• 沒有找到結果。

Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to Graves' ophthalmopathy in Taiwan males

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to Graves' ophthalmopathy in Taiwan males"

Copied!
28
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon.

Toll-Like Receptor Gene Polymorphisms are Associated with Susceptibility to Graves' Ophthalmopathy in Taiwan Males

BMC Medical Genetics 2010, 11:154 doi:10.1186/1471-2350-11-154 Wen-Ling Liao ([email protected])

Rong-Hsing Chen ([email protected]) Hui-Ju Lin ([email protected]) Yu-Huei Liu ([email protected]) Wen-Chi Chen ([email protected])

Yuhsin Tsai ([email protected]) Lei Wan ([email protected]) Fuu-Jen Tsai ([email protected])

ISSN 1471-2350 Article type Research article Submission date 23 March 2010 Acceptance date 5 November 2010

Publication date 5 November 2010

Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/11/154

Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article was published immediately upon acceptance. It can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright

notice below).

Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central.

For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/

BMC Medical Genetics

© 2010 Liao et al. , licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

(2)

Toll-Like Receptor Gene Polymorphisms are Associated with Susceptibility to Graves’ Ophthalmopathy in Taiwan Males

Wen-Ling Liao

1,2

, Rong-Hsing Chen

3

, Hui-Ju Lin

4

, Yu-Huei Liu

1,2

, Wen-Chi Chen

5

,

Yuhsin Tsai

2

, Lei Wan

1,2,6§

, Fuu-Jen Tsai

1,2,6§

1

Genetic Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan;

2

School of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan;

3

School of Post Baccalaureate Chinese Medicine; China Medical University,

Taichung, Taiwan;

4

Department of ophthalmology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung,

Taiwan;

5

Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine; China Medical University,

Taichung, Taiwan;

6

Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.

§

Corresponding author

Email addresses:

(3)(4)

Abstract

Background: Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of pattern-recognition receptors,

which plays a role in eliciting innate/adaptive immune responses and developing

chronic inflammation. The polymorphisms of TLRs have been associated with the

risk of various autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE),

multiple sclerosis and rheumatorid arthritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate

whether TLR genes could be used as genetic markers for the development of Graves’

ophthalmopathy (GO).

Methods: 6 TLR-4 and 2 TLR-9 gene polymorphisms in 471 GD patients (200

patients with GO and 271 patients without GO) from a Taiwan Chinese population

were evaluated.

Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the genotypic and

allelic frequencies of TLR-4 and TLR-9 gene polymorphisms between the GD

patients with and without GO. However, sex-stratified analyses showed that the

association between TLR-9 gene polymorphism and GO phenotype was more

pronounced in the male patients. The odds ratios (ORs) was 2.11 (95% confidence

interval [CI] = 1.14–3.91) for rs187084 A G polymorphism and 1.97 (95% CI =

1.07–3.62) for rs352140 A G polymorphism among the male patients. Increasing

one G allele of rs287084 and one A allele of rs352140 increased the risk of GO (p

(5)

values for trend tests were 0.0195 and 0.0345, respectively). Further, in haplotype

analyses, the male patients carrying the GA haplotype had a higher risk of GO (odds

ratio [OR] = 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09–3.73) than those not carrying

the GA haplotype.

Conclusion: The present data suggest that TLR-9 gene polymorphisms were

significantly associated with increased susceptibility of ophthalmopathy in male GD

patients.

(6)

Background

Graves’ disease (GD) is an organ-specific autoimmune thyroid disease, one of the

manifestations of which is ophthalmopathy [1]. Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) is

characterized by inflammation and fat deposition in the eye muscles and the

connective tissue surrounding the eye. It is known that multiple factors contribute to

the etiology and severity of GD, including the host’s genetic factors as well as

environmental factors [2-3]. Female sex, old age, and smoking history are common

risk factors for GD [4-8]. With regard to genetic factors, the classical major

histocompatibility complex class II genes and cytotoxic T cell antigen-4 genes

(CTLA-4) [9-11] have been consistently reported to be associated with GD. Also,

there were published studies on association of GO and genes such as CD103 [12],

CTLA-4 and IL-13 [13]. However, the findings of most genes effect in GD or GO

were inconsistent. Recently, toll-like receptors (TLRs) which play important roles in

eliciting human innate/adaptive immune responses and developing chronic

inflammation [14] are a new area of basic immunological investigation and could be

associated with autoimmune thyroiditis [15].

TLRs are a family of pattern-recognition receptors and can be expressed in

several types of cells and tissues such as macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), B cells,

T cells and monocytes. A total of 10 human TLRs have been identified and the

(7)

functions of human TLR-1 to TLR-9 have been characterized [16-17][14-15]. TLRs

are well known to recognize a variety of microbial molecules such as TLR-4 can

recognize lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) in gram-negative bacteria and TLR-9 activation

can be triggered by unmethylated CpG DNA of bacteria. Once TLRs are activated by

microbial molecules, downstream signalling pathway via myeloid differentiation

factor 88 (MyD88) and interleukin-1R (IL-1R)-associated kinase (IRAK) activates

nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), leading to cytokine production, and even to apoptosis.

TLRs could response to not only exogenous, microbe derived pathogen associated

molecular patterns (PAMPs) but also endogenous or self ligands. Recently, the ability

of TLRs to recognize host-derived danger signals, which are produced on cell damage

and necrosis, was also recognized [18-19]. Moreover, studies have found that the

immune complexes containing self-RNA and/or self-DNA can act as endogenous

triggers for the activation of TLRs [20-22].

Recently, release of endogenous TLR ligands during inflammation and the

consequent activation of TLR signaling pathways have been indicated and

polymorphism of the TLR4 and TLR9 gene have been reported to be associated with

many autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE),

atherosclerosis, asthma, type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis

(RA) [14, 23-31]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there were no reports about

(8)

TLR4 and TLR9 in GO. Therefore, our aim in the present study was to investigate the

potential association between GO and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of

TLR genes—TLR-4 and TLR-9 genes—in a Chinese population in Taiwan.

Methods

Patients and data collection

Four hundred and seventy one GD patients at China Medical University Hospital

in Taiwan were enrolled in present study. All GD patients were examined by

experienced endocrinologist and identified using following criteria: having

hyperthyroidism, having diffused goiter and presence at least one of

thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody, diffusely increased

131

I

(iodine-131) uptake in the thyroid gland or presence of exophthalmos. The proptosis

was quantified with an exophthalmometer. The data regarding age, sex, history of

tobacco use, thyroid gland pathology and affected anatomic sites were extracted from

the questionnaire and blood samples were collected by venipuncture for genomic

DNA isolation and serological test at the enrollment in study. Informed consent was

obtained from each participant before his/her inclusion in this study and the ethics

committee of China Medical University Hospital gave its approval for the study.

(9)

Genomic DNA extraction and genotyping

The genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes of GD patients

using the Genomic DNA kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To

select the most representative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by capturing

the majority genetic variation, SNP genotype information was downloaded in

December 2008 from the HapMap Han Chinese in Beijing (HCB) and Japanese in

Tokyo (JPT) population. HapMap genotypes were analyzed within Haploview and

Tag SNPs were selected using the Tagger function. The following criteria were used

to select Tag SNPs: (1) a threshold minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.10 (2)

multimarker method with r

2

threshold > 0.8 and logarithm of odds threshold 3.0 (3)

probe or primers that pass the qualification as recommended by the manufacturer

(Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA) to ensure a high genotyping success rate.

The mean max r

2

were 0.949 and 1 for TLR4 and TLR9 SNPs, respectively. A total of six SNPs for TLR-4 and 2 SNPs for TLR-9

,

were selected in present study.

Genotyping was achieved using an assay on-demand allelic discrimination assay and

detection system according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosys tems).

Briefly, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in the presence of 10 ng

genomic DNA, 10µl TaqMan master mix, and 0.125µl of 40x assay mix. Polymerase

chain reaction analysis was performed in 96-well plates on a thermal cycler (ABI

(10)

9700; Applied Biosystems). Reaction conditions were 50° C for 2 minutes and 95° C

for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles at 95° C for 15 seconds and 60° C for 1 minute.

Real-time detection of fluorescence signals was performed using the ABI Prism 7900

Real-Time PCR System. The frequency of SNPs’ genotype for HCB + JPT population

was extracted from PubMed [32-36].

Statistical analysis

The difference of genotypic and allelic frequencies distributions between GD

patients with and without ophthalmopathy and between GD patients and individuals

information from HCB-HapMap were analyzed by the χ

2

test or Fisher exact test. The

odds ratio (OR) was calculated from genotypic and allelic frequencies with 95%

confidence interval (CI) by using unconditional logistical regression adjusting for age

of diagnosis, gender and smoking history. We further stratified data into subgroups by

sex and homogeneity test were performed to determine whether the association

between genotype/haplotype frequencies and GO phenotype is similar in males and

females two groups. If the homogeneity test was significant, the different association

in males and female was indicated. Then males and females two groups should be

analyzed separately. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS statistical

(11)

software, version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). All tests were two-sided, and a p

value less than 0.05 was used as the level of significance.

Power calculation

The power calculation was based on the following assumptions: the allele

frequencies of the investigated SNPs within the population were based on the

information from HapMap-CHB (0.422 to 0.675 for TLR9 SNPs and 0.067 to

0.633for TLR4 SNPs) and the size of present study were 271 for control group and

200 for case group. Therefore, the estimated effect size of OR, 0.578 to 0.592 for

TLR9 and 1.63 to 2.25 for TLR4 of the investigated SNPs in case group can be

observed using a two independent sample test with a power of 80% at two-sided type

I error rate 0.05 (Additional file 1: table S1).

For the effect size of TLR on GO, no formal data are available. Therefore, we

compare the observable effect sizes from our design power calculation with the effect

sizes (OR=0.55 to 0.56 for TLR9 and 1.78 to 2.85 for TLR4) from previous study in

RA [37]. The magnitude of effect size in previous study in RA is bigger than our

estimated effect size. Therefore, the power will be bigger than 80% if our effect size

could be the same with the effect size from previous study in RA. Based upon above

information, our study design could be justified.

(12)

Results

A total of 471 GD patients comprising 200 patients with GO and 271 patients

without GO were enrolled in this study. The female to male ratio was 3.75 and the

mean age was 39.41 ± 12.42 years. There were statistically significant differences in

the GO phenotype and smoking history between the male and female patients. The

percentage of male and female GD patients with GO was 52% and 40%, respectively

(p = 0.04). None of the frequency distribution for other anatomic sites (goiter, nodular

hyperplasia, myxedema and vitiligo) was significant different between two genders. A

higher percentage of male patients had smoking history than female patients (66.67%

vs. 12.10%, p < 0.0001) (Table 1).

Association between TLR gene polymorphism and disease severity

We compared the allelic and genotypic frequencies of TLR-4 and TLR-9 gene

polymorphisms in the Taiwanese GD patients, with the information regarding the

populations of Han Chinese in Beijing (HCB) and Japanese in Tokyo (JPT) extracted

from the PubMed SNP database. The TLR-4 and TLR-9 gene polymorphisms in the

Taiwanese GD patients were not statistically different from those in normal HCB and

JPT. Further, we classified the GD patients on the basis of the presence of GO

(Yes/No) in order to determine whether TLR-4 and TLR-9 genes were associated with

(13)

the GO phenotype. The results did not indicate any significant differences in the

TLR-4 and TLR-9 gene polymorphisms between the GD patients with and without

GO (Additional file 2: table S2 and additional file 3: table S3). All tested SNPs were

in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05).

Sex-specific effects of TLR gene polymorphisms on susceptibility to GO

In the present study, 52% male GD patients had GO as compared to 40% female

GD patients (p = 0.04). However, there was no sex-based difference in the genotypic

distribution of TLR-4 and TLR-9 gene polymorphisms (data not shown). Therefore,

we performed sex-stratified analyses to investigate the association between TLR gene

polymorphisms and GO phenotype in the 2 sex-based subgroups. Statistically

significant differences were observed in the allelic frequencies of 2 SNPs of the

TLR-9 gene between the male patients with and without GO but not in the female

patients (Table 2). The odds ratios (ORs) for rs187084 A G polymorphism were 2.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14–3.91) and 0.79 (95% CI = 0.57–1.08) for

the male and female patients, respectively. The p value for homogeneity test was 0.01.

For rs352140 A G polymorphism, the ORs were 1.97 (95% CI = 1.07–3.62) and 0.76 (95% CI = 0.55–1.05) for the male and female patients, respectively. The p value

for homogeneity test was 0.01. Among the male patients, increasing one G allele of

(14)

rs287084 and one A allele of rs352140 increased the risk of GO (p values for trend

tests were 0.0195 and 0.0345, respectively). Furthermore, we investigated the

association between the TLR-9 haplotype and susceptibility to GO in the male and

female patients. AG haplotype was significantly inversely associated with

susceptibility to GO (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.26–0.89), while GA haplotype was

significantly associated with a high risk of GO (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.09–3.73) in

the male patients (Table 3). However, this sex-specific association was not found in

the case of even one of the SNPs of the TLR-4 gene. Furthermore, we investigated the

association between various phenotype parameter and GO among male but no

significant association was found (Additional file 4: table S4).

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the effect of TLR-4 and TLR-9 gene

polymorphisms on the organ-specific autoimmune disease GD in a Taiwanese

population. TLR-9 polymorphisms and haplotype were significant associated with

susceptibility to GO in males. However, none of the TLR-4 and TLR-9 polymorphism

or haplotypes was associated with overall GO risk. The TLR4 is known to activate the

NF-κB and subsequent gene expression such as cytokines and adhesion molecules. A

TLR-4 polymorphism that prevents ligands binding and subsequent cellular signaling

(15)

would result in lower NF-κB activation and subsequent NF-κB-dependent

proinflammatory gene expression. However, we did not find any association between

TLR4 polymorphism and GO in present study. Low statistical power may be the

reason for this non significant results in TLR4 association in GO. For TLR9, our

results were consistent with those of the previous studies with regard to the

association between TLR9 gene polymorphisms and systemic autoimmune diseases,

such as SLE in Japan [30][28] and China [38][36]. From SLE model, Tao et al study

[30][28] found diminished expression of TLR9 could increase anti-dsDNA antibody

in SLE mice model which may increase the risk of developing autoimmune disease.

Also, it has been hypothesized that nucleic acid from dying cells may act as ligands

for TLR9 to trigger IFN-1 production in SLE [39][37]. In this study, 2 TLR-9 SNPs,

one (–1486T C, rs187084) is in the promoter region and the other (1635AG, rs352140) is in exon 2. The variation of TLR-9 gene in those region may down

regulate TLR9 expression and involved in production of autoantibodies or IFN-1

which may increase the risk of GO. Therefore, future studies are required to

investigate if variation of TLR9 gene, especially in exon region may affect TLR9

protein expression or function which increase the risk of GO.

TLR-9 polymorphisms were associated with increase the risk of GO in males in

present study. In general, GD is more common among women; however, male sex

(16)

also faces the risk of developing progressive and severe thyroid-associated

orbitopathy [4, 7][4, 7] or responds poorly to treatment [40][38]. A previous study has

reported a female to male ratio of 9.3 for patients with mild GO and of 3.2 for those

with moderate GO, with the ratio being 1.4 for patients with severe GO [4][4]. Our

data suggest that the role of TLR-9, which plays an important role in conferring innate

immunity, would be more critical in men with GO. The susceptibility factor seems to

play a different role depending on sex, or the effect could be more apparent in men

and not in women because of the difference in the basic immune responses between

the 2 sexes [41][39]. Further studies are required to investigate that if the TLR-9

activity and its potential relevance cytokines being more prone to male with GO.

As the smoking is potential confounding factor for susceptibility of GO, we

adjusted the variable of smoking history in the multivariate model to eliminate the

smoking effect on susceptibility of GO. However, the significant association between

TLR-9 gene polymorphism and susceptibility to GO in the male patients was no

changed. Furthermore, the strength association between TLR-9 polymorphism and

GO in male was modest in present study. Therefore, a larger sample sized, especially

in male population will be needed in the future study to confirm the importance of

these polymorphisms as genetic markers of GD in Taiwanese population. Furthermore,

the interpretation of our study results is limited because the patients were recruited

(17)

from Taiwan only. Studies in ethnically disparate populations are needed before firm

conclusions can be drawn.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings suggested that TLR-9 gene polymorphisms were

significantly associated with susceptibility to GO in the male GD patients in Taiwan.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

WLL carried out statistical analyses, results interpretation and drafted the manuscript.

RHC, HJL and WCC recruited and maintained the clinical information of participants.

YHL and YHT supervised genotyping experiments. LW and FJT carried out study

design and coordination and have given final approval of the version to be published.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

(18)

This study was supported by a grant from the National Science Council

(98-2320-B-039-008-MY3), Taipei, Taiwan, and a grant from the China Medical

University Hospital (DMR-93-45), Taichung, Taiwan. The author also thank Dr. Li

Tsai-Chung for her advice in the statistical analysis.

References

1. Mishra A, Mishra SK: Multicentre study of thyroid nodules in patients with Graves' disease (Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1111-13). Br J Surg 2001, 88(2):313.

2. Gianoukakis AG, Smith TJ: Recent insights into the pathogenesis and management of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2008, 15(5):446-452.

3. Anvari M, Khalilzadeh O, Esteghamati A, Esfahani SA, Rashidi A, Etemadi A, Mahmoudi M, Amirzargar AA: Genetic susceptibility to Graves'

ophthalmopathy: the role of polymorphisms in proinflammatory cytokine genes. Eye (Lond) 2010, 24(6):1058-1063.

4. Lin MC, Hsu FM, Bee YS, Ger LP: Age influences the severity of Graves' ophthalmopathy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008, 24(6):283-288.

5. Tomer Y, Huber A: The etiology of autoimmune thyroid disease: a story of genes and environment. J Autoimmun 2009, 32(3-4):231-239.

6. McGrogan A, Seaman HE, Wright JW, de Vries CS: The incidence of autoimmune thyroid disease: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008, 69(5):687-696.

7. Lim SL, Lim AK, Mumtaz M, Hussein E, Wan Bebakar WM, Khir AS:

Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical features of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy in multiethnic Malaysian patients with Graves' disease.

Thyroid 2008, 18(12):1297-1301.

8. Manji N, Carr-Smith JD, Boelaert K, Allahabadia A, Armitage M, Chatterjee

VK, Lazarus JH, Pearce SH, Vaidya B, Gough SC et al: Influences of age,

gender, smoking, and family history on autoimmune thyroid disease

phenotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006, 91(12):4873-4880.

(19)

9. Kavvoura FK, Akamizu T, Awata T, Ban Y, Chistiakov DA, Frydecka I, Ghaderi A, Gough SC, Hiromatsu Y, Ploski R et al: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 gene polymorphisms and autoimmune thyroid

disease: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007, 92(8):3162-3170.

10. Kouki T, Sawai Y, Gardine CA, Fisfalen ME, Alegre ML, DeGroot LJ:

CTLA-4 gene polymorphism at position 49 in exon 1 reduces the inhibitory function of CTLA-4 and contributes to the pathogenesis of Graves' disease. J Immunol 2000, 165(11):6606-6611.

11. Weetman AP: The genetics of autoimmune thyroid disease. Horm Metab Res 2009, 41(6):421-425.

12. Liu YH, Chen RH, Chen WC, Tsai Y, Wan L, Tsai FJ: Disease association of the CD103 polymorphisms in Taiwan Chinese Graves' ophthalmopathy patients. Ophthalmology 2010, 117(8):1645-1651.

13. Chong KK, Chiang SW, Wong GW, Tam PO, Ng TK, Hu YJ, Yam GH, Lam DS, Pang CP: Association of CTLA-4 and IL-13 gene polymorphisms with Graves' disease and ophthalmopathy in Chinese children. Invest

Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008, 49(6):2409-2415.

14. Drexler SK, Foxwell BM: The role of toll-like receptors in chronic inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010, 42(4):506-518.

15. Caturegli P, Kimura H, Rocchi R, Rose NR: Autoimmune thyroid diseases.

Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007, 19(1):44-48.

16. Fischer M, Ehlers M: Toll-like receptors in autoimmunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1143:21-34.

17. O'Neill LA: The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: 10 years of progress. Immunol Rev 2008, 226:10-18.

18. Midwood KS, Piccinini AM, Sacre S: Targeting Toll-like receptors in autoimmunity. Curr Drug Targets 2009, 10(11):1139-1155.

19. Montero Vega MT, de Andres Martin A: Toll-like receptors: a family of innate sensors of danger that alert and drive immunity. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2008, 36(6):347-357.

20. Krieg AM, Vollmer J: Toll-like receptors 7, 8, and 9: linking innate immunity to autoimmunity. Immunol Rev 2007, 220:251-269.

21. Hurst J, von Landenberg P: Toll-like receptors and autoimmunity.

Autoimmun Rev 2008, 7(3):204-208.

22. von Landenberg P, Bauer S: Nucleic acid recognizing Toll-like receptors and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol 2007, 19(6):606-610.

23. Dezsofi A, Szebeni B, Hermann CS, Kapitany A, Veres G, Sipka S, Korner A,

Madacsy L, Korponay-Szabo I, Rajczy K et al: Frequencies of genetic

(20)

polymorphisms of TLR4 and CD14 and of HLA-DQ genotypes in children with celiac disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus, or both. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008, 47(3):283-287.

24. Hur JW, Shin HD, Park BL, Kim LH, Kim SY, Bae SC: Association study of Toll-like receptor 9 gene polymorphism in Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Tissue Antigens 2005, 65(3):266-270.

25. Kang ES, Lee J: Genotypic analysis of Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile

polymorphism of Toll-like receptor 4 in systemic autoimmune diseases of Korean population. Rheumatol Int 2007, 27(9):887-889.

26. Ng MW, Lau CS, Chan TM, Wong WH, Lau YL: Polymorphisms of the toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) gene with systemic lupus erythematosus in Chinese. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005, 44(11):1456-1457.

27. Radstake TR, Franke B, Hanssen S, Netea MG, Welsing P, Barrera P, Joosten LA, van Riel PL, van den Berg WB: The Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly functional variant is associated with decreased rheumatoid arthritis disease susceptibility but does not influence disease severity and/or outcome. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50(3):999-1001.

28. Reindl M, Lutterotti A, Ingram J, Schanda K, Gassner C, Deisenhammer F, Berger T, Lorenz E: Mutations in the gene for toll-like receptor 4 and multiple sclerosis. Tissue Antigens 2003, 61(1):85-88.

29. Sheedy FJ, Marinou I, O'Neill LA, Wilson AG: The Mal/TIRAP S180L and TLR4 G299D polymorphisms are not associated with susceptibility to, or severity of, rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67(9):1328-1331.

30. Tao K, Fujii M, Tsukumo S, Maekawa Y, Kishihara K, Kimoto Y, Horiuchi T, Hisaeda H, Akira S, Kagami S et al: Genetic variations of Toll-like receptor 9 predispose to systemic lupus erythematosus in Japanese population. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66(7):905-909.

31. Urcelay E, Blanco-Kelly F, de Las Heras V, de la Concha EG, Arroyo R, Martinez A: TLR4 haplotypes in multiple sclerosis: a case-control study in the Spanish population. J Neuroimmunol 2007, 192(1-2):215-218.

32. Frazer KA, Ballinger DG, Cox DR, Hinds DA, Stuve LL, Gibbs RA, Belmont JW, Boudreau A, Hardenbol P, Leal SM et al: A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 2007, 449(7164):851-861.

33. Consortium TIH: A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 2005, 437(7063):1299-1320.

34. Project TIH: The International HapMap Project. Nature 2003,

426(6968):789-796.

(21)

35. Consortium TIH: Integrating ethics and science in the International HapMap Project. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5(6):467-475.

36. Thorisson GA, Smith AV, Krishnan L, Stein LD: The International HapMap Project Web site. Genome Res 2005, 15(11):1592-1593.

37. Jaen O, Petit-Teixeira E, Kirsten H, Ahnert P, Semerano L, Pierlot C, Cornelis F, Boissier MC, Falgarone G: No evidence of major effects in several

Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2009, 11(1):R5.

38. Xu CJ, Zhang WH, Pan HF, Li XP, Xu JH, Ye DQ: Association study of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the exon 2 region of toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) gene with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus among Chinese. Mol Biol Rep 2009, 36(8):2245-2248.

39. Ronnblom L, Eloranta ML, Alm GV: The type I interferon system in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54(2):408-420.

40. Allahabadia A, Daykin J, Holder RL, Sheppard MC, Gough SC, Franklyn JA:

Age and gender predict the outcome of treatment for Graves' hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85(3):1038-1042.

41. Senthilselvan A, Chenard L, Kirychuk S, Predicala B, Schwartz DA, Burch

LH, Rennie DC, Willson PJ, Dosman JA: Gender-Related Tumor Necrosis

Factor-alpha Responses in Naive Volunteers With Toll-Like Receptor 4

Polymorphisms Exposed in a Swine Confinement Facility. J Interferon

Cytokine Res 2009.

(22)

Table 1. Characters of Graves’ Disease Patients between Male and Female.

Male (n = 99)

Female

(n = 372) P-value

*

Ophthamology

Yes 51 (51.52) 149 (40.05)

No 48 (48.48) 223 (59.95) 0.04

Goiter

Yes 95 (95.96) 345(92.74)

No 4 (4.04) 27 (7.26) 0.25

Nodular hyperplasia

Yes 8 (8.08) 39 (10.48)

No 91 (91.92) 333 (89.52) 0.48

Myxedema

Yes 2 (2.02) 4 (1.08)

No 97 (97.98) 368 (98.92) 0.46

Vitiligo

Yes 1 (1.01) 3 (0.81)

No 98 (98.99) 369 (99.19) 0.84

Age at enrollment

mean ± SD† 40.25 (10.62) 39.81 (12.57) 0.55†

Age at diagnosis

mean ± SD† 35.69 (10.34) 34.57 (12.25) 0.16†

Smoking history

Never 33 (33.33) 327 (87.90)

Ever 66 (66.67) 45 (12.10) <0.001

Data are no. (%)

*

Chi square test.

†Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon test.

(23)

- 22 -

le 2. T h e G en ot yp e an d A ll el ic F re q u en cy o f T L R -9 S tr at if ie d b y S ex a m on g G rave s’ D is eas e P a ti en ts i n T ai w a n rs 187084 rs 352140 w it h G O w /o G O w it h G O w /o G O S N P I D N ( % ) N ( % ) P -val u e

*

O R (95% C I) N ( % ) N ( % ) P -val u e

*

O R (95% C I) ot yp e F e m al e A /A 67 ( 44.97) 89 ( 39.91) 1 A /A 12 ( 8.05) 24 ( 10.76) 0.57 ( 0.26, 1.24) A /G 71 ( 47.65) 108 ( 48.43) 0.86 ( 0.55, 1.34) A /G 66 ( 44.30) 110 ( 49.33) 0.73 ( 0.47, 1.14) G /G 11 ( 7.38) 26 ( 11.66) 0.33 0.51 ( 0.23, 1.33) G /G 71 ( 47.65) 89 ( 39.91) 0.30 1 M al e A /A 18 ( 35.29) 27 ( 56.25) 1 A /A 9 ( 17.65) 3 ( 6.25) 4.43 ( 1.04, 18.89) ** A /G 25 ( 49.02) 18 ( 37.50) 2.15 ( 0.91, 5.09) A /G 23 ( 45.10) 19 ( 39.58_ 1.70 ( 0.72, 3.99) G /G 8 ( 15.69) 3 ( 6.25) 0.08 4.53 ( 1.03, 19.91) ‡ G /G 19 ( 37.25) 26 ( 54.17) 0.11 1 P

Homogeneity Test

:0.01 P

Homogeneity Test

:0.01 el ic F e m al e A al le le 205 ( 68.79) 286 ( 64.13) 1 A al le le 90 ( 30.20) 158 ( 35.43) 0.76 ( 0.55, 1.05) G al le le 93 ( 31.21) 160 ( 35.87) 0.19 0.79 ( 0.57, 1.08) G al le le 208 ( 69.80) 288 ( 64.57) 0.14 1 M al e A al le le 61 ( 59.80) 72 ( 75.00) 1 A al le le 41 ( 40.20) 25 ( 26.04) 1.97 ( 1.07, 3.62) G al le le 41 ( 40.20) 24 ( 25.00) 0.02 2.11 ( 1.14, 3.91) G al le le 61 ( 59.80) 71 ( 73.96) 0.03 1 P

Homogeneity Test

:0.01 P

Homogeneity Test

:0.01 lue w er e d et er m ine d b y c hi -s qu ar e t es t; P va lue s l es s t ha n 0.05 w er e c ons ide re d s ig ni fi ca nt us te d f or di ag nos is a ge a nd s m oki n g hi st or y i n unc ondi ti ona l l og is ti c r eg re ss ion m ode l nd t es t i s s ig ni fi ca nt ( p va lue s = f o r t re nd t es ts w er e 0.0195 ** t re nd t es t i s s ig ni fi ca nt ( p v al ue s = f or t re nd t es ts w er e 0.03 45.

(24)

- 23 -

evi at ions : C I, conf ide nc e i nt er v al ; G O , G ra v es ’ opht ha lm opa th y ; S N P , s ing le -nuc le ot ide pol y m or phi sm ; O R , odd r at io.

(25)

- 24 -

le 3. T h e H ap lot yp e F re q u en cy of T L R -9 G en e S tr at if ie d b y S ex am on g G rav es ’ D is eas e P at ie n ts i n T ai w a n H ap lot yp e 1

*

H ap lot yp e 2

*

w it h G O w /o G O w it h G O w /o G O P I D N ( % ) N ( % ) P val u e O R ‡‡‡‡ (95% C I) N ( % ) N ( % ) P val u e O R ‡‡‡‡ (95% C I) al e F e m al e A G 203 ( 68.12) 284 ( 63.68) 0.21 1.27 ( 0.92, 1.74) G A 88 ( 29.53) 156 ( 34.98) 0.12 0.76 ( 0.55, 1.04) A G 95 ( 31.88) 162 ( 36.32) 1 N on- G A 210 ( 70.47) 290 ( 65.02) 1 e M al e A G 60 ( 58.82) 71 ( 73.96) 0.02 0.49 ( 0.26, 0.89) G A 40 ( 39.22) 24 ( 25.00) 0.03 2.02 ( 1.09, 3.73) G 42 ( 41.18) 25 ( 26.05) 1 N on G A 62 ( 60.78) 72 ( 75.00) 1 P

Homogeneity Test

:0.01 P

Homogeneity Test

:0.01 128 ( 32.00) 180 ( 33.21) 0.70 0.94 ( 0.71, 1.25) G A 263 ( 65.75) 355 ( 65.50) 0.94 1.02 ( 0.77, 1.35) G 272 ( 68.00) 362 ( 66.79) 1 N on G A 137 ( 34.25) 187 ( 34.50) 1 r o f S N P s c om pr is ing t he T L R 9 ha pl ot y pe s: r s187084 ( A /G ) a nd rs 35 1401 ( A /G ). T he h apl ot y pe s w er e i de nt if ie d b y t h e B a y si an s ta ti st ic al hod a va il abl e i n t he p rogr am P ha se 2.1. c hi -s qua re t es t ( 2 × 2 t abl e) w as p er fo rm ed t o obt ai n t he p -va lue . P v al ue s l es s t ha n 0.05 w er e cons ide re d s ig ni fi ca nt . dj us te d f or di ag nos is a ge a nd s m oke hi st or y ( eve r vs . ne ve r) i n unc ondi ti ona l l og is ti c r eg re ss ion m ode l evi at ions : C I, conf ide nc e i nt er v al ; G O , G ra v es ’ opht ha lm opa th y ; S N P , s ing le -nuc le ot ide pol y m or phi sm ; O R , odd r at io.

(26)

Additional files

Additional file 1

Title: Table S1. Power calculation using GPower 3.1 software.

Description: Power calculation using GPower 3.1 software.

Additional file 2

Title: Table S2. Genotype Frequency of TLR-4 and TLR-9 Markers for Graves’

Disease Patients in Taiwan.

Description: The results of comparisons of TLR-4 and TLR-9 genotype frequency

between the Graves’ Disease patients with and without Ophthalmopathy.

Additional file 3

Title: Table S3. Allelic Frequency of TLR-4 and TLR-9 Genes for Graves’ Disease

Patients in Taiwan.

Description: The results of comparisons of TLR-4 and TLR-9 allelic frequency

between the Graves’ Disease patients with and without Ophthalmopathy.

Additional file 4

Title: Table S4. Characters of Male Graves’ Disease Patients with Ophthalmopathy

(27)

and without Ophthalmopathy.

Description: Characters of Male Graves’ Disease Patients with and without

Ophthalmopathy.

(28)

Additional files provided with this submission:

Additional file 1: TLR sup table1_for publication.doc, 34K

http://www.biomedcentral.com/imedia/5535834964763142/supp1.doc Additional file 2: TLR sup table2_for publication.doc, 79K

http://www.biomedcentral.com/imedia/1568685463476314/supp2.doc Additional file 3: TLR sup table3_for publication.doc, 66K

http://www.biomedcentral.com/imedia/1748786361476314/supp3.doc Additional file 4: TLR sup table4_for publication.doc, 38K

http://www.biomedcentral.com/imedia/1617076595476314/supp4.doc

數據

Table 1. Characters of Graves’ Disease Patients between Male and Female.    Male  (n = 99)  Female  (n = 372)  P-value * Ophthamology  Yes  51 (51.52)  149 (40.05)  No  48 (48.48)  223 (59.95)  0.04  Goiter  Yes  95 (95.96)  345(92.74)  No  4 (4.04)  27 (7

參考文獻

相關文件

The combined immunohistochemical expression of p53 and Ki67 proteins could represent a simple and inexpensive molecular marker for early detection of potentially malignant lesions

When case 2 in the present report is compared with those cases, the common findings are symptoms in relation to the condyle, absence of suppuration in relation to the

In this case, a 16-year-old female presented with a well-demarcated radiolucent lesion of 2.5 cm di- ameter in the anterior maxillary region associated with an impacted

Exclusion criteria were: 1) Lack of initial histological diagnosis; 2) follow-up period of less than one year; 3) lesion with clinical appearance or histological findings white,

In conclusion, data from the present study demonstrat- ed that signs of carotid calcifications in panoramic radio- graphs are associated with future events of stroke and/or

A prospective study of magnetic resonance and radiographic imaging in relation to symptoms and clinical findings of the temporomandibular joint in children with juvenile

Dental variations like dens invaginatus in the upper left central incisor (Figure 5) and taurodontism in posterior molars (Figure 6) are associated with talon cusps.. On

Female zebras don’t like male zebras with lots of scars because their stripes don’t look nice.. Female zebras like male zebras with lots of scars because they are the