朱淑娟（2010a）。〈體檢中科三期健康風險專家會議〉，《環境報導—我還會留在地球》，
Blogger。http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_19.html。2012/9/5。
(Shu-juan Chu [2010a]. “Reviewing CTSP III Health Risk Assessment Expert Meeting.”
Environmental Report. http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_19.html [accessed September 5, 2012].)
（2010b）。〈未納入后里既存風險，中科三期環評初審過關〉，《環境報導—我還會 留在地球》，Blogger。http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_9588.html。
2012/9/5。
( [2010b]. “Not Including Houli’s Existing Risk, The CTSP III EIA Preliminary Review Is Approved” Environmental Report. http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_9588.
html [accessed September 5, 2012].)
（2010c）。〈環評委員噤聲，中科三期環評大會過關〉，《環境報導—我還會留在地 球》，Blogger。http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_31.html。2012/9/5。
( [2010c]. “The EIA Committee Silenced, The CTSP III EIA Review Passed.”
Environmental Report. http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_31.html [accessed September 5, 2012].)
行政院環境保護署（2008）。《行政院環保署未管制污染物健康風險評估諮詢作業規範》
（環署毒字第0970103180號函）。台北：行政院環境保護署。
(Environmental Protection Administration [2008]. EPA Non-regulated Pollutants Health Risk Assessment Consultation Guidline [Environmental Protection Administration Department of Environmental Sanitation & Toxic Substance Document No.0970103180]. Taipei:
Environmental Protection Administration.)
（2009）。《六輕相關計畫之特定有害空氣污染物所致健康風險評估」專家會議議事 說明》（環署綜0980057269號函）。台北：行政院環境保護署。
( [2009]. 6th Naphtha-cracking Plant Certain Air Pollutant Caused Health Risk Assessment Expert Meeting Guideline [Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning Document No.0980057269]. Taipei: Environmental Protection Administration.)
（2010a）。《彰化縣西南角（大城）海埔地工業區計畫環境影響評估報告書初稿」及
「彰化縣西南角（大城）海埔地工業區工業專用港開發計畫環境影響評估報告書初 稿」案之「健康風險評估」議題專家會議第3次延續會議紀錄》（環署綜0990103954 號）。台北：行政院環境保護署。
( [2010a]. Da Cheng Industrial Park EIA Report: 3rd Extended Expert Meeting Minutes [Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning Document No.0990103954]. Taipei: Environmental Protection Administration.)
臺灣民主季刊
（2010b）。《「中部科學工業園區第三期發展區（后里基地—七星農場部分）開 發計畫環境影響說明書」之「健康風險評估」專家會議延續會議紀錄》（環署綜 0990076500號）。台北：行政院環境保護署。
( [2010b]. CTSP Stage III EIA Report: Health Assessment Report Extended Expert Meeting Minutes [Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning Document No.090076500]. Taipei: Environmental Protection Administration.)
（2010c）。《我國環境風險評估之公眾參與和專家代理機制探討（環保署委託計 畫報告EPA-099-E101-02-220）》，行政院環境保護署。http://epq.epa.gov.tw/project/
projectcp.aspx?proj_id=0997827713。2012/9/5。
( [2010c]. Research on Public Participation and Expert Representation Mechanism in Environmental Risk Assessment Process [Environmental Protection Administration Department of Document No. EPA-099-E101-02-220]. [accessed September 5, 2012].) 行政院環境保護署綜計處（2009）。〈澄清事實，不是打壓—環保署回應「籲請環保署勿
濫用行政資源打壓環保團體《聯合聲明》〉，《環保新聞專區》，行政院環境保護 署。http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?InputTime=0980720181521。
2012/9/5/。
(Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning [2009] “Fact Clarification: EPA’s Reponse to the Joint Statement of Enviornmental Groups,” News Posting “Newsletter 2009.7.20.” Environmental Protection Administration. http://ivy5.epa.
gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?InputTime=0980720181521 [accessed September 5, 2012].)
（2011a）。〈環保署澄清健康風險評估的方法論討論會不是環評審查會〉，《環保新 聞專區》，行政院環境保護署。http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?inputti me=1000325210651。2012/9/5。
( [2011a] “Clarification: Risk Assessment Methodology Discussion Meeting is not EIA Meeting.” News Posting. Environmental Protection Administration. http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/
enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?inputtime=1000325210651 [accessed September 5, 2012].) （2011b）。〈環保署說明「健康風險評估方法論—以國光石化為例」討論會議
結果〉，《環保新聞專區》，行政院環境保護署。http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_
Newsdetail.asp?InputTime=1000415124555。2012/9/6。
( [2011b] “EPA Statement on Risk Assessment Method Discussion Meeting.” News Posting.
Environmental Protection Administration. http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.
asp?InputTime=1000415124555 [accessed September 6, 2012].)
汪浩（譯）、Beck, Ulrich（原著）（2004）。《風險社會—通往下一個現代的路上》。台北，
巨流。
(Beck, Ulrich [2004]. Hao Wang [trans.]. Risikogesellschaft-Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne.
Taipei: Chu Liu Book Company.)
杜文苓（2009）。〈高科技汙染的風險論辯—環境倡議的挑戰〉，《台灣民主季刊》，第6卷，
第4期，頁101-139。
(Wen-ling Tu [2009]. “The Risk Debates on High-Tech Pollution: A Challenge to Environmental Advocacy.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4:101-39)
（2011）。〈環境風險與科技政治—檢視中科四期環評爭議〉，《東吳政治學報》，第 29卷，第2期，頁57-110。
( [2011]. “Environmental Risks and Policy Making: Examining the EIA Controversies of CTSP-IV.” Soochow Journal of Political Science, Vol. 29, No. 2:57-110)
杜文苓、施麗雯、黃廷宜（2007）。〈風險溝通與民主參與—以竹科宜蘭基地之設置為 例〉，《科技、醫療與社會》，第5卷，頁71-107。
(Wen-ling Tu, Li-wen Shih,and Ting-yi Huang [2007]. “Public Participation Deliberative Democracy Risk Risk Communication Hsin-chu Science-based Industrial Park in I-lan.”
Taiwanese Journal for Studies of Science, Technology and Medicine, Vol. 5:71-107) 林崇熙（2011年）。〈不負責任的知識—對環境評估的知識論考察〉。臺灣科技與社會研究
學會第三屆年會「風險社會的公民科技素養」論文。台北：國立陽明大學，5月21-22 日。
(Chong-si Lin [2011]. “Irresponsible Knowledge: Examining EIA’s Epistemology” Paper presented in Symposium on 13th Taiwan Science, Technology and Society Association. Taipei:
National Yang Ming University, May 21-22.)
周桂田（2002）。〈在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口—遲滯型高科技風險社會〉，《台灣社會研 究》，第45期，卷89-129。
(Kuei-tien Chou [2002]. “The Theoretical and Practical Gap of Glocalizational Risk Delayed High-tech Risk Society.” Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, Vol. 45:89-129.) （2004）。〈獨大的科學理性與隱沒（默）的社會理性之「對話」—在地公眾、科學
專家與國家的風險文化探討〉，《台灣社會研究》，第56期，頁1-63。
( [2004]. “ ‘Dialogue’ between Monopolistic Scientific Rationality and Tacit (Submerged) Social Rationality: A Discussion of Risk Culture between Local Public, Scientists, and the State.” Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, Vol. 56:1-63.)
（2005）。〈爭議性科技之風險溝通—以基因改造工程為思考點〉，《生物科技與法律 研究通訊》，第18期，頁42-50。
( [2005]. “Risk Communication in the Disputed Technology: Example of Genetic Engineering.” Bio-Technology and Law Research Newsletter, Vol. 18:42-50.)
胡慕情（2010）。〈讓專家們進退維谷的環評「專家會議」〉。《公視新聞議題中心》，公視新 聞網。http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=7090。2012/9/5。
(Mu-ching Hu [2010]. “Expert in Dilemma in the Expert Meeting” Public Television Service News Network. Public Television Service News Network. http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=7090 [accessed September 5, 2012].)
臺灣民主季刊
單厚之（2010）。〈沈世宏：六輕十年，雲林人更長命〉，中國時報，A16版。
(Hou-chi Shan [2011]. “EPA Director: Yunlin People Have Longer Life, 10 Years After 6th Naphtha-cracking Plant Operated” China Times, November 12:A16.)
詹順貴（2010）。〈中科三期專家會議大騙局〉，《玉山週報》。http://www.formosamedia.
com.tw/weekly/post_1534.html。2012/9/6。
(Shun-kui Chan [2010]. “The Hoax of the CTSP III Expert Meeting” Jade Mountain Weekly. http://
www.formosamedia.com.tw/weekly/post_1534.html [accessed September 6, 2012].) 廖靜蕙（2010）。〈莊秉潔：國光運轉後，每年死亡人數增加1,356人〉，《環境資訊中心》。
http://e-info.org.tw/node/60932。2012/9/5。
(Jing-hui Liao [2010]. “Professor Chung: The Death Number Will Increase 1,356 Annually if Kuokuang Petrochemical Operates”, Taiwan Environmental Information Center. http://
e-info.org.tw/node/60932 [accessed September 5, 2012].)
鐘聖雄、胡慕情（2011）。〈青年擋國光，第四次專案小組慘勝〉，《公視新聞議題中心》，，《公視新聞議題中心》，公視新聞議題中心》，
公視新聞網。http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=20244。2012/9/5。
(Sheng-hsiung Chong and Mu-ching Hu [2011]. “The Youth Stop Kuokuang and Barely Win in the 4th EIA Preliminary Meeting” Public Television Service News Network, Taiwan. http://pnn.
pts.org.tw/main/?p=20244 [accessed September 5, 2012.)
Ascher, William, Toddi Steelman, and Robert Healy (2010). “The Generation of Policy-relevant Environmental Knowledge.” In William Ascher, Toddi Steelman, and Robert Healy (eds.) Knowledge and Environmental Policy: Reimagining the Boundaries of Science and Politics (pp. 27-60). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Bucchi, Massimiano and Federico Neresini (2007). “Science and Public Participation.” In Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman (eds.) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 448-72). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Corburn, Jason (2005). Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice.
Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Davis, D. Lee (2002). When Smoke Ran Like Water: Tales of Environmental Deception and the Battle Against Pollution. New York: Basic Books.
De Boer, Martin, Mary McCarthy, Mary Brennan, Alan Kelly, and Christopher Ritson (2005).
“Public Understanding of Food Risk Issues and Food Risk Messages on the Island of Ireland: The View of Food Safety Expert.” Journal of Food Safety, Vol. 25, No.4:241-65.
Funtowicz, O. Silvio and Jerome R. Ravetz (1992). “Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-normal Science.” In Sheldon Krimsky and Dominic Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk (pp. 251-73). Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
Hinchliffe, Steve (2001). “Indeterminacy In-Decisions: Science, Policy and Politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) Crisis.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 26, No. 2:182-204.
Jasanoff, Sheila (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
(2004). “Science and Citizenship: A New Synergy.” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 31 No.
2:90-94.
Lambert, Barrie (2002). “Radiation: Early Warnings; Late Effects.” In Poul Harremoes, David Gee, Malcolm MacGarvin, Andy Stirling, Jane Keys, Brian Wynne and Sofia Guedes Vaz (eds.) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896-2000 (pp. 31-37).
Luxembourg: European Environment Agency
Latour, Bruno (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Limoges, Camille (1993). “Expert Knowledge and Decision-making in Controversy Contexts.”
Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 2, No. 4:417-26.
Martin, Brian and Evellen Richards (1995). “Scientific Knowledge, Controversy, and Public Decision Making.” In Jasanoff, S., Gerald E. Markle, James C. Peterson, & Trevor Pinch (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, (pp. 506-26). Newbury Park, California:
Sage.
Nelkin, Dorothy (1975). “The Political Impact of Technical Expertise.” Social Studies of Science, Vol. 5, No. 1:35-54.
Petts, Judith and Simon Niemeyer (2004). “Health Risk Communication and Amplification: : Learning from the MMR Vaccination Controversy.” Health, Risk & Society, Vol. 6, No.
1:7-23.
Renn, Ortwin (1999). “A Model for an Analytic-Deliberative Process in Risk Management.”
Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 33, No. 18:3049-55.
Ridley, M. Rosalind and Harry Baker (1998). Fatal Protein: The Story of CJD, BSE and Other Prion Diseases. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sarewitz, Daniel (2004). “How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.”
Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 7, No. 5:385-403.
Weingart, Peter (1999). “Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics.” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3:151-61.
臺灣民主季刊
Wen-ling Tu is associate professor at the Department of Public Administration, National Cheng-Chi University. Her major research interests are environmental policy and politics, STS (science, technology, and society), public participation, social movement, and deliberative democarcy.