• 沒有找到結果。

臺北縣市呼吸器依賴病患決策家屬選擇呼吸照護病房因素之研究

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "臺北縣市呼吸器依賴病患決策家屬選擇呼吸照護病房因素之研究"

Copied!
15
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

1  !"#$"#% 2  !"!#$!%&'(%) 3  !"#$%!&'() 4  !"!#$!%&'( 5  !"#$%!&'( 6  !"#$%!&'()!*+,*+%  !"2007  12  4  !"#2008  1  2  !"#$2008  8  30   !"#$%&&110  !"# 250 

 !"

 !"#$%&'()*+,- !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%!&'()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./ 0  !"#$%&'($)*+, -./  !"#$% &'()*+,-./  !"#$%&'()*+,-./#01  !"#$%&'()*++,-./01  !"#$%& 2003 !"#$%&'( 20  !"  !"# 2004  26  !"#$ 2005 !"#$%& 2~30  !"#$  (Ambrosino & Clini, 2004) !"#$%  !"#$%&'()* (2005)  !"  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  21.3%  !"#$%&'(")*#%+

 !"#$%&'()*+,-."#/0'1

 !"



1

 !

2

 !

3

 !

4

 !

5

 !

6



 !"#$%&'()*+!",-.!"/0+1234567#$%8&+9:;6<  !"#$%&'()*+,-./%&01*23456789:;<=>./789?@  !"#$%&'()* 41  !"#$%&'()*+,- 20  !"#$%&'()  !" #$%&'()*+,-./01 2345678*+.9:; 320  !"#$

 288  ! 94.4% !"#$%&'()&*+,&-./& Mann-Whitney test 

Kruskal-Wallis test Spearman  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01234562785629/01:;<=>?@A  !"#$%&'()*!+,-./012(345678 !"#9:;<"=>?  !"#$"%&'()*+,"%&-./0123456789:;<=">?@A"  !"#$%&'(!)*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@AB)

(2)

 !"#$%&'()*+,-'."/0  !"#$%&'()*#+%&,-./   (Green & Edmonds, 2004; Groeger et al.,

1992) !"#$%&'()*+&,#-.

 !"#$%&'()*!+,-&./0  !"#$%&'()* (Daly, Rudy, Thompson,

& Happ, 1991) !"#$%&'()*+

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01#  !"#$%&'()* !" 2001  !"#$%&'()*#+,   !"#$%&'()*+,-./01)  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$% ! "# 2001  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012   ! " # $ % & ' ( ) *  + , - . / 0  !"#$%&'()*+, !" 2004Johnson, 1990 !"#$%&'(  !"#$%& '()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*$+,-./01  !"#$%&'()#*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./#01  !  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01'  !"#$%!&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$ 2001 !"!#$  !"#$%&'()!"#*+),-.  !" (Coulter & Jenkinson, 2005)

 !"#$%&'()*+,-&./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./"#$  !"#$%&' (Cleary & Edgman-Levitan,

1997) !"#$%&'()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-. !$/  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,- !"#$%&'()"available)  (accessible) !"# (acceptable)   ! (affordable)   ! (accountable)   ! " # $   2004  Penchansky  Thomas (1987)  !"#$%&'()*+  !"#$1.  (availability) !  !"#$%&'()*+,-./2.   (accessibility) !"#$%&'()*+  !"#$%&'()*+,-./ &  !"#$ !"%&'()*+3.  (accommodation) !"#$%&'()*+  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#4.  ! (affordability) !  !"#$%&'()* +,-./-0  !"#$%&'($)*+,-./01  !"#$%5.  (acceptability)  !"#$%&'()*+,-./#01  !"#$  !"#$%&'()#*+&#$,- !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'(! 39%  !"#$  !"#$%&' (Johnson, 1986) !  !"#$%&'()*+,-./(01  !"#$%&'()*+#$%,-./&  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-."#$/  !"#$%&"'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+ ! "#

2004Fletcher et al., 1983; Marengoni, Agüero-Torres, Timpini, Cossi, & Fratiglioni, 2008



!"#$%&'()*+,-()  !

(3)

    ! " # 2002 Sofaer, Crofton,

Goldstein, Hoy, & Crabb, 2005 !"#$  !2002  !2007Hill, 2001  ! ! "# 2001 1999 !

2004 ! 2002Boscarino & Steiber, 1982; Oswald, Turner, Snipes, & Butler, 1998

 (Jolley, 2005) !"#$%&'()  !"# ()  !  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+(,-./ (  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'() 1998Inguanzo

& Harju, 1985 !"#$%&'()*+

 !"#$%&'()*+,-.-/01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./ ! 2001  ()  !"#  !"#$%&'()*+,- 1999  !" 2003 ! "#$ 2007  !"#$%&'( 1999 1999  ! 1999 ! "#$ 2001 !  !"#$%&'()*+,-./ 2001 !"#$%&'()*+,Javalgi et al., 1991 !"#$ !" 1999

  Rao, & Thomas, 1991  2001  !

2004 !"#$%&'()*+,-.

 1998

()  !

  ! " # $   % & ' ! ( ) * + ,

(Berkanovic & Telesky, 1982) ! 2001  2003 !"#$%&'()*+,+-./

 !"#$%&'()*+#,-#$./  (Tu, 2005a) !"#$% (Tu, 2005b)  !"#$%&'()*+,-./&01  !"#$%&'()*+!,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"# !" 2001) !"#$%  !"# 2002 ()  !  !"#$%&'()*+,%"-.

(Hendriks, Vrielink, van Es, De Haes, & Smets, 2004) !"#$%&'()*+,-./)

 !"#$%&'()*+,-)./!0  ! " #$ 2006 ! " #$ 2004Boscarino & Steiber, 1982; Brown, 2001; Inguanzo & Harju, 1985; Javalgi et al., 1991  (2003)  !"#$%&'()*$+,-.  !"#!$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./  !" 2003 ! " # $% 1998

Al-Doghaither, Abdelrhman, Saeed, & Magzoub, 2003; Boscarino & Steiber, 1982; Hill, 2001; Javalgi et al., 1991 !" !" 2002  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,% -./(  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-.)/01  ! "#$ 1996  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'(&')$'*+,-.   ! 2001  ! 2002 Andaleeb, 1998;

Javalgi et al., 1991; Marengoni et al., 2008

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./012)  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01$  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01)  !"#$%&'(  !"#$% 1. !"#$%&'()*+,-./0$  ! 2. !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  ! 3. !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 

(4)

 !"#

 !"#$%&'()*   !"#$%&'()*+,-.  21  !"#$%& 6  !  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0  !"# 17  !"#$%&'()  3  !"#$%&'(   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0  !"#$%   !"#$%&'()*+,-./$  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*&+,-()  !"#$%"#&'

 !"#$

 !"#   ! " # $  % & (cross-sectional design) !"#$%&  !"#  !"# 41  ! 13  !" 28  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"# $%"&'()*$+,  20  ! 938  ! 6  !"  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01,  !"#$%&'()*+'(,-./0  814  !" 86.8% !"#$%&  ! 380  !"#$%&'()*+,  46.7% 60  !"#$%&'()*  !"#$%&'( 320  ! 302   ! 94.4 %  !"#$%&'()*+  !"#$%&'()*+,#$%&-./  5.6%  !"#$%&'( 14  !"  288   !"#  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'!"()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%& Likert  !"#$%& 1  !"4  !"#$  ! (Content Validity IndexCVI)  .86  !"#$%&'()*+ 5  60   !"#$%&'()*+,-./01/  !"# ()  !"#$%&'()*(+,(  !"#$%&$'  !"#$%  !"#$%&'()*+, ()  !"#$%&'()*+,-.,/ . !"#$%&

(5)

 !"#$%&'(")*+  !"#$% ()  !"#$%&'()*+, !  !"#$%&'()*+"#'(*  !"#$%&'()*+,-./  !" !"#5  !4   !3  !"2  !" 1  ()  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0  !"#$ !  !"#$  !"#$%& 27  !"#$%&   ! !"#5  ! 4   !3  !" 2  !" 1  Cronbach’s Alpha (α)    !"#α .96  !" α .80~.96   !"#  !" 2006  9  15  10  31   !"#$%&'()*+,-./012$  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$#%&'()*+,-#./01  !"#$"%&' ()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'#()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+, -./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012%  !"#$%&' ()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./$012  !"#$%&'()*+,  !"#  SPSS 13.0  !"#$%&'()*+  !"#$%&'%()*%+,-./  !"#$%&'()!"*+,-./0  ! Mann-Whitney test  Kruskal-Wallis test  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'($)*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()* Spearman  ! (rs)  !"

 !"

 !"#$%&'()*  !"# (62.5%) !"# 73.5 ± 15.3 (17-102 ) 70  ! 71.9%  !  !"#$%&' (39.6%) !"#$%  !"# (Glasgow Coma Score, GCS)   7.28  (3-11 ) !"#$% (67.0%)  !"#$%&'() (95.8%) !"# (95.8%) ! (87.2%) !"#$%&'  !"#$%&'( (37.5%) !"  48.4 ± 13.0 (22-91 ) ! (76.1%)   (35.3%)  ! (66.3%)  ! " (39.8%)  !"#$%&'()* 3~10   (70.4%)  ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , (38.7%)  !"#$ (37.7%)  !"#  !"#$%&'()*!  !"#$%&'()*+,  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./ (43.2%)  !"#$%!"& (46.5%)  !"#  10.5%  !"#$%&'  !"#$%&'()*+,-.   !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  4.01  !"#$%&'()*+,-.  !"# (4.18 ) !" (4.05 )  (4.01 ) !" (3.94 ) !" (3.87) 27  !"#$%&'()*  !"#$%& (4.31 ) !"#$%  (4.28  )  (4.27  )  ! " # $ (4.25)  !"#$% (4.23 ) !"  !"#$%&'()* (3.35 )  (3.72 ) !"#$% (3.80 )

(6)

 (3.86 )  !"#$% (3.92 )  !"#$%  !"#$%&'()*+,-./  ()  !  !"#$% !"# (p = .031)  !"#$% (p = .011)  !"#$%&  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012 .  !"#$%& (N = 288)  !"      180 62.5  108 37.5  30 4 1.4 30-49 20 6.9 50-69 57 19.8 70 207 71.9   190 66.0  !" ! " #$% 98 34.0  !"#  39 13.5  !"  !"#$%& 13 4.5  !"# 155 53.8  !"#$%& 60 20.8  !"# 19 6.6  !"#$% 7 2.4   !"#$%& 114 39.6  !"#$ 67 23.3  !"#$% 88 30.6  19 6.6   !3-8  193 67.0  !9-12  95 33.0  !13-15  0 0  !  !0-20  276 95.8  !21-60  10 3.5  !61-90  2 0.7  !91-99  0 0  !100  0 0   276 95.8  12 4.2   37 12.8  251 87.2

(7)

 !"#$%&'() *+,-./  !"#$% (p = .022) !"#$  !"#$ !"# (p = .024)  (p = .006) !"#$%&'()*+  !"#!$%&'()*+,-./01   ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * +   ! " # (rs = .151, p = .010) !"# !"#  (rs = .137, p = .019)  !"#$%&'( .  !"# (N = 288)  !"     !"  51 17.7  108 37.5  73 25.3  !"#!$%!&'()! 56 19.4  !"#$%   137 47.7  150 52.3  22-29 20 7.4 30-49 129 47.8 50-69 103 38.1 70 18 6.7   57 20.0  217 76.1  !"#$%&' 11 3.9  !  ! 91 31.8  94 32.9  ! 101 35.3   191 66.3  97 33.7   113 39.8  104 36.6  ! !"#$%"&'%"(%) 33 11.6  34 12.0  !"#$ 30,000 49 18.1 30,000~100,000 190 70.4 100,001  31 11.5  !  22 7.7  2 0.7  110 38.7  43 15.1  !"# 107 37.7

(8)

 !"#$%& %'()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012 ()  !"#  !"#$%&'()*+ !"#  (p = .019)  !"#$%&'()*)  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !" !" (p = .028) !"# (p = .026) !"# (p = .001) !"  (p = .048)  !"#$%&'()*+  !"#$%&'()*+,+"  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01.  !"#$%&'()*+, !" (p = .001) !"# (p = .000) !"# (p = .000) !"#$% (p = .000) !  (p = .046)  !"#$%&'()*+   !"#  !"#  !"#$%&!'()*+,-%./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01)  !"#$%&'()'*+',-./'  !"#$%&'()*+, ()  !"#$%&'()*+,  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  ! !" (p = .047) !"# (p = .026) !"# (p = .039) !"#  (p = .001)  !"#$%&'()*+,  !"#$%&'()*+,!+,!"  !"#$%&'!"#()*+,-.+  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !

 !"

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$% 4.01  !"#$%&'(  !"#$% ! !"#$%&  !"# !"#$% !"#  !"# !"#$%&'()*+,- !"#$%&'()* +,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+ 2003  !"#$%&'()*+,-.%/01  !"#$%&'#()#$*+,-./0  !"#$%&' 1999 !" 1999  2001 1999 ! 2007 !  2000 !"#$%&'()*+,-.  !"#$%&'()* (N = 288)  !"     !  !"#$%&'()*+, 123 43.2  !"#$%&'()*+, 92 32.3  !"#$%&'( 57 20.0  ! 7 2.5  ! 0 0  !"#$%&'() 6 2.1   ! 2 0.7  28 9.8  123 43.0  114 39.9  !" 19 6.6

(9)

.  !"#$%&'()*+,-./ (N = 288)  !" M ± SD  ! 3.87 ± 0.53  ! 3.35 ± 0.76  ! 4.19 ± 0.65  ! 4.02 ± 0.72  ! 3.72 ± 0.73  ! 4.04 ± 0.70  ! 3.94 ± 0.61  !"#$ 3.92 ± 0.72  !"#$% 3.94 ± 0.73  !"#$ 3.80 ± 0.86  !"#$%&'() 4.02 ± 0.74  !"#$%&'() 3.93 ± 0.75  ! 4.04 ± 0.71  !"# 4.18 ± 0.53  4.27 ± 0.62  4.31 ± 0.63  !"# 4.25 ± 0.61  !"#$% 4.16 ± 0.65  !"# 4.23 ± 0.59  !"#$% 4.28 ± 0.57  !"#$ 4.22 ± 0.63  !"#$%& 4.23 ± 0.61  !"#$ 4.14 ± 0.61  ! 4.15 ± 0.66  !"#$% 4.00 ± 0.71  ! 3.86 ± 0.74  ! 4.05 ± 0.75  ! 4.05 ± 0.75  ! 4.01 ± 0.63  !" 4.08 ± 0.67  ! 3.94 ± 0.75   4.00 ± 0.71  4.01 ± 0.50  !"#$%&'()*+,-./ Isaacs (1996)  !"#$%&'()*+,-.!  !"#$%!"&'()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  ! (1999)  !"#$%&' ()*  !"#$%&'()*+,-"./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-.  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  ! 43.2%  Elliott & Polkinhom (1994)  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0)1  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 2.5%   !"#$%&'(&)*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&' 10.5%  !"#$%  46.5%  !"#$% !"&'()*  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0!1  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,#-./01  !"#$%&'()*  !"# 32.3%  !"#$%&'(   ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1/3 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()* 20.0%  !" (2002)  ! 9  !"#$%&'()*  !"#$%&'() (65.9%)  !"  !"#$%&'()*+,-*./0)  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./   !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+$%&'(),  !"# !"# !"#

(10)

 .  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789: (N = 288)  !  !  !"#  !  !  Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean  ! Rank Z / χ 2 Rank Z / χ 2 Rank Z / χ 2 Rank Z / χ 2 Rank Z / χ 2 Rank Z / χ 2 •  !    (n = 180) 140.9 -0.99 137.6 -1.87* 136.0 -2.30* 137.5 -1.30 140.6 -1.06 138.3 -1.63   (n = 108) 150.7 156.2 158.9 149.5 150.9 154.8  !"#   (n = 4 6 ) 133.2 -0.72 128.3 -1.17 119.1 -2.02* 138.1 -0.04 135.8 -0.49 128.6 -1.14   (n = 235) 142.5 143.5 145.3 138.6 142.0 143.4    (n = 276) 144.4 -0.10 144.1 -0.42 145.1 -0.57 143.9 -1.98* 147.0 -2.54** 145.5 -0.98   (n = 1 2 ) 146.9 154.3 131.2 100.0 87.1 121.6 •  !"#  !"   (n = 5 1 ) 131.9 3.43 137.1 5.95 124.3 9.92* 132.2 3.45 139.0 1.37 132.4 5.36   (n = 108) 142.9 135.6 135.1    135.9 141.8 136.6   (n = 7 3 ) 158.5 164.3 165.6    149.9 153.8 161.8   (n = 5 6 ) 140.9 142.5 153.6    152.6 142.6 148.2    (n = 5 7 ) 165.2 7.30* 142.5 14.0** 164.9 6.06* 143.3 0.49 152.5 1.42 160.4 7.14*   (n = 217) 139.2    60.5    138.7    140.5 141.4 141.1      (n = 1 1 ) 103.2    142.5    114.5    125.5 125.9 90.7     !   ! (n = 9 1 ) 114.0 18.2*** 115.1 16.83*** 112.2 20.0*** 135.0 4.39 127.4 6.18* 116.0 15.15**   (n = 9 4 ) 163.0    151.9    153.7    154.3 155.9    159.5      ! (n = 1 0 1 ) 152.0    161.3    162.2    134.0 146.4    153.4    •  !    161.3 7.33* 177.7 6.50* 191.2 14.04* 153.3 0.84 162.7 2.07 174.8 6.13*   128.7    135.3    129.2    139.7 139.5 133.7      153.2    143.4    145.9    139.6 142.9 145.5       *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.

(11)

 !"#$ !"#$%&'()*+  !"#$ !"#$%&'()*  !"# !"#$%&'()  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012   !"#$%&'() !"#  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"# !"# !"#$%&  !"#$%&'()*+,-./*01 10,000~35,000 !"#$%&"#$%'(  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*!+,-./01  !"#$%&'() !"#  !"#$%&'()*(+,-./0'  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'%()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./   !"#$%&'()*+,-./  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012   ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , ! - . / 0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012

(Thomson & Dixon, 2006) !"#$%&

 !"#$%&!'()*+,-.)*/  !"#  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0/  !"#$ !"#$% !"#  !"#$%&'()*#+,-./01  !"#$%&'!()!*+,-./0  !"# !"#$% ! (1999)  !"# 16  !"#$%&'()*+  !"# !"# !"#$%&'  !"#$%&$'()*+ !"#  !"# !"#$% !"#$  !"#$%&'()*+,-./)01  !"#$%&' 1999 1999   ! " # $ % & '  ! " ( # $ ) * +  !"#$% !"# !"#  !"#$%&'()*+,-./#  !

 !"#

 !"#$%&1.  !"#$%&  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  2.  !"#$%&'()*+,-.  !"#$%&'()*+ 3.  !"#  !"#$%&'(#)*+,-./01  !"#$%&'() 4.  !"#$%  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%!&'()*+,-./0(  !"#$%&'()*+,

 !"#$

 !  !"#$%&'()*+,-#.  !"#$%&'()*+"#,-./$  !"#$%&'()*$+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+),-./01)  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123  !"#$%&'()'*#+,'-./  !"#$%&'()*+,-./#$0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01"  !"#$%&'()*+#,-./'  !"#$%&'  ! ()  !"# 1.  !"#$%&'()*+,-./  !"#$%&'()*+2.  !"#  !"#$%&'()*!+,-./0  !"#$%3.  !"#$%&'()  !"#$%&'()*+4.  !"#  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01#  !"#$%5.  !"#$%&'()  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0%

(12)

 !"#$%&'()*+,- !./0  ()  !"# 1.  !"#$%&'()*+,-./  !"#$%&'()*+,-.!/01  !"#$%&'() !*+,-(  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  2.  !"#$%&'()*+',-./  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,#-./01  3.  6.5%  !"#$%&'()*+  !"#$%&'# ()*+,-./0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+ ,-./01  !"#$%&'()*+,-. 4.   !"#$%&'()*+,-./ 0  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012&  !"#$%&'()*#+,-./01  !"#$%&'(



 !"#$%&'()*+,-+,*.  !"#$%&'()*+,-./(01 

 !"#

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

(13)

 !"#$!%&'!()* (2004)  !"#$%&"#'()*+,   5(1) 101-119   !"#$!%&' (2007)  !"#$  !"#$%&'()*+),-./0  !"#"$% 12(4) 220-229   (1998) !"#$%&'()*+,  !"#$%&'()*+, ! 2(1) 217-247   !"#$!%&'!()*!+,- (1998)  !"#$%&'()*+,*-./0  ! ! 19(3) 161-171   !"#$!%&' (2004) !"#$  !"#$%&'()*+,-.   3(1) 47-58   !"#$!%&' (2000) !"#$  !"#$%&'()*+,- !  ! 19(6) 437-445   !"# $%& (2001) !"#$!  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01  ! !"#$% 20(5) 381-394   !"# $%& (2002) !"#$%  !"#$ !%&'() !"#  21(4) 266-277 

Al-Doghaither, A. H., Abdelrhman, B. M., Saeed, A. A., & Magzoub, M. E. (2003). Factors in-fluencing patient choice of hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Royal Society of Health, 123(2), 105-109.

Ambrosino, N. & Clini, E. (2004). Long-term me-chanical ventilation and nutrition. Respiratory Medicine, 98(5), 413-420.

Andaleeb, S. S. (1998). Choice and evaluation of hospitals in Bangladesh: Insights from patients and policy implications. Journal of Health & Population in Developing Countries, 1(2), 19-28.

Berkanovic, E., & Telesky, C. (1982). Social

networks, beliefs, and the decision to seek medical care: An analysis of congruent and incongruent patterns. Medical Care, 20(10), 1018-1026.

Boscarino, J., & Steiber, S. R. (1982). Hospital shopping and consumer choice. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 2(2), 15-23.

Brown, H. S. (2001). Income, location, and the demand for health care from public, nonprofit, and for profit hospitals. Journal of Health Care Finance, 27(4), 24-38.

Cleary, P. D., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (1997). Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspec-tives. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(19), 1608-1612.

Coulter, A., & Jenkinson, C. (2005). European pa-tients’ views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. European Journal of Public Health, 15(4), 355-360. Daly, B. J., Rudy, E. B., Thompson, K. S., & Happ,

M. B. (1991). Development of a special care unit for chronically critically ill patients. Heart & Lung, 20(1), 45-51.

Elliott, B. J., & Polkinhorn, J. S. (1994). Provision of consumer health information in general practice. Journal of British Medical, 308 (6927), 505-510.

Fletcher, R. H., O'Malley, M. S., Earp, J. A., Littleton, T. A., Fletcher, S. W., Greganti, M. A., et al. (1983). Patients’ priorities for medi-cal care. Medimedi-cal Care, 21(2), 234-242. Green, A., & Edmonds, L. (2004). Bridging the gap

between the intensive care unit and general wards-the ICU Liaison Nurse. Intensive Criti-cal Care Nursing, 20(3), 133-143.

Groeger, J. S., Strosberg, M. A., Halpern, N. A., Raphaely, R. C., Kaye, W. E., Guntupalli, K. K., Bertram, D. L., Greenbaum, D. M.,

(14)

Clemmer, T. P., Gallagher, T. J., et al. (1992). Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United States. Critical Care Medicine, 20(6), 846-863.

Hendriks, A. A., Vrielink, M. R., van Es, S. Q., De Haes, H. J., & Smets, E. M. (2004). Assessing inpatients' satisfaction with hospital care: Should we prefer evaluation or satisfaction ratings? Patient Education and Counseling, 55 (1), 142-146.

Hill, C. J. (2001). Determinant attributes in nursing home choice: Profiling attribute segments. Health Marketing Quarterly, 19(2), 73-88. Inguanzo, J. M., & Harju, M. (1985). What makes

consumers select a hospital? Hospitals, 59(6), 90-94.

Isaacs, S. L. (1996). Consumers’ information needs: Results of a national survey. Health Affairs, 15(4), 31-41.

Javalgi, R. G., Rao, S. R., & Thomas, E. G. (1991). Choosing a hospital: Analysis of consumer tradeoffs. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 11(1), 12-22.

Johnson, D. E. (1986). Patient's healthcare needs dictate who influences choice of providers. Modern Healthcare, 16(10), 27.

Johnson, M. A. (1990). Nursing home placement: T h e d a u g h t e r ' s p e r s p e c t i v e . J o u r n a l o f Gerontological Nursing, 16(11), 6-11. Jolley, S. (2005). Single rooms and patient choice.

Nursing Standard, 20(9), 41-48.

Marengoni, A., Agüero-Torres, H., Timpini, A., Cossi, S., & Fratiglioni, L. (2008). Rehabilita-tion and nursing home admission after hospi-talization in acute geriatric patients. Journal o f t h e A m e r i c a n M e d i c a l D i r e c t o r s Association, 9(4), 265-270.

Oswald, S. L., Turner, D. E., Snipes, R. L., & Butler, D. (1998). Quality determinants and hospital satisfaction. Perceptions of the facil-ity and staff might be key influencing factors. Marketing Health Services, 18(1), 18-22. Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1987). The

con-cept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127-140.

Sofaer, S., Crofton, C., Goldstein, E., Hoy, E., & Crabb, J. (2005). What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals? Health Services Research, 40(6), 2018-2036. Thomson, S. & Dixon, A. (2006). Choices in health

care: The European experience. Journal of Health Services & Research Policy. 11(3), 167-171.

Tu, H. T. (2005a). More Americans willing to limit physician-hospital choice for lower medical costs. Issue Brief/ Center for Studying Health System Change, 94, 1-5.

Tu, H. T. (2005b). Medicare seniors much less willing to limit physician-hospital choice for lower costs. Issue Brief/ Center for Studying Health System Change, 96, 1-8.

(15)

Factor Analysis of Respiratory Care Ward Choices among

Families of Ventilator—Dependent Patients in Taipei

Hsiu-O Kao

1

Yann-Fen Chao

2

Matthew Huei-Ming Ma

3

Pi-Hsia Lee

4

Shu-Hui Chang

5

Tong-Yang Chou

6

Abstract

Medical consumers have begun recently to request high quality medical services. Factors affecting hospital choice are very important for decision behavior of consumers. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting the selection of Respiratory Care Wards (RCWs) for families of ventilator-dependent patients. The study employed a cross-sectional design. Structured questionnaires were developed to survey the main family decision-maker of ventilator-dependent patients from 20 randomly selected ones among 41 RCWs in Taipei. Out of 320 self-reported questionnaires sent out, 288 (94.4%) valid questionnaires were returned. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearman rank correlation coefficient were utilized. The survey results showed that family decision-makers focused on the following five subscale factors affecting the selection of RCWs, which were ranked-ordered as follows: professional services, price factor, convenience factor, hospitalized services and hardware plan. Reported the most common selection of RCWs based on subscales of 5 structure factors: physician moral values, nurse attitude, and physician skill. Patient characteristics affecting selection of RCWs included gender, age, social welfare help and hemodialysis service. The relationship with the patient, marriage, personal education and sufficient information resources were the factors for affecting family decision-makers. These survey results provide an important reference for promoting the quality of RCWs.

Key words: Respiratory care ward, decision-maker, ventilator-dependent patient.

1

Head Nurse, Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital.

2

Professor and Dean, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University.

3

Associate Professor, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University.

4

Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University.

5

Professor, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University.

6

Graduate Student, BS, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University. Received: Dec. 4, 2007 Revised: Jan. 2, 2008 Accepted: Aug. 30, 2008

參考文獻

相關文件

- Informants: Principal, Vice-principals, curriculum leaders, English teachers, content subject teachers, students, parents.. - 12 cases could be categorised into 3 types, based

volume suppressed mass: (TeV) 2 /M P ∼ 10 −4 eV → mm range can be experimentally tested for any number of extra dimensions - Light U(1) gauge bosons: no derivative couplings. =&gt;

incapable to extract any quantities from QCD, nor to tackle the most interesting physics, namely, the spontaneously chiral symmetry breaking and the color confinement.. 

• Formation of massive primordial stars as origin of objects in the early universe. • Supernova explosions might be visible to the most

(Another example of close harmony is the four-bar unaccompanied vocal introduction to “Paperback Writer”, a somewhat later Beatles song.) Overall, Lennon’s and McCartney’s

 The IEC endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this presentation is accurate as of the date of its presentation, but the information is provided on an

Experiment a little with the Hello program. It will say that it has no clue what you mean by ouch. The exact wording of the error message is dependent on the compiler, but it might

Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the segments for wine consumers in Taiwan by product, brand decision, and purchasing involvement, and then determine the