Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. A.
Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural psychological and contextual influence (pp. 45-68). Hong Kong, China: Comparative Education Research Centre.
Brenner, M. E., Herman, S., Ho, H., & Zimmer, J. M. (1999). Cross-national comparison of representational competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 541-557.
doi:10.2307/749773
Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31-48. doi:10.2307/749317 Cai, J. (1995). A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical performance on
tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Monograph series 7). Reston, VA: NCTM. doi:
楊德清、鄭婷芸 幾何教材內容之分析 67
10.2307/749940
Cai, J. (2001). Improving mathematics learning: Lessons from cross-national studies of U.S. and Chinese students. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 400-404. doi:10.1177/003172170108200511 Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2013). Mathematical problem
posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57-69. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3
Cai, J., Wang, N., Moyer, J. C., & Nie, B. (2011). Longitudinal investigation of the curriculum effect:
An analysis of student learning outcomes from the LieCal project in United States.
International Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 117-136. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.06.006 Cain, J. S. (2002). An evaluation of the connected mathematics project. The Journal of Educational
Research, 95(4), 224-233. doi:10.1080/00220670209596595
Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H.-Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151. doi:10.1080/10986060903460070
Cifarelli, V. V., & Cai, J. (2005). The evolution of mathematical explorations in open-ended problem-solving situations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 302-324. doi:
10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.007
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-464). New York, NY:
Macmillan.
Connected Mathematics Program. (2009). Connected mathematics project. Retrieved from http://
connectedmath.msu.edu/
Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & Glažar, S. (2010). States of matter explanations in Slovenian textbooks for students aged 6 to 14. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 217-235.
Ding, M., & Li, X. (2010). A comparative analysis of the distributive property in U.S. and Chinese elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 146-180. doi:10.1080/
07370001003638553
Duval, R. (1995). Geometrical pictures: Kinds of representation and specific processing. In R.
Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 142-127). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/
978-3-642-57771-0_10
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at
68 幾何教材內容之分析 楊德清、鄭婷芸
China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61-75. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9069-6
Fan, L., Zhu, F., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633-646. doi:10.1007/s11858-013- 0539-x
Ginsburg, A., Leinwand, S., Anstrom, T., & Pollock, E. (2005). What the United States can learn from Singapore’s world-class mathematics system (and what Singapore can learn from the United States): An exploratory study. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED491632)
Hall, P. P. (2009). Guiding principle: Student learning: Rationale for a problem centered curriculum.
Retrieved from http://connectedmath.msu.edu/
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the
“Voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344-369.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Wagner, D. (2005). In the middle of nowhere: How a textbook can position the mathematics learner. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED496900)
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., & Jacobs, J. (2003).
Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2014). A comparison of Korean and American secondary school textbooks: The case of quadratic equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 241-263. doi:10.1007/s10649-013-9512-4
Huang, R., & Cai, J. (2011). Pedagogical representations to teach linear relations in Chinese and U.S.
classrooms: Parallel or hierarchical? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 149-165.
doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.01.003
Jones, K. (2010). Linking geometry and algebra in the school mathematics curriculum. In Z. Usiskin, K. Andersen, & N. Zotto (Eds.), Future curricular trends in school algebra and geometry:
Proceedings of a conference (pp. 203-215). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Kim, O.-K. (2007). Teacher knowledge and curriculum use. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.
com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/9/4/6/5/pages194653/p194653-1.php
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2006a). Connected mathematics: Looking for Pythagoras. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2006b). Connected mathematics: Covering and surrounding. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
楊德清、鄭婷芸 幾何教材內容之分析 69
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2006c). Connected mathematics: Shapes and designs. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Leung, F. K.-S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35-51. doi:10.1023/A:1017936429620
Leung, F. K.-S. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter?
Mathematics education in different cultural traditions－A comparative study of east asia and the west (pp. 21-46). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-387-29723-5_2
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234-241.
doi:10.2307/749754
Marascuilo, L. A. (1966). Large-sample multiple comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 65(5), 280-290.
doi:10.1037/h0023189
Michael, N. (2002, October). Inside the PISA: Comparing two high achieving countries from the west (Finland) and from the east (Japan). Paper presented in the ICMI Comparative Study Conference 2002, Hong Kong, China.
Ministry of Education in Singapore. (n.d.). Secondary education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.
gov.sg/education/secondary
Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/13/
39725224.pdf
Park, K., & Leung, F. K.-S. (2006). A comparative study of the mathematics textbooks of China, England, Japan, Korea, and the United States. In F. K.-S. Leung, K. D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions－A comparative study of East Asia and the West (New ICMI Study Series) (pp. 227-238). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.
1007/0-387-29723-5_14
Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61-66.
Rivette, K., Grant, Y., Ludema, H., & Rickard, A. (2003). Connected mathematics project: Research
70 幾何教材內容之分析 楊德清、鄭婷芸
and evaluation summary. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
SGBox. (2009). New syllabus math for 7th grade/secondary 1 package: Product benefits. Retrieved from http://www.sgbox.com/s1nsm.html
Show-Me Center. (2002). CMP implementation map. Retrieved from http://www.math.msu.edu/cmp/
Overview/ImplementationMap.htm
Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK:
Penguin.
Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith M. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F.
Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.
319-369). Gweenwich, CT: Information Age.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 12-17.
Tarr, J. E., Reys, B. J., Barker, D. D., & Billstein, R. (2006). Selecting high quality mathematic textbooks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(1), 50-54.
Tarr, J. E., Reys, R. E., Reys, B. J., Chavez, O., Shih, J., & Osterlind, S. (2008). The impact of middle grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 247-280.
Teh, K.-S., & Loh, C.-Y. (2007a). New syllabus mathematics 1 (6th ed.). Singapore City, Singapore:
Shinglee.
Teh, K.-S., & Loh, C.-Y. (2007b). New syllabus mathematics 2 (6th ed.). Singapore City, Singapore:
Shinglee.
Teh, K.-S., & Loh, C.-Y. (2008a). New syllabus mathematics 3 (6th ed.). Singapore City, Singapore:
Shinglee.
Teh, K.-S., & Loh, C.-Y. (2008b). New syllabus mathematics 4 (6th ed.). Singapore City, Singapore:
Shinglee.
Treffers, A. (1991). Realistic mathematics education in the Netherlands 1980-1990. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school (pp. 11-20). Utrecht, the Netherlands:
CD-b Press/Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL:
Academic Press.
Yang, D.-C., Reys, R. E., & Wu, L.-L. (2010). Comparing the development of fractions in the fifth-and-sixth grades’ textbook of Singapore, Taiwan, and the U.S.A. School Science and Mathematics, 110(3), 118-127. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00015.x
楊德清、鄭婷芸 幾何教材內容之分析 71
Yang, D.-C., & Wu, W.-R. (2010). The study of number sense: Realistic activities integrated into third-grade math classes in Taiwan. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(6), 379-392.
doi:10.1080/00220670903383010
Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2004, July). An analysis of the representation of problem types in Chinese and US mathematics textbooks. Paper presented at the ICME-10 Discussion Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2006). Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 609-626. doi:10.1007/
s10763-006-9036-9
72 幾何教材內容之分析 楊德清、鄭婷芸
Journal of Research in Education Sciences 2015, 60(1), 33-72
doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).02