䌳㽌揹炷2006炸ˤ˪Ὕ㪲埴䁢㱽䫔ḴℲ烉䈡㬲Ὕ㪲埴䁢˫ˤ冢⊿烉冒䇰ˤ Tze-chien Wang (2006). Tort law II: Special Torts. Taipei: Author.
㛶䳈厗炷2009炸炻˨慓喍䳬ㆸ䈑⮰⇑冯ℙ⎴Ὕ㪲埴䁢㱽ᷳ怑䓐炼䯉姽 㘢ㄏ屉䓊㱽昊ḅᶫ⸜㮹⮰姜⫿䫔Ḽ嘇⇌㰢˩炻˪冢䀋㱽⬠暄 娴˫炻119㛇炻枩211-219ˤ
Su-Hua Lee (2009). Pharmaceutical composition patent and its application of joint torts: A short comment on Taiwan Intellectual Property Court 2008 Min-Zhuan-Su Zi No.5 Civil Decision, Taiwan Law Journal, 119, 211-219.
⏛㫋䍚炷2009炸ˤ˨⮰⇑攻㍍Ὕ㪲炷indirect infringement炸夷⭂ᷳ⇅㍊—
ℤ婾ㆹ⚳⮰⇑㱽ᾖ㬋勱㟰ᷳℏ⭡˩炻˪㘢ㄏ屉䓊㪲㚰↲˫炻130 㛇炻枩40-69ˤ
Shin-Ling Wu (2009). An introduction to indirect patent infringement- With reference to the amendment draft of the patent act of Taiwan, Intellectual Property Rights, 130. 40-69.
恙倘㘢炷叿炸炻⦂⽿㖶ᾖ妪炷2013炸ˤ˪㕘妪㮹㱽⁝䶐忂⇯炷ᶲ炸˫炻Ḵ 䇰ˤ冢⊿烉冒䇰ˤ
Tsong-Juh Chiu (Chih-Ming Jau revised) (2013). General Principles of the Law of Obligations I. Taipei: Author.
⦂⽿㖶炷2014炸ˤ˪Ὕ㪲埴䁢㱽˫炻ᾖ妪ᶱ䇰ˤ冢⊿烉⃫䄏ˤ Chih-Ming Jau (2014). Tort law, 3rd. ed., Taipei: Angel.
⬓㢖䃙炷2014炸ˤ˪㮹㱽⁝䶐䷥婾ᶲℲ˫ˤ冢⊿烉冒䇰ˤ
Sen-Yen Sun (2014). General Principles of the Law of Obligations I, rev.
ed., Taipei: Author.
昛䥱妻炷2014炸ˤ˨婾伶⚳⮰⇑㱽⺽婀Ὕ㪲ᷳ䚜㍍Ὕ㪲天ẞ--Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., 692 F.3d 1301 (Fed.
Cir. 2012)ᷳ姽㜸˩炻˪⮰⇑ⷓ˫炻17㛇炻枩70-105ˤ
Ping-Hsun Chen (2014). The direct infringement requirement of inducing infringement under the Patent Law in the United States: A comment on Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., 692 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2012), Taiwan Patent Attorneys Journal, 17, 70-105.
昛䥱妻炷2014炸ˤ˨伶⚳⮰⇑㱽䚜㍍Ὕ㪲冯⺽婀Ὕ㪲ᷳ婧ㆾ㺼⊾˩炻
˪⮰⇑ⷓ˫炻19㛇炻枩1-33ˤ
Ping-Hsun Chen (2014). The harmonization and evolution of direct infringement and inducing infringement under the Patent Law in the United States. Taiwan Patent Attorneys Journal, 19, 1-33.
∱⚳孂炷2009炸ˤ˨伶⚳⮰⇑攻㍍Ὕ㪲⮎⊁⮵ㆹ⚳⮰⇑㱽ᾖ㬋⮶ℍ攻
㍍Ὕ㪲ᷳ┇䣢˩炻˪㓧⣏㘢ㄏ屉䓊姽婾˫炻7⌟2㛇炻枩1-38ˤ Kuo-Tsan Liu (2009). A case study of indirect infringement practices in
the U.S. and some notices to the amended Patent Act in Taiwan, NCCU Intellectual Property Review, 7(2), 1-38.
嫅所㲳炷2014炸ˤ˪㘢ㄏ屉䓊㪲㱽˫炻Ḽ䇰ˤ冢⊿烉⃫䄏ˤ
Ming-Yan Shieh (2014). Intellectual Property Law, 5th. ed., Taipei:
Angel.
柷⎱㈧炷2014炸ˤ˪⮰⇑Ὕ㪲↮㜸䎮婾⍲⮎⊁˫ˤ冢⊿烉Ḽ⋿ˤ
Chi-Cheng Yen (2014). Theory and Practice of Patent Infringement Analysis. Taipei: Wunan.
‛ҷ㝴㜖扷⎕
ᷕⰙᾉ⻀炷2012炸ˤ˪䈡姙㱽˫炻2䇰ˤ㜙Ṕ烉⻀㔯➪ˤ
㯜察䚜㧡炷2013炸ˤ˨墯㔘侭̍䈡姙Ὕ⭛̬ḳ⭇ᶲ敊ᶶ̧̘̅͌⟜⎰
̯Ὕ⭛ᷣỻ̯娵⭂˩炻ᷕⰙᾉ⻀ˣ㔱喌⌂ˣ梗㛹㓷㖶䶐˪䈏 慶⇑䥳⃰䓇⁀⮧姀⾝婾㔯普烉䞍䘬屉䓋㧑㱽䎮̩㍸妨˫炻枩 104-124ˤ㜙Ṕ烉曺㜿㚠昊ˤ
䓘㛹┬ᷳ炷2005炸ˤ˨墯㔘̯Ὕ⭛侭̍䈡姙Ὕ⭛墥⑩̯㳩忂̬敊ᶶ̘
̠⟜⎰̯㎵⭛岈柵̯䬿⭂̧̬̥̅˩炻˪䞍䘬屉䓋㱽㓧䫾⬎
䞼䨞˫炻7⎟炻枩1-34ˤ
䓘㛹┬ᷳ炷2010炸ˤ˪䞍䘬屉䓋㱽˫炻5䇰ˤ㜙Ṕ烉㚱㔸敋ˤ
⎱喌⸠㚼炷䄲察ᶨ墄妪炸炷2001炸ˤ˪䈡姙㱽㤪婔˫炻13䇰ˤ㜙Ṕ烉 㚱㔸敋ˤ
㚵悐婈炷2010炸ˤ˨㓗惵䭉䎮✳̯䈡姙Ὕ⭛̧̬̥̅˩炻䇯Ⱉ劙Ḵ⃰䓇 怬㙎姀⾝婾㔯普˪䞍䘬屉䓋㱽̯㕘̘̅㳩͍˫炻枩453-472ˤ 㜙Ṕ烉曺㜿㚠昊ˤ
㜦ᶳ㬋炷2014炸ˤ˨䈡⭂̯塭伖̩䳬̀⎰̖͍̠͐㗪̬⥳̧͂䚜㍍Ὕ
⭛̩̫͌⟜⎰̬̋̒͌攻㍍Ὕ⭛̯怑䓐̧̬̥̅˩炻˪Ή;Ϋ
˫炻67⎟炷⇍ℲΉ;Ϋ12⎟炸炻枩31-44ˤ
㜦㛔慵㓷炷2000炸ˤ˪䈡姙䘢㖶̯ᾅ嬟䭬⚚˫炻㕘䇰ˤ㜙Ṕ烉㚱㔸敋ˤ 㜦䓘ὲ㱣炷2009炸ˤ˨墯㔘ᷣỻ̍敊ᶶ͌̚䈑̯䘢㖶̧̬̥̅䈡姙㧑
̯Ὕ⭛͓偗⭂̘̠ḳἳ˩炻˪Ή;Ϋ˫炻62⎟炻枩58-69ˤ 㜦⯦⫸炷2002炸ˤ˨㕡㱽䈡姙̯ⶍ䦳̯ᶨ悐̍塓⏲ẍ⢾̯侭̬͉͋
埴͍̠͐⟜⎰̬ˣ忻℟䎮婾̬͉͋ˣ䈡姙㧑Ὕ⭛͓娵̠͂ḳ ἳ(㜙Ṕ⛘⇌⸛ㆸ3.9.20) ˩炻˪⇌ἳ㗪⟙˫炻1782⎟炻枩197-201ˤ 檀㜿漵炷2014炸ˤ˪㧁㸾䈡姙㱽˫炻5䇰ˤ㜙Ṕ烉㚱㔸敋ˤ
檀悐䛇夷⫸炷2014炸ˤ˨墯㔘ᷣỻ̯敊ᶶ̩䈡姙㧑Ὕ⭛˩炻䈏慶⇑䥳䫱 䶐˪䞍䘬屉䓋姜姇⭇⊁⣏䲣炷I炸˫炻枩403-421炻㜙Ṕ烉曺㜿 㚠昊ˤ
㶳察忼䲨炷2006炸ˤ˪䞍䘬屉䓋㱽嫃佑˨1˩䈡姙㱽ί⭇䓐㕘㟰㱽ί䧖 剿㱽˫2䇰ˤ㜙Ṕ烉㚱㔸敋ˤ
㷉形炷2011炸ˤ˨䫔101㡅˩炻ᷕⰙᾉ⻀ˣ⮷㱱䚜㧡䶐炻˪㕘ί㲐妋䈡 姙㱽炷ᶳ炸˫炻枩1470-1509炻㜙Ṕ烉曺㜿㚠昊ˤ
懜㛐⮯㔯炷2014炸ˤ˨⚥⠫͓̠̿̍͌埴䁢̩䈡姙㧑̯攻㍍Ὕ⭛̯ㆸ
⏎˩炻˪Ή;Ϋ˫炻67⎟炷⇍ℲΉ;Ϋ12⎟炸炻枩116-130ˤ 懜㛐⮯㔯炷2014炸ˤ˨墯㔘⚥̬̠̿̍͌埴䁢̩䈡姙㧑Ὕ⭛̬敊͌̚
Ḱ⁁䘬侫⮇˩炻˪⎵⎌⯳⣏⬎㱽㓧婾普˫炻255⎟炻枩555-585ˤ 㧒Ⱉᷭ剛炷2012炸ˤ˨䈡姙㧑Ὕ⭛̬͉͌㎵⭛岈婳㯪̩䈡姙㱽炷䈡
姙㱽102㜉⎬枭炸˩炻⣏㶽⒚ḇ䫱䶐炻˪䈡姙姜姇炷ᶲ炸˫枩 353-397ˤ㜙Ṕ烉㮹ḳ㱽䞼䨞Ểˤ
㼖㴟ᷭ晬炷2006炸ˤ˨↮㉭̖͍̠⭇㕥埴䁢̬⮦͌̚䈡姙攻㍍Ὕ⭛夷
⭂̯怑䓐̩⓷柴䁡˩炻˪䈡姙䞼䨞˫炻41⎟炻枩5-17ˤ