Abbagnano, N. (1967). Positivism. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. six.
New York: MacMillan.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (1998, April). Improving scienceteachers’conceptionsof the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
Abimbola,I.O.(1983).Therelevanceofthe“new”philosophy ofscience forthescience curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 83 (3), 181-193.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’conceptionsofnatureofscience.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295-317.
Alters, B. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks forscience literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Appenbrink, D., & Hounshell, P. B. (1981). Physical science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Assessment of Performance Unit (1989). Science at age 11(and13, 15). London, H MSO.
Bentley, M. L., & Garrison, J. W. (1991). The role of philosophy of science in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2 (3), 67-71.
Birenbaum, M. & Cochy, F. J. R. C. (1996). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning process, and prior knowledge. Boston: Kluwer academic publishers.
Bombaugh, R. (1995). Peace Corps Fellows enter the urban classroom: Learning to teach by the authority of experience. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.
Boyd, R. (1991). Confirmation semantics, and the interpretation of scientific theories. In R. Boyd, P.
Gasper, & J. D. Trout (Eds.), The philosophy of science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Bronowski, J. (1965). Science and human values. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Bronowski, J. (1966). The identity of man. New York: The Natural History Press.
Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Brown, H. I. (1977). Perception, theory and commitment: The new philosophy of science. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Burbules, N. C., & Linn, M. C. (1991). Science education and philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction? International Journal of Science Education, 13, 227-241.
Burbules, N.C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. N.Y.:Teachers College,
Columbia University.
California State Board of Education. (1990). Science frame work: For California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. CA: California Department of Education.
Chiang, S. H. (1994). A study on the teaching behavior of beginner science teachers in secondary school by methods of time series analysis. Taipei, Taiwan: National Science Council.
Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 787-797.
Cleminson, A. (1990). Establishing an epistemological base for science teaching in the light of contemporary notions of the nature of science and of how children learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (5), 429-445.
Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1994). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (3rd ed.). New York: Maxwell Macmillan.
Collette, A.T., & Chiappetta, E.C. (1994). Science instruction in the middle and science school, 3, 27-47). Columbas U.S.A.:Merrill.
Cox-Petersen, A. (1999). Investigating the Nature of Science through a Museum Research
Apprenticeship Program. 「1999 科學史、哲與科學教育學術研討暨研習會」論文彙編，
62-64。高雄：國立高雄師範大學物理系。
Dana, T. M., & Davis, N. T. (1993). On considering constructivism for improving mathematics and science teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
DeBore, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice , 215-241 . Teachers College, Columbia University.
Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of the literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
Doran, R., Chan, F. & Tamir, P. (1998). Science Educator' s guide to assessment. Virginia: NSTA.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People’sImagesofScience. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Duschl, R. (1990). Restructuring science education: The role of the theories and their importance.
New York: Teachers College Press.
Duschl, R. A. (1985). Science education and philosophy of science: Twenty-five years of mutually exclusive development. School Science and Mathematics, 85 (7), 541-555.
Duschl, R. A. (1988). Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72 (1), 51-62.
Eastman, G. (1969). Scientism in science education. The Science Teacher, 36, 19-22. Eisner, E. W.
(1985). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (2nd
ed.). New York: MacMillan.
Fabricius, W. V. (1983). Piaget theory of knowledge: Its philosophical context. Human Development, 26, 325-334.
Feyerabend, P. (1970). Consolation for the specialists. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1978). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London:
Verso.
Finley, F. N. (1983). Science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 47-54.
Fleury, S. C., & Bentley, M. L. (1991). Educating elementary science teachers: Alternative conceptions of the nature of science. Teaching Education, 3 (2), 57-66.
Foster, W. G. & Heiting, A. W. (1994). Embedded assessment. Science and Children, October, 30-33.
Fredericksen, J. R. & Collins, A.(1989). A systems approach to educational testing Educational Researcher, 189, 27-32.
Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers: knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121-133.
Gallagher, J. J. (1993). Secondary science teachers and constructivist practice. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Gallagher, J. J., Parker, J., & Ngwenya, L. (1999). Embedded assessment and reform in science teaching and learning. East Lansing, MI: Michigan state University.
Garofalo, J., Lindgren, R., & Neill, T. (1992). Knowledge developed by a high school teacher participating in a physics research experience. Science Education, 76 (1), 43-50.
Garrison, J. W. (1986). Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science. Educational Researcher, 15, 12-18.
Garrison, J. W., & Bentley, M. L. (1990). Teaching scientific method: The logic of confirmation and falsification. School Science and Mathematics, 90 (3), 188-197.
Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossing. New York: Routledge.
Good, R. G., Wandersee, J. H., & Julien, J. (1993). Cautionary noteson the appealofthenew “ism”
(constructivism) in science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Gorman, M. E. (1986). Falsification in experimental and classroom simulations. School Science and Mathematics, 86 (4), 306-321.
Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035.
Hanson, N. R. (1961/1958). Patterns of discovery (2nded.). Cambridge: The University Press.
Hanson, N. R. (1977). Is there a logic of scientific discovery? In B. A. Brody (Ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Harris, K. (1979). Education and knowledge: The structured misrepresentation of reality. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hodson, D. (1985). Philosophy of science, science and science education. Studies in Science
Education, 12, 25-57.
Hodson, D. (1986). Philosophy of science and science education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 20 (2), 215-225.
Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72 , 19-40.
Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72 (1), 19-44.
Hodson, D. (1993). Teaching and learning about science: considerations in the philosophy and sociology of science. In D. Edwards, E. Scanlon, & D. West (Eds.), Teaching, learning and assessment in science education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd, The Open
University.
Hume, D. (1962). Of ideas, their origin, composition, connection, abstraction, etc. In D. G. C.
Macnabb (Ed.), A treatise of human nature, Book One. London: Fontana/Collins.
Jorgensen, M. A. & Shymansky, J. A. (1996). Assessment in science: A tool to transform teaching and learning. In J. Rohton, & P. Bowers, (Eds). Issue in Science Education, 107-113, Arlington:
NSTA.
Justi R., & Gilbert, J. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: some challenges in thecaseof‘theatom’.International Journal of Science Education, 22, 993-1009.
Kant, I. (1965). Critique of pure reason (translated by Norman Kemp Smith). New York: ST Martin Press.
Kauffman, G. B. (1989). History in the chemistry curriculum. Interchange, 20, 81-94.
Kelly, G. J., Carlsen, W. S., & Cunningham, C. M. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context: Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education, 77 (2), 207-220.
Kisiel, T., & Johnson, G. (1974). New philosophies of science in the USA. A selective Survey.
Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 5, 138-191.
Krajcik, Blumenfeld, Marx, ＆ Soloway (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In Mirstell, J. Uan Zee, E. (Eds.) Inquiry into inquiry: science learning and teaching. American Association for the Advancement of Science Press, Washington, DC. pp.283-315.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970/1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nded.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of science research programmes. In I. Lakatos,
& A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Lederman, N. G. (1983). Delineating classroom variablesrelated to students’conceptionsofthe nature of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
Lederman,N.G.(1986).Students’and teachers’understanding ofthenatureofscience:A reassessment. School Science and Mathematics, 86 (2), 91-99.
Lederman, N. G. (1996). The nature of science: Instructional implications for a process more
tentative than products. Paper presented at National Association for Research in Science Teaching. St.Lous, MO.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Loving, C. C. (1997). From the summit of truth to its slippery slopes: Science education journey through positivist-postmodern territory. American Educational Research Journal, 34 (3), 421-452.
Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: historical perspectives and contemporary teaching. In K. Tobin & B. Fraser(Eds.), International handbook of science
education ,249-262.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Matthews, M. R. (1998). How history and philosophy in the US Science Education Standards could have promoted multidisciplinary teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 285-293.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational Measurement (3rded.) (pp.13103 ).
New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
Messick, S.(1992). Validity of test interpretation and use. In M. C. Alkin(Ed.), Encyclepedia of educational research, (pp. 1487-1495). New York: Macmillan.
Miller, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-42.
Milne, C., & Taylor,P.C.(1995).Metaphorsasglobalmarkersforteachers’beliefsaboutthe nature of science. Research in Science Education, 25 (1), 39-49.
Moyer, R., & Bishop, J. (1986). General science. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Murcia, K., & Schibeci, R. (1999). Primary studentteachers’conceptionsofthenatureofscience. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1123-1140.
National Research Council (1996). Naional Science Education Standards. Washington DC:
National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1994). National science education standards: A draft. Washington, DC:
National Research Council.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (1989). Conceptual change in science and in science education. Synthese, 80, 163-183.
Nott, M., & Wellington, J.J. (1997). Producing the evidence: science teachers’initiations into practical work. Research in science Education, 27(3), 395-409.
Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: philosophical perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 530-540.
Palmeri, A. B. (1995). The consistency between second-gradeteachers’beliefstoward scienceand their science teaching practice. Doctoral Dissertation: Indiana University.
Petersen-Falshoft, G. (1979). Philosophy of science and didactics (Henn, Kastellaun). In German.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press.
Popham, W. J. (1997). What's wrong--and what's right--with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55 (2), 72-75.
Popper, K. R. (1968). Conjectures and refutations in the growth of scientific knowledge. New York:
Harper Torchbooks.
Puckett, M. B., & Black, J.K.(1994). Authentic assessment of the young child celebrating development and learning. New York：Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Roth, W. M. (1993). Construction sites: Science labs and classrooms. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science: knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sax, G. (1989). Principles of Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation (3rded.).
Belmont, CA: Wad- sworth.
Shapere, D. (1987). Method in the philosophy of science and epistemology: How to inquire about inquiry and knowledge. In N. J. Nersessian (Ed.), The process of science: Contemporary philosophical approaches to understanding scientific practice. Netherlands: Dordrecht.
Shaw, K. L., & Etchberger, M. L. (1993). Transitioning into constructivism: A vignette of a fifth grade teacher. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education.
Washington: AAAS Press.
Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (10), 1101-1103.
Stake, R. E., & Easley, J. A. (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, IL: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois.
Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education.
Science Education, 78 (4), 387-398.
Stenhouse, D. (1985). Active philosophy in education and science. Boston, MA: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Stone, L. (1992). Postpositivist teaching; beyond the myth of prediction. Paper presented at the 1992 JUSTEC conference. Tamagawa University, Tokyo.
Terhart, E. (1988). Philosophy of science and school science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (1), 11-16.
Tombari, M., & Borich, G.(1999). Authentic assessment in the classroom ：Applicationa and practice. New Jersey：Prentice Hall.
Toulmin, S. E. (1953). The philosophy of science: An introduction. London: Hutchinson &
Company, Ltd.
Toulmin, S. E. (1985). Pluralism and responsibility in post-modern science. Science, Technology
and human values, 10 (1), 28-37.
Treagust,D.F.,Duit,R.,& Fraser,B.J.(1996).Overview:Research on students’preinstructional conceptions -- the driving force for improving teaching and learning in science and
mathematics. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. New York, London: Teachers College Press, Teachers College Columbia University.
Wang, H. C. A. (1999). A content analysis of the history of science in the national science
standards documents and four secondary science textbooks. 「1999 科學史、哲與科學教育 學術研討暨研習會」論文彙編，57-61。高雄：國立高雄師範大學物理系。
Wang, J. R. (1995). A casestudy:An investigation ofteachers’conceptionsofthenatureofscience, science teaching and learning, classroom practices, and other contextual matters. Doctoral Dissertation: University of Northern Colorado.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment. San Francisco:
Woolnough, B., & Allsop, T. (1985). Practical work in science. London: Cambridge University Press.
Yager, R. E. (1990). Workshop Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education.
Science Education Center, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, R. O. C.
Yager, R. E. (1994). Science-Technology-Society as Reform. Science Education Center, The University of Iowa City, JA. U. S. A.