ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect
Materials
Chemistry
and
Physics
j our na l h o me p a g e: w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / m a t c h e m p h y s
Precipitation
of
large
Ag
3
Sn
intermetallic
compounds
in
SnAg2.5
microbumps
after
multiple
reflows
in
3D-IC
packaging
Ruo-Wei
Yang,
Yuan-Wei
Chang,
Wei-Chi
Sung,
Chih
Chen
∗ DepartmentofMaterialsScienceandEngineering,NationalChiaoTungUniversity,Hsinchu30010,Taiwana
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received6May2011
Receivedinrevisedform30January2012 Accepted27February2012
Keywords: Intermetallics Pb-freesolderalloys Joining
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
MicrobumpshavebeenadoptedasinterconnectsbetweenSichipsin3Dintegrated-circuitpackaging.
Thesoldervolumeofamicrobumpdecreasesdramaticallyduetofine-pitchrequirementanditis
approx-imatelytwoorderssmallerinmagnitudethanthatofatraditionalflip-chipsolderjoint.Themetallurgical
reactionsinthemicrobumpsmaybehavequitedifferentlytothoseinflip-shipbumps.Liquid-state
metal-lurgicalreactionswereexaminedinSnAg2.5microbumpswithNimetallization.Theresultsindicatethat
largeparticlesofAg3Snintermetalliccompounds(IMCs)precipitateaftera10-minreflowonmicrobumps
with4.0-m-thicksolder,whichdoesnotoccurwithflip-chipsolderbumps.ItisproposedthattheAg
concentrationintheremainingsoldermayincreaseasSnreactswithNi.TheincreaseintheAg
concen-trationismainlyresponsiblefortheoccurrenceofthelargeAg3Snprecipitates.Theformationofthese
Ag3SnIMCswouldbedetrimentaltothemechanicalpropertiesofthemicrobumps.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
MetallurgicalreactionsbetweenPb-freesoldersandthe met-allizedpadsonintegrated-circuit(IC)chipshavebeenthefocus ofmuchattentioninrecentyears[1–7].Pb-freeSnAgalloyshave beenadoptedassoldermaterialsinflip-chipsolderjointsdueto theirexcellentmechanicalpropertiesandtheirabilitytobe electro-plated.DispersedAg3Snintermetalliccompounds(IMCs)areused
toenhancethemechanicalpropertiesoftheseSnAgalloys[8–10]. However,large,plate-likeAg3SnIMCsforminsidethesolderjoints
whentheconcentrationofAgishigherthan3.5wt%[11],andcracks mayinitiateattheinterfaceoftheseplate-likeAg3SnIMCsandthe
solderwhenthesolderjointsaresubjectedtostress[1]. There-fore,theICpackagingindustryhasadoptedSnAgalloyswithalow Agconcentration(∼2.5wt%)toavoidtheformationoftheseAg3Sn
IMCs.
Traditionalflip-chipsolderjointshavegreatersoldervolumes thandothosewithunder-bump-metallurgy(UBM).AtypicalSnAg solderjointconsistsofanapproximately100-m-thicklayerof solder alloys and several microns to 20m of UBM materials [12].Therefore,astheUBMmaterials(CuorNi)reactwithSnto formmicron-sizedCu–SnorNi–SnIMCsduringreflowingor solid-stateaging,thecompositionofthesolderalloysdoesnotchange much.However,asthepackagingindustryhasmovedto three-dimensional(3D)packaging,microbumpshavebeenadoptedasthe
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+88635731814;fax:+88635724727. E-mailaddresses:[email protected],[email protected](C.Chen).
interconnectsbetweenchips[13–15].Thesoldervolumeshereare dramaticallydecreased,andthethicknessofthesolderisreducedto arangebetweenafewmicronsand10m.Themicrobumpvolume isapproximatelytwoordersofmagnitudelessthaninatraditional flip-chipsolderjoint.Incontrast,thethicknessoftheUBMlayers remainsalmostthesameasthatinflip-chipsolderjoints.Therefore, thesoldercompositionmaychangesignificantlyduringmultiple reflows,andthemicrostructuresoftheSnAgsolderalloysmaybe differentinmicrobumps.However,therehavebeennoreported studiesonthisissue.
In this study, we investigated themetallurgical reactionsin SnAg2.5microbumpswithNiUBMsduringreflows.Wefoundthat theAg3SnIMCsprecipitatetoformlargeAg3Snparticlesafter
10-minreflowswith4-m-thick SnAg2.5microbumps. Theoretical calculationswereperformedtoshowthattheAgconcentration increasesastheSninSnAgalloysreactswithNi,anditexceeds 3.5wt%aftera10-minreflow.TheincreaseintheAgconcentration mayberesponsiblefortheprecipitationofthelargeAg3SnIMCs.
2. Experimental
Themicrobumpsusedinthisstudyconsistedof4.0-mor 6.2-mSnAg2.5alloyssandwichedbetween5-mCu/3-mNiUBMs ontwoSichips,asillustratedinFig.1.The6.2-mmicrobump hadmoreamountofSnAg2.5solderthanthe4.0-mone.Here, theupperchipisdenotedasthetopchip,whereasthebottomone isdenotedastheinterposerchip.Thesoldervolumeislessthan thetotalUBMvolume.Thediameterofthemicrobumpsis18m. TheSnAgalloysandtheUBMmaterialswereelectroplatedandthe 0254-0584/$–seefrontmatter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Fig.1.SchematicdiagramoftheSnAg2.5microbumpswithCu/NiUBMsonboth thetopchipandtheinterposerchip.
microbumpswerejoinedbythermo-compressionat285◦Cfor25s [16].Tostudythemetallurgicalreactionsintheliquidstate,the sampleswerereflowedonahotplatemaintainedat260◦Cfor var-ioustimeperiods.Thereflowtimeswere5,10,and30minforthe 4.0-m-thickmicrobumpsand0,5,10,40,and90minforthe 6.2-mmicrobumps.Aftertheallottedreflowtime,thesampleswere removedfromthehotplateandcooledinair.Themicrostructures ofthemicrobumpswere examinedwithaJSM-6500F scanning electronmicroscope(SEM).Compositionanalysiswasperformed usingenergydispersivespectroscopy(EDS)andanelectronprobe microanalyzer(EPMA,JXA-800M,JEOL).
3. Resultsanddiscussion
Inthe4.0-msample,finelydispersedAg3SnIMCs
agglomer-atedintoafewlargeprecipitatesafterreflowingfor10min.Forthe as-fabricatedsampleshowninFig.2(a),theAg3SnIMCswere
ran-domlydistributedwithintheSnmatrixintheformoftinyparticles. Thesampleshowedaneckingnearthecenterofthesolderjoint, whichiscausedbyalowcompressiveforceduringthebonding process.Thesoldervolumewasestimatedfromthecross-sectional SEMimage,andtheequivalentbumpheightwascalculatedtobe approximately4.0m.Fig.2(b)showsback-scatteredSEMimages foranothersamplereflowedfor5min.TheSnintheSnAg2.5 sol-derreactedwiththeNilayerstoformNi3Sn4 IMCsontheboth
sides,resultinginthethickeningoftheNi3Sn4 layers.TheAg3Sn
IMCswerestillfinelydispersedintheremainingsolder.However, largeAg3Snparticlesweresometimesobservedafterreflowingfor
10min,asindicatedbythearrowsinFig.2(c).Therewasalarge Ag3SnIMCprecipitatesemergingfromtheremainingsolderlayer.
Whenthereflowtimewasincreasedto30min,theprecipitation oflargeAg3SnIMCsbecamemoreobvious.Fig.2(d)illustratesthe
microstructureafterreflowfor30min.Here,thesolderlayerwas almostcompletelytransformedintoNi3Sn4IMCs.Itisinteresting
thatlargeAg3Sn IMCswerefrequentlyfoundinside theNi3Sn4
IMCs.ThelargeAg3SnIMCsmaybedetrimentaltothemechanical
propertiesofthemicrobumps.
ItisintriguingthatprecipitationofthelargeAg3SnIMCs did
nothappenwithin40minofreflowwiththemicrobumpswitha 6.2-m-thicksolderlayer.Fig.3(a)isanSEMimageshowingthe microstructureof theas-fabricated6.2-m-soldermicrobumps. SimilarlytotheresultsinFig.2(a),theAg3SnIMCswerescattered
throughouttheSnmatrix. After5-minand40-min reflows,the interfacialNi3Sn4IMCsgrewthicker,asdepictedinFig.3(b)and(c),
butnolargeAg3SnIMCswereobserved.However,whenthereflow
timewasincreasedto90min,largeAg3SnIMCsstartedtoemerge.
Fig.3(d)showsanSEMimageofa6.2-mmicrobumpaftera 90-minreflow.AlargeAg3Sninclusionappearedintheright-handside
ofthejoint,asindicatedbythearrowinthefigure.Allthesolder hadreactedwithNitoformNi3Sn4IMCsatthisstage.
Atleast50microbumpswereinspectedforeachconditionto ensurethattheobservedcross-sectionalmicrostructureswere rep-resentativeofeachcondition.Herein,alargeAg3SnIMCisdefined
Fig.3.Cross-sectionalback-scatteredSEMimagesof6.2-m-thickSnAg2.5microbumpsafterreflowingfor(a)0min,(b)5min,(c)40min,and(d)90minat260◦C. Table1
ProbabilityofobservingAg3SnIMCslargerthan2mforeachspecimeninthestudy.
Reflowtime(min) 4.0-mmicrobumps 6.2-mmicrobumps
Sampleamount Probability(%) Sampleamount Probability(%)
0 74 6.8 50 0 5 77 7.8 – – 10 95 35.8 53 0 30 90 40.0 – – 40 – – 50 0 90 – – 58 31
asonelongerthan2m.TheprobabilityofobservingalargeAg3Sn IMCislistedinTable1.Theprobabilitywasalsoplottedagainst reflowingtime,asdepictedinFig.4.Therewasanapproximately 7%chanceoffindingalargeAg3SnIMCintheas-fabricatedand
5-min-reflowed4.0-msamples.However,theprobabilityincreased significantlyforthe10-min-reflowedsamples,toapproximately 36%,andfurtherincreasedto40%aftera40-minreflow.In con-trast,noneofthe6.2-msampleshadlargeAg3SnIMCswhenthe
Fig.4.Thecurvefortheprobabilityagainstreflowingtimeforthe4.0-msamples. Thereisanabruptincreasearound10-minreflowingtime.
reflowtimewaslessthan40min;however,theprobabilityroseto 31%afterreflowingfor90min.
TheincreaseinAgconcentrationmayhavecausedthe precip-itationofthelargeAg3SnIMCsatextendedreflowtimes.Asthe
SnreactedwiththeNimetallizationlayer,theamountsofSnin theSnAgsolder decreased.Conversely,Ag doesnot form inter-metalliccompoundswithNi,andtherearenoternarycompounds fortheSn–Ni–Agsystem[8].Therefore,theAgconcentrationin thesolderwouldbeexpectedtoincreasewithincreasingreflow time.IthasbeenreportedthatlargeAg3SnplatesforminSnAg
sol-deratAgconcentrationsover3.5%[1,11].Thus,largeAg3SnIMCs
wereobservedinSnAg2.5microbumpsatextendedreflowtimes. Forflip-chipsolderjoints,thesoldervolumeisapproximately100 timesgreaterthanthatofthemicrobumps.Therefore,theAg con-centrationremainsunchangedaftermetallurgicalreaction;there havebeennoreportsoftheincreaseinAgconcentrationafter met-allurgicalreactionsinconventionalflip-chippackaging.However, thisissuewillbecriticalformicrobumpsin3DICpackaging.
ToverifywhethertheAgconcentrationisgreaterthan3.5wt% after a specific reflow time, thefollowing calculation was pre-formed to examine the evolution of Ag concentration in the remainingsolder.Itisnoteworthythattheremaynotbeacritical Agconcentration,abovewhichtheprecipitationofAg3Snwould
occur.Thisisbecausetheprecipitationalsodependsonthecooling rate.Wewilldiscussthispointlater.Yet,inthispaper,wechoose theeutecticconcentrationasthecriticalconcentration,sincethe Ag3SnprecipitationwasfoundinSn3.5AgandSn3.8Ag0.7Cu
sol-ders[1,11].BecauseAgdoesnotreactwithNi,alltheAgatoms shouldremainintheSnAgsolder,asrevealedinFigs.2and3.The AgtherereactswithSntoformAg3SnIMCswhenthespecimensare
Fig.5. ThemeasuredthicknessofNi3Sn4IMCsagainstreflowingtimeforthechip side,theinterposersideandthesumofthebothsides.
cooled.However,accordingtoSn–Agphasediagram[8],alltheAg atomsshoulddissolveinthemoltenSnAgsolderat260◦C.Froma massbalanceofAgatoms,theAgconcentrationCintheremaining soldercanbeexpressedas:
C= VssI
Vss−Vssf
(1) where Iis theoriginal Agconcentration inthe SnAg2.5 solder, Vs is theoriginalvolume ofthesolder, s isthedensity ofthe
SnAg2.5solder(7.34gcm−3),iisthedensityoftheNi3Sn4IMCs
(8.64gcm−3[9]),ViisthevolumeincreaseoftheNi3Sn4IMCs,and
fistheweightfractionofSnintheNi3Sn4IMCs(here72.93%).The
shapesofbothsolderandtheNi3Sn4layersarenearlycylindrical,
asshowninFig.3.BecausethediametersoftheNi3Sn4IMCand
solderlayersareroughlythesame,Eq.(1)maybereducedto: C= hssI
hss−hiif (2)
wherehsistheoriginalthicknessoftheSnAgsolder,andhiisthe
increaseinthicknessoftheNi3Sn4layeronbothtopandbottom
sides.Inaddition,thetime-dependentthicknessoftheNi3Sn4layer
canbeexpressedas:
ht−h0=(kt)1/2 (3)
whereh0istheoriginalthickness,htisthethicknessafterreflowfor
tmin,tisreflowtimeinminutes,andkisthegrowth-rateconstant. Fig.5(a)showsthemeasuredNi3Sn4thicknessasfunctionof
reflowtimeonthetopandinterposersidesforthe6.0-msamples. ThethicknessoftheNi3Sn4IMCsontheinterposersideisthicker
thanthatonthechipside.Theexactreasonforcausingthis differ-enceisnotclear.Itmayberelatedtothebondingprocess.Thetotal thicknessrepresentsthesumofthethicknessonthebothsides.
Fig.6. TheevolutionofAgconcentrationintheremainingsolderaftervariousreflow timesforboththe4.0-mand6.2-mmicrobumps.TheAgconcentrationexceeded 3.5wt%after13.0minwiththe4.0-m-thickmicrobumps,whereasittook25.0min todosowiththe6.2-m-thickmicrobumps.
Therefore,wecanplottheincreaseintheNi3Sn4thicknessagainst
thesquarerootofreflowtimeandtheresultsareshowninFig.5(b). Withthefittingcurve,therateconstantwascalculatedtobe0.44. CombiningEqs.(2)and(3),thetime-dependentAgconcentration canbeexpressedas:
C= I
1−((kt)0.5if/hss)
(4) Fig.6showsthecalculatedAgconcentrationintheremaining solderas afunction ofreflowtime forthe4.0-mand 6.2-m microbumpsusingtherateconstantfromFig.4.Withthe4.0- m-thickmicrobumps,theAgconcentrationincreasestoabove3.5wt% afterareflowofapproximately9.0min,whereasittakes approxi-mately22.0minfortheAgconcentrationtoexceed3.5wt%withthe 6.2-m-thicksolder.Thisisbecausethe4.0-m-thickmicrobump simplyhaslesssolder.Therefore,theconsumptionofSnhasamore obviouseffectontheAgconcentration.
Thecalculateddatafittheexperimentalresultsquitewell.As shownin Fig.4,theprobabilityforobserving largeAg3Sn IMCs
increasedsignificantlyaftera10-minreflowforthe4.0-m-thick microbumps.ThecalculateddataindicatethattheAg concentra-tionwas over 3.5wt% afteran 13.0-min reflow. Approximately 28.5wt%oftheSninthesolderwasconsumedtoformNi3Sn4IMCs,
resultingintheAgconcentrationexceeding3.5wt%inthe remain-ingsolder.Additionally,theexperimentalresultsshowedthatno largeAg3SnIMCswerefoundaftera40-minreflowwiththe
6.2-m-thickmicrobumps,buttheprobabilityroseabruptlyaftera 90-minreflow.Notethatherethecalculatedvaluesshowthatthe Agconcentrationshouldexceed3.5wt%aftera25.0-minreflow. Thisdifferencemaybeattributedtotheassumptionofaconstant reactionrateinthecalculation.Inreality,thereactionrateslowsas thereflowtimeisincreased.Thismayberesponsibleforthe dis-crepancybetweentheexperimentalandtheoreticalresultsforthe 6.2-m-thickmicrobumps.
Fig.7showsthecalculatedconcentrationofAginthe remain-ingsolderasafunctionofsolderthicknessafter10-minreflowtime whenSn2.5Ag,SnAg2.0,andSnAg1.5Agsolderswereadopted.The reasonwechoose10ministhatsolderbumpsneedstopass relia-bilitytestsafterapproximately10-minreflow.Theresultsindicate thatthethinnerthesolder,themorerapidintheconcentration increaseofAgintheremainingsolder.Forexample,whenthesolder thicknessis14.0-mthick,theconcentrationofAgonlyincreases from2.5wt%toapproximately2.75wt%after10-minreflow. How-ever,whenthesolderthicknessdecreaseto4.0-mthick,theAg concentrationwouldincreaseover3.5wt%after10-minreflow.The calculatedcriticalsolderthicknessis4.2mfortheSnAg2.5solder, belowwhichtheconcentrationoftheAgintheremainingsolder wouldexceed3.5wt%after10minreflow.
Fig.7.ThecalculatedAgconcentrationintheremainingsolderagainstthicknessof solderafter10-minreflowforSnAg2.5,SnAg2.0andSnAg1.5solders.
TheaboveresultsalsosuggestthatreducingtheAg concentra-tioninSnAgsolderwilleasetheprecipitationofthelargeAg3Sn
IMCs.Fig.7alsoshowsthecalculatedconcentrationofAginthe remainingsolder asafunction ofsolder thicknessafter10-min reflowtimeforSnAg2.0,andSnAg1.5Agsolders.Thecriticalolder thicknessis2.8and2.1mfortheSnAg2.0andSnAg1.5solders, respectively.Thatis,whenSnAg2.0solderisused,theprecipitation ofAg3Snmayoccurafter10minreflowwhenthesolderthickness
islessthan2.8m.
Shenetal.studiedthegrowthmechanismofAg3Snprecipitation
inSnAgsolder[17].TheyproposedthattheprimaryAg3Sn
parti-clesformbeforetheonset oftheeutecticreaction,moreAg3Sn phasecouldnucleateadjacenttotheprimaryAg3Snprecipitation,
resultingintheformationoflargeAg3SnIMCs.It isnoteworthy
thatcoolingratesmayhaveaprofoundeffectontheprecipitation ofAg3SnIMCs[9–12,18].BecauseAg3SnIMCsareformedduring
thecoolingprocess,aslowcoolingratefacilitatestheformationof largeAg3SnIMCs.Inthisstudy,thesampleswerecooledinairafter
reflowatafastercoolingratethanistypicallyusedinthe packag-ingindustry.Therefore,theprecipitationoflargeAg3SnIMCscould
beacriticalreliabilityissueformicrobumpsifthinsolderlayers areadopted.Inmicrobumpswithfewamountofsolder,thesolder reactswithNitoformNi3Sn4IMCsafterreflowandtheentiresolder
layermaytransformintoIMCs,asshowninFigs.2and3.TheAg3Sn
particlesadheretotheNi3Sn4IMCs.Therefore,theAg3Sn/Ni3Sn4
interfaceswillplayacrucialroleinthemechanicalpropertiesof microbumps.Thisdeservesmorefuturestudies.
4. Conclusion
Insummary,weinvestigatedtheliquid-statemetallurgical reac-tionsin microbumpswith two solder thicknesses. LargeAg3Sn
precipitatesemergedaftera10-minreflowwiththe4.0-msolder microbumps.Whenthesolderthicknesswasincreasedto6.2m, nolargeAg3SnIMCswerefoundinthesamplesforreflowtimes
below40min.TheoreticalcalculationsindicatedthattheAg con-centrationincreaseswithreflow,becauseSnreactswiththeNiUBM toformNi3Sn4IMCs,thusincreasingtheAgconcentrationinthe
remainingsolderwithreflowtime,whichfacilitatestheformation oflargeAg3Snprecipitatesduringthecoolingstage.Theselarge
Ag3Sninclusionsmaybedetrimentaltothemechanicalproperties
ofthemicrobumps;additionalstudyisneededtoinvestigatethese effects.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Economic Affairs,R.O.C.fortheirfinancialsupportundergrantno. 98-EC-17-A-05-S2-0051.Inaddition,theauthorsthankDr.Tao-ChihChang, Mr. Chau-Jie Zhan, and Mr. Jin-Ye Juang in Industrial Technol-ogyResearch Instituteof Taiwan for providing themicrobump samples.
References
[1]K.Zeng,K.N.Tu,J.Mater.Sci.Eng.Rep.38(2002)55.
[2] K.S.Kim,S.H.Huh,K.Suganuma,J.AlloysCompd.352(2003)226. [3]S.J.Wang,C.Y.Liu,Scr.Mater.49(2003)813.
[4]N.S.Liu,K.L.Lin,J.AlloysCompd.456(1)(2008)466.
[5]C.F.Yang,F.L.Chen,W.Gierlotka,S.W.Chen,K.C.Hsieh,L.L.Huang,Mater.Chem. Phys.112(1)(2008)94.
[6]S.W.Chen,W.Y.Lee,C.M.Hsu,C.F.Yang,H.Y.Hsu,H.J.Wu,Mater.Chem.Phys. 128(2011)357.
[7]C.E.Ho,Y.W.Lin,S.C.Yang,C.R.Kao,D.S.Jiang,J.Electron.Mater.35(5)(2006) 1017.
[8] S.K.Kang,A.K.Sarkhel,J.Electron.Mater.23(8)(1994)701. [9]K.S.Kim,S.H.Huh,K.Suganuma,Microelectron.Reliab.43(2003)259. [10]C.P.Huang,C.Chen,C.Y.Liu,S.S.Lin,K.H.Chen,J.Mater.Res.20(2005)2772. [11] J.W.Jang,D.R.Frear,T.Y.Lee,K.N.Tu,J.Appl.Phys.88(2000)6359. [12] C.Chen,H.M.Tong,K.N.Tu,Annu.Rev.Mater.Res.40(2010)531. [13]K.N.Tu,Microelectron.Reliab.51(2011)517.
[14]R.Agarwal,W.Zhang,P.Limaye,R.Labie,B.Dimcic,A.Phommahaxay,P. Soussan,Proceedingsofthe60thElectronicComponentsandTechnology Con-ference,LasVegas,NV,USA,June,2010,pp.858–863.
[15]J.Hwang,J.Kim,W.Kwon,U.Kang,T.Cho,S.Kang,Proceedingsofthe60th ElectronicComponentsandTechnologyConference,LasVegas,NV,USA,June, 2010,pp.1399–1403.
[16]C.J.Zhan,C.C.Chuang,J.Y.Juang,S.T.T.C.Lu,T.C.Chang,Proceedingsofthe60th ElectronicComponentsandTechnologyConference,LasVegas,NY,USA,June, 2010,pp.1043–1049.
[17] J.Shen,Y.C.Chen,S.Y.Liu,Intermetallics16(2008)1142.
[18]R.S.Sidhu,S.V.Madge,X.Deng,N.Chawla,J.Electron.Mater.36(12)(2007) 1615.