• 沒有找到結果。

第五章 結論與討論

5.4 討論

5.2.2 未來研究與檢討

組合類型在作業完成時間為單鍵控制設計其可能發生的原因,是由於設計選單的選 項太少,因此造成方向控制鍵的設計其優點無法顯著,因此未來的研究應該提高選單的 選項以分辨控制類型所造成的影響,另外在一維的控制器設計上可以改採其他不同的一

維控制器如旋鈕、滑桿等…,因為現在有許多的車內資訊系統利用旋鈕的方式控制選 單,而有關實驗過程中的一些有趣的觀察現象,或許也可以讓重新我們思考分心的造成 原因,例如:作業錯誤時駕駛者如何去發現錯誤、進而修正錯誤,而在修正錯誤的過程 之中,駕駛者分心的現象會發生如何的變化?另外顯示介面的配置方式對於作業錯誤的 修正其作用為何?,另外,在無法掌控所有控制按鍵的條件下,不常用的按鍵需要被使 用時,駕駛者會如何進行這樣的作業?而對駕駛者造成明顯的注意力分散的狀態,或許 可以進一步作為未來探討的議題。

參考文獻

文獻資料:

1. 莊忠益,”車用電腦中央控制介面之階層式選單對駕駛者績效之影響”,清華大學 工業工程與工程管理研究所,民國九十二年。

2. Tsimhoni, O.,& Green, P.(2003), Time-sharing of a visual in-vehicle task while driving:

The effect of four key constructs. Proceedings of the 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Park City, Utah, pp. 113-118.

3. Green, P. (2001), Safeguards for On-Board Wireless Communications. Presentation at second Annual Plastics in Automotive Safety Conference, Tory, Michigan.

4. Green, P. (2000), The Human interface for ITS Display and Control Systems : Developing International Standards to Promote Safety and Usability. Invited paper presented at the International Workshop on ITS Human Interface in Japan,Utsu, Japan 5. Green, P. (1999). SAE J2364-Navigation and route guidance function accessibility while

driving (Draft). Warrendale, PA: Society of automotive engineers.

6. Wiewille, W.W.(1995), Development of an Initial Model Relating Driver In-vehicle Visual Demands to Accident Rate, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Mid-Atlantic Human factors Conference, Blacksburg

7. Manes, D. and Green, P.(1977), Evaluation of a Driver Interfaces: Effects of Control Type(Knob Versus Buttons) and Menu Structure(Depth Versus Breadth). Ann Arbor, MI:

The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute

8. Redelmeier, Robret, &Tishirani (1997), Association between cellular telephone call and

motor vehicle collisions. The New England Journal of Medicine 336, Number 7.

9. Parkes, A.M.& Hooijmeijer, V.(2001).Driver situation awareness and carphone use.

Proceedings of the 1st Human-Center Transportation simulation Conference.

10. Alm, H. & Nillson, L.(1994). Changes in driver behavior as a function handsfree mobile phones-A simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(4),441-451.

11. Consiglio W., Driscoll, P., Witte M., & Berg, W.P.(2003). Effect of celluar telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response.

Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 495-500.

12. Endsley, M.R. (1994). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas Technical University, Lubbock, Texas.

13. Endsley, M.R. (1993). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas Technical University, Lubbock, Texas.

14. M.H. Martens & W. van Winsum.(2001). Measuring distraction: the peripheral detection task. TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.

15. Bossi, L. L., Ward, N. J., Parkes, A.M. & Howarth, P.A.(1997). The effect of vision enhancement systems on driver peripheral visual performance. Ergonomics and safety of intelligent diver interfaces.(239-260).

16. Recarte, M. A., & Nunes. L. M., (2000). Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery task on eye fixations while diving. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Applied, 6, 31-43.

17. Barickman, F.S., and Goodman, M.j.(1999).Micro DAS: In-vehicle portable data acquisition system. Transportation Research Record 1689. 1-8.

18. Goodman, M., Bents, F. D., Tijerina, L., Wierwille, W. W., Lerner, N., and Benel,

D.(1997). An investigation of the safety implications of wireless communications in vehicles. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

19. Goodman, M., (2000). NHTSA Driver Distraction Research: Past, Present, and Future.

NHTSA Research and Development, Washington, DC.

20. Hankey, J. M., Dingus, T. A., Hanowski, R. J., Wierwille, W. W. (Virginia Tech Transportation Institute), Monk, C. A. (Science Applications Internationl Corporation), &

Moyer, M. J. (Federal Highway Administration)(2003). The development of a design evaluation tool and model of attention demand. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov.

21. Chiang, D.P., Brooks, A.M., Wier, D.H. (2001): An Experimental Study of Destination Entry with an Example Automobile Navigation System. SAE-paper 2001-01-0810.

22. Dingus, T.A. (1987): Attentional demand evaluation for an automobile moving-map navigation system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

23. Dingus, T.A., Antin, J.F., Hulse, M.C.& Wierwille, W.W. (1989): Attentional demand requirements of an automobile moving-map navigation system. In: Transportation Research, A 23(4), 301-315.

24. Rockwell, T H.(1988): Spare visual capacity in driving-revisited: new empirical results for an old idea. In a. G. Gale et al.(eds.), Vision in vehicle(pp.317-324). Amsterdam:

Elsevier.

25. Tijerina, L.(2000): Driver distraction with wireless telecommunications and route guidance systems: Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

26. Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. (2003): Statement of Principles, Criteria and

Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems. (Draft Version 3.0).

27. Chapanis, A. & Lindenbaum, L.E. (1959), A reaction time study of four control-display linkages, Human Factors,1,1-7.

28. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility.

Amsterdam:North-Holland.

29. Proctor, R.W., Van Zandt, T., C-H., & Weeks, D.J.(1993). Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: Perception or affordance of directional coding? Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19,18-19.

30. Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T.G.(1990), Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

書籍資料:

31. Sanders,Mark S., and McCormick, Ernest J.(1998).Human Factors in Engineering and Design 7th .McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

32. Woodrow Baefield , and Thomas A. Dingus(1997). Human Factors in Intelligent Transportation Systems. Lawrence Erbaum Associates,Publishers .

33. Y. Ian Noy (1997).Ergonmics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces. Lawrence Erbaum Associates,Publishers.

相關文件