• 沒有找到結果。

訴訟風險與簽證會計師特質對審計意見購買的影響 - 政大學術集成

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "訴訟風險與簽證會計師特質對審計意見購買的影響 - 政大學術集成"

Copied!
62
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)The Impact of Litigation Risk and Auditor Characteristic on Opinion Shopping. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. Nat. n. er. io. al. sit. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 109. 6. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(2) 目 句. 小. 化. 及. 付. 付. 市. 小 「. 七. 立. !. sit. n. 反. :. Ch. 文. er. io. 了. 牙. y. Nat. 付 . ‧. 大. 「. al. 大. 已. 學. ‧ 國. 止. 大. 女支. 付. 政 治 大. 付 . 右. 用. 付. 內. (. 入. 己(. v ni. 付小 . e n g c h i U. 了. 句. 了. 允. 他. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(3) Chen, Peng, Xue, Yang, and Ye (2016). 」. 之. (. 代. 已. ) 予. 去. 心 大. 已 「. 去. 立已. 心 已. 日 . 學. 方 士. 付. 方. 交. ‧. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 充. ‧ 國. 方. 代 去 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(4) Abstract. Chen, Peng, Xue, Yang, and Ye (2016) show the evidence that audit clients successfully engage in partner-level opinion shopping (by switching engagement partner within an audit firm) in the audit market of China. However, another studies using the data from the different countries, such as Spanish, find no evidence of partner-level opinion shopping. Through the special data from Taiwan, this article observes the litigation risk and the degree of competition play the key role in partner-level opinion shopping, and attempts to reconcile the conflict of past literature on engaging partner-level audit opinions. First, in the full and listed sample, I find no evidence of partner-level opinion shopping. Second, taking unlisted market that accompanies with lower litigation risk. 政 治 大. and higher degree of competition as a sample, I find the evidence that audit clients. 立. successfully engage in partner-level opinion shopping. Finally, using unlisted market. ‧ 國. 學. as a sample, I establish the independent index of the individual partner that is measured by the rate of auditor's clients who has been successfully opinion shopping. I find that. ‧. the independent index is associated with partner’s education field, generation, and industry expertise.. io. sit. y. Nat. al. n. auditor.. er. Keywords: Opinion shopping, individual auditor, independence, Characteristics of. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(5) ................................................................................................................................. i ............................................................................................................................ii .......................................................................................................................... iii ................................................................................................................ 1 充.................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................ 4 ................................................................................................ 6 .................................................................................... 7 ........................................................................................ 7 ...................................................... 11 .............................................. 18 ...................................................................................................... 22 日 ...................................................................................... 22 日 .................................................................................. 24 日 .............................................................................. 26 .......................................................................................... 28 .......................................................................................... 31 .......................................................................... 31 .................................................................................. 36 」 .............................. 40 方 .................. 44 .................................................................................................. 47 .......................................................................................... 47 ).............................................................................................. 49 ...................................................................................................................... 50 方 公.............................................................................. 55. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(6) 1 2. ......................................................................................... 6 ............................................... 35. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. ii. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(7) 立. 政 治 大. 學 ‧ y. Nat. io. sit. 出. 民 ....................................................................... 16 ............................................................................................... 17 ................................................................................................... 28 ........................................................................... 29 ........................................................................... 30 已 」 34 ............................................................................................... 39 ........................................................... 41 ... 43 ....................... 46. n. al. er. 五. ‧ 國. 2-1 2-2 3-1 3-1 3-1 4-1 4-2 4-2 4-3 4-4. Ch. engchi. iii. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(8) . 工. Professional Standards Group 升. PSG. 于. 五. 」. 」. 」. ‧. 內. sit. io. n. al. 四示. C」h. e n g c h i. 」. 」. 」. i n U. v. 」. 充. 亦 」. 水. 充. ;. 」 入. (. 」. (. (. 入. 」. er. Nat. y. 」. 付. 巴 令. 「. 中. 學. 令. ‧ 國. 政 治 大. 立 工. 」. 工. 方三 」. 九. 今. 工. 1. 方三 (Carl Bass. 仍. 主. Raghavan , 2002 ). Arthur Andersen. 」. 」. 入. 」. AICPA, 1978, 1992 Bamber and Bamber, 2009. 1. PSG. Arthur Andersen. Arthur Andersen. 1. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(9) GAO, 2004. 工. 工. 」. 」. 母. 立. 包. 」. 」. 充. (. PCAOB, 2013 四 內. 士. Chen, Peng, Xue, Yang, and Ye (2016). 立. Aobdia, Lin, and Petacchi (2015) 政 治 大 交. 」. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 代. 代交. 」. Chen et al. (2016). iv. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Ch. n代 engchi U. Albornoz, Heras, and Rusanescu (2019). García Osma,. DeFond, Wong, and Li, 2000 Chan, Lin, and Mo, 2006. 去. Newton, Persellin, Wang, and Wilkins, 2016. ). 三. 」. 」. 」. 工( 」. 也. 」 García Osma et al.. (2019). ( 代 2. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(10) 代 Chen et al. (2016). García Osma et al. (2019) 代 García Osma et al. (2019). 」. 本. 去. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 3. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(11) . 升. 已. 代 Chow and Rice, 1982 2000. Chan et al., 2006. Krishnan, 1994 DeFond et al., 2000 Lennox,. 已. Lennox (2000). 入. 」 士. 升. 」 」. 「. 太. Lennox (2000). 立. ‧ 國. 學 y. : 10. 生 . n. er. io. sit. ). Eshleman and Guo, 2014 方三. Ch. ;. engchi. i n U. v. 凡. ; 」. 」 」. 」. 也 市. García Osma et al. (2019) 充). 干. ‧. 工. al. 代 及. 市. Nat. 」. García Osma et al. (2019). 去. García Osma et al. (2019) 」 」. 市. 政 治 大. Chen et al. (2016). 已. 市. 」 代. 去. Chen et al. (2016). 本. 去. 心 」. 市. 大. 方. 4. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(12) . 已 Aobdia et al., 2015. 「. Going Concern Opinions Svanström, 2014. GC. Sundgren and. 已. 本. 公. 方. 大. Lennox (2000). 公. 方 」. 市. 方. 予. 予. 立. 方 心. 升 . 政 治 大. 予. 內. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 入. 今手. Ch. engchi. 5. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(13) . 1. 充. 」. 立. 政 治 大. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 立已. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 1. 6. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(14) . 已. 去」 」. 心. 代. 立. 工. 1986. 內. 治 政 Modified 大Opinion Audit. MAO . Chow and Rice, 1982 MAO. 太. Dopuch, Holthausen, and Leftwich,. al. n. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 「. 代. 已. 」. 」. Chow and Rice, 1982 Stephens, 1995. Krishnan, 1994. Krishnan and. …. er. io. sit. y. ‧. 」 . Nat. 學. ;. 已. ‧ 國. 升. 市. 「 已. 代. 」. 7. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(15) Lennox (2000) 升. 手 Lennox. (2000). 代 ; Lennox (2000). 日 MAO. 公. 內. 充 公. (. 充. 令. 士 0 「. 士. 0. 士. 充 . 令. 「. (. (. 政 治 大. 生. 立. 學. Carcello and Neal (2000). 月. GC. ‧. ‧ 國. 可. Nat. Carcello, Hermanson, Neal, and Riley (2002). y. sit 「. n. al. 加. 立. Ch. er. io. 代. e n「g c h i U. v ni. GC. 「才. ;. Newton et al. (2016). 心. ). ). ) Lennox (2000). 少 日 。. ). 必 充. 充. 日 . 公. ( 日. 8. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(16) ). ). 代 交. ). Chung, Sonu, Zang, and Choi (2019) 2004. 2012. Lennox (2000). 市. 代. GC. GC Chung et al. (2019). 平. 立. 士 GC 政占 治 大. ‧ 國. 占. ‧. 生. Ch. e生n g c h i U. 已. 交 . er. n. al. 交. io. 「. ;. Nat. 士. 占. 學. y. 占. sit. 生. v ni. 」. 九. 」 DeFond et al., 2000 Chan et al., 2006. 」. (2000). 半. 方三」). 方三. 入三 代 」. 入方三. 1994. 已. DeFond et al.. 心 令. 1993. 4. 入方三. MAO. 可 9. 心 1996 2 入方三. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(17) 」. 」. 入方三 」. MAO. 」. (. 充. 」 Chan et al. (2006). (. 另. 」. 心 1996. 代 另. 2002. (. 心 . MAO. 立. (. (. y. Lennox (2000) 」. io. al. 。. n. 」. Ch. 日 . engchi. i n U. v. Carcello and Neal, 2002. 日. Chung et al., 2019. Chan et al., 2006. Newton et al., 2016. (. ( MAO. 尤. Lennox (2000). Chow and Rice, 1982 Krishnan, 1994 Krishnan and Stephens, 1995. 」. sit. 充. Nat. MAO. 政 治 大. 已. ‧ 國. 市. ‧. ;. 另. 學. 句. 及. er. 代. 心. 充. 2018 司不且 2019. 」. 手 Lennox (2000) 」 入. 市. 功 2006. 2009. (. Lennox (2000). 10. 市. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(18) . 」. Francis, 2004. 2017. 1. 1. SEC. SEC, 2016 and Yang, 2013. Gul, Wu, Taylor, 2011. 亦 」. 父. Vera-Muňoz, Ho, and Chow, 2006 Aobdia et al., 2015. (. 政 治 大市 千. 」. 去. 已. (. 又 今. O’Keefe, Simunic, and Stein, 1994 Hackenbrack and. ‧. 」. 心. y. Nelson and. sit er. n. al. 代. 方三. Ch. 交 . e n g c h i. i n U. v. 去. 互. 子 . 」 心. 已. Gul et al. (2013). Aobdia et al. (2015) 」. 代. 升. io. 升. 已. Nelson, 2009. Gul et al. (2013). 市. 學. Tan, 2005. 立. Nat. Kenchel, 1997. ‧ 國. 「. 士. 日. 11. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(19) . Initial Public Offerings 句. IPO. ;. 2006. 士. 2010. 1995. 2005. 予. et al. (2013). 本. 」. 2006. 立 入. 政 治 大. ; 已. y. sit 日 . n. al. Ch. 3.38% 交. 」. engchi. i n U. v. ). 交 R2 . 日. 手. 日. Gul et al. (2013). 心. er. io. 日. 0.89%. ‧. Nat. 」 」. 另. Aobdia et al. (2015). 2006. 學. ‧ 國. ). 大. Gul. 方三. 士. 代. 公. 予 Aobdia et al. (2015). 交 」. 代. Chen et al. (2016). 12. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(20) 士. 1998. 代. 「 付. 「. ( 2012. 付. 1998. 」. 」. Gul, Sami, and Zhou, 2009. 1998. Lennox (2000) 」. 日 . 」 ;. 」. 之. 士. 政 (治 大 入 Chen et al. (2016). 立. 學. ‧ 國. 入. García Osma et al. (2019). (. Chen et al. (2016). i n U. sit. y. 代. n. al. 」. C 戶 h. er. io. 升. ‧. 」. Nat. 士. Lennox (2000). engchi. 」 」. 」. v. 也. 」. 之. 去. 」. ;. 」. )充). Gul et al., 2013 」. 巴正. ). 句. 」 ; 去. 」 13. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(21) . ,伍 (2017). 1999. 代. 2012. 士. Chen et al. (2016) Lennox (2000). 士 et al. (2016). 」. 引 士. 九. 士. 立. ‧ 國. 已心. 代. Nat. y. sit. 凡. n. a l. 充. C h」 engchi U. er. io. v ni. 卡左. 」. 句. 」. 」. 入. 」. 」 了. 」 又. 內. ;. 充). 生. García. ‧. ,伍 2017. 」. 代. 也. 學. Chen et al. (2016). 去. 」. 政 」治 大. Osma et al., 2019. 士. 代. Chen et al. (2016). 令. 」. Chen et al. (2016). 以. Chen. 市. 代. 入 「. 主. 入. 入. 分. 已. 入. 已. 14. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(22) 1. 」. 代 Chen et al. (2016). García Osma et al. (2019). 充). 去. 也. 」. 」. 」. 」. 政 治 大. 九. 互. io. 36. 心. n. al. Ch. sit. y. 內. ‧. 「. v ni. 2. engchi U. 引. 心 比. 千. Nat. 學. ‧ 國. 立 太. 去. er. 心. 代. 士內 ) . 生 . 」 生. 中 方三. 本 手. 去. 引 15. 士. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(23) 心. 士內. 半. 比. 生 . 充. 」 去. 10. 2-1 交. 代. 7. 五. 民. 交 去. 2-1 2398 2491 3004 1207 1601 2326 2490 2505 8711 8723. 句. 五. 士. 民. 工. 政 治 大. 工 不%. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. Ch. er. io. ·. sit. y. Nat. 口. 2006 1998 1998 1999 2004 2004 1999 2004 1999 1999. 心. engchi. i n U. v. 父未. IPO. 士. 日. 士 2-2 」. 代. 公. 方2 交. 方. 士. ·. 充. 代. 2. Parrino (1997). (. ;. 士. (Homogeneity). 。 ,. 16. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(24) 士. 士. 三. 去. 交. ; 」. 2-2. 1.102. 方. 0.716 0.977 0.386*** 0.029***. 政去 治 大. 立. 升. ‧ 國. ‧ y. Nat. io. n. al. sit. 」. er. 2. 學. 去. 1.006. Ch. engchi. 17. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(25) . 」. 「. Gul et. 已 al., 2013 Taylor, 2011 . (. Francis, 2004. Aobdia et al., 2015. ( 大. (. 大. 政 治 大. 心. 立. 代. 士. 予. 三. ‧. ; Sundgren and Svanström (2014). sit. 49 力. al. GC. 入 49 力. Ch. v ni. GC. n. 士. y. GC. io. 上. er. Nat. 學. 、. 予. 心. ‧ 國. 已. e n g c h內i U. 上. 及 GC. 方三. 內 「. 今手 及. 內. 士. 士 外「. 」. 句. Sundgren and Svanström (2014). ;. 交. 18. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(26) 九. 予 40 力. 50 力. 及. 代已. ;. 及 台. ·. ; 及. 亦. :. 九. 」. 及 台. 」. 台. 及. 」. 及. 立. 政 治 大 四 . 人. ‧ y. sit. n 平. 士. 。. er. al. 。. v. Dechow and Dichev (2002) 日. Ch. e n 士 gchi. 去 已. Hardies, Breesch, and Branson (2016). io. Jones, 1991 日. 市. 學. 心. Nat. 亦. 已. ‧ 國. 及. 台. i n U. 心 . Hardies et al. (2016). 交 . 士. ) Meyers-Levy, 1986. 心 心. 士. 交 . 已 . 心. 19. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(27) 九. 予. 已. 心. 已 . 人. 、. ; Gul et al. (2013). 三. 代. 士. 交. 付 Big N. 「 付. 「. 付 「. 立. 申已. 平. 學. Gul et al. (2013). y 、. 付 . al 三 「 C h. 今互. 代. ; 月. 代. 升. 亦. 、. : . 三. 去 Johnstone, 2000. 入. Johnstone and Bedard, 2003; Johnstone and Bedard, 2004 士. 代 ;. 去. 付. iv. 主. 」. 」. 付. 升. n 付 engchi U. 去. 付. 占. sit. 付. n. 付. 「. 予. io. 「. ). Nat. 九. (. ‧. 可. 」. er. ). 」 已 政 治 大. 心. ‧ 國. 、. Carcello and Nagy, 2004 . 20. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(28) 去 Hsieh and Lin (2016). 已. 」. 去「. 去. 充. 「 四示. 手. Chin and Chi (2009). 市. 代. 」. 九. 予. 下. 立. 政 治 大. ‧ y. sit. n. al. er. io. 3. 。. 學. Nat. 士. ‧ 國. 四示. 士. 心. Ch. engchi. 21. i n U. v. 方. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(29) . ( MAO. 內 士 (. 士. (. Lennox, 2000. Lennox (2000). 半. 九. 日 政 治 大 立( MAO 充 . 日. 日 Probit 日. 日. ‧. 日. 予. 學. ‧ 國. 方. 士日. Nat. io. sit. y. 」. er. MAOit = "0 + "1 PTRSwitchit + "2 PTRSwitchit ∗ MAOLagit + "3 MAOLagit + γ4 ROAit. n. al. Ch. i n U. v. + " 5 OCFit + " 6 Levit + " 7 Sizeit + " 8 ARInvit +" 9 Ageit + " 10 CRit + " 11. engchi. RPTLendit + "12 DIRSit + "13 Lossit +∑!" #$%& γj InteractionTerms it + Year + Industry +εit .............................................................................................. (1). Probit 日. ( MAO i. t. 充. Probit 日 i. (. PTRswitchit =0 交. MAOLagit. PTRswitchit MAOLagit 心. t. 「 MAOit =1. ( MAO MAOit =0. PTRswitchit =1. ( MAO. PTRswitchit. MAOLagit. 充 22. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(30) 心 . 交. ( MAO. 充. 日 ( MAO. =. t. 公 ( MAO. 充. &'()*+'() ). 充. n. t. ( MAO. MAO. % &'()*+'( ). 充. &'()*+'(* ). 充. ( MAO. 士 % [&'()*+'( ) − &'()*+'(* )]. 內. 充. OpnShopit. 方. 1 OpnShopit. 「 2 OpnShopit. 政 治 大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. DeFond et al. (2000) Chen, Chen, and Su (2001) DeFond, Raghunandan, and Subramanyam (2002) Chan et al. (2006) 心. ). 台. 今. sit. y. 「. Nat. 。. ‧. ). Chen et al. (2016). io. ( MAO 失. n. al. er. ROA 句. ) Size. 日. Ch. 句. n 去 engchi U. iv. OCF 句 方 Lev. ). ARInv. Age. ). 句. 去. 父未. ). CR. RPTLend. 去 去 Jiang, Lee and Yue, 2010. RPTLendit. ( MAO. 代 Lennox (2000). PTRSwitch. ). ) Industry. 心 . 日. Year. ) 于. Cluster. 一句 23. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(31) . 」 . OpnShopit. PTRSwitchit. 日 PTRSwitchit = 0 0 + 0 1 OpnShopit + 0 2 ROAit + 0 3 OCFit + 0 4 Levit + 0 5 Sizeit + 0 6 ARInvit + 0 7 Ageit + 0 8 Growthit + 0 9 Lossit + 0 10 SEOit + 0 11 FTenureit-1 + 0 12 PTenureit-1+ 0 13 PExpertit + Year + Industry +εit (2). OpnShopit. 政 治 大. 交. 立Chan et al. (2006) Blouin, Grein, and Roundtree (2007). 交 . ). al. n. 父未 Chan et al., 2006. y. 去. sit. 方 Loss . Ch. 由. engchi. i n U. ). v. SEOit. 心. ). 日 Size Age. er. io. Growth. ). ARInv. 句. 台. ROA. ) Lev . ). ‧. Nat. OCF. 學. ‧ 國. Landsman, Nelson, and Rountree (2009). 去. 方 Blouin et al., 2007 FTenureit-1. 」 PTenureit-1. 」. 」. 」. 本. 」. 亦. 」. 24. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(32) . ;. PExpert. Chi and Chin, 2011 心 . Year. ). 日. 立. cluster. 于. 政 治 大. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. Industry. Ch. engchi. 25. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(33) . POpnShopit. 大. 十. 士 士 POpnShopit. 予. 心. 方 「. 士. 方. 公 POpnShopit. 句 :. OpnShopit. ( 1%. 「(2). 政 治 大 Chen et al. (2016). (. 立. OpnShopit. 學. 充. ‧ 國. 1%. (1). 內. 予(. 心. ‧. 日. sit. y. Nat. al. er. io. POpnShopit = 1 0 + 1 1 Accounting it+ 1 2 Masterit + 1 3 Foreignit + 1 4 Oldit + 1 5. v. n. Youngit + 16 Femaleit + 17 PExpertit + 18 ROAit + 19 OCFit + 110 Levit. Ch. engchi. i n U. + 1 11 Sizeit + 1 12 ARInvit + 1 13 Ageit + 1 14 Lossit + 1 15 CRit RPTLendit. + 1 16. + 117 DIRSit + 118 PROAit + 119 POCFit + 120 PLevit + 121. PSizeit + 1 22 PARInvit + 1 23 PAgeit + 1 24 PLossit + 1 25 PCRit + 1 26 PRPTLendit + 127 PDIRSit + CPA + Year + Industry +εit ................. (3). 3. 日. 已. (3). 大 升. Accounting Foreign 及. Master (. (. 付付 50 力. 40 力 26. ). 付. ) Old. 「. Young. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(34) Female. PExpert 方. 予. 心. 亦 ROA. 日 ). OCF Lev Size ARInv Age Loss CR. RPTLend. DIRS. PROA POCF. 」. 」. PLev. PSize. 」. 」. PARInv. 日 PAge PLoss. PCR. 」 PRPTLend. 政 治 PDIRS 大 ). 」. 立. CPA. ‧ 國. ). 」 予. Year. Industry. 學. 于. ‧. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 」. 」. 」. 心. ). Ch. engchi. 27. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(35) . 日. (. ) 3-1. 一句. 3-1. 日 MAO 1. (方三 Duh wt al. (2020). 0 內 入. (1) 主. 立. PTRSwitch. (3). 1. 0. (方三. 1 代. 0 日. (. 充. Nat. y. sit. er. al. n. Loss SEO FTenure PTenure. ( 充. &'()*+'( |&345678ℎ = 1) − &'()*+'( |&345678ℎ = 0) /句 /句 句 /句 日 句 > + @/句. io. ROA OCF Lev Size ARInv Age CR RPTLend DIRS Growth. ‧. OpnShop. ‧ 國. MAOLag. 「 (2) 政 治 大. 學. 日. 方三. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. / /句 =>. − 0 1 」. 1. @/ 0. 0. 28. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(36) 3-1. PExpert. 1 「. 士. 0. 日 POpnShop( 句 :. (1) OpnShopit. 內. ( -1%. 「(2) OpnShopit Chen et al. (2016) 充 . 1 1. 1 「. y. 0. 0 0. 0. er. a l」 」C h. sit. ‧ 國. 士. 0 0 0 (50力) (40力). ‧. 1. 內. 學. 付. n. PLev PSize PARInv PAge PLoss. 1 1 1. 付. io. PROA POCF. 立 付. 政 治 入大. Nat. Accounting Master Foreign Old Young Female PExpert. ( 1%. engchi. 」 」 」 」 」. i n U. v. 日. 29. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(37) 3-1. PCR PRPTLend PDIRS. 」 」 」. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 30. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(38) . 1996. 士. 62. 入 3. 2016. 士入. 予 2016. 予 2016. 入. 2015. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. io. 予. n. al. 太. 手. 本. TEJ. 去 ). 士. 745. 予. ‧. Nat. ). Taiwan Economic Journal. 45,249 去. 另入. 學. 另入. 立. 士. 4,975. y. 主. 三. 士. sit. 2017. 3,688. er. 57. 2015. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 去. 升. 內 士內. 1,721. 「 士. 164 太 . 日. 父未. 士 」. 3. 1,924. 予. 予. 」. 33 、 2018. 7. (Modified Opinion) 2016. 1. 31. 2017. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(39) 」. 」「 299. 」 10. 」. 1,353. 57.66%. 42.34%. 出. 千 : 「. 九. 士. 4-1. 已. 立. 已. 令 」. 充 」. 去. Ch. 布. engchi. 日母 . sit. y. al. n ). 士. er. io. 予. 」. 充. 」. 」. 10. Nat. 10. 」. ‧. 」. :. ‧ 國. 」. Panel B. 學. 充. 4. 政」 治 大. 令. 10,519. Panel A. 10. 」. 予. 」. 予. 」. 」. ). 24,847. 句. 句. 千. 14,328. 5,510. 23. 予. 」. i n U. v. 士. 心. 4. 90%. -. 10. 1-2. (1). 、. (2) (. ) 90%. , 10. -. 11. 32. 、 12. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(40) 4-1. Panel C. Panel D. 內 ( MAO. ( MAO. 予 ( MAO. 士. 二. (A). 士 0.003. (B) 內. -0.006. (C). 0.004. ( MAO. ( MAO. 交 予. (C). (B). 1 . 立. 2015. 平 2008. io 主. al. 九. C h. engchi U. y. v i n. 人 予. 交. n. 2015. ( MAO. sit. er. 另. ‧. 心. Nat. 學. ‧ 國. 2008. 政 治 大. 王. 入. ). 33. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(41) 4-1. 出. 已. 」 :. Panel A: 1996. 2015. 45,249 (4,975) (3,688) (745) (1,721) (164) (1,924) (299) (5,510) (23) (1,353) 24,847. ─ , :. : 10. ─. : Panel B: ( (. 9,079 (86.31%) 1,440 (13.69%) 10,519 (100.00%). 12,709 (88.70%) 1,619 (11.30%) 14,328 (100.00%). 21,788 (87.69%) 3,059 (12.31%) 24,847 (100.00%). ‧ (C). io. (A) MAO MAO 0.000 0.051 0.028 -0.020 0.090 0.120 -0.014 0.049 0.069 -0.026 0.021 0.059 0.002 0.021 0.059 -0.041 0.023 0.062 0.007 0.067 0.069 -0.055 0.000 0.037 -0.036 0.120 0.206 0.072 0.164 0.122 -0.066 0.022 0.122 0.059 0.171 0.146 -0.036 0.128 0.130 0.000 0.181 0.161 0.079 0.281 0.117 0.021 0.084 0.137 -0.035 0.136 0.143 0.000 0.080 0.094 -0.019 0.056 0.091 0.023 0.136 0.069 0.027 0.139 0.095 -0.003 0.096 0.102. n. al. Ch. (B) MAO MAO 0.023 0.043 0.054 -0.030 0.063 0.086 -0.019 0.053 0.064 -0.038 0.050 0.065 -0.037 0.096 0.058 -0.039 0.000 0.048 -0.003 0.065 0.048 -0.037 0.000 0.064 -0.086 0.147 0.154 0.041 0.216 0.102 -0.100 0.087 0.091 0.026 0.212 0.108 -0.002 0.036 0.118 0.019 0.091 0.111 0.164 0.091 0.062 -0.052 0.218 0.105 -0.007 0.046 0.099 -0.014 0.071 0.038 -0.036 0.063 0.048 0.066 0.053 0.080 0.044 0.118 0.130 -0.006 0.087 0.083. engchi. 34. sit. y. Nat. 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Mean. MAO MAO 0.047 0.047 0.075 0.094 0.051 0.066 0.037 0.063 0.061 0.058 0.013 0.054 0.066 0.059 0.000 0.055 0.136 0.171 0.185 0.113 0.044 0.110 0.191 0.132 0.090 0.126 0.147 0.147 0.179 0.100 0.149 0.128 0.096 0.131 0.078 0.078 0.059 0.078 0.095 0.072 0.132 0.104 0.092 0.095. 14,328 (57.66%) 10,519 (42.34%). 政 治 大. 學. Chi2 =32.094 p-value<0.001 Panel D:. 立. ‧ 國. Panel C:. ) ). er. : : 、. i n U. v. (C) -0.011 -0.023 -0.011 -0.014 0.038 -0.048 0.017 -0.064 -0.007 0.114 -0.004 0.104 -0.082 -0.021 0.029 0.113 -0.053 0.032 0.015 -0.027 -0.013 0.004. (B) -0.034 0.007 0.008 0.024 0.076 -0.009 0.019 -0.027 0.079 0.073 0.095 0.078 -0.080 -0.040 -0.135 0.166 -0.046 0.046 0.050 -0.093 -0.057 0.010. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(42) 立. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學. 2. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 35. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(43) . 4-2. 12.3. MAO. (. 13.7. MAO. (. 11.3. MAO. (. ;. ( MAO. 9.3 7.8 10.4. PTRSwitch . 立. ‧ 國. (. y. Nat. ROA . n 46.8. Ch. engchi. Lev 31.2. 句 Age. i n U. v. 4.2. 句. 14.203. 日. Size 14. CR. 句. 2.3. 46.185 DIRS 工 136.6. (. 日. 22.1. 28.4. SEO. 28.4. 26. 5.667. 」 」. Growth . Loss . 失. OCF. ARInv. 2.588 句. 4.8. er. io. 2.8. sit. al. MAOLag. ‧. (. RPTLend. MAOLag. MAOLag. (. 2.. 可. 學. ;. ;. 政) 治 大 (. 16.4. 13.7. PTRSwitch. 工(. 14.8. PTRSwitch. 11.138 36. 交. 失. 干 FTenure. 」 DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(44) 5. 交. 3.776. 」 PTenure . 12.2 句. ;. 」交. 戶. 4.8. ROA . 4. 6.5. 句. OCF. 42.3. Size. Lev 32.5. 句 24. Age RPTLend. 立. DIRS. 15.9. 干. 11.138. FTenure. Nat. PTenure . 戶. Ch. engchi. 4.0. i n U. Lev. 句 戶. 日. 14.896. Size. 句. ARInv. 19. 33.47. Age RPTLend. 句. 1.7. 日. 日. 2.597 CR. 74.7. 交. OCF. 32. ;. v. 5.5. 句 44.2. 3.776. 」交. n. al. 失. SEO. 12.6. io. 4-2 」交. Loss . ‧. 」. y. 失. Growth. sit. 22.1. 29.3. CR. 學. ‧ 國. 24.129. 治 2.603 政 大 句 1.3. ARInv. er. 句. 15.405. 日. 句. DIRS . Growth . 37. 24.8. 失. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(45) Loss . 20.1. (. 8.82. 」 3.78 句. PTenure. ;. Myers, Omer and Xie, 2017 代. SEO. 干. FTenure 12.5. 4-2 」交. Chi,. 已. Hsieh and Lin, 2016. 比. 去. 交. 交. 代. 立. 政 治 大. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 代交. Ch. engchi. 38. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(46) 表 4-2、敘述性統計表 一般公開發行公 一般公開發行公司 上市櫃公司 司減上市櫃公司 全部樣本 平均數 中位數 標準差 平均數 中位數 標準差 平均數檢定 中位數檢定 平均數 中位數 MAO 0.137 0.000 0.344 0.113 0.000 0.317 0.024*** 0.000*** 0.123 0.000 PTRSwitch 0.078 0.000 0.268 0.104 0.000 0.305 -0.026*** 0.000*** 0.093 0.000 MAOLag 0.164 0.000 0.370 0.137 0.000 0.344 0.027*** 0.000*** 0.148 0.000 ROA 0.028 0.035 0.147 0.048 0.048 0.102 -0.021*** -0.013*** 0.040 0.043 OCF 0.042 0.052 0.147 0.065 0.064 0.109 -0.023*** -0.012*** 0.055 0.060 Lev 0.468 0.451 0.410 0.423 0.422 0.182 0.046*** 0.029*** 0.442 0.432 Size 14.203 14.031 1.232 15.405 15.223 1.395 -1.202*** -1.192*** 14.896 14.703 ARInv 0.312 0.295 0.213 0.325 0.309 0.185 -0.013*** -0.014*** 0.320 0.304 Age 16.965 14.000 11.386 25.514 24.000 12.638 -8.549*** -10.000*** 21.895 19.000 CR 2.588 1.560 8.862 2.603 1.793 4.492 -0.015 -0.233*** 2.597 1.706 RPTLend 0.023 0.001 0.056 0.013 0.000 0.035 0.010*** 0.001*** 0.017 0.001 DIRS 46.185 40.100 26.007 24.129 20.690 14.747 22.056*** 19.410*** 33.466 27.000 Growth 1.366 0.086 23.628 0.293 0.042 18.241 1.073*** 0.044*** 0.747 0.058 Loss 0.284 0.000 0.451 0.221 0.000 0.415 0.063*** 0.000*** 0.248 0.000 SEO 0.260 0.000 0.438 0.159 0.000 0.365 0.101*** 0.002*** 0.201 0.000 FTenure 5.667 5.000 4.318 11.138 10.000 6.651 -5.471*** -5.000*** 8.822 7.000 al v0.011 i PTenure 3.787 3.000 2.618 3.776 3.000 2.831 0.000*** 3.781 3.000 n C PExpert 0.122 0.000 0.328 0.126 0.000 h e n0.332 0.003 0.125 0.000 g c h i U -0.004 N 10,519 14,328 24,847 備註:所有連續變數均經過 Winsorize 1%與 99%處理。平均數檢定與中位數檢定之上標*、**、***分別表示檢定的顯著水準 p-value < 0.1、< 0.05 與. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 39 DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640. 標準差 0.329 0.290 0.356 0.124 0.127 0.302 1.455 0.198 12.838 6.699 0.046 23.032 20.700 0.432 0.401 6.380 2.743 0.330 < 0.01。.

(47) 4-2. PTRSwitchit. MAOLagit. -0.091. ; Chen et al. (2016). García Osma et al. (2019). ,. ) :. 政 治 大. ‧. ,. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 「. ,. 學. ‧ 國. 立. :. Ch. engchi. 40. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(48) 4-2 MAO -0.340 -0.091 1.466*** -0.562* 0.324** 1.323*** 0.010 -0.666*** 0.001 0.003** 0.226 -0.001*. (-1.81) (2.02) (12.32) (0.79) (-6.69) (0.44) (2.19) (0.72) (-1.71). 0.201***. (3.79). 政 治 (0.33) 大 (-0.30). 0.000 0.008 -0.095*** 0.018*** -0.003 -0.140***. (0.42) (0.21) (-3.01) (7.78) (-0.58) (-3.89). (-7.45). y. -1.691*** Fixed Fixed cluster 24,847 0.367 0.000. sit. io. n. Ch. (-0.76) (-1.23) (-0.06) (-0.87) (0.57) (-0.97) (-1.91). er. ‧ 國. Nat. al. (0.43) (0.59) (-0.37) (-0.52) (0.43) (-1.14) (0.66) (0.57) (-2.58). -0.572 -0.189 -0.008 -0.034 0.005 -0.070 -0.002*. ‧. 0.241 -0.138 0.114 0.021 -0.095 -0.002 0.005 -1.309 0.001 0.078 -0.597*** Fixed Fixed cluster 24,847 0.367 0.000 Winsorize 1% 99% p-value < 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.01. 立. PTRSwitch z. 學. PTRSwitch PTRSwitch* MAOLag MAOLag OpnShop ROA OCF Lev Size ARInv Age CR RPTLend DIRS Growth Loss SEO FTenure PTenure PExpert PTRSwitch* ROA PTRSwitch* OCF PTRSwitch* Lev PTRSwitch* Size PTRSwitch* ARInv PTRSwitch* Age PTRSwitch* CR PTRSwitch* RPTLend PTRSwitch* DIRS PTRSwitch* Loss Intercept Year Industry Firm N pseudo R2 p. z (-0.67) (-0.93) (39.79). engchi. iv n U z. * ** ***. 4-3 1 PTRSwitchit. MAOLagit. -0.293. ;. MAO 2 PTRSwitchit. MAOLagit. 0.14 MAO. 41. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(49) MAO. ) ). 學. :. ‧. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. n. IPO. Chen et al. (2016). Ch. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. n engchi U. iv. :. García Osma, et al. (2019). ). 42. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(50) 4-3 MAO. PTRSwitch. z -1.650** (-2.16) -0.293* (-1.83) 1.446*** (27.85). (0.51) (0.04) (1.16) (1.90) (0.04) (-1.15) (1.84) (-0.42) (-0.35) (1.16) (-2.12). ‧ 國. 立. io. n. al. -0.000 (-0.23) 0.051 (0.93) -0.068 (-1.47) 0.028*** (5.41) 0.001 (0.15) -0.131** (-2.33). -1.532*** 0.513** 1.425*** 0.005 -0.710*** -0.000 0.003 1.149** -0.004***. (-4.12) (2.26) (10.53) (0.30) (-5.02) (-0.03) (0.92) (2.55) (-3.27). 0.139**. (2.13). 政 治 大. -1.482*** (-4.37) Fixed Fixed cluster 10,519 0.041 0.000. Winsorize 1% 99% p-value < 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.01. Ch. engchi. 43. 0.962 -0.436 0.141 -0.043 -0.294 0.003 -0.012 -2.731 -0.003 0.019 -0.273 Fixed Fixed cluster 14,328 0.376 0.000. (1.03) (-0.77) (0.33) (-0.85) (-0.79) (0.58) (-1.50) (-1.13) (-0.66) (0.10) (-0.85). y. 0.519 0.031 0.408 0.108* 0.016 -0.007 0.041* -0.477 -0.001 0.225 -0.723** Fixed Fixed cluster 10,519 0.368 0.000. (-1.70) (-0.80) (0.60) (-0.89) (1.56) (-2.35) (-2.03). sit. (2.45). -0.599* -0.162 0.106 -0.033 0.029 -0.259** -0.005**. er. 0.153**. z. 0.665 (0.89) 0.140 (1.06) 1.456*** (26.22). ‧. (-1.11) (1.07) (8.48) (1.07) (-3.80) (0.18) (2.03) (-1.05) (-0.06). PTRSwitch. z. -0.414 -0.101 -0.105 0.045 -0.009 0.017 -0.002. (-0.72) (-0.45) (-0.62) (0.44) (-0.71) (0.16) (-1.29). -0.001 -0.017 -0.118** 0.013*** -0.005 -0.146***. (-0.57) (-0.35) (-2.57) (4.87) (-0.81) (-2.97). 學. -0.294 0.210 1.171*** 0.023 -0.537*** 0.000 0.003** -0.419 -0.000. Nat. PTRSwitch PTRSwitch* MAOLag MAOLag OpnShop ROA OCF Lev Size ARInv Age CR RPTLend DIRS Growth Loss SEO FTenure PTenure PExpert PTRSwitch* ROA PTRSwitch* OCF PTRSwitch* Lev PTRSwitch* Size PTRSwitch* ARInv PTRSwitch* Age PTRSwitch* CR PTRSwitch* RPTLend PTRSwitch* DIRS PTRSwitch* Loss Intercept Year Industry Firm N pseudo R2 p. MAO. z. i zv n U. -1.617*** (-5.24) Fixed Fixed cluster 14,328 0.033 0.000. * ** ***. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(51) 4-6 POpnShopit 1 ) Accounting Foreign. 立. Master. ;. -0.016. ;. 、. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. io. Old. -0.023. n. al. ;. Ch. eng、 chi. sit. y. ‧. ). Young. er. 0.123 ;. -0.157. i n U. 0.037. v. ). : 44. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(52) Female. -0.065. ;. ). Expert. 立. 政 治 ;大. -0.016. :. ‧ 國. 學. ‧. ). ‧ ). n. al. 「. er. io. sit. y. Nat 2. ). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. ). 45. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(53) 4-4 t -0.157** (-2.27) -0.123 (-1.13) -0.016 (-0.16) -0.023* (-1.82) 0.037*** (3.25) -0.065 (-0.62) -0.016** (-2.39) 0.069*** (2.82) 0.030 (1.56) -0.010** (-2.39) 0.008*** (3.05) 0.031** (2.29) -0.000* (-1.73) 0.055*** (7.52) 0.000 (1.58) -0.051 (-1.16) -0.000 (-0.56) 0.001 (0.02) 0.143*** (3.20) 0.011** (2.57) 0.117*** (15.13) 0.107*** (3.54) -0.007*** (-12.36) 0.142*** (13.70) 0.012*** (7.47) -0.293** (-2.11) -0.001*** (-3.64) -1.526*** (-13.15) Fixed Fixed Fixed cluster 10,519 0.4953 Winsorize 1% 99% p-value < 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.01. engchi. 46. sit. y. (0.31) (-0.50) (1.16) (-1.46) (-1.21) (-0.26) (-1.17) (2.50) (-1.17) (1.56) (-1.98) (0.91) (-0.43) (0.65) (0.41) (0.16) (-3.18) (2.32) (0.94) (5.71) (-3.08) (-7.25) (4.97) (1.14) (0.51) (2.07) (0.33) (1.47). er. n. Ch. ‧. io. al. 學. ‧ 國. 立. t 0.054 -0.091 0.186 -0.010 -0.010 -0.014 -0.005 0.061** -0.021 0.024 -0.007** 0.015 -0.009 0.003 0.000 0.009 -0.001*** 0.136** 0.044 0.163*** -0.012*** -0.176*** 0.002*** 0.010 0.001 0.471** 0.000 0.427 Fixed Fixed Fixed cluster 14,328 0.244 t. 政 治 大. Nat. Accounting Master Foreign Old Young Female PExpert ROA OCF Lev Size ARInv Age Loss CR RPTLend DIRS PROA POCF PLev PSize PARInv PAge PLoss PCR PRPTLend PDIRS Intercept CPA Year Industry Firm N adj. R2. i n U. v. * ** ***. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(54) Chen et al. (2016). García Osma et al. (2019). : ( Chen et al. (2016). García Osma et al. (2019). 立. 政 治 大 ,. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Lennox (2000). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. ) :. 、. 、 ). 「. 47. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(55) 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 48. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(56) Lennox (2000). ‧. 立. 」. 「 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. :. ‧. Ch. MAO. engchi. i n U. v. 、 MAO :. (. 49. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(57) 2017. 2006. 2009. 2018. 2019. ‧ 國. 學. 。. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. Aobdia, D., C.-J. Lin, and R. Petacchi. 2015. Capital market consequences of audit partner quality. The Accounting Review 90 (6):2143-2176.. er. io. sit. y. Nat. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1978. The commission on auditors’ responsibilities: Report, conclusions and recommendations. New York, NY: AICPA.. n. a l Public Accountants (AICPA). American Institute of Certified 1992. Statement v i n firms of publicly held C h rotation of Uaudit of position regarding mandatory i e h ngc companies. New York, NY: AICPA. Bamber, E. M., and L. S. Bamber. 2009. Discussion of "Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan". Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (2):393-402. Blouin, J., B. M. Grein, and B. R. Rountree. 2007. An analysis of forced auditor change: The case of former Arthur Andersen clients. The Accounting Review 82 (3):621-650. Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal. 2000. Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review 75 (4):453-467. Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, T. L. Neal, and R. A. Riley Jr. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (3):365-384. 50. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(58) Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(2), 55-69. Chan, K. H., K. Z. Lin, and P. L.-l. Mo. 2006. A Political–economic Analysis of Auditor Reporting and Auditor Switches. Review of Accounting Studies 11 (1):21-48. Chen, C. J., S. Chen, and X. Su. 2001. Profitability regulation, earnings management, and modified audit opinions: Evidence from China. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (2):9-30. Chen, S., S. Y. Sun, and D. Wu. 2010. Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor Level analysis. The Accounting Review 85 (1):127-158. Chen, F., S. Peng, S. Xue, Z. Yang, and F. Ye. 2016. Do audit clients successfully Engage in opinion shopping? Partner-level evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 54 (1):79-112.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Chi, H.-Y., and C.-L. Chin. 2011. Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (2):201-229.. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Chi, W., L. A. Myers, T. C. Omer, and H. Xie. 2017. The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies 22 (1):361-391.. n. Chin, C. L., and H. Y. Chi. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry a l Accounting Research 26i(3):729-765. v expertise. Contemporary n. Ch. i U. e. n gQualified c h audit opinions and auditor Chow, C. W., and S. J. Rice. 1982. switching. Accounting Review:326-335. Chung, H., C. H. Sonu, Y. Zang, and J.-H. Choi. 2019. Opinion shopping to avoid a going concern audit opinion and subsequent audit quality. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 38 (2):101-123. Dechow, P. M., and I. D. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (s-1):3559. DeFond, M. L., T.-J. Wong, and S. Li. 2000. The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28 (3):269-305. DeFond, M. L., K. Raghunandan, and K. Subramanyam. 2002. Do non-audit 51. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(59) service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research:1247-1274. Dopuch, N., R. W. Holthausen, and R. W. Leftwich. 1986. Abnormal stock returns associated with media disclosures of ‘subject to’qualified audit opinions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 8 (2):93-117. Eshleman, J. D., and P. Guo. 2014. Do big 4 auditors provide higher audit quality after controlling for the endogenous choice of auditor? AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (4):197. Francis, J. R. 2004. What do we know about audit quality? The British accounting review 36 (4):345-368. García Osma, B., B. Gill-de-Albornoz, E. de las Heras, and S. Rusanescu. 2019. Opinion-shopping: firm versus partner-level evidence. Available at SSRN 2776609.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2004. Report to the senate committee on banking, housing, and urban affairs and the house committee on financial services: Mandatory audit firm rotation study: study questionnaires, responses, and summary of respondents' comments. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Gow, I. D., G. Ormazabal, and D. J. Taylor. 2010. Correcting for cross-sectional and time-series dependence in accounting research. The Accounting Review 85 (2):483-512.. a. n. i v program in China l C 2009. Auditor disaffiliation Gul, F. A., H. Sami, and H. Zhou. n h e n g c AhJournal and auditor independence. AUDITING: i U of Practice & Theory 28 (1):29-51. Gul, F. A., D. Wu, and Z. Yang. 2013. Do individual auditors affect audit quality? evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review 88 (6):1993-2023. Hackenbrack, K., and W. R. Knechel. 1997. Resource allocation decisions in audit engagements. Contemporary Accounting Research 14 (3):481-499. Hardies, K., D. Breesch, and J. Branson. 2016. Do (fe) male auditors impair audit quality? Evidence from going-concern opinions. European Accounting Review 25 (1):7-34. Hsieh, Y.-T., and C.-J. Lin. 2016. Audit firms' client acceptance decisions: Does partner-level industry expertise matter? AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 35 (2):97-120. 52. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(60) Jiang, G., C. M. Lee, and H. Yue. 2010. Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience. Journal of financial economics 98 (1):1-20. Johnstone, K. M. 2000. Client-acceptance decisions: Simultaneous effects of client business risk, audit risk, auditor business risk, and risk adaptation. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (1):1-25. Johnstone, K. M., and J. C. Bedard. 2003. Risk management in client acceptance decisions. The Accounting Review 78 (4):1003-1025. Johnstone, K. M., and J. C. Bedard. 2004. Audit firm portfolio management decisions. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (4):659-690. Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2):193-228.. 政 治 大. Ke, B., C. S. Lennox, and Q. Xin. 2015. The effect of China's weak institutional environment on the quality of Big 4 audits. The Accounting Review 90 (4):1591-1619.. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1):163-197.. sit. y. Nat. Krishnan, J. 1994. Auditor switching and conservatism. The Accounting Review:200-215.. n. er. io. Krishnan, J., and R. G. Stephens. 1995. Evidence on opinion shopping from audit opinion conservatism.aJournal of Accounting and Public v Policy 14 (3):179i l Ch 201. Un. engchi. Landsman, W. R., K. K. Nelson, and B. R. Rountree. 2009. Auditor switches in the pre-and post-Enron eras: Risk or realignment? The Accounting Review 84 (2):531-558. Lennox, C. 2000. Do companies successfully engage in opinion-shopping? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (3):321337. Menon, K., and D. D. Williams. 2004. Former audit partners and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 79 (4):1095-1118. Meyers-Levy, J. 1986. Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation, Northwestern University. Nelson, M., and H. T. Tan. 2005. Judgment and decision making research in 53. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(61) auditing: A task, person, and interpersonal interaction perspective. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (s-1):41-71. Nelson, M. W. 2009. A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice and Theory 28:1–34. Newton, N. J., J. S. Persellin, D. Wang, and M. S. Wilkins. 2016. Internal control opinion shopping and audit market competition. The Accounting Review 91 (2):603-623. O'Keefe, T. B., D. A. Simunic, and M. T. Stein. 1994. The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (2):241-261. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2013. Improving the transparency of audits: Proposed amendments to PCAOB auditing standards to provide disclosure in the auditor’s report of certain participants in the audit. PCAOB Release No. 2013-009.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學. Raghavan, A. 2002. How a bright star at Andersen fell along with Enron. Wall Street Journal: A1.. ‧. Reichelt, K. J., and D. Wang. 2010. National and office‐specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (3):647-686.. sit. y. Nat. n. er. io. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2016. Order granting approval of proposed rules to require disclosures of certain audit participants on a new a l amendments to auditingi vstandards. Release No. PCAOB form and related n Ch U 34-7787. (May 9). Washington, SEC. i eDC: h ngc Sundgren, S., and T. Svanström. 2014. Auditor-in-charge characteristics and going-concern reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research 31 (2):531550. Taylor, S. D. 2011. Does audit fee homogeneity exist? Premiums and discounts attributable to individual partners. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (4):249-272. Vera-Munoz, S., J. Ho, and C. Chow. 2006. Enhancing knowledge sharing in public. Accounting Horizons 20 (2): 133-155. 54. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(62) OpnShopit :. 100. 25. 75. OpnShopit. 25. OpnShopit 「. 、. 立. 1%. 政 治 大 75. OpnShopit 「. :. :. 、. ‧. 66. 學. ‧ 國. 15. -1%. ;. 15. 66. 81. v ni. 100. n. a l81 C -1% h. er. io. sit. y. Nat OpnShopit. 81. e n g1% chi U. 81. : 81. : :. 100. 0.81. 55. DOI:10.6814/NCCU202000640.

(63)

參考文獻

相關文件

fostering independent application of reading strategies Strategy 7: Provide opportunities for students to track, reflect on, and share their learning progress (destination). •

Strategy 3: Offer descriptive feedback during the learning process (enabling strategy). Where the

Quality Assessment and Compliance – SMC/IMC composition Major observations:.  SMC did not comprise all the stakeholders as managers as required in the

However, the SRAS curve is upward sloping, which indicates that an increase in the overall price level tends to raise the quantity of goods and services supplied and a decrease in

However, the SRAS curve is upward sloping, which indicates that an increase in the overall price level tends to raise the quantity of goods and services supplied and a decrease in

 HR policies (such as staff recruitment and performance management) not endorsed by SMC/IMC.  SMC/IMC has not clearly set out criteria and guidelines on approving

• Thresholded image gradients are sampled over 16x16 array of locations in scale space. • Create array of

We shall show that after finite times of switching, the premise variable of the fuzzy system will remain in the universe of discourse and stability of the adaptive control system