1. 以數值模擬探討電探空間解析度方面，可增加數值模型的馬賽克 方格層數，模擬更為複雜的地質分布型態，並考慮其他電極排列 下的解析成果。
2. 未來建議加大砂箱尺寸，以增加地電阻有效的探測深度。
3. 砂箱試驗中所使用電阻式張力計量測範圍過小，建議可改用量測 範圍較廣的現地土壤基質吸力量測設備，如TDR 土壤張力感測 器，以迴歸率定出涵蓋範圍更為完整的土水特徵曲線。
4. TDR 感測器對於導電度與含水量的感應空間範圍需做更進一步 的釐清與驗證。
5. 未來可嘗試直接於現地崩積土層，以地電阻法搭配結合量測導電 度、含水量與土壤基質吸力的多功TDR 監測系統，於崩積層場 址各點位置與深度進行現地率定與監測，以期進一步探討崩積層 高度空間變異性對於現地率定結果的影響。
參考文獻
4. Archie, G. E., 1942, “Electrical-Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics,” Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Vol. 146, pp. 54-62.
5. Arulanandan, K. and Smith, S. S., 1973, “Electrical Disperison in Relation to Soil Structure,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. SM12, pp. 1113-1133.
6. Barker, R. and Moore, J., 1998, “Application of Time-Lapse Electrical Tomography in Groundwater Studies,” Leading Edge, Vol. 17, No. 10, pp.
1454-1458.
7. Cassiani et al., 2006, “A Saline Trace Test Monitored via Time-Lapse Surface Electrical Resistivity Tomography,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 59, pp. 244-259.
8. Collins, B.D. and Znidarcic,D., 2004, “Stability analysis of rainfall induced landslides,” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 4, pp. 362-372.
9. Constable et al., 1987, “Occam’s Inversion A Practical Algorithm for
Generating Smooth Models from Electromagnetic Sounding Data,”
Geophysics, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 289-300.
10. Dahlin, T. and Leroux, V., 2006, “Time-Lapse Resistivity Investigations for Imaging Saltwater Transport in Glaciofluvial Deposite,” Environ Geol, pp.
347-358.
11. deGroot-Headlin and Constable, S., 1990, “Occam's Inversion to Generate Smooth, Two-Dimensional Models from Magnetotelluric Data,” Geophysics, Vol. 55, No. 12, pp. 1613-1624.
12. Drahor, M. G. and Berge, M. A., 2006, “Application of Electrical Resistivity Tomography Technique for Investigation of Landslides: a case from Turkey,” Environmental Geology, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 147-155.
13. Edwards, L. S. 1977, “A Modified Pseudosection for Resistivity and Induced Polarization,” Vol. 42, pp. 1020-1036.
14. Giese, K. and Tiemann, R., 1975, “Determination of the complex permittivity from thin-sample time domain reflectometry: Improved analysis of the step response wave form,” Adv. Mol. Relax. Processes, Vol. 7, pp. 45-59.
15. Hillhorst, M. A., 1998, “Dielectric Characterization of Soil,” Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen, Netherlands.
16. Inman, J. R., 1975, “Resistivity Inversion with Ridge Regression,”
Geophysics, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 798-817.
17. Irmak, S., and Haman, D.Z., 2001, “Performance of the Watermark®
granular matrix sensor in sandy soils,” Applied Engineering in Agriculture 17: 787-795.
18. Lapenna, V., Lorenzo, P., Perrone, A., Piscitelli, S., Sdao, F. and Rizzo, E.,
the Environment, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 259-268.
19. Larson, G.F., 1985, “Electrical sensor for measuring moisture in landscape and agricultural soils,” U.S. Patent #4531087.
20. Lin, C. P., Siddiqui, S. I., Feng, W., Drnevich, V. P., and Deschamps, R. J., 1999, “Quality Control of Earth Fills Using Time Domain Reflectometry,”
Constructing and Controlling Compaction of Earth Fills, ASTM Special Technical Publication, No.1384, pp. 290-310.
21. Lin, C. P., Drnevich, V. P., Feng, W., and Deschamps, R. J., 2000, “Time Domain Reflectometry for Compaction Quality Control,” Use of Geophysical Methods in Construction, Geotechnical Special Publication, No.
108,pp. 15-34.
22. Lin, C. P., 2003, "Frequency Domain versus Traveltime analyses of TDR Waveforms for Soil Moisture Measurements," Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67 : 720-729.
23. Lin, C. P., Chung, C. C., and Tang, S. H., 2007, “Accurate TDR Measurement of Electrical Conductivity Accounting for Cable Resistance and Recording Time,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71 : 1278-1287
24. Loke, M. H. and Baker, R. D., 1996, “Practical Techniques for 3D Resistivity Surveys and Data Inversion,” Geophysics Prospecting, Vol. 44, pp. 499-523.
25. Loke, M. H., 1999, “Time-Lapse Resistivity Imaging Inversion,” 5th Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Society European Section, pp. 1-2.
26. Loke, M. H., 2003, “Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D Electrical Imaging Surveys,”
Geotomo Software, Malaysia
27. Loke, M. H., Acworth I. and Dahlin, T., 2003, “A Comparison of Smooth and Blocky Inversion Method in 2D Electrical Imaging Surveys,” Exploration
Geophysics, Vol. 34, pp. 182-187.
28. Mussett, A. E. and Khan, M. A., 2000, “Looking into the Earth,” Cambridge University press.
29. Nostrand, van, R. G. and Cook K. L., 1966, USGC Professional Paper No.
49.
30. Olayinka, A. I. and Yaramanic, U., 2000, “Use of Block Inversion in the 2D Interpretation of Apparent Resistivity Data and its Comparison with Smooth Inversion,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 45, pp. 63-81.
31. Or, D. and Wraith, J.M., 1999, “A new soil matric-potential sensor based on time-domain- reflectometry,” Water Resources Research, 35: 3399-3407.
32. Reece, C. F., 1996, “Evaluation of a Line Heat Dissipation Sensor for Measuring Soil Matric Potential,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60:1022-1028.
33. Reynolds, J. M., 1997, “An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics,” Wiley.
34. Rezaur, R. B., Rahardjo, H., Leong, E.C., Lee, T.T., 2003, “Hydrologic behavior of residual soil slopes in Singapore,” ASCE Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 133-144.
35. Rinaldi, V. A. and Cuestas, G. A., 2002, “Ohmic Conductivity of Compacted Silty Clay,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 128, pp. 824-835.
36. Robinson, D. A., Schaap, M., Jones, S. B., Friedman, S. P. and Gardner, C. M.
K., 2003, “Considerations for Improving the Accuracy of Permittivity Measurement using Time Domain Reflectometry: Air-Water Calibration,
37. Sauer, M. C., et al., 1955, “Electrical Conductance of Porous Plugs Ion Exchange Resin-Solution System,” Industrial and engineering chemistry, Vol.
47, No. 10, pp. 2187-2193.
38. Scalon, B. R., Andraski, B. J. and Bilskie, J., 2002, “Miscellaneous Methods for Measuring Matric or Water Potential,” pp.643-670, In Dane, J. H. and Topp, G. C., eds. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI.
39. SEGJ, 2004, “Application of Geophysical Methods to Engineering and Environmental Problems,” The Advisory Committee on the Standardization.
40. Shah, P. H. and Singh, D. N., 2005, “Generalized Archie’s Law for Estimation of Soil Electrical Conductivity,” Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 145-164.
41. Shock, C.C., Barnum, J.M., and Seddigh, M., 1998, “Calibration of Watermark Soil Moisture Sensors for Irrigation Management, Proceedings of the International Irrigation Show, San Diego, CA. Irrigation Association, pp.
139-146.
42. Sjodahl, P., Dahlin, T. and Johansson, S., 2003, “Resistivity Monitoring for Internal Erosion Detection at Hallby Embankment Dam,” Progress in Environmental and Engineering Geophysics：Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, pp. 310-316.
43. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P. and Sheriff, R. E., 1990, “Applied Geophysics 2nd,” Cambridge University Press.
44. Topp, G. C., Davis, J. L., and Annan, A. P. (1980), “Electromagnetic Determination of Soil Water Content and Electrical Conductivity Measurement Using Time Domain Reflectometry,” Water Resources
Research,Vol. 16,pp. 574-582.
45. Van Genuchten, M. Th., 1980, “A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 44, pp. 892-898.
46. Yang, X. and Lagmanson, M., 2006, “Comparison of 2D and 3D Electrical Resistivity Imaging Methods,” Advanced Geosciences.