林志宜（2009）。建構小五學生 Google 地球地圖學習情境：以活動理論為架構之研究。
淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
【Lin, C.-Y. (2009). Research on constructing a Google Earth Map learning environment for 5th grade students: Applying activity theory as a framework. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
林怡君（2010）。從活動理論觀點研究臺灣中學跨國協作交流計畫。國立臺灣科技大學 應用外語系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
【Lin, Y.-C. (2010). Investigating the implementation of an international e-learning platform at a high school in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.】
林郁婷（2010）。以活動理論檢視三位中學英語教師對於資訊融入教學的理念與實踐。
國立交通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
【Lin, Y.-T. (2010). An activity theory perspective to examine three secondary school English teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology integration. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.】
唐昇志（2002）。以活動理論為架構分析網路主題式學習活動。國立花蓮師範學院教育 研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮市。
【Tang, S.-C. (2002). Using activity theory as framework to analyze activities of web-based thematic learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Dong Hwa University Meilun Campus, Hualien, Taiwan.】
張淑玲（2005）。合作成長小組促進國小教師數學教學知能與反思能力成長之探討。國 立臺灣師範大學數學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
【Chang, S.-L. (2005). Investigations into the growth of elementary school teacher’s mathematics teaching competence and reflection under the operation of co-development group. Unpublished doctoral of dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
黃志賢、林福來（2008）。利用活動理論分析臺灣泰雅族國中生的數學學習並設計教學 活動。科學教育學刊，16（2），147-169。
【Huang, C.-H., & Lin F.-L. (2008). The analysis of the learning of Taiwanese Tayal junior high school students and the design of teaching activities utilizing activity theory. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 16(2) , 147-169.】
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。
【Chen, C.-M. (2002). Qualitative research in Social Science. Taipei, Taiwan: Wunan.】
陳宏維（2010）。以活動理論探討兩位臺灣大學英文寫作老師教學信念及實施。國立交 通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
【Chen, H.-W. (2010). A case study on two Taiwanese EFL college writing teachers’ beliefs and teaching practices: An activity theory perspective. Unpublished master’s thesis, National
Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.】
陳佩英、焦傳金（2009）分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構：一所高中教學創新計畫的 個案研究。教育科學研究集刊，54（1），55-86。
【Chen, P.-Y., & Chiao, C.-C. (2009). Distributed leadership and professional learning community: A case study of innovative teaching in a high school. Journal of Educational Research, 54(1), 55-86.】
鄭燕祥（2004）。教育領導與改革：新範式。臺北市：高等教育。
【Cheng, Y.-C. (2004). Educational leadership and reform: New paradigm. Taipei, Taiwan:
Higher Education.】
鄭燕祥（2006）。教育範式轉變：效能保證。臺北市：高等教育。
【Cheng, Y.-C. (2006). Paradigm shift in education: Effectiveness assurance. Taipei, Taiwan:
Higher Education.】
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與運用。臺北市：心理。
【Pan, S.-F (2003)。Qualitative research: Theory and application. Taipei, Taiwan:
Psychological.】
劉宜汶（2010）。部落格為中介行為之教師發展。國立交通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，
未出版，新竹市。
【Liu, Y.-W. (2010). Blogging as mediated actions in teacher development. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.】
Ahonen, H., & Virkkunen, J. (2003). Shared challenge for learning: Dialogue between management and front-line workers in knowledge management. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 2(1–2), 59-84.
Albrow, M. (1990). Globalization, knowledge and society. London: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1998). Reorganizing the motivational sphere of classroom culture: An activity-theoretical analysis of planning in a teacher team. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 76-105). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge
creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H., & Kajamaa, A. (2007). Beyond discontinuity: Expansive orgamizational learning remembered. Management Learning, 38(3), 319-336.
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1-24.
Fenwick, T. J. (2004). Learning in portfolio work: Anchored innovation and mobile identity.
Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 229-245.
FitzSimons, G. E. (2003). Using Engeström’s expansive learning framework to analyze a case study in adult mathematics education. Literacy & Numeracy Studies, 12(2), 47-63.
Foot, K. (2001). Cultural–historical activity theory as practical theory: Illuminating the development of a conflict monitoring network. Communication Theory, 11(1), 56-83.
Ford, D. (1991). The school principal and Chicago school reform: Principal’s early perceptions of reform initiatives. Chicago: Chicago Panel on Public school Policy and Finance.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London:
Routledge.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changer times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.
Harris, A., & Bennett, N. (Eds.). (2004). School effectiveness and school improvement. New York: Continuum.
Hill, R., Capper, P., Wilson, K., Whatman, R., &Wong, K. (2007). Workplace learning in the New Zealand apple industry network: A new co-design method for government “practice making”. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(6), 359-376.
Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.
Kazlauskas, A., & Crawford, K. (2007). Learning what is not yet there: Knowledge mobilization in a communal activity. Learning and socio-cultural theory: Exploring modern Vygotskian
perspectives international workshop, 1(1). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/llrg/vol1/
iss1/8
Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S. & Bryk, A. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis, S. Kruse, & Associates (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 1-22). Long Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Langemeyer, I. (2006). Contradictions in expansive learning: Towards a critical analysis of self-dependent forms of learning in relation to contemporary socio-technological change.
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 7(1). Retrieved August 10, 2010, from http://www.
qualitative-research.net/fqs/
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (2000). Changing leadership for changing times.
Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Llewellyn, D. (2005). Teaching high school science through inquiry: A case study approach.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Makino, Y. (2007). The third generation of e-learning: Expansive learning mediated by a weblog.
International Journal of Web Based Communities, 3(1), 16-31.
Murphy, J. (1994). Transformational change and the evolving role of the principal: Early empirical evidence. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship:
Insights from transformational reform efforts (pp. 3-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Miettinen, R. (1999). Transcending traditional school learning: Teachers’ work and networks of learning. In Y. Engeström, R. Mittinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 325-344). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Pereira-Querol, M., & Seppanen, L. (2009). Learning as changes in activity systems: The emergence of on-farm biogas production for carbon credits. Outlook on Agriculture, 38(2), 147-155.
Sannino, A. (2005). Cultural-historical and discursive tools for analyzing critical conflicts in students’ development. In K. Yamazumi, Y. Engeström, & H. Daniels (Eds.), New learning
challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work (pp. 165-195).
Osaka, Japan: Kansai University Press.
Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutierrez, K. D. (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one.
Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258.
Toiviainen, H. (2007). Inter-organizational learning across levels: An object-oriented approach.
Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(6), 343-358.
Virkkunen, J., & Ahonen, H. (2004).Transforming learning and knowledge creation on the shop floor. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 4(1), 57-72.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., & Haudenschild, M. T. (2009). Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 507-517.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., & Smaldino, S. (2007). Using activity theory to evaluate and improve K-12 school and university partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 364-380.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.