Relationship of Implementation Strategies and Application
Status of Mobile Commerce to Corporate Performance
Ying-Feng Kuo, Dept. of Information Management, National University of Kaohsiung. Pang-Cheng Chen, Graduate School of Business and Administration, Shu-Te University.
ABSTRACT
Along with the rapid development of wireless communication and mobile phone market, the mobile commerce, which combines the wireless communication and Internet, is now the one that everybody focused. The construct and development of mobile commerce will be the
formulate the accurate and adequate implementation strategies when it inducing the mobile commerce application systems. The relationship between the implementation strategies and application status of mobile commerce to corporate performance of enterprises which have already adopted mobile commerce in Taiwan will be studied thoroughly.
The analytical results show that the implementation strategies of mobile commerce are internal communication and coordination, training, and system integration and application widely. The application statuses of mobile commerce are applications to customers and applications to enterprises. This research also finds that there are significant positive relation between each dimension of implementation strategies and each dimension of application statuses. Implementation strategies and application statuses of mobile commerce have significant positive effect on increasing corporate performance.
Keywords: Mobile commerce, Implementation strategies, Application status, Corporate
performance
1.
20 21 GPRS PHS (3G) ( 1996) 1. 2. 3.2.1.
(Aberdeen Group, 2000)
(Forrester Research, 2000)
(Lehner and Watson, 2001)
(Kalakota and Robinson, 2001)
(Lyytinen, 2001; Tarasewich et al., 2002; Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2003)
1. /
(Clarke, 2001; Keen and Mackintosh, 2001; Siau et al., 2001; Tsalgatidou and Pitoura, 2001) 2.
(Clarke, 2001; Siau et al., 2001; Tsalgatidou and Pitoura, 2001) 3.
(Keen and Mackintosh, 2001; Siau et al., 2001; Tsalgatidou and
Pitoura, 2001) 4. (Siau et al.,
2001; Tsalgatidou and Pitoura, 2001; , 2001) 5. /
(Clarke, 2001; Tsalgatidou and Pitoura, 2001) 6.
(Clarke, 2001; Keen and Mackintosh, 2001)
B2C B2B B2E (Siau et al., 2001) 1. B2C (Siau et al. 2001 2003) (2001) B2C 2. B2B B2B 3. B2E
3. M M 4. 2.2. (Robbins 1990) Szilagyi(1988) Lebas(1995)
Van de Ven Ferry(1980) Galbraith Schedel(1983) Madu (1996)
3.
3.1. ( 1) H1 H2 H33.2. 3.2.1. (2001) 25 Likert 3.2.2. Kalakota Whinston(1997) (2000) B2B B2E B2C 15 Likert 3.2.3. B2B B2E B2C Madu (1996) 8 Likert 3.2.4. 5 3.3. 100 5 100 3 500
欒.
欒.
欒.
欒.
4.1. 500 209 41.8% 207 41.4% 4.2. Kaiser(1958) 1.00 0.5
0.3 50% 4.2.1. Cronbach’s α 0.6042~0.9186 Item to Total 0.4 4.2.2. 1 0.5 61.794%
Cronbach’s α 0.8513~0.9274 Item to Total 0.5 4.3. ( ) ( ) ( 1) Thornidike(1978) CR2( )
0.1 F (redundancy index, RI) 0.1
1 Thorndike(1978) (CR2=0.518 p<0.001 RI>0.1) 1 (CR) (CR2) F p-value (RI) 1 0.720 0.518* 29.89783 0.000*** 43.966%* 35.776%* 2 0.067 0.004 0.45603 0.634 *CR2>0.1 *p<0.05; ** p<0.01; ***p<0.001 *RI>0.1 Lambert Durand(1975) 0.3 2 0.3 H1
2 ( ) 0.930* 0.945* 0.560* ( ) 0.950* 0.891* *| |> 0.3 2 2 CR=0.518 p 0.05 51.8% 69.029% 84.830% 43.966% 43.966% 43.966% 4.4. 4.4.1.
3 β ( ) t VIF ( ) 1.916 8.813 0.000 0.408 4.984 0.000*** 1.988 0.445 0.531 0.596 1.988 R=0.469, R2=0.220, Adj- R2=0.213, F=28.690, p-value=0.000***, D-W=1.646 *p<0.05; ** p<0.01; ***p<0.001 4.4.2. 4 4 (F=22.327 p=0.000 D-W=1.768) Adj-R2 0.238 23.8% H3 4 β ( ) t VIF ( ) 1.909 7.920 0.000 0.121 1.156 0.249 2.592 0.390 4.519 0.000*** 2.446 0.049 -0.741 0.460 1.368 R=0.499, R2=0.0.249, Adj- R2=0.238, F=22.327, p-value=0.000***, D-W=1.769 *p<0.05; ** p<0.01; ***p<0.001
5.
5 5 H1( NSC 93-2416-H-390-008) [1] 7 1 pp.49-84 85 [2] M 92 [3] 8 2 pp.23-44 90 [4] 371 pp.12-15 92 [5] eBusiness 22 pp.7-14 90 [6] M 92
[7] Aberdeen Group , Mobile electronic commerce: the new economy on the move, 2000, http://www.aberdeen.com/ab%5Fcompany/hottopics/mcom/default.htm.
Wiley and Sons, 1980.
[11] A.Tsalgatidou and E.Pitoura , Business models and transaction in mobile electronic commerce: requirements and properties, Computer networks, 37(2):221-236, 2001. [12] C.Galbraith and D.E.Schedel , An empirical analysis of strategy types, Strategic
management journal, 4(2):153-173, 1983.
[13] C.N.Madu, C.H.Kuei and R.A.Jacob , An empirical assessment of the influence of quality dimension on organizational performance, International journal of production research, 34(7):1943-1962, 1996.
[14] F.Lehner, and R.T.Waston , From E-commerce to M-commerce: research directions, Working paper, University of Regensburg, 2001,
http://www-mobile.uni-regensburg.de/(en)/freiedokumente/Berichte/ResearchDirections.pdf [15] F.Müller-Veerse, Mobile commerce report, Durlacher Research Ltd, 1999,
http://www.durlacher.com.
[16] H.F.Kaiser , The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis, Psychometrika, 23(3):187-200, 1958.
[17] I.Clarke, Emerging value propositions for M-commerce, Journal of business strategies, 18(2):133-147, 2001.
[18] K.Lyytinen, M-commerce: a new frontier for E-business, IEEE Proceedings of the 34th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, p. 9012, 2001.
[19] K.Siau, E.P.Lim and Z.Shen , Mobile commerce: promises, challenges, and research agenda, Journal of database management, 12(3):4-13, 2001.
[20] M.J.Lebas , Performance measurement and performance management, International journal of production economics, 41(1):23-35, 1995.
[21] P.G.W.Keen and R.Mackintosh, The freedom economy: gaining the M-commerce edge in the era of the wireless internet, Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGrew-Hill, 2001.
[22] P.Tarasewich, R.C.Nickerson and M.Warkentin , Issues in mobile E-commerce, Communications of the association for information system, 8:41-64, 2002.
[23] R.Kalakota, and M.Robinson, M-business: the race to mobility, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2001.
[24] R.M.Thorndike, Correlational procedure for research, New York, Gardner, 1978.
[25] S.P.Robbins, Organization theory: structure, design, and application, 3rd Ed., Englewood Cliffs, New York, Prentice-Hall, p.49, 1990.