第五章 結論
5.2 未來研究議題
5.2.2 理論層面
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
定客語（李小華 2014）等各地方言，均有「過」用於指涉重行貌之現象。跨方 言比較，或是客語次方言之間的對比分析，亦可待未來可進一步研究，藉此窺見 客語方言「過」之全貌。
第六個研究議題為再探臺灣華語「過」經驗貌，因為過去臺灣華語「過」相 關文獻均指出「年輕過」為合法，但「老過」為不合法。然而，類似 (157) 之 例句，似和過去研究結論相悖：
(157) 我曾經年老過，後來有了這牌子的青春露化妝品，我的肌膚又回春 了。
例 (157) 的合法，可能和語境有關，但也可能和「過」更加語法化有關。未來 可蒐集更多相關例句，以證明 (157) 之合法性為普遍接受，並在理論層面的論 述其依據。
第七個研究議題為「過」的語法化和詞彙化問題，在第四章4.5.3小節例 (147) 所列出的有關「過」之句法和語意演變之例句，這些例句展現臺灣客語「過」和 其前後成分組合關係之複雜，也代表「過」語法功能之多樣性 (divergence)。「過」
的句法和語意演變，是我們極為關心的議題之一。
5.2.2 理論層面
理論層面的研究議題則和構式語法、強制轉換有關。關於詞彙語意和構式語 意的互動如何落實在語言事實上；當詞彙語意和構式語意競爭時，產生強制轉換，
強制轉換的運作如何在客語時貌構式中體現，構式的隱性轉換及顯性轉換之機制 及影響，以上這些理論層面的議題都需要進一步論證，借用語料庫語言學或應用 語言學的方法來強化學術理論，這是未來需要面對的挑戰。
本論文提出，和「等」構式共現的處所倒裝構式、「忒」構式所帶的的表量 結構均對時貌具影響力。除了附加語的功用外，詞彙語意仍須藉助 Goldberg
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
(1995, 2006) 的映照 (mapping) 概念、Croft (2003) 的特定動詞類型構式
(verb-class-specific constructions)、特定動詞構式 (verb-specific construction) 之觀 點、Boas (2003, 2008a, 2008b) 迷你構式 (mini-construction) 論述，藉由以上強 調動詞詞彙語意在構式體現的論證，可更加深化本論文的理論基礎，也更能看出 詞彙和構式之間密切的關係；因此，語意和句法的映照為下一個迫切處理的議 題。
5.3 小結
未來研究議題雖未列於本論文探討重點之行列中，然而這些議題均為時貌性 研究所衍生的高相關議題，值得進一步詳加探究。藉由跨語言比較或歷時語料推 演、語料庫語言學、應用語言學之方法與理論，將深化本論文研究成果。
本論文的研究發現目前可應用於臺灣客語四縣腔、海陸腔之時貌構式，擴大 時貌構式的探討範圍，驗證本論文成果是否適用於臺灣客語其他腔調，又或是跨 方言比較，從中我們可以瞭解時貌構式之間的組合及聚合關係，並更全面性認識 臺灣客語時貌系統。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
‧
Research in Modern Chinese)》10：18-27。林若望，2002。〈論現代漢語的時制意義〉，《語言暨語言學》3.1：1-25。
1999.3: 93-96。
孫朝奮，1997。〈再論助詞「著」的用法及其來源〉，《中國語文》1997.2：139-146。
陳光明，2003。〈現代漢語動相標誌的研究〉。未出版之博士論文。新竹：國立
‧
國科會計畫：NSC 89-2411-H-007-037。新竹：國立清華大學。
郭維茹，2003。〈從閩語“去”字的用法看動相補語和體貌標記的判斷問題〉，《中
‧
Abraham, Werner, and Leonid Kulikov (eds). 1999. Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and
Causativity: Essays in Honour of Vladimir Nedjalkov. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:
John Benjamins.
Asher, Nicholas, and Julie Hunter. 2012. Aspectual coercions in content composition.
Space and Time in Languages and Cultrues: Language, Culture, and Cognition,
ed. by Luna Filipović, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 55-81. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
Bach, Emmon. 1981. On time, tense, and aspects: An essay in English metaphysics.
Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 63-81. New York: Academic Press.
Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5-16.
Bary, Corien, and Markus Egg. 2012. Variety in Ancient Greek aspect interpretation.
Linguistics and Philosophy 35.2: 111-134.
Binnick, Robert. 2006. Aspect and aspectuality. The Handbook of English
Linguistics, ed. by Bas Aarts and April McMahon, 244-268. Oxford: Blackwell.
Boas, Hans C. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Boas, Hans C. 2005. Determining the productivity of resultative constructions: A reply to Goldberg & Jackendoff. Language 81.2: 448-464
Boas, Hans. 2008a. Resolving form-meaning discrepancies in Construction
‧
Grammar. Constructional Reorganization, ed. by J. Leino, 11-36.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Boas, Hans. 2008b. Determining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 113-144.
Boas, Hans C. 2008c. Towards a frame-constructional approach to verb
classification. Grammar, Constructions, and Interfaces (Special Issue of Revista
Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57), ed. by Eulalia Sosa Acevedo, and Francisco
José Cortés Rodríguez. 17-48.Borer, Hagit. 2005. The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bott, Oliver. 2010. The Processing of Events. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Brennan, Jonathan, and Liina Pylkkänen. 2008. Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion. Brain & Language 106:
132-143.
Brinton, Laurel J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Languag
Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2005. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D. Janda, 602-623. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of
Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago:
Chicago University Press.
Chafe, Wallace. 1992. The importance of corpus linguistics to understanding the nature of language. Directions in Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Jan Svartvik, 79-97.
Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chao, Yuen Ren (趙元任). 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Chappell, Hilary (曹茜蕾). 2001. Chinese Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic
Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chappell, Hilary (曹茜蕾), and Christine Lamarre (柯理思). 2005. A Grammar and
Lexicon of Hakka: Historical Materials from the Basel Mission Library. Paris:
É cole des Hautes É tudes en Sciences Sociales.
Chen, Chien-chou (陳建州). 2009. Experientiality and reversibility of the aspectual morpheme guo in Mandarin Chinese: Temporal and Atemporal perspectives.
Dong Hwa Journal of Humanties 14: 247-294.
Cheng, Hui-wen (鄭惠文). 2004. The syntax and semantics of post-verbal diao.
Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Taiepei: National Chengchi University.
‧
Cheng, Robert L (鄭良偉). 1979. Taiwanese u (有) and Mandarin you (有). Asian
and Pacific Conference on Linguistics and Language Teaching: 141-180.
Cheng, Robert L (鄭良偉). 1985. A comparison of Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin, and Peking Mandarin. Language 61.2: 352-377.
Chiang, Shu-mei (強舒嬍). 2009. Event Conception and Argument Realizations of Hakka Potential Complement Constructions: Intergration of
Cognitive-Constructional Models. Ph.D. Dissertation. Taipei: Natioal Chengchi University.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and
Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in
Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, William. 2003. Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. Motivation
in Language: Studeis in Honour of Günter Radden, ed. by H. Cuyckens, T. Berg,
R. Dirven, and K.-U. Panther, 49-68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Danchev, Andrei. 1992. An outline of aspectuality in English within a compromise linguistic model. Current Advances in Semantic Theory, ed. by Maxim I.
Stamenov, 321-337. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of
the Clause. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyte
de Swart, Henriëtte. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and
Linguistic Theory 16.2: 347-385.
Dölling, Johannes. 2014. Aspectual coercion and eventuality structure. Events,
Arguments, and Aspects: Topics in the Semantics of Verbs, ed. by Klaus
Robering, 189-226. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of
Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D.
Reidel Publishing Company.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1992. “Corpus linguistics” or “computer-aided armchair linguistics”. Directions in Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Jan Svartvik, 35-60.
Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64.3:
501-538.
Francis, Elaine J., and Laura A. Michaelis. 2003. Mismatch: A crucible for linguistic theory. Mismatch: Form-function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar, ed. by Elaine Francis, and Laura Michaelis, 1-27. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
‧
Fuhs, Stefan. 2010. The aspectual coercion of the English durative adverbial.
Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches, ed.
by Dylan Glynn, and Kerstin Fischer, 137-154. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to
Argument Structure. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in
Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2013. Constructionist approaches. The Oxford Handbook of
Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale,
15-31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Goldberg, Adele E., and Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80.3: 532-568.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2010. Useful statistics for corpus linguistics. A Mosaic of Corpus
Linguistics: Selected Approaches, ed. by Aquilino Sánchez, and Moisés Almela,
269-291. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Gries, Stefan Th. 2012. Collostructions. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second
Language Acquisition, ed. by Peter Robinson, 92-95. London/New York:
Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Data in Construction Grammar. The Oxford Handbook of
Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale,
93-108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of
Corpus Linguistics 9.1: 97-129.
Hampe, Beate. 2011. Discovering constructions by means of collostruction annlysis:
The English denominative construction. Cognitive Linguistics 22.2: 211-245.
Heine, Bernd. 2005. Grammaticalization. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 575-601. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991.
Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago/London: University of
Chicago Press.Her, One-Soon. 2005. Optimality-theoretic lexical mapping theory: A case study of locative inversion. International Journal of Technology and Human
Interaction 2.1: 67-94.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. Approaches to
Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues,
ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 17-35.‧
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. 1996. Some recent trends in grammaticalization. Annual Review of
Anthropology 25: 217-236.
Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56.2: 251-299.
Huang, James C-T. 1987. Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. The
Representation of (In)definiteness, ed. by Eric J. Reuland, and Alice G. B. ter
Meulan, 226-253. Cambridge: MIT Press.Iljic, Robert. 1990. The verbal suffix –guo in Mandarin Chinese and the notion of recurrence. Lingua 81.4: 301-326.
Iwata, Seizi. 2005a. Locative alternation and two levels of verb meaning. Cognitive
Linguistics 16.2: 355-407.
Iwata, Seizi. 2005b. The role of verb meaning in locative alternations. Grammatical
Constructions: Back to the Roots, ed. by Mirjam Fried, and Hans C. Boas,
101-118. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Iwata, Seizi. 2008. Locative Alternation: A Lexical-Constructional
Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2008. Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges.
Language 84.1: 8-28.
Kang, Jian. 1999. The composition of the perfective aspect in Mandarin Chinese.
Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Boston: Boston University.
Kang, Jian. 2002. The unmarked perfective guo. Journal of the Chinese Language
Teachers Association 37.3: 1-36.
Kay, Paul. 1995. Construction grammar. Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Ö stman, and Jan Blommaert, 171-177.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kay, Paul, and Charles J. Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75.1: 1-33.
Kenny, Anthony. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge.
Hopper, Paul, and Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language 56.2: 251-299.
Hsiao, Yuchao E. (蕭宇超). 2003. Conceptualizations of GUO in Mandarin.
Language and Linguistics 4.2: 279-300.
Lai, Huei-ling (賴惠玲), and Shu-mei Chiang (強舒嬍). 2007. The family of Hakka idiomatic gin2 X gin2 Y constructions: Paratactic constructions with subordinate meanings. Paper presented at the 10th International Cognitive Linguistics
‧
Conference. Poland: Jagiellonian University. July 15-20.
Lauwers, Peter, and Dominique Willems. 2011. Coercion: Definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends. Linguistics 49.6: 1219-1235.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English verb. 3rd edition. New York:
Routledge.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary
Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional
Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Shih-min (李詩敏). 2000. A Study of Hakka Aspect Markers: e11/le11, ko55 and
ten31. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Taipei: Fu Jen Catholic University.
Li, Shih-min (李詩敏), and Huei-ling Lai (賴惠玲). 2011. Hakka aspectual ted4 constructions: A constructional approach. International Journal of Language
Studies (IJLS) 5.1: 67-94.
Lien, Chinfa (連金發). 2001. The semantic extension of Tioh8 著 in Taiwanese Southern Min: An interactive approach. Language and Linguistics 2.2: 173-202.
Lien, Chinfa (連金發). 2005a. Phase and aspect Markers in Li Jing Ji. Essays in
Chinese Historical Linguistics: Festschrift in Memory of Profess Fang-kuei Li on his Centennial Birthday, ed. by Pang-Hsin Ting, and Anne O. Yue, 393-420.
Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Lien, Chinfa. 2005b. Families of ditransitive constructions in Li Jing Ji. Language
and Linguistics 6.4: 707-737.
Lin, Jo-wang (林若望). 2003. Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of
East Asian Linguistics 12.3: 259-311.
Lin, Jo-Wang (林若望). 2006. Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23.1: 1-53.
Lin, Jo-Wang (林若望). 2007. Predicate restriction, discontinuity property and the meaning of the perfective marker Guo in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East
Asian Linguistics 16.3: 237-257.
Liu, Meichun (劉美君). 2003. Motion, direction and spatial configuration: A lexical semantic study of ‘hang’ verbs in Mandarin. Motion, Direction and Location in
Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier, ed. by Erin Shay, and Uwe
Seibert, 177-188. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Liu, Meichun (劉美君). 2015. Tense and aspect in Mandarin Chinese. The Oxford
Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. by William S-Y. Wang, and Chaofen Sun,
274-289. New York: Oxford University Press.Loetzsch, Martin, Remi van Trip, and Luc Steels. 2008. Typological and
computational investigations of spatial perspective. Modeling communication
‧
with Robots and Virtual Humans, ed. by Ipke Wachsmuth, and Günther
Knoblich, 125-142. Germany: Springer.Ljungqvist, Marita. 2007. Le, guo and zhe in Mandarin Chinese: A
relevance-theoretic account. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16.3: 193-235.
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Wilson. 2004. Corpus Linguistics. 2nd edition.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
McEnery, Tony, and Zhonghua Xiao. 2007. Parallel and comparable corpora: The state of play. Corpus-Based Perspectives in Linguistics, ed. by Yuji Kawaguchi, Toshihiro Takagaki, Nobuo Tomimori, and Yoichiro Tsuruga, 131-145.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
McEnery, Tony, Zhonghua Xiao and Lili Mo. 2003. Aspect marking in English and Chinese: Using the Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese for contrastive language study. Literary and Linguistic Computing 18.4: 361-378.
Mei, Tsu-lin (梅祖麟). 1979. The Etymology of the Aspect Marker tsi in the Wu Dialect. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7.1: 1-14.
Meyer, Charles F. 2002. English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Michaelis, Laura A. 2003a. Word meaning, sentence meaning, and constructional meaning. Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, ed. by H. Cuyckens, R.
Dirven, and J. Taylor, 163-210. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Michaelis, Laura A. 2003b. Headless constructions and coercion by construction.
Mismatch: Form-function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar, ed. by
Elaine Francis, and Laura Michaelis, 259-310. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Michaelis, Laura A. 2004. Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 1-67.
Michaelis, Laura A. 2005. Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax.
Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed.
by Jan-Ola Ö stman, and Mirjam Fried, 45-88. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Michaelis, Laura A. 2011. Stative by construction. Linguistics 49: 1359-1400.
Mourelatos, Alexander P. D. 1978. Events, processes, and states. Linguistics and
Philosophy 2: 415-434.
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide 30.1: 27-51.
Nagy, Tünde. 2009. Aspectual coercion and the complementation of aspectualizers in English. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 1.2: 229-240.
Paczynski, Martin, Ray Jackendoff, and Gina Kuperberg. 2014. When events change
‧
their nature: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26.9: 1905-1917.
Paducheva, Elena. 2009. Event structure: Taxonomy, semantic roles, aspect,
causation. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 43.3:
196-202.
Pan, Hai-Hua (潘海華). 1996. Imperfective aspect zhe, agent deletion, and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14:
409-432.
Pan, Hai-Hua (潘海華), and Po-Lun Lee (李寶倫). 2004. The role of pragmatics in interpreting the Chinese perfective markers –guo and –le. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 441-466.
Partee, Barbara, and Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity.
Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, eds. by Rainer Bäuerle,
Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, 361-383. Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
Pickering, Martin J., Brain McElree, Steven Frisson, Lillian Chen, and Matthew J.
Traxler. 2006. Underspecification and aspectual coercion. Discourse Processes 42.2: 131-155.
Pustejovsky, James. 1991a. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 4.1-3: 47-81.
Pustejovsky, James. 1991b. The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17.4:
409-441.
Pustejovsky, James. 1993. Type coercion and lexical selection. Semantics and the
Lexicon, ed. by James Pustejovsky, 73-94. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Pustejovsky, James. 2005. The syntax of event structure. The Language of Time: A
Reader, ed. by Inderjeet Mani, James Pustejovsky, and Rob Gaizauskas, 33-60.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pustejovsky, James. 2008. From concepts to meaning: The role of lexical knowledge.
Unity and Diversity of Languages, ed. by Piet van Sterkenburg, 73-84.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pustejovsky, James, and Pierrette Bouillon. 1995. Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy. Journal of Semantics 12: 133-162.
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Mismatching meaning in brain and behavior. Language and
Linguistics Compass 2: 712-738.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 2000. Classifying single argument verbs.
Lexical Specification and Insertion, ed. by Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert,
and Jane Grimshaw, 269-304. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Roby, David Brian. 2009. Aspect and the Categorization of States: The case of ser
and estar in Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
‧
Rodríguez, Francisco Cortés. 2009. The inchoative construction: semantic
representation and unification constraints. Deconstructing Constructions, ed. by Christopher S. Butler, and Javier Martín Arista, 247-270.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Silva, Augusto Soares da. 2007. Verbs of letting: Some cognitive and historical aspects. On Interpreting Construction Schemas: From Action and Motion to
Transitivity and Causality, ed. by Nicole Delbecque, and Bert Cornillie, 171-200.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht/Boston/London:
Kluwer Academic.
Smith, Carlota S. 1994. Aspectual viewpoint and situation type in Mandarin Chinese.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3.2: 107-146.
Smith, Carlota S. 2012. Tense and aspect: Time across languages. Semantics: An
International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3, ed. by Claudia
Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 2581-2607. Berlin/Boston:De Gruyter Mouton.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Collostructional analysis. The Oxford Handbook of
Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale,
290-306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 8.2: 209-243.
Tai, James H-Y (戴浩一). 1984. Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four
categories. Parassession on Lexical Semantics, ed. by D. Testen, U. Mishra, and J. Drogo, 289-296. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Tai, James H-Y (戴浩一). 1985. Temporal sequence and Chinese word
order. Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 49-72. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia:
John Benjamins.
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. The relation of grammar to cognition. Topics in Cognitive
Linguistics, ed. by Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 165-205.Amsterdam/ Philadelphia:
John Benjamins.
Townsend, David J. 2013. Aspectual coercion in eye movements. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research 42.3: 281-306.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Constructions in grammaticalization. The
Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D.
Janda, 624-647. Oxford: Blackwell.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. Grammaticalization. The Continuum Companion to
Historical Linguistics, ed. by Silvia Luraghi, and Vit Bubenik, 271-285. London:
‧
Continuum Press.
Trautwein, Martin. 2005. The Time window of Language: The Interaction between
Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Knowledge in the Temporal Interpretation of German and English Texts. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Tummers, Jose, Kris Heylen, and Dirk Geeraerts. 2005. Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and
Linguistic Theory 1.2: 225-261.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1972. On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht:
Reidel.
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1989. Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and
Philosophy 12: 39-94.
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal
and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verkuyl, Henk J. 2005. Aspectual composition: surveying the ingredients.
Perspectives on Aspect, ed. by Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart, and
Angeliek van Hout, 19-39. Netherlands: Springer.Wiechmann, Daniel. 2008. On the computation of collostruction strength: Testing measures of association as expressions of lexical bias. Corpus Linguistics and
Linguistic Theory 4.2: 253-290.
Wu, Hsiao-Ching (吳曉菁). 2003. A case study on the grammaticalization of GUO in Mandarin Chinese ─ Polysemy of the motion verb with respect to semantic changes. Language and Linguistics 4.4: 857-885.
Wu, Jiun-Shiung (吳俊雄). 2007. Semantic difference between the two imperfective markers in Mandarin and its implications on temporal relations. Journal of
Chinese Linguistics 35.2: 372-398.
Wu, Jiun-Shiung (吳俊雄). 2008. Terminability, wholeness and semantics of experiential guo. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17.1: 1-32.
Wu, Jiun-Shiung (吳俊雄). 2009a. Tense as a discourse feature: Rethinking temporal location in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18.2: 145-165.
Wu, Jiun-Shiung (吳俊雄). 2009b. Aspectual influence on temporal relations: A case study of the experiential Guo in Mandarin. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 7.2:
1-24.
Xiao, Richard, and Tony McEnery. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A
Xiao, Richard, and Tony McEnery. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A