中文：
王忠恕，民 90.06，「動物保護法修正案之重點簡介」，農政與農情，第 108 期，
頁 23-25
吳光平，2009.06，「動物法之構成--動物法導論」，玄奘法律學報，第十一卷，
頁 201-260
吳光平，民 100.12，「動 物 保 護 立 法 之 先 行 者 --英 國 動 物 法 導 論 」， 玄 奘 法 律 學 報， 第 十 六 卷 ， 頁 193-241
李茂生，民 92.03，「動物權的概念與我國動物保護法的文化意義」，月旦法學，
第 94 期，頁 155-180
施文真，2007.6，綠化 WTO？—貿易、環境與臺灣，元照出版社
徐揮彥，民 91.09，「世 界 貿 易 組 織 法 律 架 構 與 人 權 保 障 理 念 之 接 軌 --一 般 例 外 條 款 運 用 法 理 之 探 討 」，政 大 法 學 評 論 ，第 71 期，頁 237-301
許桂森，民 89.12，「動物保護法執行現況與展望」，雜糧與畜產，第 324 期，
頁 13-17
許桂森，民 94.08，「因應動物保護國際化的變革與作法」，農政與農情，第 158 期，頁 54-59
彭心儀，民 96.06，「全球化與多元價值--論 WTO 公共道德例外條款」，國 立 臺 灣 大 學 法 學 論 叢 ，第 36 期第 2 卷，頁 165-228
鄭祝菁，94.8，「動物運送管理辦法簡介」，農政與農情，第 158 期，頁 25-27
鄭祝菁，民 90.08，「『動物保護法』之執行成果及展望」，農政與農情，第 110 期，頁 28-32
英文：
Archibald, C. J., Winter 2008, FORBIDDEN BY THE WTO? DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A PRODUCT WHEN ITS CREATION CAUSES HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OR ANIMAL WELFARE, 48 Nat. Resources J. 15—51
Beqiraj, J., 2013, THE DELICATE EQUILIBRIUM OF EU TRADE MEASURES:
THE SEALS CASE, 14 German L.J. 279-319
Burrell, A., 2011, “GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES” IN THE AGRI-FOOD SUPPLY CHAIN, 13:4 Env. L. Rev. 251-270
Charnovitz, S., 1998, THE MORAL EXCEPTION IN TRADE POLICY, 38 Va. J.
Int'l L. 689—745
Cook, K. & Bowles, D., 2010, CROWING PAINS: THE DEVELOPING
RELATIONSHIP OF ANIMAL WELFARE STANDARDS AND THE WORLD TRADE RULES, 19:2, R.E.C.I.E.L., 227—238
Diebold, N. F., March 2008, THE MORALS AND ORDER EXCEPTIONS IN WTO LAW: BALANCING THE TOOTHLESS TIGHER AND THE UNDERMINING MOLE, 11:1 J.I.E.L. 43—74
Donnellan, L., 2007, ANIMAL TESTING IN COSMETICS: RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES, 13 Animal L. 251—280
European Commission, 2012 , COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER: IMPACT ASSESSMENT ACCOMPANYING THE DOCUMENT COMMUNICATION
FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE ON THE
EUROPEAN UNION STRATERY FOR THE PROTECTION AND WELFARE OF ANIMALS 2012-201
European Commission, 2012 , COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE ON THE EUROPEAN UNION
STRATERY FOR THE PROTECTION AND WELFARE OF ANIMALS 2012-2015
Favre, D., 2011, ANIMAL LAW: WELFARE, INTERESTS, AND RIGHTS (2nd ed.), Wolters Kluwer
Favre, D., 2012, AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY FOR ANIMAL WELFARE, 18 Animal L. 237-280
Feddersen, C.T., winter 1998, FOCUSING ON SUBSTANTIVE LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS: THE PUBLIC MORALS OF GATT'S ARTICLE XX(A) AND "CONVENTIONAL" RULES OF
INTERPRETATION, 7 Minn. J. Global Trade 75—122
Galantucci, R., Spring 2009, COMPASSIONATE CONSUMERISM WITHIN THE GATT REGIME: CAN BELGIUM'S BAN ON SEAL PRODUCT IMPORTS BE JUSTIFIED UNDER ARTICLE XX?, 39 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 281—312
Gambardella, A.M., 2010, THE EU BAN IN SEAL PRODUCTS: SOME CUSTOMS AND WTO OPEN QUESTIONS, 5:4 Global Trade & Customs J. 145—154
Gibson, M., 2011, THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF ANIMAL WELFARE, 16:2 Deakin Law Review 539-567
Graves, P., Mosman, K., & Rogers, S., 2012, 2011 LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW, 18 Animal L. 361-426
Houston, M.S., Fall 2012, ECOLABEL PROGRAMS AND GREEN CONSUMERISM: PRESERVING A HYBRID APPROACH TO
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, 7 Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L. 225-249
Howse, R. & Langille, J., summer 2012, PERMITTING PLURALISM: THE SEAL PRODUCTS DISPUTE AND WHY THE WTO SHOULD ACCEPT TRADE RESTRICTIONS JUSTIFIED BY NONINSTRUMENTAL MORAL VALUES, 37 Yale J. Int’l L. 367-432
Howse, R. & Levy, P., 2013, THE TBT PANELS: US-CLOVES, US-TUNA, US-COOL, 12:2 World T.R. 327-375
Jones, A.G., June 2005, AUSTRALIA'S DAMAGING INTERNATIONAL TRADE PRACTICE: THE CASE AGAINST CRUELTY TO GREYHOUNDS, 14 Pac. Rim L.
& Pol'y J. 677—711
Klein, J., spring 2012, EU COSMETICS DIRECTIVE AND THE BAN ON ANIMAL TESTING: COMPLIANCE, CHALLENGES, AND THE GATT AS A POTENTIAL BARRIER TO ANIMAL WELFARE, 21 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 251
Linzey, A., 2006, AN ETHICAL CRITIQUE OF THE CANADIAN SEAL HUNT AND AN EXAMINATION OF THE CASE FOR IMPORT CONTROLS ON SEAL PRODUCTS, 2 J. Animal L. 87—119
Luan, X. & Chaisse, J., winter 2011, PRELIMINARY COMMENTS ON THE WTO
SEALS PRODUCTS DISPUTE: TRADITIONAL HUNTING, PUBLIC MORALS AND TECHNICAL BARREIRS TO TRADE, 22 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl L. & Pol’y 79-121
Marwell, J.C., May 2006, TRADE AND MORALITY: THE WTO PUBLIC MORALS EXCEPTION AFTER GAMBLING, 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 802—837
Matheny, G. & Leahy, C., Winter 2007, FARM-ANIMAL WELFARE,
LEGISLATION, AND TRADE, 70-WTR Law & Contemp. Probs. 325—358
Michaud, P.V., Winter 1997, CAUGHT IN A TRAP: THE EUROPEAN UNION LEGHOLD TRAP DEBATE, 6 Minn. J. Global Trade 355—378
Michel, M., May 2011, THE LEGAL SITUATION OF ANIMAL IN
SWITZERLAND: TWO STEPS FORWARD, ONE STEP BACK—MANY STEPS TO GO, 7 J. Animal L. 1-42
Miller, G., 2009, EXPORTING MORALITY WITH TRADE RESTRICTIONS: THE WRONG PATH TO ANIMAL RIGHTS, 34 Brook. J. Int'l L. 999—1044
Nielsen, L., 2007, THE WTO, ANIMALS AND PPMS, Leiden: Martinus Publishers
Nielsen, L., march 2013, SYSTEMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE EU-SEAL PRODUCTS CASE, 8 Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L. & Pol’y 41
Pauwelyn, J., 2008, CASE NOT: SQUARING FREE TRADE IN CULTURE WITH CHINESE CENSORSHIP: THE WTO APPELLATE BODY REPORT ON
CHINA—AUDIOVISUALS, 11 Melbourne J. Int’l L. 1—22
Perisin, T., 2012, IS THE EU SEAL PRODUCTS REGULATION A SEALED DEAL? EU AND WTO CHALLENGES, 62:2 I.C.L.Q. 373-405
Peterson, L., 2010, TALKIN' 'BOUT A HUMANE REVOLUTION: NEW STANDARDS FOR FARMING PRACTICES AND HOW THEY COULD CHANGE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AS WE KNOW IT, 36 Brook. J. Int'l L.
265—298
Peterson, L., 2010, TALKIN’ ‘BOUT A HUMANE REVOLUTION: NEW
STANDARDS FOR FARMING PRACTICES AND HOW THEY COULD CHANGE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AS WE KNOW IT, 36 Brook. J. Int’l L. 265-298
Pope, C., 2009, FOR THE SAKE OF THE SEALS, 9 Asper Rev. Int'l Bus. & Trade L.
225—251
Rosholt, A.P., 2005, THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT DIRECTIVE--AN UNNECESSARY MEASURE TO A NECESSARY END--POSSIBLE LEGAL
CHALLENGES TO DIRECTIVE 2003/15/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL AMENDING COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 76/768/EEC
UNDER EUROPEAN UNION LAW, 60 Food & Drug L.J. 421—446
See., A., 2013, ANIMAL RROTECTION LAWS OF SINGAPORE AND MALAYSIA, 2013 Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 125-157
Stevenson, P., 2002, THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION RULES: A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THEIR ADVERSE IMPACT ON ANIMAL WELFARE, 8 Animal L.
107—141
Swinbank, A., 2006, LIKE PRODUCT, ANIMAL WELFARE AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION, 40:4 J.W.T 687—711
Thomas, E.M., 2007, PLAYING CHICKEN AT THE WTO: DEFENDING AN ANIMAL WELFARE-BASED TRADE RESTRICTION UNDER GATT'S MORAL EXCEPTION, 34 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 605—637
Van Calster, G., 2000, EXPORT RESTRICTIONS - A WATERSHED FOR ARTICLE 30, 25:4 E.L. Rev., 335—352
Vesilind, P.A., winter 2011, CONTINENTAL DRIFT: AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND THE WIDENING GAP BEWTEEN EUROPEAN UNION AND UNITED STATES ANIMAL WELFARE LAWS, 12 Vt. J. Envtl L. 223-253
Vranes, E., April 2009, BOOK REVIEW: LAURA NIELSEN. THE WTO,
ANIMALS AND PPMS.LEIDEN: MARTINUS PUBLISHERS, 2007, 20 Eur. J. Int’l L. 476—481
WTO Secretariat, 2009, CAN FARM ANIMAL WELFARES STANDARDS BE WTO—COMPATIBLE?, WTO Public Forum 2008: Trading into the Future 22—26
Wu, M., Winter 2008, FREE TRADE AND THE PROTECTION OF PUBLIC MORALS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NEWLY EMERGING PUBLIC MORALS CLAUSE DOCTRINE, 33 Yale J. Int'l L. 215—251