• 沒有找到結果。

CONCERT(2010)。Web of Science 中文使用手冊,檢索日期:2013 年 10 月 18 日,檢自:

http://ppt.cc/Px1Z。

Elsevier Taiwan(2013)。Scopus 操作說明書,檢索日期:2013 年 10 月 18 日,檢自:

http://taiwan.elsevier.com/htmlmailings/Scopus-QRG-2010.pdf。

Elsevier(2014)。SCOPUS 資料庫簡介,檢索日期:2014 年 06 月 04 日,檢自:http://ppt.cc/a~zv。

Google(2013)。Google 簡介,檢索日期:2013 年 10 月 18 日,檢自:

http://www.google.com.tw/about/company/。

IBM SPSS Statistics (2013)。IBM SPSS 產品說明,檢索日期:2013 年 12 月 28 日,檢自:

http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tw/analytics/spss/products/statistics/。

ISI Web of Knowledge(2013)。ISI Web of Knowledge 公司網站,檢索日期:2013 年 12 月 28 日,檢 自:http://www.isinet.com/selection/。

Microsoft (2013)。Excel 分析新功能,檢索日期:2013 年 12 月 14 日,檢自:

http://office.microsoft.com/zh-tw/excel/。

毛慶禎譯(2008)。Open Acccess-開放取用機會及挑戰手冊。Library & Book,German 頁 5。

毛慶禎譯(2012)。布達佩斯公開取用倡議 Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI),在圖書館學與資 訊科學大辭典,檢索日期:2013 年 10 月 18 日,檢自:

http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678959/。

何琳(2009) 。OpenDOAR 和機構知識庫發展現況。圖書館工作與研究,156,30-33。

吳孟瑾(2013)。引用文獻索引資料庫-Google Scholar,在認識大學排名系列報導。檢索日期:2013 年 10 月 18 日,檢自:http://www.lib.nctu.edu.tw/html/categoryid-34/id-165/

吳明德(1991)。館藏發展。台北市:漢美。

邱炯友(2006)。學術傳播與其刊出版。遠流出版,台北,頁 222~223。

翁竣霖(2014)。商業性引文資料庫與開放取用引文系統之比較研究—以諾貝爾經濟學獎得主為 例。政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,未出版碩士論文,台北市。

財團法人國家實驗研究院(2010),Web of Science 簡介,檢索日期:2013 年 10 月 18 日,檢自:

http://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/fdb/Web of Science/index.html。

財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心主編(2009)。開放取用的機會與展望。財團法 人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心,台北,頁 3。

35

陳亞寧(民 93)。開放式資訊取用之現況發展分析。圖書與資訊學刊,51,89-108。

陳薇竹(2007)。引用文獻索引資料庫之比較硏究。政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,未出版碩 士論文,台北市。

馮玉(2007)。Scopus 文摘數據庫及其檢索利用。情報科學,25(3),401-403, 413。

劉琼(2005)。美國 25 名諾貝爾獎得主致國會公開信支持學術論文的開放訪問。圖書館雜誌,

24(6), 頁 63-64。

魯佑敏(2013)。商業性引文資料庫與開放取用系統之引文索引比較研究。政治大學圖書資訊與檔 案學研究所,未出版碩士論文,台北市。

ArXive (2013). arXiv introduction. Oct. 18, 2013. Retrieved form: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXiv.

Berkeley library (2013). Search engine criteria. Oct. 23, 2013. Retrieved form:

http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/SrchEngCriteria.pdf.

Borgman, C. L. (1990). Editor’s introduction, Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Newbury Park, Sage, p13-16.

Bourne, C. P. (1969). Characteristics of coverage by the bibliography of agriculture of the literature relating to agricultural research and development, In Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information(Va.22151). Springfield.

Budapest Open Access Initiative(2013). Budapest open Access initiative. Oct. 2, 2013. Retrieved form:

http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/.

Budd, J. M. (2012). The communities of the academic library. In The changing academic library(2nd ed), Unite States: Association of College and Research Libraries(ACRL).

Calhoun, K. (2008).Online catalogs: what users and librarians want? An OCLC report. Oct. 23, 2013.

Retrieved form: http://ppt.cc/cq4F.

Chu, H. (1996). Search engines for the world wide web: A comparative study and evaluation methodology. In ASIS 1996 Annual Conference proceedings.

Doszkocs, T. (1977). Estimating citation overlap in a milti-file retrieval system, In Information

Management in the 1980’s: Proceedings of 40th ASIS Annual Meeting (Chicago, vol.14), White Plains, N. Y. :Knowledge Industry Publications for American Society for Information Science, x.

Esmaeil & Mohammad S. & Kiaie, R. M. & Ketab, F. (2011). A comparison between search engines and Meta-Search engines in retrieving information related to physics and the extent of their overlap.

Library and Information Studies, 22. 3, p130-140.

Getz, M. (2009). Open access scholarship and publishing, In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences(Third Edition). Oct. 18, 2013. Retrieved form:

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044492#.UmDK0lBkObY.

Google (2013). Google scholar. Oct. 20, 2013. Retrieved form: http://scholar.google.com.tw/.

Hirsch, J. E., (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , PNAS 102(46):16569-16572.

Hood, W. W. & Wilson, S.(1998). The distribution of bibliographic records in databases using different counting methods for duplicate records. Seientometrics, 46(3). 473-486. Dec. 14, 2013. Retrieved form:

http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/257/art%253A10.1007%252FBF02459605.pdf?auth66=

1387171099_525062b391909a564bcad9b80df0dea3&ext=.pdf.

36

IDEAS (2013). IDEAS-Search. Oct. 20, 2013. Retrieved form: http://ideas.repec.org/search.html.

Jacsoó, P. (2005). Google scholar: The pros and cons. Online information review. 29(2): 208-214.

Julian, R. L. (1976). Comparison of printed bibliographic descriptions distributed by BIOSIS, CAS, EI.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 46-52.

LaBorie, T. (1985). Library and information science abstracting and index service: coverage, overlap, and context. Library and Information Science Research, 7(1), 183-195.

Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age.

ARL: A bimonthly report. 226, pp.1-10. Oct. 2, 2013.Retrieved form:

http://scholarship.utm.edu/21/1/Lynch,_IRs.pdf.

Martyn, J. (1967). Tests on abstracts journals: Coverage overlap and indexing. Journal of Documentation, 23, 45-70.

Microsoft academic search. (2013). Microsoft Academic Search Help. Dec. 14, 2013.Retrieved form:

http://academic.research.microsoft.com/About/Help.htm

Nicholls, P. T. (1989). Bibliometrics of the laserdiscs applications literature. Laserdisk Professional, 2,106-109.

Nobelprize(2014). All Prizes in Economic Sciences. May. 28, 2014. Retrieved form:

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/.

Nobelprize(2014). All Nobel Prizes in Physics. May. 28, 2014. Retrieved form:

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/.

Okerson, A. (1989). Of making many books there is no end: Report on serial prices for the association of research Libraries, In Report of the ARL Serials Prices Project.

OAIster(2014). The OAIster® database . Feb. 19, 2014.Retrieved form:

http://www.oclc.org/oaister.en.html.

OpenDOAR(2014). The directory of open access repositories . Feb. 19, 2014.Retrieved form:

http://www.opendoar.org/.

Paisley, W. (1989). Bibliometrics, scholarly communication, and communication research.

Communication Research, 16(5), 701-717.

Poyer, P. K. (1984). Journal article overlap among index medicus, Science Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, and Chemical Abstracts. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 72(4), 353-357.

Rather, R. A., Lone, F. A. & Shah, G. J. (2008). Overlap in web search tesults: A study of five search engines, library philosophy and practice.

Read, E. & Smith, C.(2000). Searching for library and information science literature: a comparison of coverage in three database. Library Computing, 19, 118-126.

RePEc (2013). RePEc services. Dec. 14, 2013. Retrieved form: http://repec.org/.

RePEc (2014). RePEc services. Jun. 04, 2014. Retrieved form: http://repec.org/.

Scopus (2013). Scopus in detail: What does it cover? Oct. 23, 2013. Retrieved form:

http://info.scopus.com/detail/what/.

Walters, W. H. & Wilder, E. I. (2003). Bibliographic index coverage of a multidisciplinary field. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 54(14), 1305-1312.

Wang, L. & Wang, J. & Michael, L. & Yong, L. & Wang, Y. & Xu, D. (2012 May). Using internet search engines to obtain medical information: A comparative study. Journal of Medical Internet

37

Research, 14(3).

Wood , J. L. & Flanagan, C. & Kennedy, H. E. (1972). Overlap in the List of Journals monitored by BIOSIS, CAS,Ei. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23, 36-38.

Yerkey, N. & Glogowski, M.(1990). Scatter of library and information science topics among bibliographic data bases. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 41(4), 245-253.

1

相關文件