1877-0428 © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management Society
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.538
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
International Conference on Asia Pacific Business Innovation & Technology
Management
Estimating Achievable Capacity Index based on
Multiple Samples
Tsung-Yin Wang
a, Cheng-Hwai Liou
a*, Rung-Hung Su
b, Dong-Yuh
Yang
caDepartment of Accounting Information, National Taichung Institute of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan bDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
cInstitute of Information and Decision Sciences, National Taipei College of Business, Taipei, Taiwan
Abstract
This paper investigates the profitability which measures for the newsboy-type product and develops a new index “Achievable Capacity Index”, denoted by IA. It can accurately measure the profitability of newsboy-type product with normally distributed demand. Furthermore, the interrelationship between profitability and IA is also performed. An unbiased and effective estimator is derived to estimate IA. Practically, market information regarding demand is obtained from multiple samples rather than single sample. Then we estimate IA based on multiple samples. Finally, a numerical result is presented to show the probability density function of the unbiased estimator of ˆ
A
I under different groups and sample sizes.
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management Society (APBITM).” Keywords: Newsboy, estimating, achievable capacity index, multiple samples.
* Corresponding author
E-mail address: [email protected]
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management Society
1. Introduction
In the traditional newsboy problem, it usually focused on short shelf-life products with common applications such as daily newspapers, milks, seasonal products, fresh food and many others. Since the surplus products are subject to storage for a short period of time, we may require additional costs to dispose these items. Generally, the demand presented in the newsboy problem is unknown and assumed to be a random variable with a known probability distribution. Consequently, the determination of the ordering quantity (or manufacturing quantity) is critical for achieving certain objective function in the newsboy problem.
There is an excellent survey of the literature on the various objective functions such as minimizing the expected cost (Nahmias, 1993), maximizing the expected profit (Khouja, 1995), maximizing the expected utility (Ismail and Louderback, 1979; Lau, 1997), and maximizing the probability of achieving a target profit (Ismail and Louderback, 1979; Shih, 1979; Lau, 1980; Sankarasubramanian and Kumaraswamy, 1983). However, no researches have tried to study the maximum expected profit and probability of achieving a target profit, which can be used to measure a product’s profitability. This motivated us to develop an index combined with profitability requirement (Tseng, 2009).
In this paper, we consider a newsboy-type product with a normally distributed demand, and define product’s profitability as the probability of achieving the target profit under optimal ordering condition (Tseng, 2011). Then we develop a new index which can express profitability simplify, and we call it an “achievable capacity index”, denoted by IA. As the
related costs (excess, shortage, disposal and purchasing), selling price, and target profit are given, IA depends on demand mean and demand standard deviation . In order to make
the problem more relevant and applicable in practice, we assumed that the demand mean and demand standard deviation are unknown. Note that these unknown parameters can be obtained from samples. In practice, the demand data is collected from multiple samples rather than single sample. We thereby investigate IA based on multiple samples. Then, we
derive an unbiased and effective estimator to estimate IA. Finally, a numerical result is presented to show the probability density function of the unbiased estimator of ˆ
A
I under
different groups and sample sizes.
2. Achievable Capacity Index
We consider a newsboy-type product. The demand, D, follows a normal distribution, 2
( , )
N , and satisfies that the coefficient of variation ( cv ) is below 0.3 for neglecting the negative tail, i.e., f D( 0) ( / ) ( 1/ )cv ( 1/0.3) 0 . In addition, the profitability is defined as the probability of achieving the target profit, 0k , under the optimal ordering policy, in which the target profit is set according to the product property and the sales experience.
If the selling price and related cost (shortage, excess and purchasing/manufacturing costs per unit) are given, the optimal ordering quantity and the level of profitability depend on
and . Therefore, we develop a new index, which is a function of and to express the product’s profitability, and so-called “Achievable Capacity Index (ACI)”. It is defined as follows: A k T p c I , where
p the selling price per unit, p 0.
c the purchasing/manufacturing cost per unit, c 0.
T the target demand which is the minimal demand required for achieving profit, i.e.,
/ ( )0
T k p c .
The numerator of I A provides the difference between demand mean and target demand. The denominator gives demand standard deviation. Obviously, I A is getting larger as increases or departs from T . It is desirable to have an I A as large as possible.
Interrelationship between Profitability and I A
Based on Sankarasubramanian and Kumaraswamy (1983), the profit Z depends on the demand D and the ordering quantity Q, which are formulated as follows:
( ) ( ) , 0 , ( ) ( ) , , pD c Q D cQ cd p ec D c Qe D Q Z pQ c D Q cQs c D cs p c Qs D Q Where
c
p the net profit per unit (i.e., cp p c 0).c
d the disposal cost for a surplus product, cd 0.c
e the excess cost per unit (i.e., c ce d c 0).c
s the shortage cost per unit, cs 0.Note that if the surplus products can be salvaged, the value of cd is negative and redefine into salvage price. It is well known that in order to possibly achieve the target profit, the ordering quantity must be greater than target demand, i.e., Q T . For any Q T , Z is strictly increasing in D[0, ]Q and strictly decreasing in D Q[ , ) , and has a maximum at point D Q . The maximum value of Z is equal and higher than k, i.e., Z pD cQ c D c Q c T k p p p . The
target profit will be realized when D is equal to either LAL Q( ) or UAL Q( ), so the target profit will be achieved in D LAL Q UAL Q[ ( ), ( )], where
( ) c Q ke LAL Q c c p e and ( ) ( ) cp c Q ks UAL Q cs
are the lower and upper achievable limits, respectively. It is noted that both are the functions of Q. Under the assumption that the demand is normally distributed, the probability of achieving the target profit is:
( ) ( ) Pr Z k UAL Q LAL Q , (1)
where ( ) is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution. Before calculating the profitability, we first find the optimal ordering quantity to maximize Pr Z k
.We take the first-order of Pr Z k
with respect to Q, and obtain 2 2 1 ( ) 1 ( ) Pr 1 2 2 2 UAL Q LAL Q c c d Z k p se ce e dQ cs cp ce .
It is well known that the necessary condition for Q to be optimal must satisfy the equation d Pr(Z k )/dQ0, which implies 2 ( ) ( ) , 2 ( ) ( ) UAL Q LAL Q UAL Q LAL Q (2)
where ln[1c A c cp /s e] and A c p ec cs. For Q T , we solve Eq. (2), and obtain the unique optimal ordering quantity
2 2 2 2 ( )( ) ( )( ) 2 ( ) * ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) c cs p ce cp k c cs p ce cp k cs cp ce Q T T c c Ap p c ce s c c Ap p c ce s c A c Ap p c ce s . (3)
Additionally, the sufficient condition is given by
* * 2 ( ) ( ) ( 2 ) 2 ( ) * d Pr exp 1 ( ) 0. 3 2 2 * 2 ( ) 2 2 * * d ( ) ( ) UAL Q LAL Q c Ap c ce s c c c A Z k p s UAL Q p c c c Q Q Q s p e UAL Q LAL Q
It shows that the stationary point Q* is a global maximum. By using Eq. (2) and substituting Eq. (3) into Eq. (1), the profitability, , can be obtained as follows:
, 2 2 G G G G where * * 2 ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 0, 2 UAL Q LAL Q T T G M M M MIA M IA M and
0 2( 2 ) c Ap M c Ap c ce s .
It is easy to see that is a function of I A. Taking the first-order derivative of (I A) with respect to I A, and we have
1 2 d ( ) 1 1 2 2 0 2 d 2 ( 2 ) 2 G IA MG G e e e I A MIA M G .As a result, (I A) is a strictly increasing function of I A. Therefore, we can express the product’s profitability according to the value of I A.
3. Estimating I A based on Multiple Samples
The historical data of the demand ought to be collected in order to estimate the actual I A due to unknown and . For multiple samples of m groups each of size n is given as
{xi1,xi2,...,xin}, where i1, 2,...,m, let xi nj 1xij/n and si2 nj 1(xijxi) /( 1)2 n be the ith sample mean and sample standard deviation, respectively. We first consider the natural estimator ˆIA which is obtained by replacing the and by their unbiased estimators
/ 1 m x i x mi and sp [ im1si2/ ]m1/2 i.e., ˆ x T I A sp .
Furthermore, we rewrite the natural estimator, ˆIA, in the following:
1 / / 1 ˆ 2 2 ( 1) / ( 1) ( 1) 1 , ( 1) x T x T mn mn Z mnIA I A sp mn mn W m n sp m n m n ZA mn W m n
where ZA Z mnIA~ (N mnIA,1) , Z N~ (0,1), W m n ( 1) sp2/2~2m n( 1) . Since ZA and W are independent, the estimator ˆIA is distributed as (mn)1/2tm n( 1) ( ) , where
( ) ( 1)
tm n is a non-central t distribution with m n( 1) degree of freedom and the non-centrality parameter (mn)1/2 I A . Since 1/2 [ ( 1)/2] [( ( 1) 1)/2] ˆ ( ) [ ( 1)/2] m n m n E IA IA IA m n ,
the natural estimator ˆIA is biased. To tackle this problem, we add a correction factor as follows
1/2 [2/ ( 1)] [ ( 1)/2]. [( ( 1) 1)/2] m n m n b m n
Thus, we obtain the unbiased estimator bI Aˆ , which is denoted by I A. Since I A is based solely on the complete and sufficient statistics ( , 2)
x sp , we conclude that the estimator I A is the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of I A based on multiple samples. The probability density function of IA R can be derived as follows:
( 1) ( 1) 2 2 2 2 ( 1) 1 2 ( ) ( 1) exp 2 ( 1) , . 2 / 0 2 m n m n mn vr bI A m n fR r m n v m n v dv r b mn b Numerical Results
Fig. 1 plots the probability density function of R , I A1.0,1.5, 2.0, n3, 4, 5, and 10, 25, 40
m (from bottom to top in plots). From Fig. 1, one can easily see that (1) for fixed sample sizes m and n, the variance of IA R increases as I A increases; (2) for a fixed n and I A, the variance of IA R decreases as m increases; (3) for a fixed m and I A, the variance of IA R decreases as n increases.
4. Conclusions
In this paper, we developed a new index, achievable capacity index, I A, which has a simple-form to measure the profitability of the newsboy-type product with normally distributed demand. In practical situation, the demand data is collected from multiple samples rather than single sample. Hence, we considered an unbiased and effective estimator of I A to estimate the actual I A based on multiple samples. The probability density function of the unbiased estimator of ˆIA is also provided. The result is helpful in assessing the performance of the Newsboy-type problem. In the future, the evaluation testing of I A would be discussed that deserves further investigation.
References
[1] Ismail, B.; Louderback, J. (1979). Optimizing and satisfying in stochastic cost-volume profit analysis. Decis. Sci. 10, 205-217.
[2] Khouja, M. (1995). The newsboy problem under progressive multiple discounts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 84:458-466.
[3] Lau, H. (1997). Simple formulas for the expected costs in the newsboy problem: An educational note. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 100, 557-561.
Res. Soc. 31, 525-535.
[5] Nahmias, S. (1993). Production and Operations Management, Boston: Irwin.
[6] Sankarasubramanian, E. and Kumaraswamy, S. (1983). Optimal order quantity for predetermined level of profit. Manage. Sci. 29, 512-514.
[7] Shih, W. (1979). A general decision model for cost-volume-profit analysis under uncertainty. Account. Rev. 54, 687-706.
[8] Tseng, M.L. (September, 2009). Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision-making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environmental monitoring and assessment 156(1-4), 181-197
[9] Tseng M.L. (Jan. 2011) Using a hybrid MCDM model to evaluate firm environmental knowledge management in uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing 11(1), 1340~1352
177 Tsung-Yin Wang et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 25 (2011) 170 – 177
Appendix A. An example appendix