) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. #. Ch. engchi. 42#. i n U. v.

(51) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. 15. n. al. 15. sit. 15. er. io. 15. y. Nat. 18. #. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. a b a. b. b. a. a. #. a 43#.

(52) a b b b b b b 30 b b. 立立. 政 治 大. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學 •‧. b. b. io. n. al. 20. Ch. b. engchi. 30. i n U. b. 40. b b. #. sit. b. er. 10. y. Nat. 10. b. 44#. v.

(53) b b b Warneken. Tomasello 2006. 政 治 大 b. : b. :. 立立. b. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 18. Ch 5. engchi. i n U. v. 25% 20. 25% 60. 15. 87%. #. 25%. 100%. 100%. 45#. 18.

(54) 18 18. F(3,16) =1.687. 政 治 大. p =0.21. 立立. 60.0. 47.2. 6.66. 9.35. 7.76. 13.76. sit. io. n. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. b 18. b. 18 5. χ2(1, N=60) = 0.024. #. 0.21. y. 51.0. er. Nat. 56.4. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. p. p = 0.878. 46#.

(55) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Cb h. engchi 0. i n U. v. 40. χ2(1, N=60) = 0.096 p = 0.757 χ2(2, N=45) = 2.458. p=. 0.293 18 b 18. χ2(1, N=60). #. 47#.

(56) = 2.844 p = 0.092. 0. 20. χ2(1, N=60) = 7.2 p = 0.007 0. 30 χ2(1, N=60) = 5.006 p = 0.025 0. 40 χ2(1, N=60) = 1.904 p = 0.168. χ2(2, N=45) = 0.556 p = 0.757. b Over. Carpenter 2009a. Carpenter 2009a. •‧. Over. ㈻㊫學. •‧ 國. 立立. 政 治 大. y. Nat. sit. n. al. er. io 40. 10. 0.6. 0.2. 0. 0. Ch. 0.8. engchi. i n U. v. 0.4. 18 18 Over. Carpenter 2009a. 18 18. #. 0 48#. 20.

(57) 0. 30. 18. Over. Carpenter 2009a. Over. Warneken. Tomasello 2006. 0.6. n. al. Ch. 2006. engchi. 18. b. 49#. 0.53. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 0.7. •‧. Warneken. 0.66. #. Tomasello. ㈻㊫學. 2006. 立立. Tomasello 2006. •‧ 國. Warneken. 政 治 大. Carpenter 2009a. i vWarneken n U. Tomasello 18.

(58) Warneken. Tomasello. 2006 0.7. Warneken. Tomasello 2006. 0.7. b. Over. 政 治 大. Carpenter 2009a 10. 30. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. b. 立立. •‧. b. y. Nat. 0.13. n. al. b. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 0. 18 b. #. 0. 20. er. io. 0.7. 0. sit. 0.2. 20. 0. 50#. 30. 40.

(59) b. 0. 10. 0. 40 b. 0 0 0. 20. b. 40. b. b. 0.13 0. 0.2. 30. 0.66. 政 治 大. 立立. b. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學 •‧. b. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. 18. b 18. #. 10. 51#. v.

(60) 18. 12. Liszkowski & Tomasello, 2011; Woodward & Guajardo, 2002. 立立. 政 治 大 12 18. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學 sit. y. Carpenter. n. al. er. io. 18. 18. Over. Nat. 2009a. 18. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 18. 18. 0 20. 0. 30 18. #. 52#.

(61) 18 18. 立立. •‧ 國. 0.38. •‧. 40. ㈻㊫學. 0. 政 治 大. Over. n. al. Ch. engchi. er. io. sit. y. Nat Over. 0.46. Carpenter 2009a. i n U. v. Carpenter 2009a. Over Carpenter 2009a. #. 53#.

(62) Over. Over. 政 治 大 18. Carpenter 2009a. Over. Carpenter 2009a. •‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Over. ㈻㊫學. •‧ 國. 立立. Carpenter 2009a. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Carpenter 2009a. Pan & Kosicki, 1997; Rovee-Collier, Hankins & Bhatt, 1992. Over. #. 54#. Carpenter 2009a.

(63) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學 18. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Kartner, Keller & Chaudhary, 2010. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Axelrod & Hamilton,1981; Caporael, 2001; Ginits, 2003; Over & Carpenter, 2009b. #. 55#.

(64) 立立. 政 治 大. •‧. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. #. Ch. engchi. 56#. i n U. v.

(65) Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390-1396. Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 728-738. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.. 政 治 大 do toddlers respond to立立 another’s needs? Infancy, 14, 117–130.. Brownell, C. A., Svetlova, M., & Nichols, S. (2009). To share or not to share:When. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. Bullinger, A. F., Zimmermann, F., Kaminski, J., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Different social motives in the gestural communication of chimpanzees and human. •‧. children. Developmental Science, 14, 58-68.. sit. y. Nat. Caporael, L. R. (2001). Evolutionary psychology: Toward a unifying theory and a. al. er. io. hybrid science. Annual Review of Psychology, 1 , 276-298.. v. n. Coleman, P. K., & Byrd, C. P. (2003). Interpersonal correlates of peer victimization. Ch. engchi. i n U. among young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 301-314. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. Dekovic, M., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (1992). Parents’ child-rearing style and children’s sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 28, 925–932. Dunfield, K., Kuhlmeier, V. A., O’Connell, L., & Kelley, E. (2011). Examining the diversity of prosocial behavior: Helping, sharing, and comforting in infancy. Infancy, 16, 227-247. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial Development. In J.. #. 57#.

(66) Wiley & Sons (Eds.). Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 647-718). New York: Wiley Press. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Karbon, M., Murphy, B. C., Wosinski, M., Polazzi, L., Juhnke,C. (1996). The relations of children’s dispositional prosocial behavior to emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Child Development, 67, 974– 992. Falck-Ytter, T., Gredeback, G., & von Hofsten, C. (2006). Infants predict other people’s action goals. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 878-879.. 政 治 大. Feinman, S. (1982). Social referencing in infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28, 445-470.. 立立. Grusec, J. E., Davidov, M., & Lundell, L. (2002). Prosocial and helping behavior. In. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. P. Smith and C. Hart (eds.). Blackwell handbook of childhood social. •‧. development (pp.457-474). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.. io. er. humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 153-172.. sit. y. Nat. Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of. n. al. Ch. Theoretical Biolovy, 7, 1-16.. engchi. i n U. v. Hay, D. P. (1979). Cooperative interactions and sharing between very young children. and their parents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 647-65. Hampson, R. B. (1984). Adolescent prosocial behavior: Peer group and situational factors associated with helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 153–162. Hay, D. E., Caplan, M., Castle, J., & Stimson, C. A. (1991). Does sharing become increasingly more rational in the second year of life? Developmental Psychology, 27, 987-993. Kartner, J., Keller, H., & Chaudhary, N. (2010). Cognitive and social influences on #. 58#.

(67) early prosocial behavior in two sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 905-914. Kim, G., Walden, T. A., & Knieps, L. (2010). Impact and characteristics of positive and fearful emotional messages during infant social referencing. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 189-195. Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14,334-339. Liszkowski, U., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Individual differences in social, cognitive,. 政 治 大. and morphological aspects of infant pointing. Cognitive Development, 26 (1), 16-29.. 立立. Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Twelve-month-olds. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. communicate helpfully and appropriately for knowledgeable and ignorant. •‧. partners. Cognition, 108, 732-739.. y. Nat. Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2006). 12-and. er. io. sit. 18-month-olds point to provide infornation for others. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 173-187.. al. n. v i n C hC. M., & Chartrand,UT. L. (2003). The chameleon Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, engchi effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145-163. Levitt, M. J., Weber, R. A., Clark, M. C., & McDonnell,P. (1985). Reciprocity of exchange in toddler sharing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 21, 122-123. McGuire, K. D., & Weisz, J. R. (1982). Social cognition and behavior correlates of preadolescent chumship. Child Development, 53, 1478-1484. Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2009a). Eighteen-month-old infants show increased helping following priming with affiliation. Psychological Science, 20, 1189-1193. Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2009b). Priming third-party ostracism increases affiliative #. 59#.

(68) imitation in children. Developmental Science, 12, 1-8. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1997). Priming and media impact on the evaluations of the president’s performance. Communication Research, 24(1), 3-30. Triver, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. MIT Press. Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10, 121-125.. 政 治 大 prosocial behavior. Child Development, 53, 114-125. 立立. Rheingold, H. L. (1982). Little children’s participation in the work of adults, a nascent. Rovee-Collier, C., Hankins, E., & Bhatt, R. (1992). Textons, visual pop-out effects,. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. and object recognition in infancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 121(4),. •‧. 435-445.. y. Nat. Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Ayalon, H., & Raviv, A. (1980). Perceptions of giving and. er. io. 11, 139–150.. sit. receiving help by group members. Representative Research in Social Psychology,. al. n. v i n Cthe Takahashi, K. (1986). Examining procedure with Japanese U h estrange-situation i h ngc. mothers and 12-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 265-270.. Sebanc, A. M. (2003). The friendship features of preschool children: Links with prosocial behavior and aggression. Social Development, 12, 249-268. Sagi, A., Van IJzendorn, M. H., & Koren-Karie, N. (1991). Primary appraisal of the strange situation: a cross-cultural analysis of preseparation episodes. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 587-596. Van IJzendorn, M. H., & Kroonenberg, P. M. (1988). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: A meta-analysis of the Strange Situation. Child Development, 59, 147-156. #. 60#.

(69) Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Sympathy through affective perspective taking and its relation to prosocial behavior in toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 45, 534-543. Vitaro, F., Gagnon, C., & Tremblay, R. E. (1990). Predicting stable peer rejection from kindergarten to Grade one. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 257-264. Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69,1-34.. 政 治 大 gesture as an object-directed action. Cognitive Development, 17, 1061-1084. 立立. Woodward, A. L., & Guajardo, J. J. (2002). Infants’ understanding of the point. Walden, T. A., & Kim, G. (2005). Infants’ social looking toward mothers and. •‧ 國. ㈻㊫學. strangers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 356-360.. •‧. Warden, D., & Mackinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial bullies, bullies, and victims: An. y. Nat. investigation of their sociometric status, empathy, and social problem-solving. er. io. sit. strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 367-385. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and. n. al. Ch. young chimpanzees. Science, 311, 1301-1303.. engchi. i n U. v. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy, 11, 271–294. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009a). The roots of human altruism. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 455-471. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009b). Varieties of altruism in children and chimpanzees. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 397-401. Zahn-Waxler, C., Radlke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E., & Chapman, M. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 28, 126-136.. #. 61#.

(70)

參考文獻

相關文件

 Promote project learning, mathematical modeling, and problem-based learning to strengthen the ability to integrate and apply knowledge and skills, and make. calculated

Wang, Solving pseudomonotone variational inequalities and pseudocon- vex optimization problems using the projection neural network, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17

Define instead the imaginary.. potential, magnetic field, lattice…) Dirac-BdG Hamiltonian:. with small, and matrix

S15 Expectation value of the total spin-squared operator h ˆ S 2 i for the ground state of cationic n-PP as a function of the chain length, calculated using KS-DFT with various

11.4 Differentials and the Chain Rules 11.5 Directional Derivatives and Gradients 11.6 Tangent Planes and Normal Lines 11.7 Extrema of Functions of Two Variables 11.8

1B - Time Series of the Consumer Price Index B (CPI-B) by Section 2G - Month-to-Month Change of the Composite CPI by Section 2A - Month-to-Month Change of the CPI-A by

The Composite CPI for June 2008 increased by 1.11% month-to-month, of which the price indices of Clothing & footwear, Food & non-alcoholic beverages and Transport rose by

The Composite CPI for June 2009 increased by 0.39% month-to-month, with the price indices of Transport; Clothing & Footwear; and Food & Non-Alcoholic Beverages rising by