（一）研究限制
（甲）樣本取得
本研究的樣本發放多集中於台灣北部及中部之中小企業，尚未涵蓋 至其他縣市區域，因此研究結果可能因地域性的差異而有所影響。
（乙）縱斷面研究
由於人力資源措施，需要時間的發酵才看得出具體成果，然而本研 究蒐集資料的時間均在同一個時點完成所有研究變項的資料蒐集，可能 導致因果不明的問題，無法明確辨別是因賦權氣候、心理賦權導致的組 織雙歧；還是因組織雙歧而造成賦權氣候、心理賦權。因此未來的研究 可採用縱斷面研究，將資料分成不同時間點收集。
（丙）控制變數
過去學者曾提出，高階管理者年齡會使公司在從事變動及創新活動 上產生影響(Vaccaro, Jansen, Bosch, & Volberda, 2012)，然而本研究未將此 因素設定為變項之一或控制變項進行考量。
（二）建議
（甲）調節變項
本研究未設定任何的調節變項，而學者 Raisch 與 Birkinshaw(2009) 提 出 過 去 研 究 對 於 雙 歧 進 行 探 討 的 調 節 變 項 ， 如 市 場 導 向 (Market orientation)、資源稟賦(Resource endowment)、公司規模(Firm’s scope)等。
因此本研究建議未來可以增加調節變項進行探討。
第柒章 參考文獻
1. 郭素玲、廖國鋒、朱豔芳，「賦權氣候對個人績效之跨層次影響—自我效能之干
擾效果」，國防大學國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文，民國九十四年。
2. Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. ―Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions.‖
Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, pp.521–543(2001).
3. Alper Ertürk, ―Linking Psychological Empowerment to Innovation Capability:
Investigating the Moderating Effect of Supervisory Trust.‖ International Journal of
4. Amabile, T. M., & Gitomer, J., ―Children's artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials.‖ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 10, pp.209–215(1984).
5. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M., ―Assessing the work environment for creativity.‖ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp.1154–84(1996).
6. Amabile, T.M. & Grykiewicz, N.D., ―The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory.‖ Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 2, pp.231-253(1989).
7. Anne Nederveen Pieterse, Daan van Knippenberg, Michaéla Schippers and Daan Stam, ‖Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Empowerment.‖ Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp.609–623(2010).
8. Avolio, B. J. and Bass, B. M., ―Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.‖, Palo Alto, CA: Mindgarden (1997).
9. Avolio, B. J. and Bass, B. M., ―Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership.‖ Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (1994).
10. Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C., ―Building ambidexterity into an organization.‖ Sloan Management Review, Vol.45, No.4, pp.46-55(2004).
11. Bowen, D. E., and Lawler, E. E., ―Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages:
The Role of the ―Strength‖ of the HRM System.‖ Academy of Management Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.203-221(2004).
12. Çakar, N.D. & Ertürk, A., ―Comparing innovation capability of small and medium sized enterprises: Examining the effects of organizational culture and empowerment.‖
Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp.325-359(2010).
13. Çakar, N.D., ―Enhancing innovation capability through human resource practices: An empirical study in Turkish SMEs.‖ South-East Europe Review, 4/2006,
14. Chan, Y. H., Taylor, R. R., and Markham, S., ―The role of subordinates’ trust in a social exchange-driven psychological empowerment process.‖ Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 20, pp.444-467(2008).
15. Charles A. O’Reilly III and Michael L. Tushman, ―Organization Ambexterity: Past, Present and Future‖, Academy of Management, Vol. 27, No.4, pp. 324-338(2013).
16. Charles A. O’Reilly III, Michael L. Tushman, ―Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future.‖ Academy of Management Perspectives (in press) (2013).
17. Chen, E., and Katila, R. ―Rival Interpretations of Balancing Exploration and Exploitation: Simultaneous or Sequential?‖, Blackwell Handbook on Technology and Innovation Management, pp.197-214(2008).
18. Conger, J. A.,‖ Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: an insider’s perspective on these developing streams of research.‖ The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp.145-170(1999).
19. Cristina B. Gibson and Julian Birkinshaw, ―The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity.‖ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp.209-226(2004).
20. Denise M. Rousseau, Wei and Lau, ―Psychological Contracts in the Workplace:
Understanding the Ties That Motivate.‖ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.120-127(2004).
21. Dorothy Leonard-Barton ―Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development.‖ Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp.111-125(1992).
22. Ekvall, G., ―Organizational climate for creativity and innovation.‖ European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 5, pp.105-123(1996).
23. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. ―The antecedents, consequences, and mediating:
Role of organizational ambidexterity‖, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47 No.2, pp.209-226 (2004).
24. Glisson, C, & James, L. R., ―The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams.‖ Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, pp.767-794(2002).
25. Gretchen M. Spreitzer, ―Social Structural Characteristics Of Psychological Empowerment.‖ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp.483-504(1996).
26. Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A., ―Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation.‖ Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, pp.461-473(2009).
27. Harry, M.J. & Schroeder, R., ―Six sigma: The breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations.‖ Currency: New York (2000).
28. Hofmann, D. A. & Stetzer, A., ―A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents.‖ Personnel Psychology, Vol. 49, pp. 307-339(1996).
29. Huang, X., Iun, J., A., and Gong, Y., ―Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates.‖ Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 31, pp.122-143. doi:10.1002/job.636(2010).
30. Ignacio G. Vaccaro, Justin J. P. Jansen, Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch and Henk W.
Volberda, ―Management Innovation and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Organizational Size.‖ Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp.28–
51(2012).
31. Ikujiro Nonaka, ‖A Dynamic Theory of Organization Knowledge Creation.‖
Organization Science, Vol.5, No.1, pp.14-31(1994).
32. James, L. R. and Jones, A. Pl, ―Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.‖ Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 81, pp. 1096-1112(1974).
33. James, L. R., Joyce, W.F. and Slocum, J. W., ―Comment: Organizations do not cognize.‖ Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, pp.129-132(1988).
34. Jing Liu, ―High Performance Work Systems and Firm Performance: The Moderator Role of Industry and Organizational Characteristics.‖ Master of Business Studies thesis, Dublin City University (2011).
35. John F. Veiga, Yan Ling,Michael H. Lubatkin Zeki Simsek, ―Ambidexterity and Performance in Small- to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration.‖ Journal of Management, Vol. 32, No.
5(2006)
36. Julian Birkinshaw and Christina B. Gibson, ―Building an Ambidextrous Organisation.‖
37. Julian Birkinshaw and Kamini Gupta, ―Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies.‖ Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.287-298(2013).
38. Jung, D.I., Chow, C. & Wu, A., ―The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings.‖
The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4/5), pp.525–544(2003).
39. Krause, D. E., ―Influence-Based Leadership as a Determinant of the Inclination to Innovate and of Innovation-Related Behaviors: An Empirical Investigation.‖
Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15, No.1, pp.79-102(2004).
40. lanchard, K. H., Carlos, J. P., and Randolph, W. A., ―The Empowerment Barometer and Action Plan. Blanchard Training and Development, Escondido, CA (1995).
41. Lawler, E. E., Hall, D. T., & Oldham, G. R., ―Organizational climate: Relationship to organizational structure, process, and performance.‖ Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 11, pp.139-155(1974).
42. Lee, M. and Koh, J., ―Is empowerment really a new concept?‖ The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 12, No.4, pp.684-695.3(2001).
43. Liao H, Toya K, Lepak DP, Hong Y., ―Do They See Eye to Eye? Management and Employee Perspectives of High-Performance Work Systems and Influence Processes on Service Quality.‖ Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp.371-391(2009).
44. Liden, R. C. and Arad, S., ―A power perspective of empowerment and work groups:
Implications for human resources management research.‖ Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 14, pp.205-251. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press(1996).
45. Manish K. Srivastava And Devi R. Gnyawali, ―When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources For Breakthrough Innovation‖, Vol.54, No.4, pp.797-810(2011).
46. Mary J. Benner, Michael L. Tushman, ―Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited.‖ The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, No. 2 (2003).
47. Messersmith, Jake G.; Patel, Pankaj C.; Lepak, David P.; Gould-Williams, Julian S.,
―Unlocking the black box: Exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance.‖ Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 6(2011).
48. Michael H. Lubatkin, Zeki Simsek, Yan Ling and John F. Veiga4, ―Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration‖, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp.646-672 (2006).
49. Michael L. Tushman,Gilbert Probst,Julian Birkinshaw, Sebastian Raisch,
―Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance.‖ Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.685–695(2009).
50. Naumann, S. E., & Bennett, N., ―A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model.‖ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, pp.881-889(2000).
51. Pankaj C. Patel, Jake G. Messersmith, David P. Lepak, ―Walking the tight-rope: an assessment of the relationship between high performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity.‖ Academy of Management Journal, pp.2-28(2011).
52. Qing Cao, Eric Gedajlovic and Hongping Zhang, ―Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects‖, Organization Science, Vol.20, No.4, pp.781-796(2009).
53. Randolph, W. A.,‖ Navigating the Journey to Empowerment.‖ Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 24, No.4, pp. 19–32(1995).
54. Robert B. Duncan, ―The ambidextrous organization, designing dual structures for innovation‖, North-Holland, pp.167-188(1976).
55. Robert C. Ford1 and W. Alan Randolph2, ―Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management.‖ Journal of Management, Vol. 18(1992).
56. Samuel Aryee, Walumbwa, Fred O., Seidu, Emmanuel Y. M., Otaye and Lilian E.,
―Impact of high-performance work systems on individual- and branch-level performance: Test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages.‖ Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 97(2), pp.287-300(2012).
57. Schin, J. & McClomb, G.E., ―Top executive management style and organizational
58. Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E.. ―On the etiology of climates.‖ Personnel Psychology, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp.19-39 (1983).
59. Schneider, B., ―The psychological life of organizations. In N. M. Ashkanasy, .P.M.
Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.)‖ Handbook of organizational culture and climate:
xvii-xxii. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage(2000).
60. Schneider, B., Parkington, J. J., & Buxton, V. M., ―Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks.‖ Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25, pp.252-267(1980).
61. Seibert, Scott E., Silver, Seth R. and Randolph, W. Alan, ―Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction.‖ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47(3), pp.332-349(2004).
62. Spreitzer, G. M., ―Psychological empowerment in the work place: Construct definition, measurement, and validation.‖ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, 1442–1465(1995).
63. Steven Sia and Feng Wei, ‖ Transformational and transactional leaderships, empowerment climate, and innovation performance: A multilevel analysis in the Chinese context.‖, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.299-320 (2012).
64. Sung-Choon Kang and Scott A. Snell, ―Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management.‖ Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp.65-92(2009).
65. Sung-Choon Kang1 and Scott A. Snell, ―Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management‖, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.46, No.1, pp.65–92 (2009).
66. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A., ―Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation.‖ Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, pp.666–681(1990).
67. Understanding Variation in Manager’s Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and om J.
M. Tom J. M. Mom and Frans A. J. van den Bosch and Henk W. Volberda,
―Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms‖ , Organization Science, Vol.20, No.4, pp.812-828(2009)
68. Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., & Griffin, R., ―Toward a theory of organizational creativity.‖ Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.293–321 (1993).