Bernacki, E. (2002). Create a freewheelin’ creative climate. New Zealand Management,
98, 45(10), 36.
Burningham, C., & West, M. A. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Reseach, 26, 106-117.
Burtless, G. (1996). Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student
Achievement and Adult Success. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Cameron, K. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administration Science Quarterly, 23, 604-632.
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, Markets, and American Schools.
Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Codianni, A. V., & Wilbur, G. (1983). More effective schooling from research to practice.
New York: Clearing House and Urban Education.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
Creemers, B. P. M., & Van der Werf, G. (2000). Economic viewpoints in educational effectiveness: cost-effectiveness analysis of an educational improvement project, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 361-384.
Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Pell, S. W. J. (2002/ Jun.). Support for innovation in site-based-managed school: developing a climate for change. Educational Research
Quarterly, 25 (4), 36-49.
Ekvall, G. (1983). Climate, structure and innovativeness of organizations: A theoretical
framework and an experiment. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Council for
management and organizational Behavior.Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Work
and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105-123.
Forehand, G., & Glimer,B. (1964). Environmental variation in studies of organization behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 361-382.
Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (1998). Teacher talk that makes a difference. Educational
組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究 121
Leadership, 55(7), 30-34.
Genck, F. H. (1983). Improve school performance, New York: Praeger Publishers, 64-67.
Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance:
An update. Educational evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141-164.
Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. (1974). Organizational climate: Measures, research and contingencies. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 255-280.
Hoy, W. (1990). Organizational climate and culture: A conceptual analysis of the school workplace. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 149-168.
Hoy, W. K., Smith, P. A., Sweetland, S. R. (2003/Jan). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its Measure and Relationship to Faculty Trust. The High School Journal, 86(2), 38-49.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: theory, research, and
practice, (5
th ed.), New York: Random House, Inc.Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics, Academy of Management Review. 20(2), 404-437
Kauffman, G. (1997). Top teachers sound off. The American School Board Journal, 184, 8.
Kangis, P., & Williams, D. G. S. (2000). Organizational climate and corporate performance: an empirical investigation. Management Decision, 38, 531-540.
Krichevskii, V. (1998/ July). Four levels of school innovation. Russian Education and
Society, 40(7), 29-36.
Kyriakides, L. (2005/ June). Extending the Comprehensive Model of Educational Effectiveness by an Empirical Investigation. School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, 16(2), 103-152.
Lauer, K. J. (1994). The assessment of creative climate: An investigation of Ekvall’s
Creative Climate Questionnaire. Unpublished master’s thesis, State University
College, Buffalo, New York.McCormack-Larkin, M.& Kritek, W. (1983). Milwaukee’s project rise. Educational
122 臺北市立教育大學學報—教育類
Leadership, 40, 16-21.
Monk, D. H. (1992). Microeconomics of school productions. Paper presented at the Economics of Education Section of the International Encyclopedia of Education,308.
Moran, E. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (1992). The cultural approach to the formation of the organisational climate. Human Relations, 45 (1), 19-46.
Pace, C.,& Stern, G. (1958). An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments.Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 269-277.
Payne, R. L. ,& Pugh, D. D. (1976). Organizational structure and climate. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1125-1172.
Chicago: Rand McNally.
Peterson, R. E. (2002, December/January). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 7-10.
Raudsepp, E. (1987/April ). Establishing a creative climate. Training and Development
Journal, 50-53.
Reynolds, D.,& Teddlie, C.(with Creemers, B., Scheerens, J.& Townsend,T.)(2000). An introduction to school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds(Eds.),
The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 3-25). London, &
New York: Falmer Press.
Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., & Schaffer, G. (Eds.).
(2002).World calss schools:International perspectives on school effectiveness.
London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Roffe, I. (1999). Innovation and creativity in organisations : a review of the implications for training and development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(4/5), 224.
Scheerens, J. (2000a). Improving school effectveness. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning. (Fundamentals of Educational Planning.
(Fundamentals of Educational Planning series no. 68)
組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究 123
Scheerens, J. (2000b). School effectiveness in developed and developing countries: a
review of the reseach evidence. World Bank WEB-page,
http://www.worldbank.org/education.schools.
Schneider, B., & Bartlett, C. (1968). Individual differences and organizational climate I:
The research plan and questionnaire development. Personnel Psychology, 21, 323-333.
Sharman, D., & Johnson, A. (1997). Innovation in all things! Developing creativity in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training, 29(3), 85-87.
Townsend, T. (1993). School effectiveness:
identifying the complexities. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED359612).Van Houtte, Mieke(2005/March). Climate or Culture? A Plea for Conceptual Clarity in School Effectiveness Research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 71-89.
Welsh, J. F., Petrosko, J. M., & Metcalf, J. (2003). Institutional effectiveness activities:
faculty and administrator support at two-year institutions. Community College
Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 75-94.
West, M., & Dawson, J. (2002/Augest). Impacting climate for innovation: can CEOs make a difference? Presented at the 17th
Annual Conference of the society for
Industrial and Orangizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.
124 臺北市立教育大學學報—教育類
附錄 學校組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係問卷
第一部份 「組織創新氣氛」問卷
非 常
意同
同 意 無 意 見 不 同 意
非常 不同 意
01. 能接受我們嘗試有創意的工作方法法………
□ □ □ □ □
02. 主管給我的支持與激勵多於權威與壓力力………
□ □ □ □ □
03. 同事會給我中肯的建議………
□ □ □ □ □
04. 我在學校的工作可以自由發揮創意意………
□ □ □ □ □
05. 學校能提供足夠設備以支援九年一貫創新的教學學………
□ □ □ □ □
06. 我不敢提自己的想法,怕被批評………
□ □ □ □ □
07. 工作的時間壓力常使我喘不過氣來氣………
□ □ □ □ □
08. 突破與創新是我們學校的特色色………
□ □ □ □ □
09. 遇到困難時,主管會支持我度過難關………
□ □ □ □ □
10. 同事間常放開心胸,互相溝通想法法………
□ □ □ □ □
11. 我可以依需要自行變更工作方法法………
□ □ □ □ □
12. 學校對於我們工作上的需要,會盡量提供協助助………
□ □ □ □ □
13. 我覺得沒有管道可以表達意見見………
□ □ □ □ □
14. 下班之後,我還會煩惱工作上的問題題………
□ □ □ □ □
15. 我能夠自由參與學校決策或表達意見見………
□ □ □ □ □
16. 主管能引導我們以新觀點看問題題………
□ □ □ □ □
17. 同事間的討論大多對事不對人人………
□ □ □ □ □
18. 我能自行掌握工作的內容與進度度………
□ □ □ □ □
19. 學校常提供進修機會,激勵我們參與學習活動動………
□ □ □ □ □
20. 我常擔心教學計劃會因資源不足而停頓頓………
□ □ □ □ □
21. 我常要在很短的時間內完成很多事事………
□ □ □ □ □
填答說明:
一、 本問卷分為兩大部分,填答對象為教師(含兼行政),每題均請作答,謝謝您。
二、請依照您對學校實際情形的感受,在題目的右邊的適當空格上畫“ˇ”。
組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究 125
22. 我覺得學校歡迎員工提出不同的意見見………
□ □ □ □ □
23. 主管適當的授權,讓我面對工作挑戰時樂於承擔責任任………
□ □ □ □ □
24. 我常感受到同事間的支持與關心心………
□ □ □ □ □
25. 我覺得善用電腦科技處理資料很方便便………
□ □ □ □ □
26. 工作讓我隨時保持靈活的思考能力力………
□ □ □ □ □
27. 工作空間設計與分配無法滿足工作需求求………
□ □ □ □ □
28. 我常忙得沒有時間思考考………
□ □ □ □ □
29. 學校會獎賞或肯定教職員工的創新想法法………
□ □ □ □ □
30. 我感受到主管的信任任………
□ □ □ □ □
31. 我常感覺同事之間有惡性競爭,互相扯後腿的情形形………
□ □ □ □ □
32. 我樂於學習新事物,來解決所面臨的問題題………
□ □ □ □ □
33. 我覺得工作只是例行性的工作項目目………
□ □ □ □ □
34. 有能力做好工作的同事太少少………
□ □ □ □ □
35. 工作壓力常讓我覺得精神緊繃繃………
□ □ □ □ □
36. 我覺得學校作風很保守守………
□ □ □ □ □
37. 主管會徵詢我們的意見見………
□ □ □ □ □
38. 我覺得同事間各留一手,有點子不說出來來………
□ □ □ □ □
39. 我的想法和專業受到尊重重………
□ □ □ □ □
40. 我的工作內容多樣化化………
□ □ □ □ □
41. 要讓學校同仁使用新科技或改變工作流程十分困難難………
□ □ □ □ □
42. 我的工作負荷龐大,壓力沉重重………
□ □ □ □ □
43. 我們學校崇尚自由開放與創新變革革………
□ □ □ □ □
44. 我不擔心在工作上的錯誤會遭到主管的責備備………
□ □ □ □ □
45. 我常與同儕一起思考解決工作問題題………
□ □ □ □ □
46. 即使我有創新教學的點子,也不願被公開,以免被排斥………
□ □ □ □ □
47. 工作環境氣氛使我有創意的靈感與啟發發………
□ □ □ □ □
48. 我會主動要求主管解決資源不足的問題題………
□ □ □ □ □
49. 我的工作環境氣氛和諧,令人心情愉快快………
□ □ □ □ □
50. 主管會授權讓我承擔工作責任任………
□ □ □ □ □
126 臺北市立教育大學學報—教育類
第二部分 「學校效能」問卷
非 常
意同
同 意 無 意 見 不 同 意
非常 不同 意
01. 各處室的業務,都訂有詳實可行的工作計畫
□ □ □ □ □
02. 教師大多教學經歷完整
□ □ □ □ □
03. 學生的生活常規欠佳,使班級秩序維持困難
□ □ □ □ □
04. 家長積極參加本校義工服務,且認真負責
□ □ □ □ □
05. 我認為本校行政人員很有服務熱忱
□ □ □ □ □
06. 教師大多具備良好的班級經營策略
□ □ □ □ □
07. 學生的學習態度大多積極努力
□ □ □ □ □
08. 家長對於子女在校表現大多感到滿意
□ □ □ □ □
09. 我認為各處室在執行公務時,彼此配合良好
□ □ □ □ □
10. 教師在教學前會做好充分的教學準備
□ □ □ □ □
11. 學生遇到訪客時會主動問候
□ □ □ □ □
12. 家長對於學校的辦學活動尊重與支持
□ □ □ □ □
13. 我對學校所提供的工作環境感到滿意
□ □ □ □ □
14. 教師大多熱愛教學工作
□ □ □ □ □
15. 學生在學業表現上,大多優良
□ □ □ □ □
16. 家長熱烈參與學校所辦的活動
□ □ □ □ □
17. 本校校園規劃能考量到未來發展的需要
□ □ □ □ □
18. 教師會主動參與學校有關教學計畫的擬定
□ □ □ □ □
19. 學生熱烈參與校內外各項活動
□ □ □ □ □
20. 社區人士常資助學校各項活動及建設
□ □ □ □ □
21. 校長的行政經驗豐富,足以領導同仁
□ □ □ □ □
22. 教師會配合學校各項教學活動
□ □ □ □ □
23. 學生參與各種校際學藝競賽活動時,會全力以赴
□ □ □ □ □
24. 家長踴躍出席家長委員會
□ □ □ □ □
25. 校長的教學經驗豐富,足以領導教師
□ □ □ □ □
26. 教師樂於追求新知與進修
□ □ □ □ □
27. 我認為本校師生關係良好
□ □ □ □ □
組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究 127
28. 家長出席家長委員會氣氛良好
□ □ □ □ □
29. 本校文書檔案管理制度完備
□ □ □ □ □
30. 教師參與校外各種活動都能盡力表現
□ □ □ □ □
31. 我認為家長與教師關係良好
□ □ □ □ □
32. 教師之間對於教學工作常能互相支援
□ □ □ □ □
33. 教師對自我工作能力充滿信心
□ □ □ □ □
128 臺北市立教育大學學報—教育類