競爭法下之專利強制權

(1)

Mt ¥ ilrF z•'u ^~m ^ilid ^t~ ^tc.

Antitrust-induced Compulsory Licensing

of Patent Rights

Michael Kling ;f ··

*~~~ ~,

...

trans. Yi- Tien Lin

...

^~- ^~

:i!r ' ~ ilRB

~

lt ,

:w;~IJ5!W-F*~•5!r~.:z.~J~%

~, 1!~~:¥U$m=+~mf~~

~]i'B!7'l~

= ,

^~

^m:

^~^JJU

^m ^1$

^?JT^:ff

^m

^~

1

ffftJ w

^'fff~J

.:::. ' lj\

*-5

~

'

"**~·5!J:.t~-1-5fa~lj~ffi.:Z.

i~IH~~f*

El

~

,

rn~5t~c:l13fft

Hf!ll ~

(::} $!~

:tJ

;I:I¥Jjjllj

JE

- ':.l:i~I=R~--e;,

~ 1:nnm tl"P!!

(-)~5JU1~~

(::}~fl.

Iii

~~'*a ~

-ti~ aM : 2010~9 ~ 29 a ;

-tioftf•J

^~a^{l!Jl :}^2011~2~^{12 a}

.

..

*~·~·oft~~~~A·*-·~&~~~~A·*-·~~···~

2010~9~27a, 29a ~>3·J~~~~ilfA*, ~~~.J:/JA.i.JHtl-:R!i'ili:~

~·~·-·~~#~6···Aft~-~~-ili~I·&~·U~·~

~~~~A·~~~~~~··-·A6W~~~~A·*-~~~·±

-~$~,·-·~~~~~~~h·

-~~~~(M~q)A•~*'••*'a~*~··MA8*fta·

*** f.t~~151tt

(Mainz) A*it.-•t•±;

~~~.J:/JA.i'i.--·~&·Jfta

·

(2)

*~~~••R•~••~~~•~•••m~re~ft•

•·~•·~~•~•-w~=•·•~••~•+~

•·•=+•·•m~•~•Am~~•~•~*~~•·••

~~--ffl~Aiafi~-~-~fffl~IA·M·~~~-~

~•·~••mti~~~~-••M~•·*~fi

-~~-~···~RB·~-··#aM~··~M

·ti~Jbr!J~~fm~~IA

· ~-~=a•·•fl•·••*·•m•~·~M

x~

(3)

L

Michael Kling ;j , f.f. ~ ~

t' ^u. ^-f

^i!-

^-r

^~.f.

^tHi

^1fioJ.t~^ttl ³

Abstract

This article analyses the regulations under the EU and German competition law regarding the prohibition of an undertaking from abusing its dominant position, i.e. Article 102 of the Treaty of Func- tioning of the European Union, § 19 and § 20 of the German Act against the Restrains of Competition and their application to the refusal to license of the patent right owner. Competition law should not be a multi-purpose tool for enforcing licensing of intellectual property. Antitrust-induced compulsory licensing should not be served as a mechanism to correct the too widely protected intellectual property rights. Competition law and antitrust-induced compulsory licensing should be the instrument to preserve and maintain an open and inno- vative product market.

Keywords: compulsory licensing, patent rights, Competition Law, abuse of a dominant position, refusal to deal