• 沒有找到結果。

Angus, Ian. 2004. “An Interview with Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau.”

in http://english.illinoisstate.edu/strickland/495/laclau2.html. Latest update 28 March 2012.

Barry, Brian. 1994. “In Defense of Political Liberalism.” Ratio Juris 7, 3: 325-330.

Christiano, Thomas. 1997. “The Significance of Public Deliberation.”

in James Bohman and William Rehg. eds. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics: 243-277. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Cohen, Joshua. 1996. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” in Seyla Benhabib. ed. Democracy and Difference:

Contesting the Boundaries of the Political: 95-119. Princeton:

Princeton University Press.

Cohen, Joshua. 1997. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” in James Bohman and William Rehg. eds. Deliberative Democracy:

Essays on Reason and Politics: 67-91. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Cohen, Joshua. 1998. “Democracy and Liberty.” in Jon Elster. ed.

Deliberative Democracy: 185-231. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Deutsche, Rosalyn et al. 2001. “Every Form of Art Has a Political Dimension.” Grey Room 2, 2 (Winter): 98-125.

Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dryzek, John S. 2005. “Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies:

Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia.” Political Theory 33, 2:

218-242.

Duyvendak, Jan Willem. 1995. The Power of Politics: New Social Movements in France. Boulder and San Francisco and Oxford:

Westview Press.

Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Harbermas, Jürgen. 1998. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. edited by Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greif.

Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Hunter, Allen. 1988. “Post-Marxism and the New Social Movements.”

Theory and Society 17, 6: 885-900.

Johnston, Hank et al. 1994. “Identities, Grievance, and New Social Movements.” in Enrique Laraña et al. eds. New Social Movements:

From Ideology to Identity: 3-35. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Kapoor, Ilan. 2002. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism:

The Relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe Debate for Third World Politics.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27, 4: 459-487.

Karppinen, Kari et al. 2008. “Habermas, Mouffe and Political Communication: a Case for Theoretical Eclecticism.” Javnost-the Public 15, 3: 5-22.

Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso.

Mathews, David. 1996. “Public Journalism and Public Deliberation.”

National Civic Review 85, 1: 39-42.

McAfee, Noëlle. 2004. “Three Models of Democratic Deliberation.”

The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18, 1: 44-59.

Miller, David. 2002. “Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Disadvantaged Groups?” in Mourizio Passerin D’entre’ves. ed.

Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives: 201-225.

UK: Manchester University Press.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1988. “Hegemony and New Political Subjects:

Toward a New Concept of Democracy.” in Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg. eds. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture: 89-101. Urbana: University of Illinois.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1992. “Democratic Citizenship and the Political Community.” in Chantal Mouffe. ed. Dimensions of Radical Democracy: 225-239. London and New York: Verso.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London and New York: Verso.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1994a. “For a Politics of Nomadic Identity.” in George Robertson et al. eds. Travellers’ Tales: Narratives of

Home and Displacement: 105-113. London and New York:

Routledge.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1994b. “Political Liberalism. Neutrality and the Political.” Ratio Juris 7, 3: 314-324.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1995a. “Politics, Democratic Action, and Solidarity.”

Inquiry 38, 1-2: 99-108.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1995b. “The End of Politics and the Rise of the Radical Right.” Dissent (Fall): 498-502.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1996a. “Radical Democracy or Liberal Democracy?”

in David Trend. ed. Radical Democracy: Identity, Citizenship, and the State: 19-26. London and New York: Routledge.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1996b. “Democracy, Power, and the ‘Political’.” in Seyla Benhabib .ed. Democracy and Difference: 245-256. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1998. “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy.” in David Dyzenhaus et al. eds. Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: 159-175. Durlian:Duke University Press.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research 66, 3 (Fall): 745-758.

Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London and New York: Verso.

Mouffe, Chantal. 2001. “Wittgenstein and the Ethos of Democracy.” in Ludwig Nagl and Chantal Mouffe. eds. The Legacy of Wittgenstein:

Pragmatism or Deconstruction: 131-138. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political: Thinking in Action. London and New York: Routledge.

Posner, Richard A. 2003. Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rawls, John. 2001. The Law of Peoples: with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Sanders, Lynn M. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25, 3:

347-376.

Schmitt, Carl. 1988. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Ellen Kennedy. trans. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Sunstein, Cass. 2003. “The Law of Group Polarization.” in James S.

Fishkin and Peter Laslett. eds. Debating Deliberative Democracy:

80-101. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Valadez, Jorge M. 2001. Deliberative Democracy: Political Legitimacy and Self-Determination in Multicultural Societies. Boulder, Colo.:

Westview Press.

Young, Iris Marion. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” in Seyla Benhabib. ed. Democracy and Difference: 120-135. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Zournazi, Mary. 2002. Hope: New Philosophies for Change. London:

Lawrence and Wishart.

王冠生。2008。〈羅爾斯公共理性理念研究〉。政治大學哲學研究 所博士論文。(Wang, Guan-Sheng. 2008. “A Study on Rawls's

Idea of Public Reason.” Ph.D. Dissertation Philosphy of National Chengchi University.)

代理孕母公民共識會議公民小組。2004。〈代理孕母公民共識會議 公 民 小 組 結 論 報 告 〉 。 http://zhncku.med.ncku.edu.tw/web/

uploads/digilive/177_1.pdf。2010/12/5。(Civic Group of Surrogate Motherhood Consensus Conference. 2004. “ Civic Group of Surrogate Motherhood Consensus Conference Conclusion Report.” in http://zhncku.med.ncku.edu.tw/web/uploads/digilive/177_1.pdf.

Latest update 5 December 2010.)

江宜樺。2001。《自由民主的理路》。台北:聯經出版事業公司。

(Jiang, Yi-Huah. 2001. The Context of Liberal Democracy. Taipei:

Linking Publishing Co.)

江宜樺。2003a。《民族主義與民主政治》。台北:台灣大學。(Jiang, Yi-Huah. 2003a. Politics Humanity and Social Science. Taipei:

National Taiwan University Press.)

江宜樺。2003b。〈公共領域中理性溝通的可能性〉。許紀霖主編《公 共性與公共知識份子》:171-191。南京:江蘇人民出版社。(Jiang, Yi-Huah. 2003b. “The Possibilities of Rationality: Satre's Political Practice View of Intellectuals.” in Ji-Lin Xu. ed.

Publicness and Public Intellectuals: 171-191. Nanjing: Jiangsu People Publishing, Ltd.)

江宜樺。2005。〈西方「政治」概念之分析〉。《政治與社會哲學 評論》12:1-57。(Jiang, Yi-Huah. 2005. “An Analysis of Concept of the Political in the West.” A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs 12: 1-57.)

吳定。1997。《公共政策辭典》。台北:五南。(Wu, Ting. 1997. A Dictionary of Public Policy. Taipei: Wu-Nan book Inc.)

宋興洲。2003。〈論網路民主的理論與發展現況:網路民主是科幻 小說?〉。《全球政治評論》3:1-28。(Sung, Hsing-Chou. 2003.

“Is the Digital Democracy a Science Fiction?” Review of Global Politics 3: 1-28.)

李長風。1990。〈創造一個民主的團結形式〉。《新文化雜誌》21:

18-21。 (Li, Chang-Feng. 1990. “Create a United Form of Democracy.” New Culture Magazine 21: 18-21.)

李俊增。2004。〈多元分歧與正當性:對Habermas程序主義法理論 之檢證〉。《政治與社會哲學評論》11:83-127。(Lee, Chiun-Tseng.

2004. “Diversity and Legitimacy: On Habermas's Proceduralist Paradigm of Law.” A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs 11: 83-127.)

杜文苓。2007。〈審議民主與社會運動:民間團體籌辦新竹科學園 區宜蘭基地公民會議的啟發〉。《公共行政學報》23:67-93。

(Tu, Wen-Ling. 2007. “Deliberative Democracy and Social Movement: An Inspiration from the Local-initiative Citizen Conference of Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park at Ilan.”

Journal of Public Administration 23: 67-93.)

林子倫。2004。〈評John S. Dryzek, 《Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations》(審議式民主及其超 越)〉。《台灣民主季刊》1,4:181-184。(Lin, Tze-Luen. 2004.

“A Comment on John S. Dryzek, 《Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations》.” Taiwan Democracy

Quarterly 1,4: 181-184.)

林水波、石振國。1999。〈以直接民主改革間接民主的論述與評估〉。

《立法院院聞》27,3:33-44。(Lin, Shoei-Po and Chen-Kuo Shih.

1999. “Assessment and Discussion of Direct Democracy Reform Indirect Democracy.” The Legislative Yuan Monthly 27, 3: 33-44.) 林水波、邱靖鈜。2006。《公民投票 vs. 公民會議》。台北:五南

圖書出版有限公司。(Lin, Shoei-Po and Jing-Hung Chiu. 2006.

Plebiscite vs. Citizen Consensus Conference. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Inc.)

林火旺。2005。〈審議民主與公民養成〉。《台灣大學哲學論評》

29:99-143。(Lin, Huo-Wang. 2005.“Deliberative Democracy and Civic Education.” National Taiwan University Philosophical Review 29: 99-143.)

林祐聖。2007。〈我們沒有臺上臺下之分:代理孕母公民共識會議 中的專家與常民關係〉。《台灣民主》4,3:1-32。(Lin, Yu-Sheng.

2007. “No Difference between Us: the Relationship between Experts and Lay Persons in the Surrogate Motherhood Consensus Conference in Taiwan.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 4, 3: 1-32.) 林國明、陳東升。2003。〈公民會議與審議民主:全民健保的公民

參與經驗〉。《台灣社會學》6:61-118。(Lin, Kuo-Ming and Dung-Sheng Chen. 2003. “Consensus Conference and Deliberative Democracy: Citizen Participation in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Policies.” Taiwan Sociology 6: 61-118.)

林國明等。2005。《審議民主公民會議操作手冊》。台北:行政院青年 輔導委員會。(Lin, Kuo-Ming et al. 2005. Deliberative Democracy

Consensus Conference Operating Manual. Taipei: National Youth Commission.)

林淑芬。2005。〈導讀:從敵人變成對手?〉。林淑芬譯《民主的 弔詭》:V-XXIX。台北:巨流。(Lin, Shu-Fen. 2005. “Guidance:

From Enemy to Opponent?” in Shu-Fen Lin. trans. The Democratic Paradox: V-XXIX. Taipei: Chuliu Publisher.)

洪鎌德。2005。〈憲法與社會的互動:憲政主義之哲學分析〉。《台 灣 民 主 季 刊 》 2 , 2 : 101-140 。 (Hung, Lien-Te. 2005.“The Interaction between the Constitution and Society: A Philosophical Analysis of Modern Western Constitutionalism.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 2, 2: 101-140.)

胡中瑋。2007。〈科技溝通與審議式民主─美國密蘇里州幹細胞修 憲投票經驗為例〉。《法律與生命科學》2:19-31。(Hu, Chung-We.

2007. “Communication Technology and Deliberative Democracy:

A Case Study of American Missouri Stem Cells Constitution Vote Experience.” Law and Life Science 2: 19-31.)

施能傑。2004。〈審議式民主的「包容性」問題之研究〉。行政院國家 科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告 (NSC92-2414-H-004-017)。

(Shin, Jay N. 2004. “The Issue of Inclusion in the Deliberative Democracy: Challenges from the Politics of Difference.” National Science Council Research Project Outcome Report, NSC92-2414-H-004-017.)

梁文韜。2006。〈資訊時代下的公共治理:規範性電子公民身份論 之初探〉。《政治與社會哲學評論》19:1-84。(Leung, Man-To.

2006. “Public Governance in the Information Age: Towards a

Normative Theory of e-Citizenship.” A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs 19: 1-84.)

許立一。2003。《慎思熟慮的民主行政》。台北:韋伯文化國際出 版有限公司。(Hsu, Li-Yi. 2003. Deliberative Democratic Public Administration. Taipei: Weber Publication International Ltd.) 許國賢。2000。〈商議式民主與民主想像〉。《政治科學論叢》13:

61-91。 (Hsu, Kuo-Hsien. 2000. “Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Imagination.” Political Science Review 13: 61-91.) 許國賢。2002。〈寬容理念的形塑及其當代問題〉。《政治科學論

叢》17:219-248。(Hsu, Kuo-Hsien. 2002. “The Formation of the Idea of Toleration and Its Contemporary Problems.” Political Science Review 17: 219-248.)

郭秋永。2007。〈多元民主理論:公民審議的一個理論基礎〉。《台 灣民主季刊》4,3:63-107。(Kuo, Chiu-Yeoung. 2007. “Theory of Polyarchal Democracy: A Theoretical Foundation for Citizen Deliberation.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 4, 3: 63-107.)

陳宜中。1990a。〈人民民主與台灣的辯證〉。《當代》56:138-149。

(Chen, I-Chung. 1990a. “People Democracy and Taiwanese Dialectic. ” Con-Temporary Monthly 56: 138-149.)

陳宜中。1990b。〈簡評「台灣版人民民主」〉。《新文化雜誌》

21:14-17。 (Chen, I-Chung. 1990b. “Comment on ‘Taiwan People Democratic Theory’.” New Culture Magazine 21: 14-17.)

陳東升。2006。〈審議民主的限制:台灣公民會議的經驗〉。《台灣 民主季刊》3,1:77-104。(Chen, Dung-Sheng. 2006. “The Limits of Deliberative Democracy: the Experience of Citizen Conferences

in Taiwan.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 3, 1: 77-104.)

陳俊宏。1998。〈永續發展與民主:審議式民主理論初探〉。《東 吳政治學報》9:85-122。(Chen, Chung-Hong. 1998. “Sustainable Development and Democracy: Approaching to Deliberative Democracy.” Soochow Journal of Political Science 9: 85-122. ) 陳思賢。1991。〈政治哲學:政治生活的解釋或意識型態之表達?

─區克夏政治哲學初探〉。《政治科學論叢》3:35-63。(Chen, Sy-Shyan. 1991. “Political Philosophy: Discussing the Nature of Political Life or Articulating the Ideologies? - A Look into Michael Oakeshott's Political Philosophy.” Political Science Review 3:35-63.)

陳思賢。1995。〈歷史、傳統與政治─英國政治哲學家區克夏[Michael Oakeshott]思想鳥瞰〉。《美歐月刊》10,3:97-111。(Chen, Sy-Shyan. 1995. “A Bird's-Eye View of English Political Philosopher Michael Oakeshott's Ideology.” America and Europe Monthly 10, 3: 97-111.)

曾志隆。2002。《拉克勞與穆芙》。台北:生智。(Tsen, Chih-Lung.

2002. Laclau and Mouffe. Taipei: Sheng-chih Book Co., Ltd.) 曾志隆。2006。〈基進與多元民主政治理論的建構:以穆芙的「爭

勝式民主」為討論對象〉。東吳大學政治系博士論文。(Tsen, Chih-lung. 2006. “Constructing Theory of Radical and Plural Democracy: A Study of Chantal Mouffe’s‘Agonistic Democracy’.”

Ph.D. Dissertation Political Science of Soochow University.) 曾冠球等。2009。〈推展公民導向的電子化政府:願景或幻想?〉。

《 公 共 行 政 學 報 》 33: 1-43。 (Tseng, Kuan-Chiu et al. 2009.

“Promoting Citizen-centered E-government Initiatives: Vision or Illusion?” Journal of Public Administration 33: 1-43.)

曾建元、吳康維。2007。〈審議式民主在我國的創新應用「2005 臺 南縣縣長選舉電視辯論會」個案探討〉。《國會月刊》35,10:

58-87。(Tseng, Chien-Yuan and Kang-Wei Wu. 2007. “Deliberation Democracy Innovative Applications in Taiwan, A Case Study on 2005 Tainan County Magistrate Election TV Debate.” Congress Monthly 35, 10: 58-87.)

曾國祥。2007。〈審議民主的道德限制:柏林論政治自由與政治判 斷〉。《台灣民主季刊》4,4:71-108。(Tseng, Roy Kuo-Shiang.

2007. “The Moral Constraints of Deliberative Democracy: Isaiah Berlin on Political Freedom and Political Judgment.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 4, 4: 71-108.)

童涵浦。2001。〈從意識形態批判到有效性的建立:Hannah Arent 論「判斷」的政治意義〉。台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。

(Tung, Han-Pu. 2001. “Form the Critique of Ideology to the Construction of Validity─Hannah Arendt on the Political Meaning of ‘Judgment’.” Master’s Thesis Institute of Political Science of National Taiwan University.)

黃東益。2000。〈審慎思辯民調:研究方法的探討與可行性評估〉。

《 民 意 研 究 季 刊 》 211 : 123-143 。 (Huang, Tong-Yi. 2000.

“Research Methods of the Deliberative Poll and Its Feasibility in Taiwan.” Public Opinion Research Quarterly 211: 123-143.) 黃東益。2003。〈審慎思辯、議題資訊與政策偏好形成:核四議題

意見調查結果的初探〉。《理論與政策》16,4:65-87。(Huang,

Tong-Yi. 2003. “Deliberation, Policy Information and Nuclear Plant Policy Preference: Exploring the Results of a Deliberative Poll.” Theory and Policy 16, 4: 65-87.)

黃東益、陳敦源。2004。〈電子化政府與商議式民主之實踐〉。《台 灣民主季刊》1,4:1-34。(Huang, Tong-Yi and Don-Yun Chen.

2004. “E-Government and the Realization of Deliberative Democracy.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 1, 4: 1-34.)

黃東益。2006。〈審議日:治理的烏托邦或務實的民主創新工程?〉。

《 公 共 行 政 學 報 》 18 : 137-142 。 (Huang, Tong-Yi. 2006.

“Deliberation Day: Utopia for Governance or Realistic Democratic Innovation?” Journal of Public Administration 18: 137-142.) 黃東益。2008。〈審議過後:從行政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策

連結〉。《東吳政治學報》26,4:59-96。(Huang, Tong-Yi. 2008.

“After Deliberation: Exploring the Policy Connection of Consensus Conference from Public Sectors’ Perspective.” Soochow Journal of Political Science 26, 4: 59-96.)

黃浩榮。2005。《公共新聞學:審議民主的觀點》。台北:巨流。

(Huang, Hao-Jung. 2005. Public Journalism: A Viewpoint form Deliberative Democracy. Taipei: Chuliu Publisher. )

黃惠萍。2005。〈審議式民主的公共新聞想像:建構審議公共議題 的新聞報導模式〉。《新聞學研究》83:39-81。(Huang, Hui-Ping.

2005. “Imagining Public Journalism in Deliberative Democracy:

Constructing a News Reporting Model for Deliberating Public Issue.” Mass Communication Research 83: 39-81.)

黃競涓。2008。〈女性主義對審議式民主之支持與批判〉。《台灣

民主季刊》5,3:33-69。(Hwang, Ching-Chane. 2008. “Deliberative Democracy: The Feminist Pros and Cons.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 5, 3: 33-69.)

楊意菁。1998。〈民意調查的理想國:一個深思熟慮民調的探討〉。

《民意研究季刊》204:63-76。(Yang, Yie-Jing. 1998. “Utopia of Public Opinion Poll--A Discussion of Deliberative Poll.” Public Opinion Research Quarterly 204: 63-76.)

楊意菁。2007。〈當審議民主遇上公共新聞學:理論對話與交流[評 黃浩榮著公共新聞學:審議民主的觀點]〉。《新聞學研究》93:

楊意菁。2007。〈當審議民主遇上公共新聞學:理論對話與交流[評 黃浩榮著公共新聞學:審議民主的觀點]〉。《新聞學研究》93:

相關文件