• 沒有找到結果。

方孝謙(1996)。〈形象廣告「台灣魚」的符號學分析〉,《新聞學研 究》,52: 149-165。

喻維欣(2003)。〈家庭〉,王振寰、瞿海源(編),《社會學與台灣 社會》,頁250-262。台北:巨流。

劉慧雯(2002)。〈Saussure 符號學理論在廣告研究中的應用:文本意 義研究的更絃易幟〉,《新聞學研究》,70: 197-227。

廣告雜誌(2005 年 4 月)。〈2004 年《Gunn Report》全球廣告創意報

告〉,《廣告雜誌》,167: 44-47。

Adams, J. (1983). The familial image in rhetoric. Communication Quarterly, 31: 56-61.

Albada, K. (2000). The public and private dialogue about the American family on television. Journal of Communication, 50 (4), 79-110.

Ball, M. S. & Smith, G. (1992). Analyzing visual data. Newsbury Park: Sage.

Banks, M. & Morphy, H. (1997). Rethinking visual anthropology. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Barcy, M., & Hanak, K. (1984). Television and the family: The Hungarian report. Television and the image of the family (pp. 64-100).

Munich, Germany : Stiftung Prix Jeunesse.

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. New York: The Noonday Press.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. Glasgow: Fontana.

Berger, J. (1982). Another way of telling. Writers and Readers.

Cobly, P. (Ed.). (2001). The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London: Routledge.

Dail, P., & Way, W. (1985). What do parents observe about parenting from prime-time television? Family Relations, 34, 491-499.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1977). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.) New York:Viking.

Douglas, W., & Olson, B. M. (1996). Subversion of the American family?:

An examination of children and parents in television families.

Communication Research, 23, 73-99.

Dow, B. (1996). Prime-time feminism: Television, media culture and the women’s movement since 1970. PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Dyer, G. (1982). Advertising as communication. London and New York:

Methuen.

Frith, K. T. (1995). Advertising and Mother Nature. In A. N. Valdivia (Ed.), Feminism, multiculturalism, and the media: Global diversities (pp.

185-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). Media and the family: Images and impact. Washington, DC: White House Conference on the Family, National Research Forum on Family Issues. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 198 919).

Goldman, R. (1992). Reading ads socially. London: Routledge.

Greenberg, B. (1982). Television and role socialization: An overview. In D.

Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties, Vol. 2 (pp. 179-190). Rockville, MD : National Institute of Mental Health.

Greenberg, B., Hines, M., Buerkel-Rothfuss, N., & Atkin, C. (1980). Family role structures and interactions on commercial television. In B. S.

Greenberg (Ed.), Life on television: Content analyses of U.S. TV drama (pp. 149-160). Norwood, NJ : Ablex.

Greimas, A.J. (1968). The interaction of semiotic constraints. Yale French Studies, 41, 86-105.

Hall, S. (1973). The determinations of news photographs. In S. Cohen & L.

Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news (pp. 176-90). London:

Constable.

Heintz, K. E. (1992). Children's favorite television families: A descriptive analysis of role interactions. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36, 443-451.

Helmer, J. (1992). Love on bon: How McDonald’s won the burger wars.

Journal of Popular Culture, 26(2), 85-97.

Jameson, F. (1988). The ideologies of theory, essays 1971-1986, vol. 2: The syntax of history. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Jameson, F. (1990). Signature of the visible. London: Routledge.

Jhally, S. (1990). The codes of advertising: Fetishism and the political economy of meaning in the consumer society. New York: Routledge.

Jhally, S. (1989). Advertising as religion: The dialectic of technology and magic. In I. Angus & Sut Jhally (Eds.), Cultural politics in contemporary America (pp. 217-229). New York: Routledge.

Jones, M. (1984). The family on television: The portrayal of the family on British television. Television and the image of the family (pp. 101-150). Munich, Germany : Stiftung Prix Jeunesse.

Kellner, D. (1995). Advertising and consumer culture. In J. Downing, A.

Mohammadi, & A. Serberny-Mohammadi (Eds.), Questioning the media (pp. 329-344), Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Kilbourne, J. (1999). Can an engine pump the valves in your heart? Deadly persuasion: Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising (pp. 95-107). New York: The Free Press.

Kolodny, A. (1985). Dancing through the minefield: Some observations on the theory, practice, and politics of a feminist literary criticism. In E.

Showalter (Ed.), The feminist criticism (pp. 144-167). New York:

Pantheon.

Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A selection. (A. Sheridan, Trans.) London:

Tavistock.

Leiss, W., Kline, S., & Jhally, S. (1990). Social communication in advertising: Persons, products and images of well-being. (2nd ed.).

Ontario: Nelson Canada.

Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The raw and the cooked. (J. Weightman & D.

Weightman, Trans.) New York: Harper Torchbook.

Levi-Strauss, C. (1976). Structural anthropology, vol. 2. (M. Layton, Trans.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Linne, O., & Nielsen, N. (1984). The family and its problems: Portrayal of the family during a week of Danish television. Television and the image of the family (pp. 1-63). Munich: Stiftung Prix Jeunesse.

Lipsitz, G. (1986). The meaning of memory: Family, class, and ethnicity in early network television programs. Cultural Anthropology, 1(4), 355-387.

McNeil, J. (1975). Feminism, femininity, and the television series: A content analysis. Journal of Broadcasting, 19, 259-269.

Metz, C. (1982). The inaginary signifier: Psychoanalysis and the cinema. (C.

Britton, Trans.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

O’Barr, W. M. (1994). Culture and the ad: Exploring otherness in the world of ad. Boulder: Westview Press.

Perlmutter, D. D. (1994). Visual historical methods: Problems, prospects, applications. Historical Methods, 27(4), 167-84.

Perse, E. M., Pavitt, C., & Burggraf, C. S. (1990). Implicit theories of marriage and evaluations of marriage on television. Human Communication Research, 16, 387-408.

Pollay, R. W. (1986). The Distorted Mirror: Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 50, 18-36.

Press, A., & Strathman, T. (1994). Work, family, and social class in television images of women: Primetime television and the construction of postfeminism. Women and Language, 16, 7-15.

Roberts, E. (1982). Television and sexual learning in childhood. In D. Pearl,

L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties, Vol. 2 (pp. 209-233). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Rotzoll, K. B., Haefner, J. E., & Sandage, C. H. (1990). Advertising in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: South-Western Publishing Co.

Shaw, Ping & Chang, Wen-chia (2006, September). We are Family:

Mythologies of Family in Taiwan’s McDonald’s Commercials. Paper presented at Internationalising Media Studies Conference, University of Westminster, London, UK.

Sherry, J. F. (1987). Advertising as a cultural system, In J. Umiker-Sebeok (Ed.), Marketing and semiotics (pp. 441-461). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Signorielli, N. (1982). Marital status in television drama: A case of reduced options. Journal of Broadcasting, 26, 585-597.

Skill, T., & Robinson, J. D. (1994). Four decades of family on television: A demographic profile, 1950-1989. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38, 449-464.

Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. New York: Anchor Books.

Stewart, D. (1984). The television family: A content analysis of the portrayal of family life in prime time television in Australia. Television and the image of the family (pp. 51-196). Munich : Stiftung Prix Jeunesse.

Taylor, E. (1989). Prime time families. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Tueth, M. V. (2000). Fun City. Journal of Popular Film & Television, 28(3), 98-107.

Wernick, A. (1991). Promotional culture: Advertising, ideology and symbolic expression. London: Sage.

Williams, R. (1980). Advertising: The magic system. Problems in materialism and multure: Selected essays (pp. 170-195). London:

Verso.

附錄

相關文件