• 沒有找到結果。

丘昌泰(2002)。市政品質競賽的省思:服務滿意度調查的迷思與正解。公訓報 導,103,49-51。

丘昌泰、詹桂香(2007)。建構理論與實務兼具的政府服務品質評量模式:以臺北 市政府為民服務考核為例。研考雙月刊,31(4),50-60。

石泱(2003)。從顧客滿意觀點評估政府公務部門推動 ISO 9002 執行績效:勞工 保險局之個案研究。空大行政學報,13,311-339

行政院研考會(2009)。政府服務品質獎評獎作業手冊,2010 年 3 月 6 日,取自:

http://www.rdec.gov.tw/mp160.htm。

呂育誠(2002)。現代政府運作過程中基層公務員的定位與功能。中國行政,71,

75-96。

李惠宗(2007)。行政法要義(三版)。台北市:元照。

周琼怡、張國清(2004)。各級政府國家賠償支出執行情形與審計之探討。審計季 刊,24(4),10-28。

孟維德(2006)。警政的民意實證分析:以民眾陳情案件為例。執法新知論衡,2

(2),1-34。

林錫堯(2005)。國家賠償法之分析與檢討:下。臺灣本土法學雜誌,77,5-18。

林騰鷂(2002)。行政法總論(增訂二版)。台北市:三民書局。

邱上真(2001)。普通班教師對特殊需求學生之因應措施、所面對之困境以及所需 之支持系統。特殊教育研究學刊,21,1-26。

馬維麟(1995)。公務員侵權責任與國家賠償責任:最高法院歷年來判決之檢討與 分析。法學叢刊,160,39-53。

許立一(2005)。地方公務人力發展的倫理課題:第一線行政人員應採取的角色與 作為。人事月刊,41(2),27-37。

郭淑珍(2003)。國民小學教師專業自主與教師效能之研究。新竹師苑學報,17,

23-50。

陳啟光、謝安晉、邱思瑋(2007)。從首長電子信箱個案分析之觀點探討政府服務 品質的內涵與演變。研考雙月刊,31(4),13-21。

陳敦源(1999)。顧客導向的省思與再突破:尋找服務的誘因結構。空大行政學 報,9,209-235。

曾冠球(2004)。基層官僚人員裁量行為之初探:以台北市區公所組織為例。行政 暨政策學報,38,133-140。

廖洲棚(2006)。基層官僚提供線上申辦服務之評估:以臺北市政府為例。政策研 究學報,6,133-171。

廖麗娟、魏秋宜(2009)。政府服務品質獎評獎機制之探討。研考雙月刊,33

(5),94-100。

蔡允棟(2001)。官僚組織回應力之研究:個案實證分析。政治科學論叢,15,

209-240。

蔡震榮(1997)。我國國家賠償法上國家賠償責任之認定。中央警察大學法學論 集,2,35-54。

Aberbach, J. D., R. D. Putnam, & B. A. Rockman (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in

western democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Al-Ghamdi, S. S., M. S. Sohail, & A. Al-Khaldi (2007). Measuring consumer satisfaction with consumer protection agencies: Some insights from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(2), 71-79.

Cheek-Milby, K. (1989). The changing political role of the Hong Kong civil servant.

Pacific Affairs, 62(2), 219-234.

Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.

Goodsell, C. T. (1981). Looking once again at human service bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics, 43(3), 763-778.

Gregory, R. J. (1991). The attitudes of senior public servants in Australia and New Zealand: Administrative reform and technocratic consequence? Governance, 4(3), 295-331.

Grissom, J. A., J. Nicholson-Crotty, & S. Nicholson-Crotty (2009). Race, region, and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 911-919.

Hasenfeld, Y. (1985). Citizens’ encounters with welfare state bureaucracies. Social Service Review, 59(4), 622-635.

Hindera, J. J. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: Further evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 415-429.

Huang, T., D. Chen, & C. Yu (2005). The political attitudes of public managers in Taiwan. The Chinese Public Administration Review, 14(2), 1-32.

Kelly, M. (1994). Theories of justice and street-level discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(2), 119-140.

Levine, C. H., G. Peters, & F. J. Thompson (1990). Public administration: Challenges, choices, consequences. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown Higher Education.

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Maynard-Moody, S., & M. C. Musheno (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Maynard-Moody, S., & S. Leland (2000). Stories form the front lines of public management: Street-level workers as responsible actors. In J. L. Brudney, L. J.

O’ Tool., Jr., & H. G. Rainey (Eds.), Advancing public management: New developments in theory, methods, and practice (pp. 109-123). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Meier, K. J., & J. Jr. Stewart (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies:

Educational systems and public policies. American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157-171.

Meyers, M. K., B. Glaser, & K. M. Donald (1998). On the front lines of welfare delivery:

Are workers implementing policy reforms? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(1), 1-22.

Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.

Moore, S. T. (1990). Street-level policymaking: Characteristics of decision and policy in public welfare. American Review of Public Administration, 20(3), 191-209.

Muramatsu, M., & E. S. Krauss (1984). Bureaucrats and politicians in policymaking: The case of Japan. American Political Science Review, 78(1), 126-146.

Musheno, M. C. (1986). The justice motive in the social policy process: Searching for normative rules of distribution. Policy Studies Review, 5(4), 697-704.

Nascimento, L. M., & M. R. Cousineau (2005). An evaluation of independent consumer assistance centers on problem resolution and user satisfaction: The consumer perspective. Journal of Community Health, 30(2), 89-106.

Niskanen, W. A. Jr. (1994). Bureaucracy and public economics. Hants, Eng.: Edward Elgar.

Norris, D. F., & M. J. Moon (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64-75.

Osborne, D., & T. Gaebler (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Prottas, J. M. (1981). The cost of free services: Organizational impediments to access to public services. Public Administration Review, 41(5), 526-534.

Putnam, R. D. (1973). The political attitudes of senior civil servants in Western Europe: A preliminary report. British Journal of Political Science, 3, 257-290.

Riccucci, N. M. (2005). How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.

Selden, S. C. (1997). Representative bureaucracy: Examining the linkage between passive and active representation in the Farmers Home Administration. American Review of Public Administration, 27(1), 22-42.

Serra, G. (1995). Citizen-initiated contact and satisfaction with bureaucracy: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

5(2), 175-188.

Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press.

Vinzant, J. C., & L. I. Crothers (1998). Street-level leadership: Discretion and legitimacy in front-line public service. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it.

New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Behavioral Motives and Styles of

相關文件