• 沒有找到結果。

結論與未來展望

在文檔中 中 華 大 學 (頁 77-81)

這項課題。齒頂導角方 降低齒輪振動噪音,

並且對於螺旋齒輪對之整體效能並無明顯的影響。

5.2 未來展望

本研究之齒輪動態分析,得到了組合誤差、隆齒量、齒頂修整與過切對於螺 旋齒輪對動態特性的影響。但數值結果之驗證則仍需進一步之研究或實驗量測來 確認之。另外對於加工誤差包含齒形誤差、導程誤差、節距誤差及偏心誤差等,

組合誤差則分為軸中心距誤差、軸平行度誤差、軸偏心誤差,以及受外力造成之 動態彈性變形誤差等,上述各種誤差對於螺旋齒輪對動態特性的影響,或經由更 明確的主動齒輪與被動齒輪之定義,來獲得更佳的傳動誤差值等,則仍是後續值 得研究的課題。

而以 FEM 之近似連體模式齒輪動態分析,為提高建模準確度,其網格模式 越精细越準確,但是網格數目會增加,也會造成運算時間成級數延長。如何细化 網格模式以提高準確度而又不會增加運算時間,為提高齒輪動態分析的研究成效 之關鍵;另外,動態模擬分析之建模元素皆為直邊元素,對於非直邊曲線是用细 化網

法可以避免齒頂與齒腹產生干涉以及

格來提高分析準確率;因此,建立非直邊網格元素之齒輪動態分析,以提高 數值分析效率,都是未來值得探討的方向。

. J. E. Shigley, C. R. Mischke and R. G. Bunas, 2004, “Mechanical Engineering raw-Hill Education, pp. 664-771.

. H. N. Ozguven and D. R. Houser, 1988, “Mathematical models used in gear ics - a review,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 121, pp. 383-411.

3. M. H. Tsai and Y. C. Tsai, 1998, “Design of high-contact-ratio spur gears using quadratic parametric tooth profile,” Journal of Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 33, pp. 551-564.

4. R. Kasuba and K. W. Evans, 1981, “An extended model for determining dynamic loads in spur gearing,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 103, pp.

98-409.

. B. Oswald and D. P. Townsend, 1996, “Tooth modification and spur gear tooth strain,” Gear Technology, Vol. 13, pp. 20-24.

6. P. Velex and M. Maatar, 1996, “A mathematical model for analyzing the influence of shape deviations and mounting errors on gear dynamic behaviour,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 121, pp. 629-660.

7. K. Y. Yoon and S. S. Rao, 1996, “Dynamic load analysis of spur gears using a new ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 118, pp. 1-6.

8. L. Vedmar and B. Henriksson, 1998, “A general approach for determining dynamic forces in spur gears,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 120, pp.

593-598.

9. A. Kahraman and G. W. Blankenship, 1999, “Effect of involute contact ratio on spur gear dynamics,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 121, pp. 112-118.

參考文獻

1

Design,” McG 2

dynam

5. F

tooth profile,”

10. W. Nadolski and A. Pielorz, 20 vestigation of nonlinear loads on gear teeth in single gear transmission,” International Journal of Mechanical

11. ics of a spur gear pair,”

12.

14. S. Liu, 2002, “A dynamic stiffness method for dynamic

15. sai and Y. C. Tsai, 1997, “A method for calculating static transmission

, Vol.

17.

18. , V. Agashe and S. M Vijayakar, 2000, “Dynamic response of a

19. C. Yuksel and A. Kahraman, 2004, “Dynamic tooth loads of planetary gear sets having tooth profile wear,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol.39, pp. 695-715.

01, “Theoretic in

Sciences, Vol. 43, pp. 299-311.

A. Kahraman and R. Singh, 1990, “Non-linear dynam Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 142, pp. 49-75.

吳茂榮,2005,“包含潤滑特性之正齒輪動態分析”,中華大學碩士論文。 13. K. J. Huang and T. S. Liu, 2000, “Dynamic analysis of a spur gear by the dynamic

stiffness method,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 234, pp. 311-329.

K. J. Huang and T.

analysis of spur gears,” Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 23, pp. 389-394.

M. H. T

errors of plastic spur gears using FEM evaluation,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 27, pp. 345-357.

16. F. L. Litvin, Q. Lian and A. L. Kapelevich, 2000, ”Asymmetric modified spur gear drives: reduction of noise, localization of contact, simulation of meshing and stress analysis,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 188, pp. 363-390.

Y. C. Chen and C. B. Tsay, 2002, “Stress analysis of a helical gear set with localized bearing contact,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol.38, pp.

707-723.

R. G. Parker

planetary gear system using a finite element/contact mechanics model,” ASME Journal of Mechanic Design, Vol. 122, pp. 304-310.

在文檔中 中 華 大 學 (頁 77-81)

相關文件