一、中文部分：
易國榮、佘曉清（2004）。網路化雙重情境學習模式對國小學生的真菌概念 改變之研究。發表於中華民國第二十屆科學教育學術研討會。
郭重吉（1992）。從建構主義的觀點探討中、小學數理教學的改進。科學發 展月刊，20（5），548-570。
張惠博（1999）。迷思概念的研究方法。發表於科學概念學習研究研習會。
張賴妙理、涂志銘、鄭湧涇（2001）。符合建構論者理念的教學策略對生殖 與遺傳概念學習成效的影響。發表於中華民國第十七屆科學教育學術 研討會。
張賴妙理、涂志銘、鄭湧涇（2003）。國一生遺傳概念改變之研究。發表於 中華民國第十九屆科學教育學術研討會。
湯清二（1997）。交互式多媒體教學系統在國中生學習細胞分裂的成效研 究。科學教育學刊，5（3），267-294。
湯清二（2000）。我國非主修生物大學生對 DNA 認知的瞭解與改善學習的 策略探討。科學教育學刊，8（1），101-121。
楊坤原、張賴妙理（2001）。二階段式遺傳學迷思概念診斷工具的發展與效 化。發表於中華民國第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。
二、英文部分：
Anderson, O. R., & Demetrius, O. J. (1993). A flow- map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents’ narrative using science content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 953-969.
Baker, W. P., & Lawson, A. E. (2001). Complex instructional analogies and theoretical concept acquisition in college genetics. Science Education, 85, 665-683.
Brewer, W., & Samarapungavan, A. (1991). Children’s theories versus scientific theories: Differences in reasoning or differences in knowledge? In R.
Hoffman & D. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic process:
Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Brook, A., Briggs, H. & Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of secondary Students’
Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter. Leeds: Children’s learning in science project. Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds, England.
Brown, D. E., & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction.
Instructional Science, 18, 237-261.
Brown, D.E. (1993). Refocus core intuitions: a concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1273-1290.
Browning, M. E., & Lehman, J. D. (1988). Identification of student misconceptions in genetics Problem solving via computer program.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 747-761.
Burbules, N. C., & Lin, M. C. (1988). Response to contradiction: scientific reasoning during adolescence. Journal of educational psychology, 80, 67-75.
Butzow, J. W., & Gebal, D. (1986). We Should all be researchers. Science Teacher, 53(1), 34-37.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 1, 1123-1130.
Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological
categories: Implications for learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp.129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & deLeeuw, N. (1994). From things to process: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and instruction, 4, 27-43.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science
instruction. Review of educational research, 63(1), 1-49.
Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism: Protocol evidence on sources of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R.
Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of ceativity (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum Press.
Clement, J. (1991). Nonformal reasoning in science: The use of analogies, extreme cases, and physical intuition. In J. Voss, D. Perkings & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridge analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 30, 1241-1257.
Dagher, Z. R.(1994). Does the use of analogies contribute to conceptual change？ Science Education, 78(6), 601-614.
Dagher, Z. R. (1995a). Review of studies on the effectiveness of instructional analogies in science education. science education, 79(3), 295-312.
Dagher, Z. R. (1995b). Analysis of analogies used by science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 259-270.
Driver, R.（1981）. Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3（1）, 93-101.
Driver, R. (1985). Beyond appearance: the conservation of matter under physical and chemical transformations. In Driver, R., Guesne, E., &
Tiberghien(Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 145-169). Philadelphia:
Open University Press.
Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science, International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1995). Young peoples’ images of science. Open University Press: U.K. Milton Keynes.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
Duit, R. (1991). On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning Sciences.
Science Education , 75(6), 649-672.
Duit, R. (1995). Conceptual Change Approaches in Science Education. Paper presented at th Symposium on conceptual change, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Faulkner, D., Joiner, R., Littleton, K., Miell, D., & Thompson, L. (2000). The mediating effect of task presentation on collaboration and children's acquisition of scientific reasoning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 4, 418-431.
Gentner, D.(1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A.
Ortony, Eds., Similarity and analogical reasoning(pp. 199-241). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D., Berm, S., Ferguson, R.W., Markman, A.B., Wolff, P., & Forbus, K.
D. (1997). Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: A case study of Johannes Kepler. The Journal of the Learning sciences, 6(1),3-40.
Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R.H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). A constructive view of learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science (pp. 3-19). Hilldale, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hernandez, V., & Caraballo, J. N. (1993). Development of a diagnostic test to detect misconceptions in mendelian genetics and meiosis. Third misconceptions seminar proceeding.
Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’
prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 731–743.
Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84, 51-70.
Hogan, K., & Fisherkeller, J. (2000). Dialogue as data: Assessing students’
scientific reasoning with interactive protocols. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H.
Wandersee & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing Science understanding: A
Human Constructivist View. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions.
Cognition and instruction, 17, 379-432.
Indurrkhya, B. (1992). Metaphor and cognition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Keys, C.W. (1995). An interpretive study of student’ use of scientific reasoning during a collaborative report writing intervention in ninth grade general science. Science Education, 79(4), 415-435.
Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from Case-Based Resoning, American Psychologist, 52, 35-44.
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
Lawson, A. E. (1978). The Development and Validation of a Classroom Test of Formal Reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11-24.
Lawson, A. E. (1987). Hofstein and Mandler's use and interpretations of the Lawson test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(7), 683-686.
Lawson, A. E.(1988). Research on advanced reasoning, concept acquisition and a theory of science instruction. In P. Adey, J. Head & M. Shanger (Eds), Adolescent development and school science (pp. 1-37). London: Falmer Press.
Lawson, A. E. (1992). What do tests of “formal ” reasoning actually measure?
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 965-983.
Lawson, A. E. (2002). The learning cycle. In R. G. Fuller (Ed.). A Love of Discovery: Science Education - The Second Career of Robert Karplus. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lawson, A. E., Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1989). A theory of instruction:
Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills.
NARST Monograph, no.1.
Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury S., Benford, R., Clark, B.R., & Falconer, K. A. (2000).
What kinds of Scientific Concepts exist? Concept Construction and Intellectual Development in College Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 996-1018
Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as a instructional strategy for concept change: a critical appraisal. Learning and instruction, 11, 357-380.
Michalski, R. S. (1989). Concept meaning, matching and cohesiveness. In S.
Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp.
122-145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Concept mapping for meaningful learning.
In Learning how to learn, (pp. 15-54). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Pallant, A., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Reasoning With Atomic-Scale Molecular Dynamic Models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 51-63.
Pfundt, F., & Duit, R. (1991). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education.(3re ed.). Keil, West Germany:IPN.
Posner, G. L., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982).
Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
Prieto, T., Watson, J. D., & Dillon, J. S. (1992). Pupils’ understanding of combustion. Research in science education, 22, 331-340.
Saayman, R. (1991). A diagnosis of the mathematical and scientific reasoning ability of first–year physics undergraduates. Physical Education, 26, 359-366.
She, H. C. (2002). Concepts of a higher hierarchical level require more dual situated learning events for conceptual change: a study of air pressure and buoyancy. International journal of science education, 24(9), 981-996.
She, H. C. (2003). DSLM Instructional Approach to Conceptual Change Involving Thermal Expansion. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21(1), 43-54.
She, H. C. (2004a). Fostering Radical Conceptual Change through Dual-Situated Learning Model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(2), 142-164.
She, H.C. (2004b). Facilitating changes in ninth grade students’ understanding of dissolution and diffusion through DSLM instruction. Research in science education, 34, 503-525.
She, H. C., & Fisher, D. (2003). Web-base E-learning Environment in Taiwan:
The impact of the online science flash program on students’ learning. In M.
future perspective. Singapore: World Scientific.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced
misconception in advance knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A.
Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. London: Cambridge University Press.
Stepans, J. I., Beiswenger, R. E., & Dyche, S. (1986). Miscoceptions die hard.
Science Teacher, 63-69.
Tang, H. Y., She, H. C., & Lee, Y. M. (2005a). Investigating Middle School Students’ Alternative Conceptions and the Corresponding Sources Involving Animal Reproduction. Paper presented for the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2005 World Conference, Dallas, Texas.
Tang, H. Y., She, H. C., & Lee, Y. M. (2005b). Promoting middle school students’ conceptual change involving mitosis and meiosis with a DSLM instructional approach. Paper presented for the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2005 World Conference, Dallas, Texas.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic test to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
Treagust, D. F. (1995). Diagnostic assessment of students science knowledge. In S. M. Glynn, & R. Duit(Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice.(pp327-346). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tytler, R. (1998). The nature of students’ informal science conceptions.
International Journal of Science Education, 20, 901-927.
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004). Tracing Young Childen’s Scientific Reasoning.
Research in Science Eduacation, 33, 433-465.
Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring Conceptual Change in Genetics Using a Multidimensional Interpretive Framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031-1055.
Vosniadou, S. (1989). Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: a developmental perspective. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony
(Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp413-437). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of educational research, 57, 51-67.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Reserach on alternative onceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of reserach on science teaching and learning, pp. 177-210. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Wong, E. D. (1993). Self-generated analogies as a tool for construction and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1259-1272.
Zeitoun, H. H. (1984). Teaching scientific analogies: A proposed model.
Research in Science and Technological Education, 2, 107-125.