• 沒有找到結果。

王宜燕(2012)。〈閱聽人研究實踐轉向理論初探〉,《新聞學研究》,113: 39-75。

李明穎(2012)。〈網路潛水者的公民參與實踐之探索:以「野草莓運動」為 例〉,《新聞學研究》,112: 77-116。

杜小真(1997)。《勒為那斯》,台北:遠流。

林志隆、王郁文(2005)。〈南區國小初級資訊種子教師創新接受度與資訊科技融 入教學關注之相關研究〉,《屏東教育大學學報》,24: 107-146。

東森新聞雲(2014 年 3 月 30 日)。〈林飛帆:留下周圍 7 人聯絡方式 排好班表 到國會報到〉。取自ETToday 東森新聞雲網頁

http://www.ettoday.net/news/20140330/340908.htm

胡元輝(2014 年 4 月 11 日)。〈另類公共領域的美好戰役—318 占領國會運動中

的獨立與公民媒介〉。《卓越新聞獎基金會傳媒與教育電子報》,第 268

期。取自http://www.feja.org.tw/modules/news007/article.php?storyid=1444 陳婉琪(2015 年 06 月 30 日)。〈誰來「學運」?太陽花學運靜坐參與者的基本人

口圖象〉,取自巷仔口社會學網頁網頁

http://twstreetcorner.org/2014/06/30/chenwanchi-2/

郭奕伶(2013.01.17a)。〈抱歉,1313 期《商業周刊》在 7-11 缺席了!〉,《商 業周刊》。 取自

251 期。取自 http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5042484 熊凱文、魏浩翔、紀明德(2014)。〈社群媒體資訊傳播之視覺化—以 Facebook 分

享為例〉,發表於「甲午年第廿二屆計算機圖學研討會」。台北市:國立臺 北科技大學。

網易科技(2011 年 2 月 9 日)。〈Facebook 在香港設辦事處 拓展中國廣告業 務〉,取自網易科技網頁

http://tech.163.com/11/0209/10/6SEPANCK000915BF.html

劉欣飴(2009)。〈以社會能供性觀點探討資訊科技認知對合作意願影響之研 究〉,《資訊社會研究》,16: 89-135。

劉致昕(2013 年 10 月 8 日)。〈用「鄉民」更新政府,是時候了〉,取自獨立評 論@天下網頁 http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/187/article/657

劉慧雯(2014)。〈「網友」作為消息來源:探討數位時代中電視新聞製作的實質

Andsager, J. L., & White, H. A. (2007). Self versus others: Media, messages, and the third-person effect. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Alasuutari, P. (Ed.). (1999). Rethinking the media audience. London, UK: Sage.

Allen, R. C. (1987). Channel of discourse: Television and contemporary criticism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

Ang, I (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London, UK: Methuen & Co. Ltd.

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization.

Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Balasubramaniam, N. (2009). User-generated content. In F. Michahelles (Ed.), Business aspects of the internet of things. Zürich, SZ: ETH Zurich.

Best, K. (2009). When mobiles go media: Relational affordances and present-to-hand digital devices. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35, 397-414

Bociurkiw, M. (2001.09.10). Revolution by cell phone. Forbes, 10 September, 2001.

Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/asap/2001/0910/028.html

Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues on framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246-263.

boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.

Bradner, E. (2001). Social affordances of computer-mediated communication technology:

Understanding adoption. Doctoral Consortium, CHI 2001 (March 31-April 5, 2001). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=634111

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1994). Borderline issues: Social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction. 9, 3-36.

Bruns, A. (2007). Produsage: Towards a broader framework for user-led content creation.

Paper presented at Proceedings Creativity and Cognition 6, Washington, DC.

Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/6623/1/6623.pdf

Brunsdon, C. (1989). Text and the audience. In E. Seiter, et al. (Eds.), Remote control:

Television, audiences, and cultural power (pp. 116-129). New York, NY:

Routledge.

Brunsdon, C., & Morley, D. (1978). Everyday television: ‘Nationwide’. London, UK:

British Film Institute.

Castells, M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society and culture Volume II: Power of identity. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Centola, D. (2011). An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science, 334, 1269-1272.

Couldry, N. (2004). Theorizing media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132.

Crawford, D. (2004). Editorial pointers. Communication of ACM-The blogosphere, 47(12), 5-8.

Dant, P. (2005). Materiality and society. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

De Armond, P. (2000.02.29). Black flag over Seattle.’ Storming Seattle. Retrieved from http://www.monitor.net/monitor/seattlewto/index.html

Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1005). Me, us and them: Political identification and the third-person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 195-215.

Edunov, S., Diuk, C., Filiz, I. O., Bhagat, S., & Burke, M. (2016.02.04). Three and a half degrees of separation. Retrieved from:

https://research.facebook.com/blog/three-and-a-half-degrees-of-separation/?pnref=

story

Edwards, T. (2000). Contradictions of consumption: Concepts, practices and politics in consumer society. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

El-Bizri, N. (2006). Uneasy meditations following Levinas. Studia Phaenomenologica, 6, 293-315.

eMarketer (2013). eMarketer in review—Key 2013 trends, coverage areas and platform growth. eMarketer. Retrieved from

http://www.emarketer.com/newsroom/index.php/emarketer-review-key-2013-trends-coverage-areas-platform-growth/

Fiske, H. (1989). Reading the popular. London, UK: Unwin Hyman Ltd.

Fokkema, D. W., & Ibsch, E. (1987). Theories of literature in the twentieth century:

Structuralism, Marxism, aesthetics of reception, Semiotics. New York, NY: St.

Martin’s Press.

Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111-129.

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17-40). Hilladale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gerbner, George. (2009). Cultivation Theory. In Michael Ryan, A first look at communication theory (7th Ed.) (pp. 353-354). New York, NY: Frank Mortimer.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA:

Houghton Mifflin Company.

Gillmor, D. (2006). We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people.

Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Global Web Index (2014, Q2). GWI Social Q3 2014: GlobalWebIndexs’s quarterly report on the latest trends in social networking. Retrieved from

http://www.slideshare.net/globalwebindex/globalwebindex-social-q1-summary-report

Gray, A. (1999). Audience and reception research in retrospect: The trouble with audiences. In P. Allasuutari (Ed.), Rethinking the media audience: The new agenda (pp. 22-37). London, UK: Sage.

Gunther, A. C., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasion effects of product commercials and public service announcement: Third-effects in new domains.

Communication Research, 19, 574-596.

Hall, S. (1973). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.) (2005) Culture, media, language (pp. 117-127). New York, NY: Routledge.

Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997) Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practice.

London, UK: Sage Publications & Open University.

Hartley, J. (2010) The Uses of digital literacy. Queensland, AU: The University of Queensland Press.

Hermida, A., & Thurman, N. (2008). A clash of cultures: The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 343-356.

Hoorens, V., & Ruiter, S. (1996). The optimal impact phenomenon: Beyond the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 599-610.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifework: From garden to earth. Bloomington, IN:

Indiana University Press.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. Cambridge.

MA: MIT Press.

Katz, E. J., Blumler, G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973-1974). Uses and gratifications research.

The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.

Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How today’s internet is killing our culture. New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.

Keren, M. (2006). Blogosphere: The new political arena. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Lasswell, H. (1927). Propaganda technique in the world war. Cambridge, MS: MIT Press.

Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Leadbeater, C. (2007). We think: Why mass creativity is the next big thing. Retrieved from

http://charlesleadbeater.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/We-Think-charles-full-draft.pdf

Leavis, F. R., & Thompson, D. (1933). Culture and environment: The training of critical awareness. London, UK: Chatto & Windus.

Levinas, M. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on Exteriority. (A. Lingis, Trans.) Pittsburgh, PA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and Duquesne University Press.

(Original work published 1961)

Levinas, M. (1991). Otherwise than being or beyond essence. (A. Lingis, Trans.) Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (Original work published 1974) Levinas, M. (1998). Entre nous: On thinking-of-the-other. (M. Smith & B. Harshav,

Trans.). London, UK: The Athlone Press. (Original work published 1991)

Levinson, P. (1999). Digital McLuhan: A guide to the information millennium. New York, NY: Routledge.

Livingstone, S. M. (1988). Why people watch soap opera: An analysis of the explanation of British viewers. European Journal of Communication. 3(1), 55-80.

Liu, H. (2015). 〈「互動」所揭露的〉,「Huiwen Liu(臉書帳號)」。上網日期:

2015 年 8 月 11 日,取自 https://www.facebook.com/notes/huiwen-liu/互動所揭 露的/10153122687879925?pnref=lhc

Lull, J. (1990). Inside family viewing. London, UK: Hutchinson.

Martens, H. (2010). Evaluating media literacy education: Concepts, theories and future directions. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2(1), 1-22.

McGrath, B. (2006.10.13). It should happen to you: The anxieties of YouTube fame. New Yorker. Retrieved from

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/10/16/061016fa_fact

McLeod, D. M., Detenber, B. H., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for the self and others. Journal of Communication, 51, 678-695.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York, NY:

McGrew-Hill.

McLuhan, M. (2002). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto, Ont: University of Toronto Press.

Meyer, G. (2004). Diffusion methodology: Time to innovate? Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 9(S1), 61.

Morley, D. (1992). Television audiences and cultural studies. London, UK: Routledge.

Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Parkin, F. (1968). Middle class radicalism. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

Paulussen, S., & Ugille, P. (2008). User generated content in the newsroom: Professional and organizational constrains on participatory journalism. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 5(2), 24-41.

Perloff, R. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In J.

Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research.

(pp. 252-268). New York, NY: Routledge.

Pichardo, N. A. (1997). New social movements: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 411-430.

Postigo, H. (2003). Emerging sources of labor on the internet: The case of America online volunteers. International Review of Social History, 48(1), 205-223.

Quan-Haase, A. & Wellmam, B. (2005). Local virtuality in an organization: Implications for community of practice. In P. van den Besselaar; G. De Michelis; J. Preece, &

C. Simone (Eds.) Community and technologies 2005 (pp. 215-238). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.

Rafael, V. L. (2003). The cell phone and the crowd: Messianic politics in the contemporary Philippines. Public Culture, 15(3), 399-425.

Reese, S. D., Routigliano, L., Hyun, K., & Jeong, J. (2007). Mapping the blogosphere professional and citizen-based media in the global news arena. Journalism, 8(3), 235-261.

Rheingold, H. (1996). Virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier.

Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Rheingold, H. (2003). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.

Ronfeldt, D., & Arquilla, J. (2001, January). Networks, netwars, and the fight for the future. First Monday, 6(1). Retrieved from:

http://www.firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/889/798 Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.), New York, NY: Free Press.

Salanick, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.

Sawhney, H. (1996). Information superhighway: Metaphor as midwives. Media, Culture and Society, 18(2), 291-314.

Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20.

Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations.

New York, NY: Penguin Books.

Sokolowski, R. (2008). Phenomenology of the human person. New York, NY: Routledge.

Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system.

Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 115-134.

Tapscoutt, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York, NY: Portfolio Trade.

Tiedge, J. T., Sliverblatt, A., Havice, M. J., & Rosenfeld, R. (1991). Discrepancy between perceived first-person and perceived third-person mass media effects. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 141-154.

Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41-58.

Vickery, G., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2007). Participative web: User-generated content:

Web 2.0 wikis and social networking. Paris, FR: OECD.

Volosinov, V. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York, NY: Seminar Press.

Wear, A. (2008). Innovation and community strength in Provincial Victoria. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 14(2), 195.

Weaver, S. D., & Gahegan, M. (2007). Constructing, visualization, and analyzing a digital footprint. Geographical Review, 97(3), 324-350.

Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., & Hampton, K. (2003). The social affordances of the internet for networked individuals. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(3). Retrieved from

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x/full

Ethical Audience: Theorizing Social Media Users

相關文件