ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect
Applied
Surface
Science
j o ur na l ho m e p age :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / a p s u s c
Using
SiO
x
nano-films
to
enhance
GZO
Thin
films
properties
as
front
electrodes
of
a-Si
solar
cells
Kow-Ming
Chang
a,
Po-Ching
Ho
b,∗,
Shu-Hung
Yu
b,
Jui-Mei
Hsu
c,
Kuo-Hui
Yang
c,
Chin-Jyi
Wu
c,
Chia-Chiang
Chang
caElectronicsEngineeringDept.,NationalChiaoTungUniversity;CollegeofElectricalandInformationEngineering,I-ShouUniversity,RepublicofChina bDepartmentofElectronicsEngineering&InstituteofElectronics,NationalChiaoTungUniversity,1001TaHsuehRoad,Hsinchu,Taiwan30010,Republic
ofChina
cIndustrialTechnologyResearchInstitute,MechanicalandSystemsResearchLaboratories,195,Sec.4,ChungHsingRd.,Chutung,Hsinchu,Taiwan31040,
RepublicofChina
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received26January2013
Receivedinrevisedform20March2013 Accepted25March2013
Available online 1 April 2013
Keywords:
Atmosphericpressureplasma Light-trappingeffect Transparentconductiveoxide
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Oneoftheessentialapplicationsoftransparentconductiveoxidesisasfrontelectrodesforsuperstrate siliconthin-filmsolarcells.TexturedTCOthinfilmscanimproveabsorptionofsunlightforana-Si:H absorberduringasingleopticalpath.In thisstudy,high-hazeandlow-resistivitybilayerGZO/SiOx thinfilmspreparedusinganatmosphericpressureplasmajet(APPJ)depositiontechniqueanddc mag-netronsputtering.Thesiliconsubdioxidenano-filmplaysanimportantroleincontrollingthehazevalue ofsubsequentdepositedGZOthinfilms.ThebilayerGZO/SiOx(90sccm)samplehasthehighesthaze value(22.30%),thelowestresistivity(8.98×10−4cm),andreachesamaximumcellefficiencyof6.85% (enhancedbyapproximately19%comparedtoasampleofnon-texturedGZO).
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Transparentconductiveoxide(TCO)hasattractedsubstantial attentionbecauseofhightransparencyinthevisibleregionand low resistivity. Oneof the mostimportant applications of TCO is asa textured front electrode forsuperstrate pin-type silicon thin-filmsolarcells[1–3].TexturedTCOthin filmscanenhance sunlightabsorptionforthehydrogenatedamorphous silicon (a-Si:H)absorber duringoneopticalpathand furtherimprovethe cellefficiencybecauseofthelight-trappingeffect.Thereare sev-eraltypesofTCOmaterials,includingtin-dopedindiumoxide(ITO), fluorine-dopedtinoxide(FTO),andzincoxidedopedwithgroupIII elements(AZO,GZO).Foramorphoussiliconthin-filmsolarcells, bothAZOandGZOaresuitablefrontelectrodematerialsbecauseof theireasilymodifiedsurfacemorphologies.ComparedwithITOand FTO,theyalsohavehigherhydrogenandsilane(SiH4)plasma
resis-tanceandlowercost.GZOhasahighertransmittancethanAZOin thenear-infraredregion[4]andbettermoistureresistancebecause galliumexhibitslowreactivitytooxygen[5].
The morphologies of the TCO front contact strongly affect theirhazevalue.Severaldepositiontechniqueshavebeenused topreparetexturedZnOfilms[6–8].In thisstudy,roughsilicon
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+886921841971.
E-mailaddress:raymondsam.ee98g@nctu.edu.tw(P.-C.Ho).
subdioxide(SiOx)bufferlayers weredepositedusing the
atmo-sphericpressureplasmajet(APPJ)tomodifythemorphologiesand toinfluencetheoptoelectronicpropertiesofthesputteredGZOthin films.Afterpost-annealinginvacuum,bilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilms
obtainedbetteroptoelectronicpropertiesandimprovedthe effi-ciencyofana-Sisolarcellcomparedtoanon-texturedGZOsingle layer.
2. Experiment
Rough SiOx thin films were deposited at 75◦C on
100mm×100mm×3.2mm glass substrates (Taiwan Glass IndustryCo.)usingtheAPPJdepositiontechnique.Fig.1ashows a schematic diagram of the APPJ deposition system. The APPJ depositionsystemismainlycomposedofahigh-voltageACpower supply,a plasmajet,aprecursorbottle,ahot plate,and anx–y directionalscansystem.Theplasmapowerandfrequency were 450Wand20kHz,respectively.Thedistancebetweentheplasma jetnozzletothesubstratewas15mm.Thescanningrouteisshown inFig.1b.They-directionscanspeedwasfixedat250mm/s,and thepitchwasfixedat2mm.Hexamethyl-disiloxane[(HMDSO), AlfaAesar]wasusedastheprecursortodeposittheSiOxbuffer
layers.ToobtainvarioussurfaceroughnessesofSiOxthinfilms,the
argoncarriergasflowratewassettovaryat30sccm,60sccm,or 90sccm,andtheflowrateofthecompresseddryair(CDA)maingas wassetat40SLM.ThethicknessoftheSiOxnano-filmswas10nm,
0169-4332/$–seefrontmatter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Fig.1.Schematicdiagramof(a)theAPPJdepositionsystemand(b)thescanning route.
25nm,and30nmfor30sccm,60sccm,and90sccm,respectively. GZOthinfilmsweredepositedat100◦ConSiOxbufferlayersusing
direct-current(DC)magnetronsputtering.AceramicGZOtarget wasdoped with3.2wt.%Ga2O3.DC magnetronsputtering was
performedataworkingpressureof2mTorrinArworkinggasand ataDCpowerdensityof3W/cm2.ThethicknessoftheGZOthin
filmswas1m.Allas-depositedbilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilmswere
annealedinhighvacuum(<1×10−6Torr)at500◦Cfor5minto improveadhesionbetweenGZOandSiOxthinfilmsandremove
chemisorbedoxygenionsonthesurfaceofGZOthinfilms.Finally, thebilayerGZO/SiOxthin filmswereappliedtotheamorphous
siliconthin-filmsolarcellsasafront electrodewiththe follow-ing structure: 3.2-mm-thick glass substrate/SiOx buffer layers
(10–30nm)/GZO(1000nm)/p-typea-Si:H(10nm)/intrinsica-Si:H absorber (300nm)/n-type c-Si:H (15nm)/GZO (100nm)/Ag (200nm).
To investigatethe surface morphologies of SiOx and bilayer
GZO/SiOxfilms,ascanningelectronmicroscope(Hitachi,S-4700I)
wasused.TheX-raydiffraction(XRD;BRUKER,D2PHASER) mea-surementswereusedtocharacterizethecrystalorientationand qualityofthefilms.Thebindingenergyandchemicalshiftofthe samplesweremeasuredusingX-rayphotoelectronspectroscopy (XPS).TheelectricalpropertiesofbilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilmsand
sputteredGZOthinfilmswereinvestigatedusingHalleffect mea-surements (ACCENT, HL5500PC). The optical transmittance and hazemeasurements wereperformed using a UV–vis–NIR spec-trometer(Jasco,V570).Theperformanceofthea-Sisolarcellswas measuredat100mW/cm2usinganAM1.5solarsimulator.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
Fig.2shows SEMsurfacemorphologiesof SiOxbufferlayers
andbilayerGZO/SiOxfilms.Thegrainsizeand roughnessofthe
SiOxbufferlayerswerefoundtoincreasewiththeargoncarrier
gasflowrate.Becauseofalargedifferencebetweenthemaingas andtheargoncarriergasflowrate,avortexwasformedinsidethe plasma-dischargingarea.Thevortexcausedradicalstostayinthe airforalongtime,andthisresultedintheformationofparticleson thesubstrates[9].Astheargoncarriergasflowrateincreased,the
Fig.3.XRDpatternsofGZOthinfilmsdepositedonvariousmorphologiesofSiOx
bufferlayers.TheargoncarriergasflowrateoftheSiOxnano-filmswassetfrom30
to90sccm.
roughsurfaceoftheSiOxbufferlayerscausedlowsurfacekinetics
ofthesputteredatomsandadecreaseinthenucleidensity[10]. Consequently,thebilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilmshadroughsurface
microstructureandalargegrainsize.The90sccmsamplehasthe largestrootmeansquare(RMS)roughnessof60.76nm.
Fig.3presentstheXRDpatternsofdissimilarbilayerGZO/SiOx
thinfilms.TheargoncarriergasflowrateoftheSiOxbufferlayers
wassetfrom30to90sccm.XRDpatternsofallsamplesexhibited mainlyZnO(002)and(101)diffractionpeaks.Astrongc-axis pref-erentialorientationindicatedthatthegraingrowthoftheGZOthin filmisnormaltotheplaneoftheglasssubstrate.Theintensityof the(002)diffractionpeaksharplyincreasedwiththeargoncarrier gasflowrate,meaningthatthecrystallinityofthebilayerGZO/SiOx
thinfilmsimproved.
Fig.4showsthediffractionangle,thefullwidthathalf max-imum (FWHM), and the calculated grain size along the(002) orientation. The (002) peak position of all samples is shown tohaveshiftedtoa higherBragganglecomparedtothatofthe standardpatternofZnO(JCPDS:36-1451),implyingthatgallium incorporatesintoZnO thinfilms[11].Thisresultwasconsistent withthecarrierconcentrationdeterminedbytheHall measure-ment,asshowninTable1.ThecrystallitesizeoftheGZOthinfilms
Fig.4.ThediffractionangleoftheGZO(002)peak,FWHMoftheGZO(002)peak andcalculatedcrystallitesizealongthe(002)orientationforthebilayerGZOfilms asafunctionoftheargoncarriergasflowrate.
Table1
Halleffectmeasurementsofnon-texturedGZOfilmandbilayerGZO/SiOxfilms.
Sample Resistivity (cm) Mobility (cm2/Vs) Carrierconcentration (cm−3) Non-textured 1.10×10−3 23.1 2.448×1020 GZO/SiOx(30sccm) 1.35×10−3 27.3 1.694×1020 GZO/SiOx(60sccm) 9.72×10−4 28.7 2.238×1020 GZO/SiOx(90sccm) 8.98×10−4 29.1 2.387×1020
increasedwiththesurfaceroughnessoftheSiOxthinfilms.The crystallitesizealongthe(002)orientationwasestimatedusing thefollowingDebye-Scherrerformula[12]:
D=0.94/(ˇcosq)
whereisthewavelengthofCuK␣line,ˇistheFWHM,andis theBraggdiffractionangle.AlowerFWHMindicateshigher crys-tallinity.Therefore,the90sccmsamplehadthelargestcrystallite sizebecauseofthelowestFWHM.
Thewide-scanXPSspectraofthebilayerGZO/SiOx filmsare
shownin Fig.5a.ThephotoelectronicpeaksofZn, O,C, andGa wereobserved.Thecarbonpeak(C1s)waspositionedat285.43eV
Fig.6.Narrow-scanXPSspectraofO1softhebilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilmsdeposited
onSiOxbufferlayerswithanargoncarriergasflowrateof(a)30sccm(b)60sccm
(c)90sccm.
[13].Thecarboncontaminationmaycomefromsamplefabrication andsubsequentmeasurement.NometallicZnpeakwascentered at1021.1eV[14,15],whichconfirmsthatZnatomsappearonlyin theoxidizedstate.Fig.5bshowstheGa2pXPSspectraofbilayer GZO/SiOx filmsdeposited ontheSiOx bufferlayers withvaried
Fig.7. ElectricalpropertiesofthebilayerGZO/SiOxfilmsasafunctionoftheargon
carriergasflowrate.
argoncarriergasflow rates.The30sccm,60sccm,and 90sccm sampleshavebindingenergiesofGa2p3/2locatedat1119.66eV, 1119.33eV,and1118.46eV,respectively.Theresultconfirmsthat GaatomswereincorporatedintoZnOfilmsduringdeposition.
Fig.6showsthenarrow-scanXPSspectraofO1softhebilayer GZO/SiOxfilms.BeforerunningtheXPSmeasurements,thebilayer
GZO/SiOxthinfilmswerepre-sputteredwithArplasmatoremove
surfaceoxidesandcontamination.Theoxygenspectrumis asym-metricandcanbefittedbytwoGaussiandistributions,locatedat 530.62±0.11eV(OI)and531.31±0.05eV(OII).Thelowbinding
energycomponent(OI)isrelatedtothelatticeoxygenoftheZnO
(wurtzite)structure,andthehighbindingenergy(OII)component
isattributedtooxygenvacancieswiththeZnOmatrix.Thespectra showedthattheareapercentofOIIincreasedwiththeargoncarrier
gasflowrate,implyingthatGZOthinfilmsdepositedonrougher SiOxbufferlayerscanleadtoanincreaseofoxygenvacancies(Vo)
insidefilms.Nevertheless,Vohavebeenreportedtoactasadeep
donor[16–18],andithasnotinfluenceontheelectricalproperties oftheGZOthinfilms.
ElectricalpropertiesofthebilayerGZO/SiOxfilmsasafunction
oftheargoncarriergasflowrateareshowninFig.7.Bothmobility andcarrierconcentrationincreased,whichmightbeattributedto theimprovementofthecrystallinityofbilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilms.
Thedefectsinsidethinfilms,suchasgrainboundaries,vacancies, andinterstitials,resultinthescatteringofthecarriersandreduce thecarrierconcentration.Atahighelectrondensity(>1020cm−3),
thedominantscatteringeffectofmobilitymeasuredbytheHall equipmentwasregardedasionizedimpurityscattering[19,20].An enhancementinthecrystallinityofthebilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilms
couldreduceionizedimpurityscattering,furtherincreasingboth thecarriermobilityandthecarrierconcentration.Theresistivity ofthebilayerGZO/SiOx filmsdeclined,resultinginthe
achieve-mentofthelowestresistivity(8.98×10−4cm)atthe90sccm argon carriergas flow rate. TheHall measurement dataof the bilayerGZO/SiOxandnon-texturedGZOthinfilmsaresummarized
inTable1.Thecarrierconcentrationsofallbilayersampleswere lowerthanthatofthenon-texturedGZOthinfilm.Thismaybedue tounstableoxygenintheSiOxbufferlayersdiffusingintotheGZO
filmsduring500◦Cpost-annealingandactingasscatteringcenters toreducethecarrierconcentration.
Fig.8showstheopticaltransmittanceandhazeofthebilayer GZO/SiOxfilmsasafunctionoftheargoncarriergasflowrate.All
Fig.8. (a)Transmittance(b)hazeofthebilayerGZO/SiOxfilms.
Table2
Comparisonofperformancefora-Sisolarcellswithnon-texturedGZOandtextured GZO/SiOxfrontcontacts.
Sample Voc(V) Jsc(mA/cm2) FF(%) (%)
Non-textured 0.710 13.25 58.9 5.55
GZO/SiOx(90sccm) 0.849 13.96 57.7 6.85
inthevisibleregion.Theinsetimagepresentsthemagnifiedcurve oftheabsorptionbandedge.Theblueshiftsoftheabsorptionedge occurredastheargoncarriergasflowrateincreasedfrom30to 90sccm.ThisphenomenonisknownastheBurstein–Mosseffect, whichoccursasthecarrierconcentrationexceedstheconduction bandedgedensityofstates(DOS)[21–23].Therefore,theoptical bandgapofthebilayerGZO/SiOxfilmsincreased(datanotshown
here) dueto anincrease in thecarrierconcentration.Withthe increaseinargoncarriergasflowrate,thebilayerGZO/SiOxfilm
showedanincreaseinhazevalueinthevisibleregion.
Thecurrent-voltageparametersforthea-Sisolarcellswith non-texturedGZOandtexturedGZO/SiOx(90sccm)frontcontactsare
showninTable2.TheconductivityofthebilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilm
wassuperiortothatofnon-texturedGZOthinfilm,andthisresulted inalargerVoc[24]becauseofadecreaseinrecombinationatthe
frontcontact/p-typea-Si:Hlayerinterface.TheJscofthesolarcell
usingthebilayerGZO/SiOxfrontelectrodewashigherthanthatof
solarcellusinganon-texturedGZOfrontelectrode,implyingthat thebilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilmhassuperiorphotoncollection
effi-ciencytonon-texturedGZOthinfilm.Anexplanationforthisisthat thebilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilmhasahigherhazevalue(22.3%)and
abetterlight-trappingeffectcomparedtoanon-texturedGZOthin film.Theefficiencyofthea-SisolarcellusingthebilayerGZO/SiOx
frontcontactwas6.85%andimprovedbyapproximately19% com-paredwiththatofthea-Sisolarcellusinganon-texturedGZOfront contact.
4. Conclusion
Inthisstudy,bilayerGZO/SiOxandnon-texturedGZOthinfilms
weredepositedonglasssubstratesbyusingtheAPPJtechnique andDCmagnetronsputtering.Thereafter,a-Si:HlayersandGZO/Ag backcontactweredepositedtocompletea-Sisolarcells.Roughness oftheSiOxbufferlayersdepositedusingAPPJcanbecontrolledby
modifyingtheargoncarriergasflowrate.BasedontheXRDresults, thecrystallinityofallbilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilmsimprovedasthe
surfaceroughnessoftheSiOxbufferlayersincreased.Becauseof
theenhancementincrystallinity,bothcarriermobilityandcarrier concentrationincreasedandresultedinadecreaseofresistivity. TheXPSdataconfirmedthatGaatomsincorporatedintotheZnO filmsandtheVonumberincreasedwiththeargoncarriergasflow
rate.However,Vohasbeenreportedtoactasadeepdonor,andit
isdifficulttocontributethecarrierconcentrationofGZOfilms.The transmittanceofallthebilayerGZO/SiOxfilmsismorethan80%in
thevisibleregion.RoughmorphologiesofSiOxthinfilmsresulted
inanincrementofhazevalueofthebilayerGZO/SiOxthinfilms.
ThesampleofthebilayerGZO/SiOx(90sccm)hasthehighesthaze
value(22.30%)andthelowestresistivity(8.98×10−4cm),and reachesamaximumcellefficiencyof6.85%(approximately19% improvementcomparedtothenon-texturedGZOsample).
References
[1]L.Prusakova,S.Flickyngerova,M.Fischer,I.Novotny,M.Tijssen,M.Netrvalova, M.Zeman,V.Tvarozek,P.Sutta,Vacuum86(2008)765.
[2]J.Krc,M.Zeman,O.Kluth,F.Smole,M.Topic,Thinsolidfilms426(2003)296.
[3]O.Kluth,B.Rech,L.Houben,S.Wieder,G.Schope,C.Beneking,H.Wagner,A. Loffl,H.W.Schock,Thinsolidfilms351(1999)247.
[4]S.H.Park,J.B.Park,P.K.Song,CurrentAppliedPhysics10(2010)S488.
[5]V.Assuncao,E.Fortunato,A.Marques,H.Aguas,I.Ferreira,M.E.V.Costa,R. Martins,ThinSolidFilms427(2003)401.
[6]K.Sato,Y.,Gotoh,Y.,Hayashi,K.,Adachi,H.,Naishimura,ReportsRes.LabAsahi GlassCo.,Ltd,vol.40,1990,p.233.
[7]S.Fay,S.Dubail,U.Kroll,J.Meier,Y.Ziegler,A.Shah,Proc.16thEUPVSEC, Glasgow,2000,p.p361.
[8]D.W.Kang,S.H.Kuk,K.S.Ji,S.W.Ahn,M.K.Han,JapaneseJournalofApplied Physics49(2010)031101.
[9]S.H.Yang,C.H.Liu,C.H.Su,H.Chen,ThinSolidFilms517(2009)5284.
[10]B.D.Ahn,Y.G.Ko,S.H.Oh,J.H.Song,H.J.Kim,ThinSolidFilms517(2009)6414.
[11]K.M.Chang,S.H.Huang,C.J.Wu,W.L.Lin,W.C.Chen,C.W.Chi,J.W.Lin,C.C. Chang,ThinSolidFilms519(2011)5114.
[12]A.R.Babar,P.R.Deshamukh,R.J.Deokate,D.Haranath,C.H.Bhosale,K.Y.Rajpure, JournalofPhysicsD:AppliedPhysics41(2008)135404.
[13]W.T.Yen,Y.C.Lin,P.C.Yao,J.H.Ke,Y.L.Chen,ThinSolidFilms518(2010)3882.
[14]F.Wu,L.Fang,Y.J.Pan,K.Zhou,Q.L.Huang,C.Y.Kong,PhysicaE43(2010)228.
[15]S.S.Lin,J.L.Huang,P.Sajgalik,SurfaceandCoatingsTechnology190(2005)40.
[16]A.Janotti,ChrisG.VandeWalle,AppliedPhysicsLetters87(2005)122102.
[17]X.J.Wang,L.S.Vlasenko,S.J.Pearton3,W.M.Chen,I.A.Buyanova,Journalof PhysicsD:AppliedPhysics42(2009)175411.
[18]M.D.McCluskey,S.J.Jokela1,JournalofAppliedPhysics106(2009)071101.
[19]T.Yamada,H.Makino,N.Yamamoto,T.Yamamoto,JournalofAppliedPhysics 107(2010)123534.
[20]J.J.Robbins,J.Harvey,J.Leaf,C.Fry,C.A.Wolden,ThinSolidFilms473(2005) 35.
[21]X.Y.Gao,Q.G.Lin,H.L.Feng,Y.F.Liu,J.X.Lu,ThinSolidFilms517(2009)4684.
[22]E.Burstein,PhysicsReview93(1954)632.
[23]S.M.Park,T.Ikegami,K.Ebihara,ThinSolidFilms513(2006)90.
[24]Y.C.Lin,T.Y.Chen,L.C.Wang,S.Y.Lien,JournalofTheElectrochemicalSociety 159(2012)H599.