建議 - 結論與建議 - 便利商店自願性建築能效標示推廣計畫

第六章結論與建議

第二節建議

建議一：

以本研究成果進行便利商店能效試評估認定審查會：立即可行性建議主辦機關:內政部建築研究所

協辦單位:綠建築標章評定機構

內政部建築研究所 108 年完成之「既有建築綠建築評估手冊 EEWH-EB 之研究」尚未有示範申請認證案，也未開展市場化工作，本案可透由民間自主節能管理申請便利商店自願性建築能效標示，有利於未來之推廣。

建議二：

辦理便利商店能效等級評估與標示暨改善說明會：立即可行性建議主辦機關:連鎖超商股份有限公司

協辦單位:綠建築標章評定機構

企業通常可針對節能改善經濟效益佳的排行最差的 5%或 10%之分店作為節能改善診斷與改善的優先目標，分年逐步改善其節能，這是作為企業發展內部節能管理策略的有利工具，可優先針對等級 7 之便利商店進行改善說明會。

建議三：

辦理便利商店能效評估與標示制度說明會：短期可行性建議主辦機關:內政部建築研究所

協辦單位:綠建築標章評定機構、各連鎖超商股份有限公司

能源護照制度為國際公認最有節能效益的政策，國內外目前未聞有貫徹能源護照制度為社會企業責任之民間企業。許多企業花費重金編寫社會責任報告書，

常常苦無環保實績與亮點。本合作企業若能以此訴求 CSR，定能獲得各方肯定。

為了建築能效制度之推廣，應以各大便利商店相關業者為對象，辦理北中南推廣講習會。

參考文獻

(1) Apoorva Prakash Kaskhedikar, 2013, Regression Tree-Based Methodology for Customizing Building Energy Benchmarks to Individual Commercial Buildings, master degree thesis, Arizona State University

(2) Bio Intelligence Service, Ronan Lyons and IEEP (2013) Energy performance certificates in buildings and their impact on transaction prices and rents in selected EU countries, Final report prepared for European Commission (DG Energy) (3) Building Energy Efficiency Task group, IPEEC (the International Partnership for

Energy Efficiency Cooperation), 2014, Building Energy Rating Schemes--Assessing Issues and Impacts

(4) Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE), 2010, Energy Performance Certificates across Europe---From design to implementation,

(5) Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE), 2014, Energy Performance Certificates across the EU--- A Mapping of National Approaches

(6) CIBSE. 2004. Energy efficiency in buildings. 2nd Edn. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London.

(7) ENERGY STAR 2018, ENERGY STAR Score for Hotels in the United States, Technical Reference

(8) European Union. 2014. Energy Efficiency Directive. European Union. 2014.

Energy Efficiency Directive.

(9) Griffith B., Torcellini P., Long N., Crawley D., and Ryan J. (2006) “Assessment of the technical potential for achieving zero-energy commercial buildings.” National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Conference Paper NREL/CP-550-39830, June 2006

(10) Haydock, H. and Arbon, J. (2009). “Study on energy performance of buildings.”

European Parliament, Policy Department: Economic and Scientific Policy, Brussels.

(11) IPCC, 2007, the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

(12) IPEEC (the International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation), 2014, Building Energy Rating Schemes-Assessing Issues and Impacts, Building Energy Efficiency Taskgroup

(13) Intelligent Energy Erope, 2012. The Success Model of Brussels: ACase Study.

(14) Lauren Smith, 2015, Commercial Building Benchmarking Programs in the Southwest, Southwest Energy Efficiency Project

(15) Kaskhedikar A. P, 2013, Regression Tree-Based Methodology for Customizing Building Energy Benchmarks to Individual Commercial Buildings, master degree’s thesis, Arizona State University

(16) Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), (2015). A Technical Manual for SBEM( Simplified Building Energy Model), Part of the National Calculation Methodology : SBEM for assessing the Energy Performance of Buildings

(17) Dirk Brounen , NilsKok, 2011, On the economics o fenergy labels in the housing market, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

(18) Huang, Y. J., Hanford, J. W., & Piraino, M. (1993). The impact of variations in building parameters and operating conditions on commercial building energy use and load shapes. Proc. IBPSA Conference, 16-18.

(19) IEA. 2015. “Energy Technology Perspective 2015—Mobilising Innovation to Accelerate Climate Action.”

(20) Implementing Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, 2016, Co-funded under the Intelligent Energy – Europe Programme of the European Union under the contract IEE/CA/10/002 SI2.588732

(21) Lin, Hsien-Te; Su, Tzu-Ching; Ho, Ming-Chin; 2013 ,‘Dynamic Energy-Use Intensity Index for Green Building Evaluation Systems in Taiwan,. DISASTER ADVANCES 6(3) 1-10, JUL 2013 (SCI))

(22) Na Wang, Atefe Makhmalbaf, Viraj Srivastava, John E Hathaway, 2016,

Simulation-based coefficients for adjusting climate impact on energy consumption of commercial buildings, Building Simulation

(23) Na Wang, Supriya Goel, Atefe Makhmalbaf & Nicholas Long, 2016,

Development of building energy asset rating using stock modelling in the USA, Journal of Building Performance Simulation

(24) Nikolaou T. , Kolokotsa D. & Stavrakakis G. (2011) Review on methodologies for energy benchmarking, rating and classification of buildings, Advances in Building Energy Research.

(25) Sharp, T. (1996). Energy Benchmarking in Commercial Office Buildings.

ACEEE 1996 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (4) (pp. 321-329)

(26) UNEP, 2011, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication

(27) UNEP SBCI. 2009. “Common carbon metric for measuring energy use and reporting greenhouse gas emissions from building operations.” United Nations Environment Programme, Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative, Paris.U.S.

Green Building Council and C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. 2015.

"Moscow City Market Brief

(28) Unit Alembic Research Ltd. in association with Energy Action Scotland and Dr Patrick Waterfield, 23 March 2018, Energy Performance Certificates in Scotland Research report for the Scottish Government, Heat, Energy Efficiency and Consumers

(29) Youssef, S., J. K. Paik, Y. Seop Kim, M. Soo Kim and F. Cheng (2013).

Probabilistic Selection of Ship-Ship Collision Scenarios.

(30) McDonald C., et al. 2016, Benchmarking Energy Data Analysis,Weatherization And Intergovernmental Programs Office, US DOE

(31) Koo C., Hong T. , Lee M., Park H.S. (2014) Development of a new energy efficiency rating system for existing residential buildings, pp218-231, Energy Policy 6

建議

第六章結論與建議

第二節建議

參考文獻

附錄一

○○○便利商店能效評定書

評定項目： □ 便利商店能效評估

評定結果： ■ 1 + □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 申請人： OO 便利商店/A 門市

評定專業機構：

評定書版本：建築能效評估手冊評定書編號：《評定單位提供》

評定日期：中華民國○年○月○日

目錄

1. 便利商店能效評定申請書 2. 便利商店能效評估表 3. 便利商店能效標示 4. 基本圖說

4.1 平面圖

4.2 外觀照片

4.3 室內現況

4.4 兩年耗電量

1.便利商店能效評估評定申請書

茲檢具申請書及相關圖文資料，謹請評定。此致 OOOO

申請人：《申請單位名稱》

案件編號案件名稱

申請人 OOO

門市地址 A 門市(門市名稱)

聯絡人電話傳真

通訊地址

E-Mail 掛件日期 ○年○月○日

2.便利商店能效評估表

3.便利商店能效分級標示

4.基本圖說

4.1 平面圖

4.2 外觀照

4.3 室內現況

4.4 兩年耗電量

附錄二

附錄三

建議

第六章 結論與建議

第二節 建議

參考文獻

附錄一

○○○便利商店能效 評定書

評 定 項 目 ： □ 便利商店能效評估

評 定 結 果 ： ■ 1 + □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 申 請 人 ： OO 便利商店/A 門市

評 定 專 業 機 構 ：

評 定 書 版 本： 建築能效評估手冊 評 定 書 編 號： 《評定單位提供》

評 定 日 期： 中華民國○年○月○日

目 錄

1. 便利商店能效評定申請書 2. 便利商店能效評估表 3. 便利商店能效標示 4. 基本圖說

4.1 平面圖

4.2 外觀照片

4.3 室內現況

4.4 兩年耗電量

1.便利商店能效評估評定申請書

茲檢具申請書及相關圖文資料，謹請評定。此致 OOOO

申請人：《申請單位名稱》

案件編號 案件名稱

申請人 OOO

門市地址 A 門市(門市名稱)

聯絡人 電話 傳真

通訊地址

E-Mail 掛件日期 ○年○月○日

2.便利商店能效評估表

3.便利商店能效分級標示

4.基 本 圖 說

4.1 平面圖

4.2 外觀照

4.3 室內現況

4.4 兩年耗電量

附錄二

附錄三

第六章結論與建議

第二節建議

○○○便利商店能效評定書

評定項目： □ 便利商店能效評估

評定結果： ■ 1 + □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 申請人： OO 便利商店/A 門市

評定專業機構：

評定書版本：建築能效評估手冊評定書編號：《評定單位提供》

評定日期：中華民國○年○月○日

目錄

案件編號案件名稱

聯絡人電話傳真

4.基本圖說