An Analysis for Transportation-Health Related Data and Indicators
;: jg;
3¥
I '::EJt:l1J
2Kevin P. Hwang1 Y i -Fang Wang2
1
~rL})Xr;l]*~~im~I!fH'!~* liltl¥51:~
2
~rL})XrfJ*~~im~I!H~* ~W±~
*~~~~~-ft~~•••m~zH~·~•~~oo~~~•m~
L::,
~~15~:Wn*:g-Y'§~=:{[QI~®":?;t
WHO ftm±mrnt~t~ffiJ§,
{i~.L-~1~Jt&$wro\~L:::W~~Y5~ '1JJ*MI~D*:g-Y'§~" ~~cpt~~ii:l~rlli~i:litrtJ, r.'D
•rn-i:lmrn~~•m~L::-~~A~,~~Y5~~M~&~:g-ww~M· ~~~~ffiJ§,$m-~B~~-@A~-*~~~-,~~15~:W~:g-Y'§ ~!'!U·:fJ~~f~B"J
,
:¥:~8"J,
'l'ltiB"J~W•
[z;J~£1~liB"J~rf&,
~~Y'§~.L-~&n*s15~~~~k~m~~--~~•·
This thesis discusses the relation between transportation behavior and its influence on health indicators. The influence could be divided into three parts, including accident fatality, air pollution and noise pollution. The WHO Healthy City indicators just involve accident fatality and air pollution but not noise pollution. The article discusses the accident fatality, injury, degree of air pollution and degree of noise disturbance over the years at Taipei City, Tainan City and Kaoshiung City in Taiwan. Accident fatality is the direct, personal, family effect, but air pollution and noise pollution are regional, entire, chronic effect. Because the way of measurement, air pollution and noise pollution are difficult to show their effect on health and worth further study.
IIIII~: ~-~f'J~ (transportation behavior) '~mH~*~ (hea I th
indicators) '!l!~f,HEt:: (accident fatality) '~~57:7~ (air poI I ut ion) ' ~1§-57:7~ (noise poI I ut ion)
40