• 沒有找到結果。

台北榮民總醫院糖尿病衛教困難度之調查

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "台北榮民總醫院糖尿病衛教困難度之調查"

Copied!
9
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

201

1 2 1 1,3

1 2

3

2003 2004

( Diabetes mellitus ) ( Diabetes education )

1995 1 3 5 2000

1 7 1

1-2

2030

3 6 6

2

2000

3

2

6% 12%

3-5

1

1 9 7 8

6.5 1995 33.97

2 0 0 3 4 4 . 3 8 1 9 8 3

6

(2)

( lifestyle modification ) ( pharmacological intervention ) ( patient education )

Brown 1988

1 9 9 0

7 - 8

9 - 1 0

Padgett

11

1988

( physical ) ( psychological ) ( knowledge ) ( compliance )

1 9 9 2

1998

12-14

2004

2003 2004

( European Association for the Study o f D i a b e t e s , E A S D )

( Diabetes Education Study Group, DESG )

1 5

1 3

5 5

1 ( )

( )

2003 10-11 2004 10-11

1 0

( )

1 2

3 4 6 7 8 9 5

10 ,

11

12

13

(3)

2003 2004

(4)

15

Cronbach's alpha 0.72 Crobanch's alpha 0.90

SPSS ( SPSS 12.0.1 for windows )

t-test ANOVA

2003 2004

(

) 2003

2004

7 2 7 2

100% 19 ( 26% )

22 ( 31% ) 24 ( 33% )

7 ( 10% ) a

7 2 5 6

88% 12 ( 21% ) 20

( 36% ) 18 ( 32% ) 5 ( 9% )

1 ( 2% ) b

1

2 0 0 3

( 4.06 0.99 )

1.07 ) 2004 ( 3.82 1.03 )

( 3.75 0.97 )

( 3.55 1.14 ) ( 3.55 1.03 ) ( )

1 3

2003 2004

( 2003 45.68 7.57

2004 45.13 10.43 ) ANOVA

2003 p 0.004

2004 p 0.697 ( )

a 2003 b 2004

(5)

2003

( p=0.609 ) 2004 ( p=0.002 ) ( )

( ) 2003

( 3.48 0.80 ) ( 3 . 1 4 0 . 7 2 )

( 2.93 0.77 ) 2004 (

3 . 5 6 0 . 8 8 3 . 4 1

0.84 2.92 0.90 ) 2003

ANOVA

2003

( p=0.010 p=0.003 ) 2004

2003 2004

1 4.06 ± 0.99 3.82 ± 1.03

2 3.60 ± 1.16 3.75 ± 0.97

3 3.51 ± 1.07 3.55 ± 1.14

4 3.42 ± 1.02 3.55 ± 1.03

5 3.26 ± 1.16 3.53 ± 1.05

6 3.22 ± 0.91 3.34 ± 1.10

7 3.19 ± 0.96 3.34 ± 1.03

8 3.14 ± 1.10 3.30 ± 0.95

9 3.14 ± 0.92 3.25 ± 0.90

10 3.00 ± 0.87 3.24 ± 1.20

11 2.83 ± 1.01 2.75 ± 1.10

12 2.75 ± 1.20 2.63 ± 1.21

13 2.32 ± 1.07 2.61 ± 1.29

*

2003 2004

2004 Mean ± SD

*

2003 Mean ± SD

*

t

+ P value+

41.08 ± 5.20 41.84 ± 5.13 -0.505 0.624

45.13 ± 10.43 45.68 ± 7.57 -0.234 0.817

41.52 ± 11.91 38.25 ± 8.28 1.166 0.260

40.40 ± 9.21 38.00 ± 5.32 0.583 0.591

*

13

+

t test 2003 2004 13

2004

Number Mean

*

SD

*

32 45.99 9.93

24 37.98 7.80

*

13

(6)

2003 2004

2003 2004

2004

( 42.55 9.85 ) 2003 ( 41.44 7.65 )

2 0 0 4

( )

2003 2004

2004 (

)

p 0.021 2003 2004

p 0.179

2003 2004

2 0 0 3

2004

3.14 ± 0.67 2.96 ± 0.74 0.895 0.390

3.62 ± 0.86 3.35 ± 0.79 1.394 0.179

3.33 ± 0.90 3.12 ± 0.65 0.982 0.340

3.47 ± 0.87 3.00 ± 0.61 1.200 0.296

Total 3.41 ± 0.84 3.14 ± 0.72 2.371 0.021

2.60 ± 0.62 2.89 ± 0.78 -1.644 0.128

3.19 ± 0.97 3.36 ± 0.77 -0.797 0.435

2.86 ± 0.98 2.54 ± 0.64 1.363 0.191

2.84 ± 0.75 2.97 ± 0.50 -0.390 0.717

Total 2.92 ± 0.90 2.93 ± 0.77 -0.064 0.949

3.73 ± 0.73 3.69 ± 0.66 0.183 0.858

3.67 ± 0.85 3.76 ± 0.68 -0.508 0.617

3.45 ± 1.04 3.23 ± 0.89 0.875 0.394

3.16 ± 0.77 2.83 ± 0.72 0.996 0.389

Total 3.56 ± 0.88 3.48 ± 0.80 0.725 0.471

*

+

t test 2003 2004 13

2003 2004

(7)

2 0 0 4

2 0 0 4 2 0 0 3

2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4

2004

15

1980

( )

1 6 - 1 7

16

( barriers affecting basic needs and rights )

( medical barriers )

( educational bar- riers )

( emotional barriers )

( lack of political will )

Ramachandran

17

2003 2004

2003 2004

(8)

1.King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global Burden of Diabetes, 1995–2025. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1414-31.

2.Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global Prevalence of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1047–53.

3. 1996-2000

2002; 21: 173-80

4.Chou P, Li CL, Tsai ST. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes in Taiwan. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2001; 54 (S1):

S29-35.

5.

2002; 21: 83- 96

6. 2003

7.Brown SA. Effects of educational interventions in diabetes care:

a meta-analysis of findings. Nursing Research. 1988; 37: 223- 30.

8.Brown SA. Studies of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetic adults: a meta-analysis revisited. Patient Education and Counseling 2000; 16: 189-215.

9.

2000; 13: 1-17

10. 2

1999; 12:

39-50

nagement of diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1988; 41: 1007-30.

12.

1998; 12: 11-7

13.Chuang LM, Tsai ST, Huang BY, Tai TY, the DIABCARE (Taiwan) Study Group. The current state of diabetes manage- ment in Taiwan. Diab Res Clin Pract 2001; 54(S1): S55-65.

14.Lin JD, Tsai ST, Lin HD. Comparison of glycemic control in the year 2004 and 1998 among diabetic patients of Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Proceedings of Annual Meeting, the Endocrine Society and the Diabetes Association, ROC, March 19-20, 2005.

15.Assal J-Ph, Lion S. Difficulties encountered with patient edu- cation in European Diabetic Centers. In: Assal J-Ph, Berger M, Gay N, Canivet J, eds. Diabetes education. How to improve pa- tient education. Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium of the Diabetes Education Study Group ( Geneva, 3-6 June 1982 ) and selected topics held at workshops of the DESG. Amsterdam:

Excerpta Medica; 1983; 78-89.

16.Chan JCN, Cockram CS. Organization of Care: Western Pacific Region, China and Hong Kong as examples. In: DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Keen H, Zimmet P eds. International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus. 3rd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, England.

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2004; 1793-800.

17.Ramachandran A, Shera S. Indian Subcontinent, The economics of diabetes and diabetes care. A report of the Diabetes Health Economics Study Group. IDF-WHO, 1997; 75-81.

(9)

in Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Li-Ying Juan

1

, Shir-Ling Lin

2

, Pin-Fan Chen

1

, and Hong-Da Lin

1,3

Patient education is an essential component in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Understanding the diffi- culties encountered during patient education helps health providers to offer better education programs and there- fore to achieve better disease outcomes. We performed two questionnaire-studies in the year of 2003 and 2004 to evaluate the difficulties encountered in diabetes education. In addition, we try to find out the impacts of "Global Budget Payment System" and"Diabetic Case Management" on diabetes education. Our results found institute and administrative factors, especially short of education manpower, were the major problem resulting in educa- tion difficulties. "Global Budget Payment System" and "Diabetic Case Management" add some difficulties on dia- betes education. Our study found the administrative institutes must provide more support to solve the difficulties encountered in diabetes education. ( J Intern Med Taiwan 2005; 16: 216-224 )

1

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine,

2

Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and

3

National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

參考文獻

相關文件

• To enhance teachers’ understanding of the major updates of the English Language Education Key Learning Area under the ongoing renewal of the school curriculum;.. • To

 develop a better understanding of the design and the features of the English Language curriculum with an emphasis on the senior secondary level;..  gain an insight into the

 Promote project learning, mathematical modeling, and problem-based learning to strengthen the ability to integrate and apply knowledge and skills, and make. calculated

[Supplementary notes to 2.3.4 The Senior Secondary Curriculum and Suggested Time Allocation and Appendix 7 in Booklet 2 Learning Goals, School Curriculum Framework and Planning of

1.8 Teachers should take every opportunity to attend seminars and training courses on special education to get a better understanding of the students’ special needs and

These programmes are operated by 11 degree-awarding self-financing institutions registered under the Post Secondary Colleges Ordinance (Cap. 320) or statutory

- To provide career and life planning education at the junior secondary level to develop students’ understanding of themselves in the context of whole-person development.

It is intended in this project to integrate the similar curricula in the Architecture and Construction Engineering departments to better yet simpler ones and to create also a new