• 沒有找到結果。

Approximation of Lp(X) by simple functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Approximation of Lp(X) by simple functions"

Copied!
3
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

6 STEVE SHKOLLER

1.6. Approximation of Lp(X) by simple functions.

Lemma 1.23. If p ∈ [1, ∞), then the set of simple functions f =n

i=1ai1Ei, where each Ei is an element of the σ-algebraA and μ(Ei) <∞, is dense in Lp(X,A, μ).

Proof. If f ∈ Lp, then f is measurable; thus, there exists a sequence{φn}n=1 of simple functions, such that φn→ f a.e. with

0≤ |φ1| ≤ |φ2| ≤ · · · ≤ |f|, i.e., φn approximates f from below.

Recall thatn− f|p→ 0 a.e. and |φn− f|p≤ 2p|f|p∈ L1, so by the Dominated Convergence Theorem,n− fLp → 0.

Now, suppose that the set Ei are disjoint; then b definition of the Lebesgue integral,



X

φpndx =

n i=1

|ai|pμ(Ei) <∞ .

If ai= 0, then μ(Ei) <∞. 

1.7. Approximation of Lp(Ω)by continuous functions.

Lemma 1.24. Suppose that Ω ⊂ Rn is bounded. Then C0(Ω) is dense in Lp(Ω) for p∈ [1, ∞).

Proof. Let K be any compact subset of Ω. The functions FK,n(x) = 1

1 + n dist(x, K) ∈ C0(Ω) satisfy FK,n≤ 1 ,

and decrease monotonically to the characteristic function1K. The Monotone Con- vergence Theorem gives

fK,n→ 1K in Lp(Ω), 1≤ p < ∞ .

Next, let A⊂ Ω be any measurable set, and let λ denote the Lebesgue measure.

Then

λ(A) = sup{μ(K) : K ⊂ A, K compact} .

It follows that there exists an increasing sequence of Kj of compact subsets of A such that λ(A\ ∪jKj) = 0. By the Monotone Convergence Theorem,1Kj → 1Ain Lp(Ω) for p∈ [1, ∞). According to Lemma 1.23, each function in Lp(Ω) is a norm limit of simple functions, so the lemma is proved.  1.8. Approximation of Lp(Ω) by smooth functions. For Ω ⊂ Rn open, for

 > 0 taken sufficiently small, define the open subset of Ω by Ω:={x ∈ Ω | dist(x, ∂Ω) > } . Definition 1.25 (Mollifiers). Define η ∈ C(Rn) by

η(x) :=

 Ce(|x|2−1)−1 if |x| < 1

0 if |x| ≥ 1 ,

with constant C > 0 chosen such that

Rnη(x)dx = 1.

For  > 0, the standard sequence of mollifiers on Rn is defined by η(x) = −nη(x/) ,

and satisfy

Rnη(x)dx = 1 and spt(η)⊂ B(0, ).

(2)

NOTES ON Lp AND SOBOLEV SPACES 7

Definition 1.26. For Ω ⊂ Rn open, set

Lploc(Ω) ={u : Ω → R | u ∈ Lp( ˜Ω) ∀ ˜Ω ⊂⊂ Ω} ,

where ˜Ω⊂⊂ Ω means that there exists K compact such that ˜Ω ⊂ K ⊂ Ω. We say that ˜Ω is compactly contained in Ω.

Definition 1.27 (Mollification of L1). If f ∈ L1loc(Ω), define its mollification f= η∗ f in Ω,

so that

f(x) =



Ω

η(x− y)f(y)dy =

B(0,)

η(y)f (x− y)dy ∀x ∈ Ω. Theorem 1.28 (Mollification of Lp(Ω)).

(A) f∈ C).

(B) f→ f a.e. as  → 0.

(C) If f ∈ C0(Ω), then f→ f uniformly on compact subsets of Ω.

(D) If p∈ [1, ∞) and f ∈ Lploc(Ω), then f→ f in Lploc(Ω).

Proof. Part (A). We rely on the difference quotient approximation of the partial derivative. Fix x ∈ Ω, and choose h sufficiently small so that x + hei ∈ Ω for i = 1, ..., n, and compute the difference quotient of f:

f(x + hei)− f(x)

 = −n



Ω

1 h

 η

x + hei− y



− η

x− y h

f (y)dy

= −n



Ω˜

1 h

 η

x + hei− y



− η

x− y



f (y)dy for some open set ˜Ω⊂⊂ Ω. On ˜Ω,

h→0lim 1 h

 η

x + hei− y



− η

x− y



= 1



∂η

∂xi

x− y



= n∂η

∂xi

x− y



, so by the Dominated Convergence Theorem,

∂f

∂xi(x) =



Ω

∂η

∂xi(x− y)f(y)dy .

A similar argument for higher-order partial derivatives proves (A).

Step 2. Part (B). By the Lebesgue differentiation theorem,

→0lim 1

|B(x, )|



B(x,)|f(y) − f(x)|dy for a.e. x ∈ Ω . Choose x∈ Ω for which this limit holds. Then

|f(x)− f(x)| ≤



B(x,)η(x− y)|f(y) − f(x)|dy

= 1

n



B(x,)

η((x− y)/)|f(y) − f(x)|dy

C

|B(x, )|



B(x,)|f(x) − f(y)|dy −→ 0 as  → 0 .

(3)

8 STEVE SHKOLLER

Step 3. Part (C). For ˜Ω ⊂ Ω, the above inequality shows that if f ∈ C0(Ω) and hence uniformly continuous on ˜Ω, then f(x)→ f(x) uniformly on ˜Ω.

Step 4. Part (D). For f ∈ Lploc(Ω), p∈ [1, ∞), choose open sets U ⊂⊂ D ⊂⊂ Ω;

then, for  > 0 small enough,

fLp(U)≤ fLp(D). To see this, note that

|f(x)| ≤



B(x,)

η(x− y)|f(y)|dy

=



B(x,)η(x− y)(p−1)/pη(x− y)1/p|f(y)|dy



B(x,)η(x− y)dy

(p−1)/p 

B(x,)η(x− y)|f(y)|pdy 1/p

, so that for  > 0 sufficiently small



U|f(x)|pdx≤



U



B(x,)η(x− y)|f(y)|pdydx



D|f(y)|p 

B(y,)η(x− y)dx

dy≤



D|f(y)|pdy . Since C0(D) is dense in Lp(D), choose g ∈ C0(D) such thatf − gLp(D) < δ;

thus

f− fLp(U)≤ f− gLp(U)+g− gLp(U)+g − fLp(U)

≤ 2f − gLp(D)+g− gLp(U)≤ 2δ + g− gLp(U).

 1.9. Continuous linear functionals on Lp(X). Let Lp(X) denote the dual space of Lp(X). For φ ∈ Lp(X), the operator norm of φ is defined byφop = supLp(X)=1|φ(f)|.

Theorem 1.29. Let p ∈ (1, ∞], q = p−1p . For g∈ Lq(X), define Fg: Lp(X)→ R as

Fg(f ) =



X

f gdx .

Then Fg is a continuous linear functional on Lp(X) with operator normFgop=

gLp(X).

Proof. The linearity of Fgagain follows from the linearity of the Lebesgue integral.

Since

|Fg(f )| = 

Xf gdx 

X|fg| dx ≤ fLpgLq ,

with the last inequality following from H¨older’s inequality, we have that supf

Lp=1|Fg(f )| ≤

gLq.

參考文獻

相關文件

Nanongkai, A deterministic near-linear time algorithm for finding minimum cuts in planar graphs, in Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2004,

– Factorization is “harder than” calculating Euler’s phi function (see Lemma 51 on p. 406).. – So factorization is hardest, followed by calculating Euler’s phi function,

[r]

Cowell, The Jātaka, or Stories of the Buddha's Former Births, Book XXII, pp.

(Correct formula but with wrong answer form: 1-point deduction for each error.) (Did not use unit vectors: 1-point deduction for each

So we check derivative of f and g, the small one would correspond to graph (b) and the other to (c)(i.e.. Moreover, f is

[r]

May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.. All